Implement revisions for the posix fs

[aduffeck]

No description provided.

[butonic]

hm, versioning seems to work in general .. but revisions seem to emit wrong events

[aduffeck]

hm, versioning seems to work in general .. but revisions seem to emit wrong events

I think those are results of the .opencloud directly being assimilated and tracked. I was pondering whether we might want to ignore that directory or not but haven't really formed an opinion yet.

[butonic]

the driver seems to still lock directories in the .OC-nodes directory:

root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/
total 52K
drwxr-x--- 4 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02  .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02  ..
drwx------ 3 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02  .OC-Nodes
-rw------- 1 root root    0 Feb  6 16:02  .OC-Nodes.mlock
drwx------ 2 root root  20K Feb  6 16:02 'Gregorz Rutkowski'
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   12 Feb  6 16:02 'New file.txt'
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes
total 24K
drwx------ 3 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02 .
drwxr-x--- 4 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02 ..
drwx------ 3 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02 46
-rw------- 1 root root    0 Feb  6 16:02 46.mlock
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes
.OC-Nodes/       .OC-Nodes.mlock  
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes/46
46/       46.mlock  
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes/46/cf/54
54/       54.mlock  
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes/46/cf/54/2d/-3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16\:02\:
-3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:46.764867635Z  -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:51.789233636Z  
-3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:50.023206478Z  -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:53.093429545Z  
root@eea6eeeb0288:/# ls -lah /var/lib/opencloud/storage/users/users/admin/.OC-Nodes/46/cf/54/2d/                                                    
total 44K
-rw------- 1 root root    0 Feb  6 16:02 -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:46.764867635Z
-rw------- 1 root root    3 Feb  6 16:02 -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:50.023206478Z
-rw------- 1 root root    6 Feb  6 16:02 -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:51.789233636Z
-rw------- 1 root root    9 Feb  6 16:02 -3d43-41b4-b437-14cd6683767f.REV.2025-02-06T16:02:53.093429545Z
drwx------ 2 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02 .
drwx------ 3 root root 4.0K Feb  6 16:02 ..

but that might be an issue for a subsequentt PR ... well ... or until we merge features again

[butonic]

I cannot share a text file with alan ...

[rhafer]

Can we keep this all lower case here? .oc-nodes

[aduffeck]

The reason for uppercasing it like this was to make it consistent with the fdo .Trash directory we're using I think. I personally don't have a strong opinion either way though and would change it to .oc-nodes, or do you object, @butonic ?