-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 638
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references #304
manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references #304
Conversation
17c80a2
to
ae138eb
Compare
This seems to go against the compatibility matrix |
Yes, please add the nondistributable to the compat matrix. Thanks! |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:12:19PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:
Should be covered by the just-landed #233. I'll rebase around that |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:00:57PM -0700, Vincent Batts wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the compatibility matrix. I had thought it |
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
I now have similar confusion to #304 (comment) so a clarification would be appreciated. |
ae138eb
to
a3b9724
Compare
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:22:54PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
|
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
This patch LGTM based on my understanding so would love to hear what I'm missing.. |
1 similar comment
gd... now it needs a rebase? how did github not show that right before? ... rebase please |
a3b9724
to
3b6f413
Compare
Require implementations to support these media types (although an implementation which also supports additional media types is still compliant). Suggest portable manifests and manifest lists stick to these types so the can rely on implementation support. A manifest(-list) can safely use a type from outside the list if the author expects the implementation to support the extension type (e.g. application/vnd.docker.image.rootfs.diff.tar.gzip). But how that out-of-band expectation is setup is beyond the scope of this specification. Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
3b6f413
to
b1f1d9c
Compare
I typo'd these in b1f1d9c (manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references, 2016-09-13, opencontainers#304). Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers/image-spec#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers/image-spec#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers/image-spec#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers/image-spec#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Linking the files from Makefile's DOC_FILES in their listed order. Link text generally follows the headers used by the linked document. Informative stuff (for image and implementation authors) is indented under the README (although I'm not sure there's consensus on whether media-types.md is normative or informative [1]). [1]: opencontainers/image-spec#304 (comment) Subject: manifest: List media types supported by descriptor references Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Require implementations to support these media types (although an implementation which also supports additional media types is still compliant). Suggest portable manifests and manifest lists stick to these types so the can rely on implementation support.
A manifest(-list) can safely use a type from outside the list if the author expects the implementation to support the extension type (e.g. application/vnd.docker.image.rootfs.diff.tar.gzip). But how that out-of-band expectation is setup is beyond the scope of this specification.
Previous discussion in #286 and a few other one-off comments ;).