Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backend] support memory per job constraint #10008

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2020

Conversation

adrianschroeter
Copy link
Member

To increase the memory need per used job on the worker. This can be
potentionally racy, because parallel builds may happened on different
times so the need of memory might differ depending on build speed.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #10008 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #10008   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.53%   90.53%           
=======================================
  Files         568      568           
  Lines       21252    21252           
=======================================
  Hits        19241    19241           
  Misses       2011     2011           

@DavidKang DavidKang added the Backend Things regarding the OBS backend label Aug 12, 2020
src/backend/BSDispatcher/Constraints.pm Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
To increase the memory need per used job on the worker. This can be
potentionally racy, because parallel builds may happened on different
times so the need of memory might differ depending on build speed.
@marxin
Copy link

marxin commented Jul 26, 2022

@adrianschroeter One small note, can you please document the newly added param here:
https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.build_job_constraints.html
?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backend Things regarding the OBS backend
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants