Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.38.0 -> 8.39.0 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.38.0 -> 8.39.0 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.39.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.39.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 67ac78c to ce92030 Compare August 4, 2025 20:45
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency @typescript-eslint/parser to v8.39.0 fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.39.0 Aug 4, 2025
@JammingBen JammingBen merged commit e641386 into main Aug 5, 2025
29 checks passed
@JammingBen JammingBen deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch August 5, 2025 07:14
@openclouders openclouders mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants