-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add OTEL_SERVICE_NAME
environment variable
#1677
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
22cc59f
Add OTEL_SERVICE_NAME environment variable
iNikem 987e435
Add changelog
iNikem 1e47163
Update PR link in changelog
iNikem df4cddc
Polish text
iNikem 239dc6d
Polishing text
iNikem 6c9278c
Update specification/sdk-environment-variables.md
iNikem 0d91482
More clearly say that service.name is a special attribute
iNikem cb734a9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/iNikem-patch-1' into iNikem-patch-1
iNikem dda6729
Update specification/resource/semantic_conventions/README.md
iNikem 9169d40
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into iNikem-patch-1
iNikem 058d606
Merge branch 'main' into iNikem-patch-1
carlosalberto File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add NAMESPACE and INSTANCE as well. Service name should not be treated special than the others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I usually prefer to keep PR scope small, if possible. This PR solves one specific issue. I am happy to file a follow-up one, if you feel this is needed :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have never heard of anyone using namespace (but maybe it just works so well that there are no questions?). instance.id has is currently IMHO too vaguely defined to be useful, as discussed in #1034. So the service name is IMHO definitely the most useful one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(If exporter specs are updated to include service.namespace in their reported service, which maybe they should, then adding a special envvar for service.namespace might make sense)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the "service name" as defined right now is unique within a namespace, and the fact that Jaeger/Zipkin don't have this concept made us use just "service name" which is wrong.
@Oberon00 I agree that exporters that only have a "service name" concept should use actually "{service.namespace}/{service.name}" as the name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/d001d5d25ea11a28bd4c4ec2652e2db1a41fc064/specification/trace/sdk_exporters/zipkin.md#:~:text=note%2C%20the%20attribute%20service.namespace%20must%20not%20be%20used%20for%20the%20zipkin%20service%20name%20and%20should%20be%20sent%20as%20a%20zipkin%20tag.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/b46bcab5fb709381f1fd52096a19541370c7d1b3/specification/resource/semantic_conventions/README.md#:~:text=Note,same%20string
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can change that, but it was intentionally not suppose to be concatenated to avoid the need to parse the namespace out of the name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do understand that, and I've just added an open question to my PR. I think in case of one value string like Jaeger/Zipkin we have to guarantee the uniqueness somehow, otherwise we will have conflicts. For example 2 service names named "kafka" run by 2 teams/namespaces "a" and "b" will be seen as same service by these backends.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
happy to change that. Given that namespace is empty in many cases now it is not such a breaking change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this discussion/related PR block this PR from merging?