Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow specifying name on the connection to RabbitMQ #34682

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

snichme
Copy link
Contributor

@snichme snichme commented Aug 14, 2024

Description:

Allow specifying name on the connection to RabbitMQ

Link to tracking Issue: 34681

Testing:

Locally tested by changing the name of the connection in the config file and see that it changes in the broker.

@snichme snichme requested a review from atoulme as a code owner August 14, 2024 13:12
@snichme snichme requested a review from a team August 14, 2024 13:12
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 14, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@swar8080
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, it'd also be helpful to update the README with the new config option

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Aug 15, 2024

@swar8080 added name as config option and also noted that the configuration appears to have wrong indentation, routing isn't under connnection or am I missing something? WDYT?

@swar8080
Copy link
Contributor

@swar8080 added name as config option and also noted that the configuration appears to have wrong indentation, routing isn't under connnection or am I missing something? WDYT?

Thanks for fixing the indentation

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Aug 20, 2024

What is the next step to get this merged?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 4, 2024
@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Sep 4, 2024

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

thats not good, what are the missing steps to get this merged?

@atoulme atoulme removed the Stale label Sep 4, 2024
@swar8080
Copy link
Contributor

swar8080 commented Sep 4, 2024

Hi @snichme, the pipeline's blocked because there isn't a changelog. It's pretty quick to add, see https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-changelog-entry

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Sep 5, 2024

Will fix the changelog and have a look at tests

Another question, is there a way to mark a field as optional in the config. Because now it's a breaking change where the collector wont start if you supply a name, would be nice if the given name was used if available, otherwise use the default so we keep backwards compatibility.

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Sep 5, 2024

Added a changelog entry as enhancement but unless we can make the setting optional I would consider this a breaking change.
So either change the changelog or the make the setting optional (if that is possible) WDYT?

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Sep 5, 2024

Never mind about the optional settings. It works just as it is and this change is just an enhancement

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Sep 10, 2024

@swar8080 changelog added now

@snichme
Copy link
Contributor Author

snichme commented Oct 1, 2024

@swar8080 merge is still blocked and some checks haven't run on the PR, is there anything I can do to get this merged?

@snichme snichme requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2024 07:10
@snichme snichme requested a review from mwear October 14, 2024 07:10
@djaglowski djaglowski merged commit ad6a19f into open-telemetry:main Oct 22, 2024
158 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants