-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
Insights: ocaml/opam
Overview
Could not load contribution data
Please try again later
1 Release published by 1 person
-
2.4.0-alpha1 2.4.0~alpha1
published
Apr 18, 2025
5 Pull requests merged by 3 people
-
build(deps): bump actions/cache from 3 to 4
#6478 merged
Apr 21, 2025 -
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 3 to 4
#6479 merged
Apr 21, 2025 -
Add 2.4.0~alpha1 to the install scripts
#6475 merged
Apr 18, 2025 -
Release 2.4.0~alpha1
#6473 merged
Apr 16, 2025 -
Support Nix depexts with
opam env
#5982 merged
Apr 16, 2025
2 Pull requests opened by 2 people
-
Bump the version number to 2.4.0~alpha2~dev
#6476 opened
Apr 19, 2025 -
API: remove `ignore` use and some open
#6481 opened
Apr 22, 2025
2 Issues closed by 1 person
-
Should functions in `OpamConsole` check verbosity level?
#6477 closed
Apr 21, 2025 -
depext does not support nixOS
#5124 closed
Apr 16, 2025
2 Issues opened by 2 people
-
Improve the opam file comparison to avoid unnecessary rebuild
#6480 opened
Apr 21, 2025 -
Opam fails to download cygwin shasum
#6474 opened
Apr 16, 2025
6 Unresolved conversations
Sometimes conversations happen on old items that aren’t yet closed. Here is a list of all the Issues and Pull Requests with unresolved conversations.
-
Complete format upgrade mechanism at repo & switch level
#6417 commented on
Apr 18, 2025 • 2 new comments -
Windows: problems installing packages that manifest via `Sys_error("...\CMD.exe: Invalid argument")` e.g. CMD=python3
#6395 commented on
Apr 16, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Add documentation about default compiler change at init
#6407 commented on
Apr 22, 2025 • 0 new comments -
ci: add depexts test for Altlinux
#6277 commented on
Apr 22, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Change 'opam switch create <version>' to look for packages listed in default-compiler instead of any compiler packages
#6465 commented on
Apr 22, 2025 • 0 new comments -
Prevent 'opam switch create <version>' from looking for packages mentioning any of the builtin eval-variables
#6466 commented on
Apr 22, 2025 • 0 new comments