[BUG]: Webhook installation type missing `client_id`

[nathandao]

What happened?

Looks like all webhooks we received from GH now contains the Installation's client_id field, but it is not documented in the type. And I found a related announcement about replacing app_id by client_id as the unique identifier. Would it make sense to at least add an optional client_id field to the Installation type?

Versions

@octokit/webhooks-types v7.6.1

Relevant log output

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labeled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

[wolfy1339]

What version of @octokit/webhooks are you using?
This package (and it's containing schemas and types) is very out of date ever since GitHub started publishing an OpenAPI specification for the webhooks.

Check out @octokit/openapi-webhooks-transition for a drop-in replacement