Trip at Balise 358: BG358 not in linking list

[BerndHekele]

The list looks like follows:

Seeing the size of the linking list in Uwe's model and the lnumber of sections to be covered before next linking data is sent I believe we now need to extend the list in the interfaces to a reasonable size.
@UweSteinkeFromSiemens
@JakobGartner

I propose to use at least 33 elements in the interfaces.
Uwe, can you please confirm?

[UweSteinkeFromSiemens]

This should not be functional problem.

From the practical view of testing, I would prefer to stay with the current limited lengths instead of being snowed under long lists otherwise. An increase to 33 will lead to at least 66 elements of the list shown above and truly fill the screen.

Please decide for your own, if this is really what you want.

[BerndHekele]

The size of the list is also touched in #624

[BerndHekele]

This argument is valid.
But we need to have a list which is tailored for the track requirements.

[BerndHekele]

The biggest list I can see from the track has 29 elements.
This is fairly close to 33

[BerndHekele]

@JakobGartner
@Mairamou
Do we need changes in the track model or in the tm model as well?

[BerndHekele]

I did a check on dependencises to other models.
I can see impact in the EVC, Calculae Train Position, Manage Trackside, TM, Provide Position Report.
I would like to do this change tomorrow after a discussion in our telco.

Any objections?

[JakobGartner]

No, this should have no impact.

On the track, we can see 32 increments + the initial distance

The operator for conversion to Uwe’s type is already based on Uwe’s dimensioning constant

On 05 Oct 2015, at 16:26, Bernd Hekele notifications@github.com wrote:

@JakobGartner https://github.com/JakobGartner
@Mairamou https://github.com/mairamou
Do we need changes in the track model or in the tm model as well?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #780 (comment).

[UweSteinkeFromSiemens]

The modification can be achieved by changing BG_Types_Pkg::cMaxNoOfLinkedBGs accordingly.

[BerndHekele]

As agreed in the morning session I pushed the interface change.
I see dependencies in TM @JakobGartner and calcTrainPosition @UweSteinkeFromSiemens .
I take care on Position Report dependencies.

[janWelte]

The constant cEmptyPositionedBGs has to be adopted to the new array size.

@UweSteinkeFromSiemens