Skip to content

Conversation

johanneskastl
Copy link

No description provided.

@lkocman
Copy link
Contributor

lkocman commented Dec 5, 2024

@johanneskastl seems like the linter pipeline did not pass. could you please look into it?

@johanneskastl
Copy link
Author

@johanneskastl seems like the linter pipeline did not pass. could you please look into it?

Looking into it, hope the new commits fix the error.

@johanneskastl
Copy link
Author

@lkocman Fixed!

- staging-bot
tasks:
- script: |
ruby obs-to-vagrantcloud.rb --url https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap-micro/6.1/appliances/openSUSE-Leap-Micro.x86_64-Default-Vagrant.json --organization opensuse --new-box-name Leap_Micro_6.1_Default.x86_64
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That URL is wrong, it points to some SBOM json file

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ouch! You are of course correct. Looks like there is no boxes subdirectory for the Leap Micro 6.1 image.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could it be that we are missing an entry here:
https://build.opensuse.org/projects/openSUSE:Leap:Micro:6.1/prjconf

%if "%_repository" == "images"
Type: kiwi
Repotype: staticlinks
[...]

I think the Repotype should also contain vagrant, like here.

%if "%_repository" == "images"
Type: kiwi
Repotype: staticlinks vagrant
[...]

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added. I noticed that totest-manager was misconfigured and it didn't find the openQA jobs, I fixed that in the config. The next published snapshot should have the proper .json files again.

(CC @lkocman)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @Vogtinator!

(Fun question from when I was comparing prjconf's: Why is this not needed on devel:microos:images? My guess would be that there the images are published on another URL, hence everything is setup properly)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Fabian, I was not sure if the releases are frozen as there are so few updates for Leap Micro (something Lubos mentioned a while back)...

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm, OpenQA seems to be finished with the same result as 5.7, but I see no changed files. Apparently no new release was published.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I totally forgot about this PR. But I just checked and I still cannot find any JSON files that are NOT sbom-related.

https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap-micro/6.1/appliances/

@lkocman @Vogtinator Who would be the right person to ping?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

openQA still fails for Leap Micro 6.1, so nothing got published. Something for @lkocman.

@johanneskastl johanneskastl changed the title publish Leap Micro 6.1 Vagrant boxes (Base and Default) Draft: publish Leap Micro 6.1 Vagrant boxes (Base and Default) Dec 6, 2024
@johanneskastl johanneskastl marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2024 14:14
@johanneskastl johanneskastl force-pushed the 20241205_publish_leap_micro_vagrant_box branch from d4c358a to 0f606da Compare May 15, 2025 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants