Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "feat!: upgrading django-storages to 1.10.1""" #33113

Merged

Conversation

awais786
Copy link
Contributor

@awais786 awais786 commented Aug 28, 2023

scorm-xblock functionality implemented but new release is not available. I have requested author for new version.

In edxo-internal it has following entry and nothing to change here to get new version it will pick the new release.

 name: openedx-scorm-xblock
 version: <16.1.0

Reverts #33111

@awais786 awais786 marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2023 14:00
@awais786 awais786 merged commit 3c76d66 into master Aug 30, 2023
43 checks passed
@awais786 awais786 deleted the revert-33111-revert-33109-revert-32571-django-storages-upgrade branch August 30, 2023 14:40
@awais786 awais786 restored the revert-33111-revert-33109-revert-32571-django-storages-upgrade branch August 30, 2023 14:40
awais786 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2023
@edx-pipeline-bot
Copy link
Contributor

2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX staging environment in preparation for a release to production.

@awais786 awais786 changed the title Revert "Revert "Revert "feat!: upgrading django-storages to 1.10.1""" Revert "feat!: upgrading django-storages to 1.10.1""" Aug 30, 2023
Yagnesh1998 pushed a commit to ManpraXSoftware/edx-platform that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
@nedbat nedbat deleted the revert-33111-revert-33109-revert-32571-django-storages-upgrade branch January 8, 2024 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants