Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[chore] rework memorylimiter test to avoid flaky tests #9733

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

atoulme
Copy link
Contributor

@atoulme atoulme commented Mar 8, 2024

Peeling this set of changes from #9584 as a separate PR.

These changes allow a reduction of issues when working with ARM64, which seems to fail on some of the resource locking used in those tests.

@atoulme atoulme requested review from a team and jpkrohling March 8, 2024 23:41
@atoulme atoulme mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.95%. Comparing base (2413346) to head (bb8f53a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9733   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.95%   90.95%           
=======================================
  Files         350      350           
  Lines       18576    18580    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        16895    16899    +4     
  Misses       1354     1354           
  Partials      327      327           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dmitryax dmitryax merged commit 2a6a3f9 into open-telemetry:main Mar 19, 2024
47 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone Mar 19, 2024
@atoulme atoulme deleted the memorylimiter_test branch March 19, 2024 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants