cpu: aarch64: Expand ARM SVE support for forward convolution.

[kasturedeeksha]

Description

This commit expands ARM SVE support for JIT SVE forward convolution in FP32, introducing compatibility with various vector lengths. The changes made are for implementing different ARM SVE vector lengths.

Major code changes:

1. Added common files jit_sve_convolution.hpp, jit_sve_convolution.cpp, jit_sve_conv_kernel.hpp, jit_sve_conv_kernel.cpp to accommodate the extended ARM SVE vector length.
2. Set data format tags according to the SVE length being used for forward convolution.
3. Replaced ldr, and str instructions for vector registers with ld1w and st1w to utilize predication.

Checklist

General

• Do all unit and benchdnn tests (make test and make test_benchdnn_*) pass locally for each commit? Yes
  Test output is same with and without this commit.

1. make test output:

99% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 162

Total Test time (real) = 137.49 sec

The following tests FAILED:
        145 - test_graph_unit_dnnl_conv_usm_cpu (Failed)
        150 - test_graph_unit_dnnl_large_partition_usm_cpu (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
Output from these tests are in: /home/deekshak/xybak/oss_pr/forked_oss/oneDNN_Fork/build/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log
Use "--rerun-failed --output-on-failure" to re-run the failed cases verbosely.
make: *** [Makefile:71: test] Error 8

2. make test_benchdnn_modeC_conv_ci_cpu/fast output:

tests:30510 passed:16848 skipped:13662 mistrusted:0 unimplemented:0 invalid_arguments:0 failed:0 listed:0
total: 316.16s; fill: 25.08s (8%); compute_ref: 6.38s (2%); compare: 8.97s (3%);

• Have you formatted the code using clang-format? Yes
  cc : @kawakami-k

[igorsafo]

Hi @kasturedeeksha ,
Could you please squash all commits into a single one and change the commit message to something like src: cpu: aarch64: conv: forward: add sve_256 support?

[abhijain1204fujitsu]

@igorsafo, mentioned changes have been done
Kindly support to review this PR and share the feedback

[igorsafo]

@kasturedeeksha Thank you, the changes LGTM!

[abhijain1204fujitsu]

@igorsafo, @vpirogov could you please support for merger, in case any update required at our end please let us know.