Skip to content

Add support for std::string_view to Json::Value::operator[] #1352

Open

Description

@sir-exasol

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We use std::string_view for names of object entries. However, when accessing values with Json::Value::operator[], we always have to convert the name a std::string first. This incurs an unnecessary allocation and adds boilerplate code.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like Json::Value::operator[] to support std::string_view.

Describe alternatives you've considered
As mentioned an alternative is to convert the name to std::string first, but this is less readable and slower. Converting to const char* is in general not possible, because the contents of std::string_view might not be null-terminated.

Additional context
This feature requires C++17. jsoncpp seems to build fine with C++17 so this shouldn't be a problem as long as the feature is deactivated when compiling with a lower standard.
#999 already implemented this feature, but was closed. It is not clear to me why the PR was closed. If there is additional work necessary, I am happy to help.

Activity

  1. BillyDonahue commented on Nov 5, 2021

    @BillyDonahue
    Contributor

    The PR was incorrect code.
    I don't think it would compile. A key variable was misspelled.

    It could create an ambiguity among the overloads of the operator[], which would break some users.

    the detection of C++17 was incorrect for the case where jsoncpp is built without c++17 but the client code is built with it. The client would have missing symbol errors.

    There are workarounds for these problems but it is not simple.

  2. aberaud commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @aberaud

    GCC is now moving to C++17 by default, and C++20/22 include additional support for std::string_view.

    This feature would be great to improve performance and code readability!

    Also simply to be compatible and interoperable with the C++ standard library...

  3. aberaud commented on Mar 28, 2022

    @aberaud

    first step here: #1397

  4. bcsgh commented on Dec 4, 2024

    @bcsgh
    Contributor

    Any chance of reviving this?

    And while this is being done adding the corresponding constructor Json::Value::Value(std::string_view) would be nice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions