-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add OTEL_EXPORTER_JAEGER_PROTOCOL and improve description of other OTEL_EXPORTER_JAEGER_* env vars #2341
Merged
Merged
Add OTEL_EXPORTER_JAEGER_PROTOCOL and improve description of other OTEL_EXPORTER_JAEGER_* env vars #2341
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1e64a2b
Standardize OTEL_EXPORTER_JAEGER_PROTOCOL
pellared 0be7bf2
Update sdk-environment-variables.md
pellared f0bcb48
Update CHANGELOG.md
pellared 4254238
Update CHANGELOG.md
pellared 63716b4
Update CHANGELOG.md
pellared 1b746ac
Add udp/thrift.binary and reformat table
pellared b523b36
Merge branch 'main' into patch-2
pellared 37885d2
Merge branch 'main' into patch-2
pellared e2c4178
Update sdk-environment-variables.md
pellared f701df3
Merge branch 'main' into patch-2
carlosalberto File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does this say
MAY
? This is not a recommendation, it is a strict list. Should it say:MUST be one of ...
instead?.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Taken from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/protocol/exporter.md. The same wording is used in #2345
I would prefer to address it in a separate PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think
MAY
is not the right word here and other similar places that you found, but I am fine if it is addressed in a future PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will create issues for it once this PR is merged and assign it to myself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressing this addition in a future PR could potentially lead to compatibility issues. Reviewers of the future PR may not know if this change was released and "upgrading" from an option to a requirement would be a backwards incompatible change. Or, even worse, this would be released prior to the follow on PR being merged. Given this section of the doc is marked stable, this seems like a valid concern.
Can we address the change from
MAY
toMUST
for these changes in this PR instead? That way it will be a cohesive and complete change that is not copying prior errors.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tigrannajaryan @MrAlias PTAL e2c4178