[processor/transform] Allow covert_summary methods to use custom metric suffix #35141
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… custom metric suffix
…de custom metric suffix
lahsivjar
requested review from
TylerHelmuth,
bogdandrutu and
evan-bradley
as code owners
|
I don't think the failing |
|
@TylerHelmuth @bogdandrutu @evan-bradley Friendly ping, do you think the PR makes sense? |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
|
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description: Currently, the
convert_summary_{count,sum}_val_to_summethods have a fixed metric suffix of_sumwhich is quite restrictive to make use of the function. The PR makes the suffix configurable.Link to tracking Issue: Related to #33850
Testing: Tested via test-cases.
Documentation: Updated the README with the new argument.