Skip to content

Conversation

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

This is the same as gh-227 but rebased onto develop.


This comes after several reports on the mailing lists of NFS and CIFS installs
failing.

Questions

  • Is the section obvious enough? Do we need a red blinking banner?
  • Are all of the terms well-enough understood? Do we need links?
  • Are there any tests that can be performed to check locking?
  • Should we also add a section on latency?

/cc @chris-allan

This comes after several reports on the mailing lists of NFS
and CIFS installs failing.
@bpindelski
Copy link

Looks good to merge and provides proper explanation.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, @bpindelski

joshmoore added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2013
Add sections on locking and remote shares to unix/windows (rebased onto develop)
@joshmoore joshmoore merged commit 647af9e into ome:develop Feb 5, 2013
@joshmoore joshmoore deleted the rebased/develop/remote-mounts branch February 5, 2013 15:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants