Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[editorial] Remove implementation specific specification from metric API #3890

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

MrAlias
Copy link
Contributor

@MrAlias MrAlias commented Feb 20, 2024

The api.md document specifies the Metric API, it does not defined the OpenTelemetry defined implementations of this API. Remove or correct the details within this API and leave it for the implementation specification to define.

Importantly, the API is decoupled from implementation for a reason. Third-party implementation may exists that OTel does not have domain over. This document needs to written with that in mind.

Related to #3171 and #3071.

@MrAlias MrAlias added the spec:metrics Related to the specification/metrics directory label Feb 20, 2024
@carlosalberto carlosalberto merged commit 94fabf7 into open-telemetry:main Feb 23, 2024
7 checks passed
carlosalberto pushed a commit to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
…API (open-telemetry#3890)

The api.md document specifies the Metric API, it does not defined the
OpenTelemetry defined implementations of this API. Remove or correct the
details within this API and leave it for the implementation
specification to define.

Importantly, the API is decoupled from implementation for a reason.
Third-party implementation may exists that OTel does not have domain
over. This document needs to written with that in mind.

Related to
open-telemetry#3171
and
open-telemetry#3071.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:metrics Related to the specification/metrics directory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants