Power8: Hit with "Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11" on latest nightly #14
Comments
|
------- Comment From viparash@in.ibm.com 2017-08-31 09:26:40 EDT------- I see two issues here Issue 1> |
|
------- Comment From satheera@in.ibm.com 2017-09-26 06:44:04 EDT------- ------- Comment From satheera@in.ibm.com 2017-09-26 06:45:15 EDT------- |
malcolmcrossley
pushed a commit
to malcolmcrossley/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2018
... before the first use of kaiser_enabled as otherwise funky things happen: about to get started... (XEN) d0v0 Unhandled page fault fault/trap [open-power-host-os#14, ec=0000] (XEN) Pagetable walk from ffff88022a449090: (XEN) L4[0x110] = 0000000229e0e067 0000000000001e0e (XEN) L3[0x008] = 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fault at ffff82d08033fd08 entry.o#create_bounce_frame+0x135/0x14d (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0: (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.9.1_02-3.21 x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 0 (XEN) RIP: e033:[<ffffffff81007460>] (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000286 EM: 1 CONTEXT: pv guest (d0v0) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
paulusmack
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2018
for_each_set_bit() only accepts variable of type unsigned long, and we can not cast it from smaller types. [ 16.499365] ================================================================== [ 16.506655] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in find_first_bit+0x1d/0x70 [ 16.513313] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8803616cf510 by task systemd-udevd/180 [ 16.521998] CPU: 0 PID: 180 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G U O 4.15.0-rc3+ #14 [ 16.530317] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7040/0Y7WYT, BIOS 1.2.8 01/26/2016 [ 16.537760] Call Trace: [ 16.540230] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb [ 16.543569] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290 [ 16.548306] kasan_report+0x28a/0x370 [ 16.551993] ? find_first_bit+0x1d/0x70 [ 16.555858] find_first_bit+0x1d/0x70 [ 16.559625] intel_gvt_init_cmd_parser+0x127/0x3c0 [i915] [ 16.565060] ? __lock_is_held+0x8f/0xf0 [ 16.568990] ? intel_gvt_clean_cmd_parser+0x10/0x10 [i915] [ 16.574514] ? __hrtimer_init+0x5d/0xb0 [ 16.578445] intel_gvt_init_device+0x2c3/0x690 [i915] [ 16.583537] ? unregister_module_notifier+0x20/0x20 [ 16.588515] intel_gvt_init+0x89/0x100 [i915] [ 16.592962] i915_driver_load+0x1992/0x1c70 [i915] [ 16.597846] ? __i915_printk+0x210/0x210 [i915] [ 16.602410] ? wait_for_completion+0x280/0x280 [ 16.606883] ? lock_downgrade+0x2c0/0x2c0 [ 16.610923] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x46/0x90 [ 16.615238] ? acpi_dev_found+0x76/0x80 [ 16.619162] ? i915_pci_remove+0x30/0x30 [i915] [ 16.623733] local_pci_probe+0x74/0xe0 [ 16.627518] pci_device_probe+0x208/0x310 [ 16.631561] ? pci_device_remove+0x100/0x100 [ 16.635871] ? __list_add_valid+0x29/0xa0 [ 16.639919] driver_probe_device+0x40b/0x6b0 [ 16.644223] ? driver_probe_device+0x6b0/0x6b0 [ 16.648696] __driver_attach+0x11d/0x130 [ 16.652649] bus_for_each_dev+0xe7/0x160 [ 16.656600] ? subsys_dev_iter_exit+0x10/0x10 [ 16.660987] ? __list_add_valid+0x29/0xa0 [ 16.665028] bus_add_driver+0x31d/0x3a0 [ 16.668893] driver_register+0xc6/0x170 [ 16.672758] ? 0xffffffffc0ad8000 [ 16.676108] do_one_initcall+0x9c/0x206 [ 16.679984] ? initcall_blacklisted+0x150/0x150 [ 16.684545] ? do_init_module+0x35/0x33b [ 16.688494] ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x31/0x40 [ 16.692968] ? kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0 [ 16.696743] ? do_init_module+0x35/0x33b [ 16.700694] ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x31/0x40 [ 16.705168] ? __asan_register_globals+0x82/0xa0 [ 16.709819] do_init_module+0xe7/0x33b [ 16.713597] load_module+0x4481/0x4ce0 [ 16.717397] ? module_frob_arch_sections+0x20/0x20 [ 16.722228] ? vfs_read+0x13b/0x190 [ 16.725742] ? kernel_read+0x74/0xa0 [ 16.729351] ? get_user_arg_ptr.isra.17+0x70/0x70 [ 16.734099] ? SYSC_finit_module+0x175/0x1b0 [ 16.738399] SYSC_finit_module+0x175/0x1b0 [ 16.742524] ? SYSC_init_module+0x1e0/0x1e0 [ 16.746741] ? __fget+0x157/0x240 [ 16.750090] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c [ 16.754747] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a [ 16.759397] RIP: 0033:0x7f8fbc837499 [ 16.762996] RSP: 002b:00007ffead76c138 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 16.770618] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000012 RCX: 00007f8fbc837499 [ 16.777800] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000056484e67b080 RDI: 0000000000000012 [ 16.784979] RBP: 00007ffead76b140 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000021 [ 16.792164] R10: 0000000000000012 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000056484e67b460 [ 16.799345] R13: 00007ffead76b120 R14: 0000000000000005 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 16.808052] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 16.812876] page:00000000dc4b8c1e count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 [ 16.820934] flags: 0x17ffffc0000000() [ 16.824621] raw: 0017ffffc0000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff [ 16.832416] raw: ffffea000d85b3e0 ffffea000d85b3e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 16.840208] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 16.847318] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 16.852143] ffff8803616cf400: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 16.859427] ffff8803616cf480: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 [ 16.866708] >ffff8803616cf500: f1 f1 04 f4 f4 f4 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 16.873988] ^ [ 16.877770] ffff8803616cf580: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 16.885042] ffff8803616cf600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 [ 16.892312] ================================================================== Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
liyi-ibm
referenced
this issue
in liyi-ibm/linux
Dec 6, 2018
When booting kernel with LOCKDEP option, below warning info was found: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 4.19.0-rc7+ #14 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000dcfc0fc8 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] 00000000dcfc0fc8 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: tipc_link_reset+0x125/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:850 but task is already holding lock: 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: tipc_link_reset+0xfa/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:849 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock#4); lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock#4); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: 00000000f7539d34 (pernet_ops_rwsem){+.+.}, at: register_pernet_subsys+0x19/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1051 #1: 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] #1: 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: tipc_link_reset+0xfa/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:849 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc7+ #14 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1af/0x295 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1759 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1803 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2399 [inline] __lock_acquire+0xf1e/0x3c60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3411 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3900 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:168 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] tipc_link_reset+0x125/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:850 tipc_link_bc_create+0xb5/0x1f0 net/tipc/link.c:526 tipc_bcast_init+0x59b/0xab0 net/tipc/bcast.c:521 tipc_init_net+0x472/0x610 net/tipc/core.c:82 ops_init+0xf7/0x520 net/core/net_namespace.c:129 __register_pernet_operations net/core/net_namespace.c:940 [inline] register_pernet_operations+0x453/0xac0 net/core/net_namespace.c:1011 register_pernet_subsys+0x28/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1052 tipc_init+0x83/0x104 net/tipc/core.c:140 do_one_initcall+0x109/0x70a init/main.c:885 do_initcall_level init/main.c:953 [inline] do_initcalls init/main.c:961 [inline] do_basic_setup init/main.c:979 [inline] kernel_init_freeable+0x4bd/0x57f init/main.c:1144 kernel_init+0x13/0x180 init/main.c:1063 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:413 The reason why the noise above was complained by LOCKDEP is because we nested to hold l->wakeupq.lock and l->inputq->lock in tipc_link_reset function. In fact it's unnecessary to move skb buffer from l->wakeupq queue to l->inputq queue while holding the two locks at the same time. Instead, we can move skb buffers in l->wakeupq queue to a temporary list first and then move the buffers of the temporary list to l->inputq queue, which is also safe for us. Fixes: 3f32d0b ("tipc: lock wakeup & inputq at tipc_link_reset()") Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Kernel Version: 4.13.0-3.rc3.dev.gitec0d270.el7.centos.ppc64le
Hit few mins after a fresh boot, tried to run avocado tests(just started).
Most of(sosreport, service restart, etc) command gets stuck after the crash.
cde:info Mirrored with LTC bug #158177 </cde:info>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: