Skip to content

Conversation

@xiaochenshen
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaochenshen xiaochenshen commented Oct 27, 2018

This is the prerequisite of runc PR:
opencontainers/runc#1919

MBA Software Controller feature is introduced in Linux kernel v4.18.
It is a software enhancement to mitigate some limitations in MBA which
describes in kernel documentation. It also makes the interface more user
friendly - we could specify memory bandwidth in "MBps" (Mega Bytes per
second) as well as in "percentages".

We could enable this feature through mount option "-o mba_MBps":
mount -t resctrl resctrl -o mba_MBps /sys/fs/resctrl

In runtime-spec, we handle both memory bandwidth schemata in unified
format: "MB:<cache_id0>=bandwidth0;<cache_id1>=bandwidth1;..."
The unit of memory bandwidth is specified in "percentages" by default,
and in "MBps" if MBA Software Controller is enabled.

For more information about Intel RDT and MBA Software Controller:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt

Signed-off-by: Xiaochen Shen xiaochen.shen@intel.com

…ler support

MBA Software Controller feature is introduced in Linux kernel v4.18.
It is a software enhancement to mitigate some limitations in MBA which
describes in kernel documentation. It also makes the interface more user
friendly - we could specify memory bandwidth in "MBps" (Mega Bytes per
second) as well as in "percentages".

We could enable this feature through mount option "-o mba_MBps":
mount -t resctrl resctrl -o mba_MBps /sys/fs/resctrl

In runtime-spec, we handle both memory bandwidth schemata in unified
format: "MB:<cache_id0>=bandwidth0;<cache_id1>=bandwidth1;..."
The unit of memory bandwidth is specified in "percentages" by default,
and in "MBps" if MBA Software Controller is enabled.

For more information about Intel RDT and MBA Software Controller:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt

Signed-off-by: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

crosbymichael commented Oct 30, 2018

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

1 similar comment
@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Nov 11, 2018

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants