net: avoid irqsave in skb_defer_free_flush

The spin_lock irqsave/restore API variant in skb_defer_free_flush can
be replaced with the faster spin_lock irq variant, which doesn't need
to read and restore the CPU flags.

Using the unconditional irq "disable/enable" API variant is safe,
because the skb_defer_free_flush() function is only called during
NAPI-RX processing in net_rx_action(), where it is known the IRQs
are enabled.

Expected gain is 14 cycles from avoiding reading and restoring CPU
flags in a spin_lock_irqsave/restore operation, measured via a
microbencmark kernel module[1] on CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz.

Microbenchmark overhead of spin_lock+unlock:
 - spin_lock_unlock_irq     cost: 34 cycles(tsc)  9.486 ns
 - spin_lock_unlock_irqsave cost: 48 cycles(tsc) 13.567 ns

We don't expect to see a measurable packet performance gain, as
skb_defer_free_flush() is called infrequently once per NIC device NAPI
bulk cycle and conditionally only if SKBs have been deferred by other
CPUs via skb_attempt_defer_free().

[1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/time_bench_sample.c

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167421646327.1321776.7390743166998776914.stgit@firesoul
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

net/core/dev.c

@@ -6616,17 +6616,16 @@ static int napi_threaded_poll(void *data)
 static void skb_defer_free_flush(struct softnet_data *sd)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *next;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in skb_attempt_defer_free() */
 	if (!READ_ONCE(sd->defer_list))
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sd->defer_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irq(&sd->defer_lock);
 	skb = sd->defer_list;
 	sd->defer_list = NULL;
 	sd->defer_count = 0;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sd->defer_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&sd->defer_lock);
 
 	while (skb != NULL) {
 		next = skb->next;