Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a potential precision loss on integer in ReservoirCellIndexFor #1696

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

ThomsonTan
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes # (issue)

Changes

Please provide a brief description of the changes here.

For significant contributions please make sure you have completed the following items:

  • CHANGELOG.md updated for non-trivial changes
  • Unit tests have been added
  • Changes in public API reviewed

@ThomsonTan ThomsonTan requested a review from a team October 17, 2022 23:51
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1696 (de9bb0a) into main (7f37bc3) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1696      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.37%   86.35%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         169      169              
  Lines        5156     5156              
==========================================
- Hits         4453     4452       -1     
- Misses        703      704       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...dk/metrics/exemplar/histogram_exemplar_reservoir.h 81.25% <100.00%> (ø)
sdk/src/trace/batch_span_processor.cc 90.63% <0.00%> (-0.78%) ⬇️

Copy link
Member

@marcalff marcalff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works too, I was wondering about the best way to fix the original warning.

Note that there is still a potential loss when casting the size_t to an int.

In practice, the number of boundaries should be very low anyway, so not an issue.

@lalitb lalitb merged commit d9f8bce into open-telemetry:main Oct 18, 2022
ays7 added a commit to ays7/opentelemetry-cpp that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2022
…ad-local-stack

* commit '9acde87b08b225ce511fa8a20c6cba14f2921518': (36 commits)
  Prepare v1.7.0 release with Metrics API/SDK GA. (open-telemetry#1721)
  Fix: 1712 -  Validate Instrument meta data (name, unit, description) (open-telemetry#1713)
  Document libthrift 0.12.0 doesn't work with Jaeger exporter (open-telemetry#1714)
  Fix:1674, Add Monotonic Property to Sum Aggregation, and unit tests for Up Down Counter (open-telemetry#1675)
  [Metrics SDK] Move Metrics Exemplar processing behind feature flag (open-telemetry#1710)
  [Metrics API/SDK] Change Meter API/SDK to return nostd::unique_ptr for Sync Instruments (open-telemetry#1707)
  [Metrics] Switch to explicit 64 bit integers (open-telemetry#1686)
  Add metrics e2e test to asan & tsan CI (open-telemetry#1670)
  Add otlp-grpc example bazel (open-telemetry#1708)
  [Metrics SDK] Add support for Pull Metric Reader (open-telemetry#1701)
  Fix debug log of OTLP HTTP exporter and ES log exporter (open-telemetry#1703)
  [SEMANTIC CONVENTIONS] Upgrade to version 1.14.0 (open-telemetry#1697)
  Fix a potential precision loss on integer in ReservoirCellIndexFor (open-telemetry#1696)
  fix Histogram crash (open-telemetry#1685)
  Fix:1676 Segfault when short export period is used for metrics  (open-telemetry#1682)
  Add timeout support to MeterContext::ForceFlush (open-telemetry#1673)
  Add CMake OTELCPP_MAINTAINER_MODE (open-telemetry#1650)
  [DOCS] - Minor updates to OStream Metrics exporter documentation (open-telemetry#1679)
  Fix:open-telemetry#1575 API Documentation for Metrics SDK and API (open-telemetry#1678)
  Fixes open-telemetry#249 (open-telemetry#1677)
  ...
@ThomsonTan ThomsonTan deleted the FixPotentialPrecisionLoss branch November 9, 2022 22:52
yxue pushed a commit to yxue/opentelemetry-cpp that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants