-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename prefix for Zipkin attributes from OT to OTel #967
Conversation
We should really standardize these attribute names across different exporters #660 (comment) |
Yeah definitely - I see work like open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python#1124 but should we block work on exporters until the attributes are finalized? |
No, I don't think that is required, as long as we take care to be consistent even without a central definition. |
I just did not approve because I have no idea about zipkin 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should specify somewhere that "otel.*" is reserved for OpenTelemetry usage and should not be used for any other semantic conventions or attribute names. This is to ensure there are no clashes if the end users decide for some reason to prefix their own attributes with "otel.".
Can be done in a separate PR.
…orter (#1201) Based on the spec change: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#967
…orter (#1201) Based on the spec change: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#967
The official rename of the acronym happened after this spec was made, but looks like we haven't updated it yet.