-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unsafe_merge: detect value with no root #1088
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
# Detect the special case where value has no root: | ||
value_has_root = ( | ||
isinstance(value, Container) or value._get_parent() is not None | ||
) | ||
# if value is from the same config, perform a deepcopy no matter what. | ||
if self._get_root() is value._get_root(): | ||
if value_has_root and self._get_root() is value._get_root(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Normally, every node should have a root. The "root" of a node is a top-level Container
that owns the node. In other words, the root is the top of the config tree. You can get the root of a node by calling node._get_root()
.
In example from issue #1087, the above call to value._get_root()
raises an AssertionError
. This happens because value
is a temporary UnionNode
value that has no parent (and thus has no root).
Here is a potential alternative approach to solving issue #1087:
Instead of detecting whether value_has_root
as above, we could modify the Node._get_root
method to return an Optional[Container]
instead of a Container
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both approaches seems okay to me.
Also, please add a test for unsafe_merge similar in this case (similar to the repro in the bug report).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make sure that your proposed logic does not treat the nodes as being from the same config (see comment in 538).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added the test.
Make sure that your proposed logic does not treat the nodes as being from the same config
Yup. If value_has_root
is False
then value
is a temporary node and does not come from the same config as self
.
Hi @omry , Thank you for creating this PR. I'm wondering if there is any blocker for merging this PR, that I could potentially help resolving? |
Closes #1087.
This PR addresses an edge-case where
AssertionError
is raised during acall to
OmegaConf.unsafe_merge
.This PR is marked as a draft: