##### Detailed description The advantage of log-pol coordinates in computer vision is that > By using this transformation, both rotations and scaling between two images can be represented by translations. https://sthoduka.github.io/imreg_fmt/docs/log-polar-transform/ This means those will have similar representations (for use in neural net) `bioinspired.Retina` has an option for `useRetinalLogSampling`, eg as shown at: http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/~alex/Projects/TemplateTracking/logpolar.htm I am wondering: - any advantages of logpolar over retinal log-sampling? - is the log-polar transformation biologically plausible, or the `useRetinalLogSampling` should be used when we want plausible models? Thank you,