Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reimplement depth variables as variables #472

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2021

Conversation

lukemaurer
Copy link

@lukemaurer lukemaurer commented Jun 16, 2021

Depth variables will now work exactly like variables in most respects.
Like a normal variable, a depth variable has a type with an Flambda
kind, only the kind must be the new kind Rec_info established in #465.

lukemaurer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2021
@lukemaurer lukemaurer force-pushed the depth-vars-as-vars branch from a7bf516 to 5a59f2c Compare June 17, 2021 10:45
lukemaurer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
@lukemaurer lukemaurer force-pushed the depth-vars-as-vars branch from 5a59f2c to f219239 Compare June 21, 2021 16:50
@lukemaurer lukemaurer changed the title Reimplement depth variables by wrapping variables Reimplement depth variables as variables Jun 21, 2021
@lukemaurer lukemaurer force-pushed the depth-vars-as-vars branch 2 times, most recently from 6bdae77 to e92a5e1 Compare June 21, 2021 17:02
lukemaurer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2021
This includes #472.
Depth variables will now work exactly like variables in most respects.
Like a normal variable, a depth variable has a type with an Flambda
kind, only the kind must be the new kind `Rec_info` established in #465.
@lukemaurer lukemaurer force-pushed the depth-vars-as-vars branch from e92a5e1 to 174a2a0 Compare June 25, 2021 09:52
lukemaurer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2021
This includes #472.
@mshinwell mshinwell merged commit e9c60d4 into flambda2.0-stable Jun 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants