Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[receiver/kafkametricsreceiver] update scope name for consistency #34538

Conversation

codeboten
Copy link
Contributor

Update the scope name for telemetry produced by the kafkametricsreceiverreceiver from otelcol/kafkametricsreceiver to github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/receiver/kafkametricsreceiverreceiver

Part of open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#9494

Update the scope name for telemetry produced by the kafkametricsreceiverreceiver from otelcol/kafkametricsreceiver to github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/receiver/kafkametricsreceiverreceiver

Part of open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#9494

Signed-off-by: Alex Boten <223565+codeboten@users.noreply.github.com>
@codeboten codeboten requested a review from a team August 8, 2024 18:39
@mx-psi mx-psi merged commit 0076a75 into open-telemetry:main Aug 9, 2024
154 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone Aug 9, 2024
@codeboten codeboten deleted the codeboten/update-scope-kafkametricsreceiver branch August 9, 2024 16:32
f7o pushed a commit to f7o/opentelemetry-collector-contrib that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
…en-telemetry#34538)

Update the scope name for telemetry produced by the
kafkametricsreceiverreceiver from otelcol/kafkametricsreceiver to
github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/receiver/kafkametricsreceiverreceiver

Part of
open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#9494

---------

Signed-off-by: Alex Boten <223565+codeboten@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants