-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create README for MTU-1.5 PMTUD handling. #3067
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9452525653Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9452712295Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9464534153Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9464600245Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9464710453Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9464714738Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add the packet-processing-aggregate and control-plane-traffic counters, otherwise LGTM
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9481482302Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9481576034Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9481899893Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Co-authored-by: Darren Loher <dloher@google.com>
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10039853246Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
platform_type: [ "INTEGRATED_CIRCUIT" ] | ||
/components/component/integrated-circuit/pipeline-counters/drop/lookup-block/state/fragment-total-drops: | ||
platform_type: [ "INTEGRATED_CIRCUIT" ] | ||
/components/component/integrated-circuit/pipeline-counters/control-plane-traffic/vendor: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding this path I asked for! Unfortunately our CI check for paths only allows leaf paths and not containers like this.
Since we don't know what the leaf path(s) for this will be. So please move this path out of this yaml section and into the main body with some text like:
The device may support some vendor proprietary leafs to count MTU exceeded packets which are dropped due to control plane policing rules in the `components/component/integrated-circuit/pipeline-counters/control-plane-traffic/vendor` tree. Implementation should add code with a switch statement to expose these counters, if they exist.
* Create README for MTU-1.5 PMTUD handling. --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Loher <dloher@google.com>
No description provided.