[ci] Check contrib modules are using the correct core collector version

[hickeyma]

Description from @mx-psi in #8546 (comment):

My intention is to avoid the following situation:

1. Someone creates a PR adding a new examplemodule module, targeting Collector core vN module
2. Weeks pass, it gets reviewed and merged just before the vN+3 contrib release, still targeting vN
3. The release manager for vN+3 has then to manually update the examplemodule module code to be compatible with vN+3

I want to avoid (3) and, instead, make the contributor adding examplemodule do that job before merging the PR, by comparing the Collector core version at the top-level go.mod file with the Collector core version at the examplemodule go.mod file.

The result of check-collector-module-version (no incorrect versions):

There are 0 incorrect "go.opentelemetry.io/collector " version(s) in the module files.
There are 0 incorrect "go.opentelemetry.io/collector/model" version(s) in the module files.

The result of check-collector-module-version (incorrect versions):

Incorrect version "v0.47.0" of "go.opentelemetry.io/collector " is included in "./receiver/couchbasereceiver/go.mod". It should be version "v0.48.0".
Incorrect version "v0.44.0" of "go.opentelemetry.io/collector " is included in "./exporter/awsemfexporter/go.mod". It should be version "v0.48.0".
There are 2 incorrect "go.opentelemetry.io/collector " version(s) in the module files.

The result of check-collector-module-version (incorrect model versions):

There are 0 incorrect "go.opentelemetry.io/collector " version(s) in the module files.
Incorrect version "v0.43.0" of "go.opentelemetry.io/collector/model" is included in "./exporter/datadogexporter/go.mod". It should be version "v0.48.0".
There are 1 incorrect "go.opentelemetry.io/collector/model" version(s) in the module files.

Fixes #8546

Signed-off-by: Martin Hickey martin.hickey@ie.ibm.com

[hickeyma]

Thanks for the review @mx-psi. dated and ready for review again.

[mx-psi]

Tested locally, seems to work fine. I would like another approver/maintainer to take a look before I mark as ready to merge

[mx-psi]

And thanks for doing this @hickeyma 🙇 I think this will make releases a bit smoother

[jpkrohling]

LGTM, just a couple of minor comments. Would you be able to add example outputs as a comment to this PR?

[hickeyma]

Thanks for the review and feedback @jpkrohling. I have updated with your comments. It is ready for review again.

Would you be able to add example outputs as a comment to this PR?

I added output to the description.