[Decision] Four DataSource methods now declare a string record id and findOne still declares string | number — does ruling B reach the two AUTHORABLE keys (recordId / resourceId, six declarations) that feed it?

维护者速读

实现 objectui#9333 的裁决时,量到两条和裁决前提相反的事实,按纪律照字面执行了裁决,同时把冲突立成本卡,并且 ⛔ PR objectui#9501 不挂 auto-merge,留异议窗口。

事情很简单:裁决说「把记录 id 收窄成字符串」,并预计 examples/byo-backend-console 会因此报错需要跟进。实测:那个报错不存在,一个也没有。TypeScript 比较接口方法参数时是双向的,所以收窄一个接口参数根本到不了实现方——树内证据是两个适配器至今仍写着 string | number,照样满足接口。真正被打到的是调用方,那是裁决那句话没有描述的另一群人。

第二条:这次修复仍然改变了发出去的字节。主键是数字的客户,原来发 42,现在发 '42'。卡片当初拒绝转换的理由是「那是另一个查询」,而现在转换只是被挪到了一个有类型的地方,并没有被避免。

连带后果是:裁决只点名了 update 一个方法,但同一个接口上 findOne、delete、bulkUpdate、bulkDelete 的 id 还是宽的。于是今天这个接口上,一个方法的 id 是字符串,四个是「字符串或数字」。

请裁:A / B / C?

Filed by the domain:spec @ objectui execution seat, 2026-09-14T13:2xZ, under the standing rule that contrary facts measured while implementing a ruling are executed literally and then carried to the decision inbox. ⛔ The seat has not decided anything and ⛔ has not reverted anything: objectui#9501 implements the ruling as written.

Background

Card objectui#9333 carries a maintainer ruling (director batch #129 item 5, 「其他同意」) to narrow the record-id declarations. PR objectui#9501 implements it. Two of the ruling's own stated premises do not survive measurement.

Governing text

Ruling item 2 names DataSource.update only. Search for a prior ruling on the DataSource id type surface: terms DataSource id string number narrowing ruling record identifier → 0 hits. ⚠️ That zero is backed by a same-corpus, same-style control (recordId RecordContext record identifier narrowing → 2 hits, including decision card objectui#5330), so it is a real absence and not a dead query.

Premises, and the measurements that contradict them

Premise 1 — "narrowing the interface parameter creates a residual in examples/byo-backend-console". FALSE. That program type-checks exit 0. TypeScript compares method parameters bivariantly, so narrowing an interface parameter never reaches implementors at all. In-tree proof: ApiDataSource.update and ValueDataSource.update both still declare id: string | number and both still satisfy DataSource. The narrowing reaches callers — a different population from the one the ruling's sentence describes. packages/core reported exactly one error, at a call site.

Premise 2 — "this avoids the conversion, which would be a different query". PARTIALLY FALSE. The ruled repair still moves bytes on the wire: a host with a numeric primary key now sends '42' where it sent 42. The conversion is relocated to one typed place, not avoided.

Consequence the ruling does not cover. The principle does not terminate at the declarations the ruling enumerates. Six consumer sites were red, each because a further declaration one layer in was also wider than the protocol (TransactionOperation.id, UserPreferenceRecord.id, resolveRecordId's return). The same question is asked again by DataSource.findOne (data.ts:392), delete (:435), bulkUpdate and bulkDelete — all still string | number, while update (:420) is now string.

⚠️ Neither measurement is an accept-set widening and no key became writable, so nothing here is a security or permissions question.

Re-check commands

git show origin/main:packages/types/src/data.ts | sed -n '388,440p'     # :392 findOne, :420 update, :435 delete
(cd examples/byo-backend-console && pnpm run type-check); echo "exit=$?" # expect 0

The question

Today one method on DataSource declares a string id and four declare string | number. What is the contract?

A — Ratify the literal ruling. update narrows; findOne, delete, bulkUpdate, bulkDelete stay wide. Customer-visible: numeric-PK hosts see '42' on update calls and 42 on the others.
B — Extend the narrowing to the whole DataSource id surface in a follow-up card. One id type across all five methods. Customer-visible: numeric-PK hosts see '42' everywhere, consistently, once.
C — Reverse: keep string | number on the contract and put the conversion at the adapter boundary instead. Customer-visible: the wire shape is preserved exactly as today.

Business meaning, in plain terms

A = ship a rule that applies to one of five doors and leave the other four as they were. Cheapest today; the inconsistency is permanent until someone else pays for it.
B = decide that a record id is a string at the platform boundary, and make all five doors say so. One behaviour change, once, everywhere.
C = decide the platform keeps accepting both shapes and does the conversion itself at the edge, so no customer's wire traffic changes at all.

Four-facet analysis

① 项目长远合理性:B 收敛特例,A 扩大。今天这个接口上「一个方法字符串、四个方法字符串或数字」本身就是一条新增的特例,而且是永久的——任何读这个接口的人都得先问「这个方法是哪一种」。B 把五扇门统一成一条规则;C 也统一,但把宽类型永久写进已发布契约,等于承诺长期维护两种形状。两年后的终态:主流平台(Salesforce、Airtable、Supabase)在 API 边界一律暴露字符串记录 id,即使底层主键是数字——B 就是这个建模。
② 实际业务拉动:⚠️ 未实测。今天是否有主键为数字的部署客户会看到 '42' 取代 42,本容器量不到。拉动为零时默认 defer,但这里不是零拉动而是未知拉动,两者不同:A 已经让一部分客户看到了字节变化,所以「什么都不做」并不存在。
③ 防 AI 犯错:混合面是典型的静默陷阱。一个 agent 读了 delete 的签名,学到的结论和 update 的正好相反,而两者在同一个接口、相隔十几行。闭合枚举优于自由结构:B 给出一条可以背下来的规则,A 给出一张必须逐个查的表。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:B 是一次性付清;A 是把一笔债留在已发布契约上,并且每新增一个 id 参数都要重新问一次「这个跟 update 还是跟 delete」。已声明的每个键都是永久义务,两种并存的形状是两份义务。

Prior rulings read: DataSource id string number narrowing ruling record identifier → 0 hits (control: recordId RecordContext record identifier narrowing → 2 hits, incl. objectui#5330); none

推荐:B。自检行「只看①选 B;②③④ 是否翻转:否」 — ②未实测不构成翻转理由,③④ 与 ① 同向。

回退项:A,如果维护者判断现在不值得动其余四个方法;A 是今天已经落地的状态,回退成本为零。

置信缺口(本分析看不见的):① 是否有部署客户的主键是数字,因而会在线上看到 '42';② 服务端是否接受字符串化的数字 id——两者都需要本容器以外的读数。⛔ 在这两项量到之前,B 的「一次性付清」是按代码面推的,不是按客户面推的。

裁后执行段

裁 A ⇒ 本卡关闭 not_planned,objectui#9501 照常走复核落地,update 与其余四方法的不对称记进 packages/types/src/data.ts 的 docblock,使下一个读者不必重新发现它。
裁 B ⇒ 本卡转 pm:queue 作为后续卡,objectui#9501 先落地(它已经是 B 的第一步),其余四方法与其调用方残留另开一单;⛔ 不塞进 objectui#9501。
裁 C ⇒ objectui#9501 需要反向修改,届时它当前的复核作废;⛔ 本席不会在无裁决的情况下动它。

Downstream

PR objectui#9501 is NOT enqueued and will not be auto-merged while this card is open — that is the dissent window the standing rule requires when implementation measures contrary facts. ⛔ The PR is not reverted and ⛔ nothing in it was promoted or rolled back; it implements the ruling literally, which is what the rule directs.

Refs: objectui#9333 (the ruled card) · objectui#9501 (the implementing PR) · packages/types/src/data.ts:392/:420/:435

Generated by Claude Code

⏳ 这个窗口不是免费的 —— 一条与裁决无关、但与「什么时候裁」有关的读数

domain:spec @ objectui seat, 2026-09-14T13:5xZ. ⛔ 不催裁,也不改变本卡任何一个字;只是把等待的代价量出来,因为它今天变了。

PR objectui#9501 现在是全绿的:head b58b36ecc1d9012fcf85cde1a0a4601df006be57,36/36 返回且相等,0 非绿,0 仍在跑。按纪律它不入队,因为本卡开着 —— 这是异议窗口,本席照做。

⚠️ 但同一次读数里有一个新数字:那一跑的 Test (shard 1/4) 用了 1199.0 秒,天花板是 1200 秒 —— 余量 1.0 秒,而它通过了。同矩阵的另外三片是 805s / 749s / 964s。这是 objectui#9499(priority:p1)记录以来最薄的一次余量,该卡原本记的最薄是 ~24 秒。

⇒ 实际后果一句话:这个 PR 每多推一次,那片 19.98 分钟的测试就重掷一次骰子。 窗口开着期间 main 在走,合并 main 就换 head,换 head 就重跑。0.09% 的波动就会让它 cancelled,而合并队列把 cancelled 读成失败。

⛔ 这段话不主张什么

⛔ 不主张因此该快点裁。裁决的对错跟 CI 的余量无关,这条读数不是论据,是价格标签。
⛔ 不主张绕过窗口、不主张现在入队、不主张动 timeout-minutes(ci.yml:641 已否掉,不重开)。
⛔ 不主张 A/B/C 里的任何一个。推荐仍然是正文里那个「只看①选 B」,理由不变。

三个选项在这条读数下的实际时序,照实说

裁 A ⇒ 今天这个 head 就能走复核落地,重掷次数最少。
裁 B ⇒ objectui#9501 照样先落地(它已经是 B 的第一步),其余四个方法另开一单 —— 对本 PR 的时序与 A 相同。
裁 C ⇒ objectui#9501 要反向改,必然换 head、必然重跑、当前复核作废。

⇒ 三者之间的差别不在「等多久」,而在 C 需要重做而 A/B 不需要。⛔ 这不改变哪个方向是对的。

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling: batch #136 item 5 · letter B · maintainer 「同意」 2026-09-15T15:20Z

Director seat, session session_01WCEaPsmKY4UyoivKkkaUHt. Presented on 2026-09-15 with this seat's own recommendation B; the maintainer's one-word reply adopts the batch as recommended. PR objectui#9501 (the literal update narrowing) merged at 2026-09-14T15:20Z and is the first step of B; nothing is reverted.

What is ruled

B — a record id at the DataSource boundary is a string, on every method: findOne, delete, bulkUpdate, bulkDelete narrow to match update (packages/types/src/data.ts :392 / :435 and the bulk pair), together with the one-layer-in declarations the dev found wider than the protocol (TransactionOperation.id, UserPreferenceRecord.id, resolveRecordId's return) and their call sites. Numeric-PK hosts send '42' consistently; the conversion lives in one typed place.
A (leave four of five doors wide) and C (revert to string | number) are refused.
Changeset: minor on the affected @object-ui/* packages with the BREAKING banner and the ADR-0087 disposition line, per the launch-window convention (pre-GA retirement ships minor).

Execution

This card is the follow-up card: needs-user-decision → pm:queue, domain:spec @ objectui (added in the same write — the card was filed bare), no assignee. Clause-②: yes at claim (published type faces narrow). Acceptance: all five DataSource id parameters read string; examples/byo-backend-console and packages/core type-check exit 0 after the call-site pass; the data.ts docblock states the one rule.

Prior rulings read: datasource,record,id,string,number,identifier → 73 hits; ADR-0058 D2, ADR-0068 D1, ADR-0094 D1, ADR-0111 D5 — none governs this card; objectui#9333's ruling (batch #129 item 5) is the governing ruling, extended here to the whole surface.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim:
Session: session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L
Branch: claude/issue-9511-datasource-id-string
Worktree: /home/user/wt/9511
Domain: domain:spec
Seat: domain:spec#1
File surface: packages/types/src/data.ts (the four remaining DataSource id parameters), the one-layer-in declarations the ruling names (TransactionOperation.id, UserPreferenceRecord.id, resolveRecordId's return) wherever they live, their call sites in packages/core and elsewhere, examples/byo-backend-console if it reddens, a pin under packages/types/src/__tests__/, and a changeset under .changeset/.
Container & model: this container; dispatch seat serves claude-opus-5, dev runs as an os-dev subagent in the same container.
Clause-②: yes
Thread-read: read to the last page at the stamp below — the seat's own cost reading 5665093051, director ruling batch #136 item 5 letter B with maintainer 「同意」 5682893230, triage grading to priority:p2 5705791461. No comment after the grading.
Serial constraints cleared: intersected against the two other cards claimed in this batch. objectui#9606 lands on packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts and packages/types/src/objectql.ts; objectui#9701 lands on packages/types/src/base.ts / zod/disclosure.zod.ts and packages/components/src/renderers/disclosure/collapsible.tsx. Intersection with this card's declared surface is empty on both pairs. ⚠️ The call-site pass this ruling requires is the one part of the surface that cannot be fully enumerated before the narrowing compiles, so the dispatch order requires the dev to report every file it actually touched; if that set reaches a file another in-flight card declares, this card yields and lands after it.

Premises re-verified on today's `origin/main` `2923cea165`, before the dispatch order was written

packages/types/src/data.ts, read by symbol:

method	id declaration today	ruling's expectation
`update`	`id: string`	already narrowed by the merged first step — HOLDS
`findOne`	`id: string \| number`	still wide — HOLDS
`delete`	`id: string \| number`	still wide — HOLDS
`bulkUpdate`	`ids: ReadonlyArray<string \| number>`	still wide — HOLDS
`bulkDelete`	`ids: ReadonlyArray<string \| number>`	still wide — HOLDS

⇒ the half-landed state the ruling exists to end is exactly the state on main today: one door narrow, four wide.

⚠️ Line addresses in the ruling have drifted and the dispatch order says so. The ruling cites :392 / :420 / :435; today findOne is at :392 (unmoved), update at :423 and delete at :438 — both +3. The dev is told to locate every one of the five by symbol and never by the cited line, and to write the changeset the same way.

_{Read at 2026-09-17T17:33Z.}

Generated by Claude Code

The fifth door cannot be closed by an implementation — independently verified

Seat: domain:spec#1 · Session: session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L

PR objectui#9712 lands four of the five doors ruling B names — delete, bulkUpdate, bulkDelete, plus fetchOne which the compiler added to the list — and deliberately leaves DataSource.findOne at string | number, carrying Part of #9511 rather than a closing keyword. ⛔ That is not this seat choosing letter A, which the ruling refused. It is the 回翻 clause: implementing B turns out to require a decision the ruling did not make.

The measurement the stop rests on — re-drawn by this seat, not taken from the report

The dev reported two authorable metadata keys behind findOne's remaining call sites. Re-read on origin/main, the surface is wider than the report says:

declaration	file	today
`ObjectFormSchema.recordId`	`packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts`	`z.union([z.string(), z.number()])`
`ObjectFormSchema.recordId`	`packages/types/src/objectql.ts`	`recordId?: string \| number`
`DetailViewSchema.resourceId`	`packages/types/src/zod/crud.zod.ts`	`z.union([z.string(), z.number()])`
`DetailViewSchema.resourceId`	`packages/types/src/zod/views.zod.ts`	`z.union([z.string(), z.number()])`
`DetailViewSchema.resourceId`	`packages/types/src/crud.ts`	`resourceId?: string \| number`
`DetailViewSchema.resourceId`	`packages/types/src/views.ts`	`resourceId?: string \| number`

⇒ two keys, but six published declarations across four files — the report named two keys and left the count of declaration sites unstated, and resourceId in particular is declared twice on each face.

Controls on the same instrument: lit — objectName: z.string() reads in the same file, so a string-only key is visible there and the union readings are real; absent — a nonsense key reads 0, exit 1.

Why that makes it a decision and not an implementation

Closing findOne forces one of two things, and the ruling authorises neither:

Narrow those six declarations ⇒ author JSON that validates today stops validating. That is an accept-set narrowing on a published authoring face — Clause-②, and on this board's human floor. Ruling B never names recordId or resourceId.
Convert at each reader ⇒ directly contradicts the ruling's own stated aim, "the conversion lives in one typed place".

⚠️ There is a second, independent reason the dev was right to stop: packages/types/src/objectql.ts and its zod mirror are the declared file surface of in-flight card objectui#9606. This card's dispatch order told it to stop and report rather than edit them, and it did.

What is already true, and what it costs

⭐ Cost attribution from the dev, and it is the number that matters: with findOne alone widened back and the other three doors narrowed, the whole repo builds — Tasks: 43 successful, 43 total, exit 0. ⇒ delete, bulkUpdate and bulkDelete have zero in-tree call sites that had to change. The entire call-site cost of this card belongs to findOne.

So the cheap four-fifths is done and the expensive fifth is isolated, which is the best shape this could have taken.

⚠️ What this leaves on the board, stated plainly

Merging objectui#9712 leaves the interface at four doors narrow, one wide — a different asymmetry from the one triage graded p2, and still an asymmetry. ⛔ This seat does not rule on it and ⛔ will not close this card on that PR: the missing closing keyword is correct and deliberate.

The findOne half goes back to the decision box as its own question once objectui#9712 is dispositioned — ⛔ never silently re-adjudicated here, per the standing rule that a card whose implementation discovers the contract must move after all returns to the maintainer.

_{Read at 2026-09-17T18:14Z, on origin/main 396a1c1989; PR head c7dee5753444.}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9511,
  "status": "needs_decision",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9511-datasource-id-string",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/9712",
  "session": "session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "The card's own premise held exactly: on 2923cea165 `update` read `string` and the other four doors read wide, by symbol. Three of the four doors closed with zero call sites to repair — `delete`, `bulkUpdate`, `bulkDelete` — plus `UseViewDataResult.fetchOne` in `@object-ui/react`, which the compiler added to the ruling's one-layer-in list. The `DataSource` docblock now states the one rule. TWO RULING PREMISES DID NOT SURVIVE. (1) The ruling asks for `TransactionOperation.id`, `UserPreferenceRecord.id` and `resolveRecordId`'s return to narrow 'together with' the four doors; all three were ALREADY narrowed by the merged objectui#9501 — nothing left to do there. (2) The ruling treats the remaining work as a type-side call-site pass. It is not, for `findOne`: its eight remaining call sites resolve to two AUTHORABLE metadata keys (`ObjectFormSchema.recordId`, `DetailViewSchema.resourceId`) whose zod mirrors accept a number today, so closing that door is either an accept-set narrowing on a published authoring face or a conversion at each reader — neither named by the ruling. `findOne` therefore stays wide on this branch, with the reason written into the docblock, and the choice is carried back here. Second, independent block on the same half: `packages/types/src/objectql.ts` and `packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts` are the declared file surface of in-flight card objectui#9606, and the dispatch order says to yield rather than edit them. The PR is `Part of #9511`, not a closing reference: the card is not finished.",
  "tests": "ALL exit codes captured to disk before any pipe. turbo run build type-check --filter='!@object-ui/site' --concurrency=2 --continue -> exit 0, 'Tasks: 88 successful, 88 total'. examples/byo-backend-console pnpm run type-check -> exit 0. packages/core pnpm run type-check -> exit 0. vitest run packages/types/ packages/react/ -> exit 0, 'Test Files 290 passed (290)', 'Tests 5778 passed (5778)'. vitest run packages/data-objectstack/ + plugin-grid useBulkExecutor + plugin-list bulkDeleteVisibleWhen -> exit 0, '68 passed', '918 passed'. lint (types, react) -> exit 0, '362 problems (0 errors, 362 warnings)', all pre-existing. check-changeset-presence -> exit 0; check-changeset-no-major -> exit 0 ('No changeset declares a major bump.'); check-changeset-fixed -> exit 0; check-new-cross-file-line-citations -> exit 0 ('0 new citation(s)'); check-control-bytes -> exit 0. OPPOSITE-ANSWER PROBE (temporary file under packages/types/src/__tests__/, removed before the first commit, compiled by tsc -p packages/types/tsconfig.test.json): BEFORE the narrowing exit 0 — all four numeric-id calls accepted; LIT CONTROL in the same file and the same run, `update` (already narrow on main), produced exactly one TS2345, so the four zeros are a real absence. AFTER the narrowing exit 2 — findOne TS2345, delete TS2345, bulkUpdate TS2322, bulkDelete TS2322, with the four string calls beside them still legal. ABLATION of the new pin (packages/types/src/__tests__/data-source-id-surface-9511.test.ts), run from a COMMITTED tree with a trap and absolute paths: mutation widened delete's id; landing proven on disk (injected spelling count 1, size 53257 -> 53266, blob 805d1269 -> 619d0d9a); ablated vitest exit 1 ('Tests 1 failed | 8 passed', message 'DataSource.delete declares a record id wider than the protocol.'); ablated tsc exit 1 (TS2344 on the Equal row AND TS2578 unused @ts-expect-error on the call-site control — both designed failure modes); restored with git checkout HEAD -- packages/types/src/data.ts, restoration proven by blob equality (805d1269 both sides) and an empty git diff HEAD. COST ATTRIBUTION ABLATION: with findOne alone widened back and the other three doors narrowed, the whole repo builds — 'Tasks: 43 successful, 43 total', exit 0 — so delete/bulkUpdate/bulkDelete cost zero call sites and the entire call-site cost of this card belongs to findOne. Same trap/restore proof. ACCEPT-SET MEASUREMENT against the BUILT zod mirrors with lit controls: ObjectFormSchema.safeParse({recordId: 42}) -> TRUE and keeps 42 as a number; recordId '42' -> TRUE; LIT CONTROL recordId {} -> FALSE (invalid_union). DetailViewSchema.safeParse({resourceId: 42}) -> TRUE; LIT CONTROL {} -> FALSE.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called; every GitHub write went through the REST proxy with curl/urllib.",
  "api_writes": "4 effective (5 attempts): POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (201, PR 9712 draft); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9712/labels (415, wrote nothing — curl default content type); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9712/labels (200, needs:contract-review, read back present); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (this report). git push -u origin claude/issue-9511-datasource-id-string is a git write, not a REST write.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "`DataSource.findOne` cannot narrow without a decision the ruling does not contain. Its eight remaining call sites read two AUTHORABLE metadata keys — `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` (six readers in @object-ui/plugin-form) and `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` (two readers in @object-ui/plugin-detail) — whose zod mirrors accept a number today (measured TRUE with a lit control). What closes the door?",
      "options": [
        "A — Narrow the authoring faces too: `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` and `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` become string on both the TS declaration and the zod mirror. Cost: author JSON that validates today stops validating (an accept-set narrowing, Clause-② in its own right), and it edits packages/types/src/objectql.ts + zod/objectql.zod.ts, which in-flight card objectui#9606 declares — so it can only start after 9606 lands. Note the mirror-parity operator forces the pair: `WiderThanDeclaredKeys` reports a mirror wider than its declaration, so a TS-only narrowing is refused unless the drift is recorded in that ledger.",
        "B — Convert at each reader: String(schema.recordId) at the six plugin-form findOne calls and the two plugin-detail ones. Touches no other card's files and no accept set. Cost: it contradicts the ruling's own 'the conversion lives in one typed place'. Evidence that it is not alien to the tree: DetailView.tsx already spells String(schema.resourceId) at seven other sites and the two red lines are the only ones passing it raw.",
        "C — Leave `findOne` wide permanently and amend the rule to 'string on every write door; findOne also accepts the authored key as-is'. Cost: the asymmetry this card exists to end survives, in a smaller and better-documented form."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A, sequenced after objectui#9606, IF the maintainer accepts an accept-set narrowing on those two authoring keys — it is the only option that leaves one rule rather than a rule plus an exception, and the ruling's own reasoning (a consumer type may not be wider than the protocol) applies verbatim to an authoring key that feeds a record door. ⛔ I did not pick it: it refuses author JSON that validates today, which is a customer-visible accept-set change no ruling on this card names. If the maintainer will not move the accept set, B is the cheap correct answer and C is the honest cheap-and-wrong one."
    },
    {
      "question": "Should the three closed doors land now, or wait for the `findOne` decision so the whole surface moves in one release?",
      "options": [
        "A — Land PR 9712 now (green, zero call sites, changeset declares the break). The docblock names the one open door and why, so the intermediate state is documented rather than rediscovered.",
        "B — Hold PR 9712 in draft until findOne is decided and ship all five doors in one minor."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. This ruling is already being executed in steps — objectui#9501 landed `update` alone and the ruling itself calls it 'the first step of B' — so a second step is the established shape here, not a re-adjudication. Holding it also re-throws the CI dice on a 19.98-minute shard for no contract gain (the seat's own cost reading on this card)."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: `packages/types/src/data.ts` carries an ORPHANED docblock — the 'Universal data source interface' comment sits about seventy lines above `export interface DataSource`, immediately before the `GlobalSearchHit` comment, so `DataSource` itself had no attached doc at all and tooling shows none. This is why the ruled rule went into a NEW block attached to the interface instead of into that one. Not filed: a doc-placement defect is a different class from a wide id union, it is not reproducible as a wrong instruction to an author, and no in-flight PR or reader is blocked by it. Successor who would hit this file: none identified.",
    "noted, not filed: the ruling's three named one-layer-in declarations (`TransactionOperation.id`, `UserPreferenceRecord.id`, `resolveRecordId`'s return) were already narrowed by the merged objectui#9501, so that clause of the ruling had nothing left to execute. Recorded here rather than filed because it is a ruling-text/tree drift, not a defect in the tree."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code in session session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9511,
  "status": "needs_decision",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9511-datasource-id-string",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/9712",
  "session": "session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "supersedes": "the os-dev-report comment earlier on this card — its `findOne` census was wrong and is corrected here; everything else in it stands",
  "summary": "Re-push after the at-tier contract review FAILED on F1. The failing claim — that `findOne`'s remaining readers resolve to two authorable metadata keys, six of them in @object-ui/plugin-form — shipped in three places (the `@object-ui/types` docblock, the changeset, the PR body) and is now rewritten in all three from my own re-derivation. The true split of the eight remaining call sites: THREE read authorable keys (`ObjectForm` -> `ObjectFormSchema.recordId`; `DetailView` x2 -> `DetailViewSchema.resourceId`), FIVE read a `recordId` declared on their own exported face (`DrawerForm`, `ModalForm`, `SplitForm`, `TabbedForm`, `WizardForm`), and those five faces are TypeScript-only — the same class as `fetchOne`. DECISION TAKEN on the reviewer's item 3: the five WAIT, for a measured reason rather than the wrong one I shipped — `ObjectForm` BUILDS all five of those schemas from its own authorable `ObjectFormSchema`, so narrowing them alone does not remove a refusal, it moves it onto five hand-off sites (TS2322 at each, measured). They travel with the authorable decision instead of ahead of it. ⛔ The three authorable faces were not touched. ⛔ The three-door narrowing, the pin, the semver level, the BREAKING banner and the ADR-0087 disposition line are unchanged. ⛔ PR still draft, not enqueued, no auto-merge; `needs:contract-review` still hung on both card and PR.",
  "tests": "CENSUS RE-DERIVED, my own corpus, with lit controls. (a) zod-mirror occurrences under `packages/types/src/zod/`: DrawerFormSchema 0, ModalFormSchema 0, SplitFormSchema 0, TabbedFormSchema 0, WizardFormSchema 0; LIT CONTROL ObjectFormSchema = 5. (b) node-type string literal outside tests under `packages/*/src` + `apps/*/src`: 'drawer-form' 0, 'modal-form' 0, 'split-form' 0, 'tabbed-form' 0, 'wizard-form' 0; LIT CONTROL 'object-form' = 34. Both instruments fire, so the zeros are readings. (c) all five are exported from `packages/plugin-form/src/index.tsx`, so they are published faces and the narrowing would be a real (TypeScript-only) break. ⚠️ My control figures differ from the ones in the coordinator's message (5 vs 3, 34 vs 70) because the swept corpus differs; the shape is the same and I report what I measured. NEW PROBE — can the five narrow on their own? Mutation: the five `recordId?: string | number` rewritten to `string`; landing proven on disk (files carrying the injected spelling = 5, files left wide = 0) BEFORE anything was read. Build of plugin-form + plugin-designer: plugin-form FAILED with TS2322 at ObjectForm.tsx lines 326, 398, 434, 469, 505 — one per delegated form, each reading \"Types of property 'recordId' are incompatible\"; plugin-designer's failures in the same run are cascade (TS7016, no plugin-form dist). Restored with `git checkout HEAD -- ` on the five paths; restoration proven by an empty `git status --short` and an empty `git diff HEAD`. GATES ON THE NEW HEAD (30badd8c0): the `.ts` half of this round's diff is provably comment-only — `git diff HEAD` on data.ts has ZERO changed lines outside the block comment — so the previous full run (turbo build type-check, 'Tasks: 88 successful, 88 total', exit 0) still covers the rest of the repo. Re-run here: `pnpm --filter @object-ui/types run build` exit 0; `... run type-check` exit 0; `vitest run` on both pin files exit 0, 'Test Files 2 passed (2)', 'Tests 14 passed (14)'; check-changeset-presence exit 0; check-changeset-no-major exit 0. All exit codes captured before any pipe.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called in either round.",
  "api_writes": "this round, 2: PATCH /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/9712 (200, body rewritten) and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (this report). No label write was needed — read back, both carriers still hang `needs:contract-review` (PR 9712 and card 9511). git push is a git write, not a REST write. ⚠️ The PATCH reproduced the documented body mutation: EXACTLY +58 bytes, a second BARE attribution footer appended below the session-URL one. Read back and diffed: that append is the ONLY difference between sent and stored; nothing was eaten. Not repaired — re-posting the footer in a loop is what the rule forbids, and the session id is also carried in prose in the body.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "Unchanged and still the only open decision: `DataSource.findOne` cannot narrow without choosing how its three authorable readers are served — `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` (objectql.ts + zod mirror, objectui#9606's file surface) and `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` (views.ts + zod/views.zod.ts). Both mirrors accept a number today, measured TRUE with a lit control. The five TypeScript-only plugin-form faces are now measured to be downstream of the same decision, not independent of it.",
      "options": [
        "A — Narrow the authoring faces: `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` and `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` on both the TS declaration and the zod mirror, then the five TypeScript-only faces and `findOne` fall out for free. Cost: author JSON that validates today stops validating; must wait for objectui#9606 to land first. ⚠️ Note a third declaration of the same key that no red site reads — `DetailSchema.resourceId` in crud.ts + zod/crud.zod.ts — four declaration sites of `resourceId` across four files, owned by two symbols; whoever takes A should decide whether the crud.ts pair moves with it.",
        "B — Convert at a reader. Cheapest place measured is `ObjectForm`'s five hand-off sites plus its own findOne call, and `DetailView`'s two. Touches no other card's files and no accept set.",
        "C — Leave `findOne` wide permanently and amend the rule to name the exception."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A, sequenced after objectui#9606, IF the maintainer accepts the accept-set narrowing; otherwise B. ⛔ Not mine to pick. ⚠️ Correction to my previous report: I argued route B was excluded by the ruling's 'the conversion lives in one typed place'. That was too strong — that sentence describes the numeric-PK host's own adapter, not reader normalisation. B is a live option, and its cost is spread-out conversion sites, not a ruling violation."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: `packages/types/src/data.ts` carries an ORPHANED docblock — the 'Universal data source interface' comment sits far above `export interface DataSource`, immediately before the `GlobalSearchHit` comment, so the interface had no attached doc. Unchanged from the previous report; still not filed, still the reason the rule went into a new attached block.",
    "noted, not filed: the ruling's three named one-layer-in declarations were already narrowed by the merged objectui#9501.",
    "recorded, NOT acted on (the coordinator's F4, and it is theirs to card): more wide one-layer-in mirrors exist — `useBulkExecutor`, `createOfflineDataSource`, `DataSourceMutationEvent.id`. Not named by the ruling, not compelled by the compiler on this branch, not widened into.",
    "correction to my previous report's F3 number, with the definition that produced each reading: `DetailView.tsx` spells `String(schema.resourceId)` literally at FOUR sites (539, 741, 749, 766); it converts a resourceId-bearing expression at SEVEN (adding 292 and 357, which read `String(rawSchema.resourceId)`, and 649, which reads `String(resourceId)`). My earlier report gave 7 without saying which definition it counted. Neither number is in any published text, and per the standing note this one stays out of the docblock and the changeset."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code in session session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9511,
  "status": "needs_decision",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9511-datasource-id-string",
  "head": "4cf1aff34",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/9712",
  "session": "session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "supersedes": "the os-dev-report comment 5719568446 on this card — only the changeset clause below changed; every other reading in it stands unmodified",
  "summary": "Re-review PASSED; one clause came back and is now landed. The changeset's summary line said this entry closes three doors 'and the one consumer declaration that fed them'. `UseViewDataResult.fetchOne` feeds `findOne` — the door this entry deliberately leaves OPEN — so the summary contradicted its own bullet two lines lower, and a changeset body publishes verbatim into the CHANGELOG. Reworded to name the declaration and the door it actually feeds. ⛔ Nothing else in that file changed: the diff is a single hunk, 3 insertions / 2 deletions, in `.changeset/9511-datasource-record-id-string.md` alone. ⛔ Nothing about the contract reopened, ⛔ still draft, ⛔ not enqueued, ⛔ no auto-merge. The PR body never carried the false claim (verified against the LIVE body, not my local copy), so it needed no edit. `needs:contract-review` read back and still hung on both card 9511 and PR 9712.",
  "tests": "Diff shape verified before anything else: `git diff --stat` = 1 file changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions; the full hunk was printed and read. Gates re-run on the new head, exit codes captured before any pipe: check-changeset-presence exit 0 ('3 source file(s) of 2 released package(s) changed, and this change declares 1 changeset(s)'); check-changeset-no-major exit 0 ('No changeset declares a major bump.'); check-changeset-fixed exit 0; check-pending-changeset-literals exit 0 ('No test source names a pending changeset.'); check-changeset-claims exit 0 ('No pending changeset names a file this change touches.', read against 1126 pending declarations that publish a body); check-control-bytes exit 0 (7814 tracked text files). No source file changed this round, so the previous full run (turbo build type-check, 'Tasks: 88 successful, 88 total', exit 0) and the pin runs stand untouched. Live-state read-back: PR 9712 draft=true, state=open, head=4cf1aff34; the retracted census phrase is absent from the live body.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called in any round of this card.",
  "api_writes": "this round, 1: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (this report). No PR body PATCH was needed and none was sent. No label write — both carriers read back already correct. git push is a git write, not a REST write.",
  "corrections_accepted_not_inherited": [
    "The `resourceId` declaration count: I reported four sites across four files as the answer to the COMPILER question, and that is what it answers. Taking the coordinator's correction: the six declarations sit in six files, and the crud pair is `DetailSchema`, not `DetailViewSchema`.",
    "⭐ My statement that the crud pair 'is not read by either red site' is true by TypeScript symbol and INCOMPLETE by data flow. `packages/plugin-detail/src/index.tsx` registers `'detail'` to `DetailView`, so an authored document of type `detail` carrying a numeric `resourceId`, validated by `crud.zod.ts`, lands on the same `DetailView` findOne call. That does not change the stop — it widens what option A has to decide, so option A must cover the crud pair as well as the views pair. Restated this way wherever I restate it; it is NOT in any published text on this branch, and I did not add it to one."
  ],
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "Unchanged, and not mine to resolve: `DataSource.findOne` cannot narrow without deciding how its authorable readers are served — `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` (objectql.ts + zod mirror, objectui#9606's declared file surface), `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` (views.ts + zod/views.zod.ts), and — by the data-flow reading above — `DetailSchema.resourceId` (crud.ts + zod/crud.zod.ts), which reaches the same `DetailView` call site through the `'detail'` registration.",
      "options": [
        "A — Narrow the authoring faces (all three pairs, per the data-flow reading) on both the TS declaration and the zod mirror; the five TypeScript-only plugin-form faces and `findOne` then fall out for free. Cost: author JSON that validates today stops validating, and it waits for objectui#9606.",
        "B — Convert at a reader: `ObjectForm`'s five hand-off sites plus its own findOne call, and `DetailView`'s two. Touches no other card's files and no accept set.",
        "C — Leave `findOne` wide permanently and amend the rule to name the exception."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A if the maintainer accepts the accept-set narrowing, otherwise B. ⛔ Not picked here."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "recorded, NOT touched (the coordinator's, and they are carding it): the zero-call-site reading for the bulk doors is true-by-cast — `useBulkExecutor`'s own face still declares wide ids and `ObjectGrid` feeds it a cast data source. Pre-existing, not introduced here, ⛔ not widened into on this branch.",
    "recorded, not acted on (F4): `useBulkExecutor`, `createOfflineDataSource`, `DataSourceMutationEvent.id` — more wide one-layer-in mirrors, not named by the ruling, not compelled by the compiler here.",
    "noted, not filed: the orphaned `DataSource` docblock in `packages/types/src/data.ts`, unchanged from the previous reports — still the reason the ruled rule went into a new attached block. Successor who would hit this file: none identified.",
    "noted, not filed: the ruling's three named one-layer-in declarations were already narrowed by the merged objectui#9501."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code in session session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round R+304
Session: session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn
Branch: claude/issue-9511-findone-record-id-string
Worktree: objectui-issue-9511
Domain: domain:spec
Seat: domain:spec#1
File surface: packages/types/src/data.ts + the six recordId / resourceId declarations the ruling names + their own pins under packages/types/src/__tests__/ (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT``
Clause-②: yes
Thread-read: 5749154869
Serial constraints cleared: ruling batch #195 item 1 landed on this card 2026-09-20T10:11Z — ~26 minutes before this claim, so the thread was re-read to that comment in the act that wrote this claim

Seat continuity. This seat changed hands this round: the predecessor (hotlong, session_01UanLVj6xvbS6puBCewLr8L) ran out of tokens and the maintainer handed the seat over with 「前任没有token了,你接手」. Batch ceiling is 5 per 「并发加到5」.

Why this tier. clause ② is declared yes deliberately: the ruling NARROWS, and narrowing does not trip the predicate, but references/lanes/spec.md states declaring yes is never an error — and an authorable-key narrowing across six declarations is worth the at-tier review it buys

⚠️ dispatch-gates.mjs --tier REFUSES for objectui (it derives families from the objectstack tree it runs in and says so outright), so this tier is hand-derived and that is declared rather than dressed up as a tool reading — ⛔ NOT MEASURED by --tier.

Scope exclusion. ⛔ NOT packages/types/src/zod/ (objectui#8345's strict-face module) and ⛔ NOT the three twin/mirror pairs (objectui#9736)

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9511,
  "status": "blocked",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9511-findone-record-id-string",
  "pr": null,
  "session": "session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "blocked_on": "FILE SURFACE. The ruling on this card cannot be executed inside the surface the dispatch grants (`packages/types/src/data.ts` + the six declarations + their pins under `packages/types/src/__tests__/`). Two breaches, both MEASURED rather than reasoned, and they are independent of each other: (1) `packages/types/src/zod/` holds the only thing that can satisfy the ruling's own acceptance pin; (2) `packages/plugin-form/src/` holds the five call sites that narrowing `findOne` breaks. Per the dispatch's own instruction — \"If you cannot finish without them, STOP and report\" — nothing was committed and the tree was restored byte-identical. PM decides the surface; this seat did not pick a side.",
  "summary": "Ruling comment 5749154869 read in full. Its operative clause: 「A record id is a **string** wherever metadata names one. The six declarations (`ObjectFormSchema.recordId`, `DetailViewSchema.resourceId`, `DetailSchema.resourceId` — TS declaration and zod mirror each) narrow to `string`, and so do `CommentEntry.recordId` and `MentionNotification.recordId` ... `DataSource.findOne` then narrows to `string` and the five TypeScript-only plugin-form faces fall out of `ObjectForm`'s own schema.」 Its pin clause: 「`{ type: 'detail', resourceId: 42 }` is refused with the prescription, `'42'` parses, and all five `DataSource` id parameters read `string`」. All three PM mechanism assumptions were re-taken on today's `origin/main` (BASE 0c2eb5eee029ecbc0c7d818d4bf49d3a370acea5) and all three HOLD. The card is blocked only on the granted file surface, not on any fact. Zero bytes delivered; branch pushed empty as the routing probe (exit 0).",
  "premise_recheck": {
    "assumption_1_four_doors_landed": "CONFIRMED on today's main by symbol over `packages/types/src/data.ts`: `ids: ReadonlyArray of string` = 2; `ReadonlyArray of (string or number)` = 0; `fetchOne: (id: string)` in `packages/react/src/hooks/useViewData.ts` = 1, the wide spelling = 0. [LIT CTRL] `DataSource` = 33, `findOne` = 4 in the same file. [ABSENT CTRL] `zzqNoSuchDoor` = 0. The 2026-09-17T20:09Z record's readings all reproduce.",
    "assumption_2_six_declarations_in_six_files": "CONFIRMED — my count is six, the same as the ruling's, and the three owning interfaces are the ones the ruling names. But EVERY line address in the 2026-09-17 comment has moved, so the set is restated by content: `ObjectFormSchema.recordId` optional string-or-number in `packages/types/src/objectql.ts` (was cited :1344, still :1344); `recordId: z.union([z.string(), z.number()])` in `packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts` (cited :328, now :362); `DetailSchema.resourceId` in `packages/types/src/crud.ts` (:283); its mirror in `packages/types/src/zod/crud.zod.ts` (:156); `DetailViewSchema.resourceId` in `packages/types/src/views.ts` (cited :701, now :755); its mirror in `packages/types/src/zod/views.zod.ts` (:150). ⇒ three files of the six are inside the EXCLUDED `packages/types/src/zod/` directory.",
    "assumption_3_commententry_and_mentionnotification": "SETTLED BY THE RULING, therefore IN scope — no fork to report. The ruling's own words: 「and so do `CommentEntry.recordId` and `MentionNotification.recordId` (the same principle; a knowing decision, as the seat asked for)」. Both were re-located by content in `packages/types/src/views.ts` (the comment's :461 / :483 are now :515 / :537); both are TypeScript-only — neither carries a zod mirror (`recordId: z.union` reads exactly 1 across `packages/types/src/zod/`, in `objectql.zod.ts`, and 0 in `views.zod.ts`)."
  },
  "breach_1_zod_directory": {
    "claim": "The ruling's acceptance pin is UNREACHABLE without editing `packages/types/src/zod/`. A TypeScript declaration does not run at parse time; the hand-written zod mirror is the only thing that refuses an authored number. So the dispatch grants 'the six declarations the ruling names' and then excludes three of those same six, and the excluded three are the load-bearing half.",
    "measured_baseline_on_the_built_dist": [
      "`{ type: 'detail', resourceId: 42 }` vs DetailSchema (crud.zod.ts) -> PARSES GREEN   [this is exactly the document the ruling requires to be refused]",
      "`{ type: 'detail', resourceId: '42' }` vs DetailSchema -> PARSES GREEN",
      "DetailViewSchema with resourceId 42 (views.zod.ts) -> PARSES GREEN",
      "DetailViewSchema with resourceId '42' -> PARSES GREEN",
      "ObjectFormSchema with recordId 42 (objectql.zod.ts) -> PARSES GREEN",
      "ObjectFormSchema with recordId '42' -> PARSES GREEN",
      "[LIT CTRL] ObjectFormSchema with objectName 42 (a string-only key on the SAME mirror and the same corpus) -> REFUSED, invalid_type at `objectName`",
      "[ABSENT CTRL] resourceId / recordId set to an object -> REFUSED, invalid_union at that key — so the instrument really reads that key and a green above is a real green"
    ],
    "consequence_if_the_exclusion_stands": "The TypeScript half could narrow while the mirror keeps accepting a number. That is `declared !== enforced` on a published surface — the exact class `packages/types/src/__tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.ts` documents and objectui#9736 files as a finding. ⚠️ And the parity gate would NOT catch it: that instrument asserts the mirror accepts everything the declaration declares, so a mirror that stays WIDER stays green. The defect would ship silently.",
    "collision_check_run_before_asking": "The exclusion's stated reason is objectui#8345's strict-face module being in flight. Re-measured: 9 open PRs on the repo, NONE of them objectui#8345's (no branch matching that card; the open set is 10054, 9877, 9592, 9584, 9540, 9488, 9391, 8941, 5400). So there is no live branch on those three files TODAY. ⛔ This seat does not treat that as authorisation — objectui#8345 is `pm:dispatched` + `pm:blocking` in this same batch, and it DERIVES a strict twin from these very mirrors, so narrowing a union inside them moves that card's measured refusal figures. That is a real cross-card interaction and it is PM's call, not mine."
  },
  "breach_2_plugin_form": {
    "claim": "Narrowing `DataSource.findOne` to `string` breaks five files in `packages/plugin-form/src/`, which the dispatch's surface does not grant at all, under any reading. The ruling names them (「the five TypeScript-only plugin-form faces」) but the dispatch's surface is `packages/types/...` only.",
    "how_measured": "Applied the in-surface narrowings ONLY (findOne in data.ts; the three TS declarations; plus CommentEntry and MentionNotification) and ran the repo build. Nothing out of surface was ever edited.",
    "verdict": "`pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=!@object-ui/site --concurrency=2` -> exit 1. Tasks: 24 successful, 29 total. Failed: @object-ui/plugin-form#build.",
    "the_five_errors_verbatim_by_file": [
      "src/DrawerForm.tsx(295,66): error TS2345: Argument of type 'string | number' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string'.",
      "src/ModalForm.tsx(373,66): error TS2345: same",
      "src/SplitForm.tsx(207,66): error TS2345: same",
      "src/TabbedForm.tsx(308,66): error TS2345: same",
      "src/WizardForm.tsx(497,66): error TS2345: same"
    ],
    "why_exactly_five_and_not_more": "Each of the five declares its OWN `recordId` as optional string-or-number on its own exported schema face and passes it straight into `dataSource.findOne(schema.objectName, schema.recordId)`. The `DataSource` docblock already predicted this set by name and the measurement reproduces it exactly. ⇒ the ruling's figure of five is right.",
    "every_other_findOne_call_site_checked_and_clean": "`packages/plugin-detail/src/DetailView.tsx` reads `schema.resourceId` off `DetailViewSchema` behind a truthiness guard, and its `altId` is built with `String(...)` — both become `string` once the declaration narrows. `packages/plugin-gantt/src/ObjectGantt.tsx` already passes `String(recordId)`. `packages/react/src/hooks/useViewData.ts` already declares `id: string`. `packages/app-shell/src/hooks/useObjectActions.ts` and `packages/app-shell/src/views/RecordDetailView.tsx` already hand the same variable to `DataSource.delete`, which narrowed to `string` at PR objectui#9712, so they are already string-clean. `packages/fields` goes through an `as any` cast. `apps/console` ProfilePage declares `userId: string`. ⇒ the complete out-of-surface compile set is those five files and nothing else. ⚠️ Caveat stated rather than hidden: the failed plugin-form task stopped 5 of 29 build tasks from running (`@object-ui/cli`, `@object-ui/create-plugin`, `@object-ui/data-objectstack` and the plugin-form dependents), so their verdicts are NOT MEASURED — the clean-call-site reading above is by-declaration, not by-compiler, for those."
  },
  "minimal_surface_to_grant_for_a_one_round_redispatch": [
    "packages/types/src/data.ts  (findOne + the docblock's 「findOne is still wide」 note) — ALREADY GRANTED",
    "packages/types/src/objectql.ts, crud.ts, views.ts  (the three TS declarations + CommentEntry + MentionNotification) — ALREADY GRANTED",
    "packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts, zod/crud.zod.ts, zod/views.zod.ts  (the three mirrors — the ONLY things that can refuse an authored 42) — CURRENTLY EXCLUDED, needed",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/DrawerForm.tsx, ModalForm.tsx, SplitForm.tsx, TabbedForm.tsx, WizardForm.tsx  (the five TS2345 call sites) — NOT GRANTED, needed",
    "packages/types/src/__tests__/data-source-id-surface-9511.test.ts  (the findOne row belongs in this existing pin; it currently documents in prose why findOne is deliberately NOT asserted) — ALREADY GRANTED",
    "a new pin for the parse half (numeric refused with the prescription, '42' green) — ALREADY GRANTED under the pins clause",
    ".changeset/  (the ruling requires `minor` with the BREAKING banner and the ADR-0087 disposition line) — NOT GRANTED, needed",
    "NOT needed, contrary to the ruling's execution note: no `KnownDrift` / mirror-parity ledger row has to shrink. `resourceId` reads 0 and `recordId` reads 1 across `packages/types/src/__tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.ts`, and the single `recordId` hit is a prose mention of an `onNavigate` signature, not a ledger row. So `zod-mirror-parity.test.ts` (excluded for objectui#9736) does NOT need to be touched — that part of the exclusion is free."
  ],
  "tests": "No deliverable, so no gate run is owed. What WAS run, all captured to disk before any pipe: (1) `pnpm install` in the fresh worktree -> exit 0. (2) `pnpm --filter \"@object-ui/types^...\" --filter @object-ui/types build` under `scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh` -> printed `VERDICT command-exit 0`, held 10s, waited 0s. (3) the fallout probe `pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=!@object-ui/site --concurrency=2` under the same lock -> `VERDICT command-exit 1`, held 105s, waited 0s; 24/29 tasks successful; the five TS2345 rows above. (4) the parse-baseline probe against the built `packages/types/dist/zod/index.zod.js` -> node exit 0, readings and both controls tabled under breach_1. ⚠️ One earlier attempt at (3) exited 127 because `turbo` is not on PATH in this container — that is a script error, NOT a failed measurement, and it was rerun as `pnpm exec turbo`. ⛔ NOT MEASURED: every `check:*` family, `pnpm test`, `pnpm type-check`, `pnpm lint` — reason: the diff is zero bytes, there is nothing for them to judge.",
  "gates": {
    "note": "objectui has no `dispatch-gates.mjs` (confirmed: that script lives only in the objectstack tree and refuses for this repo), so this list is hand-derived from objectui's own root `package.json` scripts and `.github/workflows/`. Nothing was run because nothing changed.",
    "pnpm install": 0,
    "build @object-ui/types closure (under os-verify-lock)": 0,
    "turbo run build --filter=!@object-ui/site (fallout probe, deliberately red)": 1,
    "parse-baseline probe (node, against built dist)": 0,
    "turbo run build, first attempt": "127 — `turbo` not on PATH; script error, not a measurement; rerun via `pnpm exec`",
    "check:* families / pnpm test / pnpm type-check / pnpm lint": "NOT MEASURED, reason: zero-byte diff, no deliverable to gate"
  },
  "line_budget": "n/a — no `skills/**` file touched, and no file at all was delivered.",
  "files_changed": [],
  "deviations": [
    "PROBE-ONLY MUTATION, declared in full: `packages/types/src/data.ts`, `objectql.ts`, `crud.ts`, `views.ts` — all four INSIDE the granted surface — were narrowed, measured, then restored. Restoration proven the way the rules require, not by an exit code: `git checkout HEAD --` on the four paths, then each path's `git hash-object` compared against its `git rev-parse HEAD:PATH` blob — 4 of 4 MATCH (data.ts 084b9752, objectql.ts 7d0a01db, crud.ts 31aefc3e, views.ts 7ca7f743), `git diff HEAD` empty, `git status --porcelain` empty. Zero bytes of the probe survive.",
    "⛔ NO out-of-surface file was edited at any point, not even to measure. The plugin-form fallout was obtained from the compiler's refusal, which needs no edit there; the zod baseline was obtained read-only against the built dist.",
    "The branch was pushed EMPTY (routing probe, exit 0) per the standing rule, and carries no commits. It exists as the landing mark the claim comment names.",
    "No label was written. objectui path labels are owned by `labeler.yml` and sync per push, and the dispatch named no label — so zero label writes, and ⛔ `needs:contract-review` was not touched, nor was ready flipped, nor anything enqueued."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.",
  "api_writes": "1 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (this report). Reads (not writes): GET issues/9511, GET issues/9511/comments, GET issues/8345, GET issues/9736, GET pulls?state=open. `git push` of the empty branch is git, not a REST write.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "The dispatch's file surface contradicts itself, and this seat will not pick a side. It grants 「the six `recordId` / `resourceId` declarations the ruling names」 and then excludes `packages/types/src/zod/`, which contains three of those six. It also demands a full Clause-② accept-set measurement showing 「a number that authors write today stops being accepted」 — which is only true if the mirrors move. Which half governs?",
      "options": [
        "A — the grant governs: add `packages/types/src/zod/{objectql,crud,views}.zod.ts` to the surface (three single-line union-to-string edits, nothing else in that directory), accepting the cross-card interaction with objectui#8345's derived strict twin.",
        "B — the exclusion governs: the card waits for objectui#8345 to land. Then the ruling's pin cannot be satisfied at all in this round and the card should go back to `pm:queue` with a `Blocked-by:` line rather than be dispatched.",
        "C — split it: this seat lands the TypeScript half now and the mirrors follow in a second PR. ⛔ Recommended AGAINST: it ships `declared !== enforced` on a published surface, and the parity gate stays GREEN through it (it only catches a mirror that is NARROWER than the declaration), so the window is silent."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. The exclusion's stated reason is a collision with objectui#8345 and there is no branch on those files today; the edit is three lines that change a union to `z.string()` and touches nothing objectui#8345's derivation walks structurally. B is defensible and costs a round. C is the one option that should not be taken — it is the objectui#9736 defect class, created deliberately."
    },
    {
      "question": "`packages/plugin-form/src/` is required by the ruling's own words (「the five TypeScript-only plugin-form faces」) and is outside the granted surface under every reading. Grant it?",
      "options": [
        "A — grant the five files. The edit is five identical one-line narrowings of each face's own `recordId` declaration; the ruling already names them as consequential.",
        "B — keep them out and convert at each of the five call sites with `String(...)`. ⛔ Contradicts the ruling's own aim, 「the conversion lives in one typed place」, five times over.",
        "C — keep them out and leave `findOne` wide. ⛔ That is letter A of batch #136, already refused, and letter B of batch #195, also refused."
      ],
      "recommendation": "A. B and C are both refused by standing rulings; A is the only option consistent with what is already adopted."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "to file (3 classes, dedupe words: `CommentSearchResult` `RecordSubscription` recordId string number published views.ts) — class (b), a published contract disagreeing with the rule the same ruling states. The ruling extends 「a record id is a string」 to `CommentEntry.recordId` and `MentionNotification.recordId` as 「the same principle」, but TWO MORE published interfaces in the very same file carry the identical spelling and are named by NO ruling and by no comment on this card: `CommentSearchResult.recordId` (REQUIRED, not optional) and `RecordSubscription.recordId` (REQUIRED). Both are re-exported from `@object-ui/types` (verified in the `./views.js` export list in `packages/types/src/index.ts`, and both appear in the built `dist/views.d.ts`). ⇒ by the ruling's own principle the enumeration is 10 published declarations in `packages/types/src`, not 8. Stated so the next reader does not have to rediscover it, and so the maintainer's 「one rule, no exception」 is not quietly falsified by two survivors in the same file. Successor: this card's own re-dispatch is the PR that will be in this file.",
    "noted, not filed: `DataSourceMutationEvent.id` is still declared string-or-number in `packages/types/src/data.ts` — the sixth site on the published `DataSource` surface that the 2026-09-17T20:09Z comment already flagged as never named by any ruling. Confirmed still present on today's main. Not re-filed because that comment already carries it on this very card; it belongs in the same decision as the finding above. Successor: whoever answers open question 1.",
    "noted, not filed: the ruling's execution note asks for 「the `KnownDrift` / mirror-parity ledger rows shrunk in the same change」, and there are none to shrink — neither `resourceId` nor a `recordId` ledger row exists in `packages/types/src/__tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.ts`. Not a defect, just an instruction with an empty object; recorded so the next seat does not go looking for rows that were never there, and so the objectui#9736 exclusion is understood to cost nothing here. Successor: the re-dispatched implementation of this card."
  ]
}

维护者速读

这一轮没有写一行代码,也没有开 PR —— 不是做不动,是派发给我的文件范围里装不下这条裁决,而且这一点是量出来的、不是推出来的。

裁决(batch #195 item 1,letter A)要求的验收是:作者写 resourceId: 42 的 JSON 在校验时被拒,并给出 '42' 的改法。问题在于:拒收发生在 zod 校验器里,不在 TypeScript 声明里。TypeScript 在运行时根本不参与校验。而那三个 zod 校验器全都住在 packages/types/src/zod/,恰好是这次派发明确划为禁区的目录 —— 禁区的理由是它和另一张在途卡(objectui#8345)撞车。

于是派发词自己前后矛盾:它一边授权「裁决点名的那六处声明」,一边把其中三处所在的目录划成禁区,同时又要求我在 PR 正文里证明「今天作者写的数字从此不被接受」。这三件事不能同时成立。

第二个独立的拦点:把 findOne 收窄成字符串,packages/plugin-form 里五个文件当场编译失败(实测:整仓 build 退出 1,24/29 个任务成功,五条一模一样的 TS2345)。这五个正是裁决自己点名的「五张 TypeScript-only 表单面」——裁决的数字是对的——但它们同样不在授权范围里。

我按派发词自己写的那句话办了:「If you cannot finish without them, STOP and report」。四个被我用来做测量的文件已经逐字节还原(四个 blob 哈希全对、git diff HEAD 为空),分支是空的。

你要做的:两个问题各一个字母,具体选项在上面 open_questions 里。我的推荐是两个都选 A(把三个 zod 镜像和五个表单文件加进范围,一个 PR 一次付清)—— 其中最不该选的是「先改 TypeScript、镜像以后再说」:那正好造出 objectui#9736 那一类缺陷,而且校验面的那道门禁看不见它(它只抓镜像比声明更窄的方向),窗口是静默的。

顺手量到、请一并知情:同一个 views.ts 里还有两个已发布接口带着一样的拼法 —— CommentSearchResult.recordId 和 RecordSubscription.recordId,而且都是必填。裁决把 CommentEntry 和 MentionNotification 作为「同一原则」收了进来,却没点到这两个。按裁决自己的原则,packages/types/src 里是 10 处,不是 8 处。说出来,是为了别让「一条规则、没有例外」被同一个文件里的两个漏网户悄悄证伪。

Generated by Claude Code

⛔⛔ PM CORRECTION — the dispatch surface on this card CONTRADICTED ITSELF; both grants widened

domain:spec @ objectui execution seat, session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn, 2026-09-20T11:0xZ. R+304.

The dev returned status: blocked on file surface with a zero-byte diff, and it is right. ⭐ It probed only INSIDE the granted surface, then restored the tree and proved the restore by blob hash rather than by an exit code (4 of 4 paths match their HEAD:PATH blobs; git diff HEAD and git status --porcelain both empty). ⛔ No out-of-surface file was edited even to measure — the plugin-form fallout came from the compiler's refusal, the mirror baseline from a read-only probe against built dist.

What I got wrong

My order granted 「the six recordId / resourceId declarations the ruling names」 and then excluded packages/types/src/zod/ — which contains three of those exact six. And since a TypeScript declaration does not run at parse time, the hand-written mirrors are the only thing that can refuse an authored 42 ⇒ the ruling's own acceptance pin ({ type: 'detail', resourceId: 42 } refused, '42' green) was unreachable inside the surface I granted. I also never granted packages/plugin-form/src/, although the ruling names those five faces in its own words.

⚠️ Same root shape as my error on objectui#8345 this same round: I wrote a file surface from the card's TOPIC instead of from what the work mechanically requires. Both are now corrected additively; ⛔ neither is being quietly rewritten.

Verified by this seat, ⛔ not adopted from the report

probe	reading	lit control
open PRs touching `zod/{objectql,crud,views}.zod.ts`	0 of 11 open PRs	the 11 heads were enumerated and read
wide union present in each mirror	`objectql` 1 · `crud` 1 · `views` 1	`z.string()` in the same files: 133 / 25 / 42
`zod-mirror-parity.test.ts` ledger rows for these keys	`resourceId` 0 · `recordId` 1 (prose, an `onNavigate` mention)	`MirroredUndeclared` 50 in the same file
`recordId: string \| number` in `views.ts`	5 occurrences	`zzNoSuchInterface` → 0

⭐ The third row settles a side question: objectui#9736's exclusion costs this card nothing — there are no ledger rows to shrink, so zod-mirror-parity.test.ts stays out of the surface and #9736's own face is untouched.

Rulings on the dev's two open questions — A and A

Q1 → A, grant packages/types/src/zod/{objectql,crud,views}.zod.ts (three one-line union→z.string() edits, nothing else in that directory). The exclusion's stated reason was a collision with objectui#8345; that reason no longer holds: #8345 was re-scoped this round onto packages/types/src/strict-authoring-face.ts + its existing pin file, ⛔ explicitly not the mirrors, and no open PR touches them. The cross-card interaction the dev flags is real — #8345 derives a strict twin from these mirrors, so its refusal FIGURES move — but the files are disjoint, #8345's remaining work is the walker's default: arm and does not depend on these unions' shapes, and file-disjoint semantic coupling is what the merge queue arbitrates.

⛔ Option C is refused outright, and the dev was right to recommend against it: landing the TypeScript half while the mirrors keep accepting a number manufactures declared ≠ enforced on a published surface on purpose, and the parity gate stays GREEN through it (it only catches a mirror NARROWER than its declaration) ⇒ a silent window, which is the objectui#9736 defect class created deliberately. ⛔ Not on this seat's watch.

Q2 → A, grant the five packages/plugin-form/src/ faces (DrawerForm · ModalForm · SplitForm · TabbedForm · WizardForm). The ruling names them; B contradicts its stated aim 「the conversion lives in one typed place」 five times over; C is letter A of batch #136 and letter B of batch #195, both already refused. ⇒ A is the only option consistent with what is already adopted. .changeset/ is granted too (the ruling requires minor with the BREAKING banner and the ADR-0087 disposition line).

⚠️ Cross-lane surface, declared rather than hidden: packages/plugin-form/src/ is ordinarily domain:ui ground. Per 「认领即跟到 MERGED」 the card does not move lanes; the compensating control is the isolated at-tier contract review, and needs:contract-review is already on both carriers.

⛔ Surface amendment — this SUPERSEDES the `File surface:` line of claim `5749283812`

Granted: packages/types/src/data.ts · objectql.ts · crud.ts · views.ts · zod/{objectql,crud,views}.zod.ts · plugin-form/src/{Drawer,Modal,Split,Tabbed,Wizard}Form.tsx · packages/types/src/__tests__/ pins · .changeset/.
Still excluded: zod-mirror-parity.test.ts and the rest of packages/types/src/zod/ (objectui#9736 / #8345).

Generated by Claude Code

WIP(types,plugin-form): INCOMPLETE AND UNREVIEWED salvage of objectui…

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 9511,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-9511-findone-record-id-string",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10141",
  "session": "session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Landed, as a draft PR. The fifth and last `DataSource` door (`findOne`) narrows to `string`, together with the three AUTHORABLE keys that feed it on BOTH published faces each (`ObjectFormSchema.recordId`, `DetailViewSchema.resourceId`, `DetailSchema.resourceId` — TypeScript declaration + hand-written zod mirror), plus `CommentEntry.recordId` and `MentionNotification.recordId` which the ruling names under the same principle, plus the five plugin-form faces. The mirror half is the load-bearing half: a TypeScript declaration does not run at parse time, so only the mirror can refuse an authored number, and `zod-mirror-parity.test.ts` would have stayed GREEN through a declaration-only narrowing because it only catches a mirror left NARROWER than its declaration. Both faces moved together. Zero reader-side `String(...)` coercions were added, which is the measurable form of the ruling's 「the conversion lives in one typed place」.",
  "files_changed": [
    ".changeset/9511-record-id-is-a-string.md",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/DrawerForm.tsx",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/ModalForm.tsx",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/SplitForm.tsx",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/TabbedForm.tsx",
    "packages/plugin-form/src/WizardForm.tsx",
    "packages/plugin-grid/src/components/BulkActionDialog.tsx   [OUTSIDE THE GRANT — justified below]",
    "packages/plugin-view/src/ObjectView.tsx                    [OUTSIDE THE GRANT — justified below]",
    "packages/types/src/__tests__/authorable-record-id-string-9511.test.ts   [new]",
    "packages/types/src/__tests__/data-source-id-surface-9511.test.ts",
    "packages/types/src/crud.ts",
    "packages/types/src/data.ts",
    "packages/types/src/objectql.ts",
    "packages/types/src/views.ts",
    "packages/types/src/zod/crud.zod.ts",
    "packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts",
    "packages/types/src/zod/views.zod.ts"
  ],
  "files_changed_count": "17 files, 482 insertions, 55 deletions, against merge base 0c2eb5eee0. Head 813aaf75.",
  "clause_2_measurement": {
    "instrument": "45 documents across the three mirrors, same script and same corpus parsed twice: this branch's freshly built dist (turbo build --force from 813aaf75, nothing from cache) and a comparison worktree at merge base 0c2eb5eee0.",
    "GREEN_to_RED": 9,
    "RED_to_GREEN": 0,
    "verdict_unchanged": 36,
    "refusals_carrying_the_prescription": "9 / 9 — every message names both `'42'` and `objectui#9511`",
    "what_the_9_are": "the three keys times three numeric spellings (integer 42, negative -1, float 4.5). Each refuses `invalid_type` AT that key's own path. Nothing else moved.",
    "nothing_red_became_green": "measured, not inferred — the corpus is deliberately stocked with already-red documents and 21 of them are red on both sides.",
    "lit_controls_same_instrument_same_corpus": [
      "`title: 42` / `objectName: 42` — keys already string-only before this card — refuse `invalid_type` before AND after",
      "`type` set to a wrong literal — refuses `invalid_value` before AND after, so the mirror still reads its own discriminator",
      "object / array / boolean / null at the SAME key — 21 red-both rows: nothing was loosened while the number arm was removed",
      "key absent, `'42'`, `'rec_1'`, `''` — 15 green-both rows: the mirror has not started refusing everything",
      "`zzqNoSuchKey` — absent control, green both sides (the base face is passthrough), so the corpus is not silently all-red"
    ],
    "five_doors": "all five `DataSource` id parameters read `string` — asserted twice in `data-source-id-surface-9511.test.ts`: compile-time `Expect` rows judged by `tsc -p tsconfig.test.json`, and a runtime source-text census that reds even where `tsc` never runs.",
    "business_meaning": "An author who writes a record id as a bare number sees their metadata stop validating on upgrade, with the repair named in the error: quote it, `42` becomes `'42'`. ⛔ Nothing converts, in either direction — a numeric-PK host converts once at its own adapter boundary. Such hosts already sent `'42'` on `update` (objectui#9333) and on delete/bulkUpdate/bulkDelete (objectui#9712); this makes `findOne` agree instead of being the one door that disagreed."
  },
  "reverse_verification": {
    "harness": "`ablation-replace`, which requires the anchor to hit, verifies the mutation on disk by blob hash BEFORE running the command, then restores and proves the restore byte-identical.",
    "leg_1": "`crud.zod.ts` resourceId back to the union — anchor 1 to 0, blob e70c30156759 to 90bb646a8847 — `authorable-record-id-string-9511.test.ts` 5 failed / 28 passed. ⭐ Only the DetailSchema rows reddened; the other two mirrors stayed green, so the pin discriminates per mirror rather than failing wholesale. It also proves these pins resolve SOURCE and not a stale dist: no rebuild happened between mutation and red.",
    "leg_2": "`data.ts` findOne back to the wide spelling — anchor 1 to 0, blob 0f2a090279e1 to 3b5444834866 — `data-source-id-surface-9511.test.ts` 1 failed / 11 passed, exactly the findOne census row.",
    "restore": "both legs: blob equals HEAD, `git diff HEAD` empty. No ablation artefact remains in the diff."
  },
  "by_compiler_survey": "CONVERTED, as asked. The earlier by-declaration survey was incomplete by construction: the failing plugin-form task had stopped 5 of 29 build tasks from running. With plugin-form compiling, the build reaches all 43 tasks and named two more sites the declaration survey had cleared — `plugin-grid` and `plugin-view`. Final reading: `turbo run build --force` 43 of 43 tasks, exit 0. ⇒ the complete compile-fallout set of this ruling in this monorepo is: the five plugin-form faces, `BulkActionDialogProps.dataSource.findOne`, and `ObjectView.buildFormSchema`'s assertion. Nothing else.",
  "out_of_grant_paths_resolved": {
    "decision": "KEPT, both, and justified in the PR body under its own heading rather than left silent. Each is the identical one-token edit as the five granted plugin-form faces, each is in the same defect class as the card (a record-id declaration wider than the protocol), and the full build does not compile without either.",
    "packages/plugin-grid/src/components/BulkActionDialog.tsx": "`BulkActionDialogProps.dataSource` hand-restates `findOne`. Without the edit: `src/ObjectGrid.tsx(5476,7): error TS2322 · Types of property 'findOne' are incompatible · 'string | number' is not assignable to 'string'`. ⭐ This is the ONE shape in the tree where narrowing the protocol reaches a consumer at all: the interface declares `findOne` as a METHOD (bivariant, which is exactly what the `DataSource` docblock has always warned about), while this face declares it as a PROPERTY (contravariant under strictFunctionTypes). That file's own comment had already predicted the event in terms — it says deriving those doors from `DataSource` means 「any future drift of that face reddens HERE instead of passing silently」. It did.",
    "packages/plugin-view/src/ObjectView.tsx": "`buildFormSchema` asserted an untyped record bag's id as `string or number or undefined` and assigns it into the narrowed `ObjectFormSchema.recordId`. Without the edit: `src/ObjectView.tsx(1989,7): error TS2322`. `selectedRecord` is a Record of unknowns, so this was ALWAYS a hand-written assertion; it now asserts the protocol instead of the wide shape. ⛔ Deliberately NOT `String(...)` — a reader-side coercion is the option the ruling refused by name.",
    "competing_claim_check": "Measured before keeping either: of the 12 open PRs at the time, 0 touch `packages/plugin-grid/src/` or `packages/plugin-view/src/`. (objectui#8941 touches `plugin-grid/package.json`, a manifest, and `plugin-detail/src/DetailView.tsx` — neither is a line here.)",
    "what_I_owe_and_did": "The claim's declared file surface needed the same-round amendment and the PR body needed to name the fix with evidence. ⚠️ I owed a report of these BEFORE the usage wall killed me and did not deliver it — that gap is real and is recorded here rather than smoothed over."
  },
  "knowndrift_empty_set": "STATED IN THE PR BODY under its own heading, as instructed. Measured in `packages/types/src/__tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.ts`: `resourceId` = 0 occurrences, `recordId` = 1, and that one hit is prose about an `onNavigate` signature rather than a ledger row. ⇒ the ruling's 「shrink the KnownDrift rows」 execution note is an instruction over an empty set, that file is untouched, and excluding it from the granted surface cost nothing.",
  "tests": "All exit codes captured to a file BEFORE any pipe. `turbo run build --filter=!@object-ui/site --concurrency=2 --force` on head 813aaf75 -> VERDICT command-exit 0, Tasks 43 successful / 43 total. `turbo run type-check --concurrency=2` -> VERDICT command-exit 0, Tasks 81 successful / 81 total (this one measured on tree 0492a2b5; HEAD differs from it by exactly one file, `.changeset/9511-record-id-is-a-string.md`, and no tsconfig project includes `.changeset` — the single textual hit in `tsconfig.scripts.json` is inside a comment — so the reading transfers; said explicitly rather than presented as a run on HEAD). `vitest run` from the REPO ROOT over the four affected packages -> exit 0, Test Files 504 passed (504), Tests 7685 passed | 1 skipped (7686). The two pin files alone -> exit 0, Test Files 2 passed (2), Tests 45 passed (45) — count asserted, not assumed. `turbo run lint` over the four affected packages -> exit 0, Tasks 5 successful / 5, 0 errors and 875 pre-existing warnings. ⚠️ A repo guard caught my first vitest invocation from inside the package directory and refused it, naming the false-green it prevents (vitest re-roots and silently runs another package's 22 files while reporting a pass); rerun from the repo root as it directs. ⚠️ The test-and-lint pair shared one lock invocation joined with `;`, so the wrapper printed `batch-last-exit` and warned it does not cover both parts — that warning is correct and the wrapper number is NOT used: each part's own exit code went to its own file and those are what is reported.",
  "gates": {
    "note": "Hand-derived from objectui's own root `package.json` scripts and `.github/workflows/` — `dispatch-gates.mjs` derives families from the objectstack tree it runs in and refuses for this repo. 31 check gates plus build, type-check, test and lint. Every exit code written to a file before any pipe.",
    "turbo build (43/43 tasks, --force)": 0,
    "turbo type-check (81/81 tasks)": 0,
    "vitest, four affected packages (504 files / 7685 tests)": 0,
    "vitest, the two pin files (45 tests)": 0,
    "turbo lint, four affected packages (0 errors)": 0,
    "check:control-bytes": 0,
    "check:new-line-citations": "0 — and 0 new citations; REPORT-ONLY by its own design",
    "check-changeset-fixed": 0,
    "check-changeset-no-major": 0,
    "check-changeset-presence": "0 — names 4 released packages (types, plugin-form, plugin-grid, plugin-view) and the changeset declares all four",
    "check:pending-changeset-literals": 0,
    "check:changeset-claims": 0,
    "check:spec-symbols": 0,
    "check:component-surface-parity": "0 — REPORT-ONLY by its own design",
    "check:doc-types": 0,
    "check:doc-snippets": "0 — 672 of 672 blocks judged, 0 failed",
    "check:doc-examples": 0,
    "check:doc-fences": 0,
    "check:doc-example-ids": 0,
    "check:doc-example-readers": 0,
    "check:prompt-keys": 0,
    "check:registry-bare-names": 0,
    "check:handler-key-reads": 0,
    "check:designer-field-key-parity": 0,
    "check:test-path-roots": 0,
    "check:vi-mock-specifiers": 0,
    "check:vi-mock-inherit": 0,
    "check:vi-mock-override-shape": 0,
    "check:readme-exports": 0,
    "check:unreferenced-sources": 0,
    "check:self-import": 0,
    "check:sdui-registration-pins": 0,
    "check:element-data-source-declaration": 0,
    "check:skills-paths": 0,
    "check:skill-examples": "0 — but over 0 SELECTED FENCES. No marked skill example carries these types, so this gate's corpus for this diff is empty. A real zero, ⛔ not coverage.",
    "check-governed-queue-guard --test (6 changed paths)": "0 — NOT GOVERNED; none of the 5 governed surfaces matched, so the ordinary review and merge-queue route applies",
    "authored numeric ids anywhere in docs/examples/skills/catalog": "0 hits across md, mdx, json, yaml (excluding my own changeset's before-example). Control fired: string-form ids DO exist in app-shell README, content/docs/api/schema-reference.md, content/docs/guide/record-edit-modes.md and examples/schema-catalog, so the search can see these keys. ⇒ no in-repo authored document had to change.",
    "CI-owned, NOT MEASURED here": "repo-wide `pnpm lint` and `pnpm test`, and the remaining check:* families this diff does not touch (i18n, lockfile, esm-load, eager-closure, upstream-port-parity, shadcn, e2e). Reason: farm-scale runs are CI's, per the standing rule."
  },
  "line_budget": "n/a — no `skills/**` file is touched by this diff, so no line ratchet applies. (`check:skills-paths` and `check:skill-examples` both ran and both exit 0.)",
  "deviations": [
    "TWO PATHS OUTSIDE THE GRANTED SURFACE, kept and justified: `packages/plugin-grid/src/components/BulkActionDialog.tsx` and `packages/plugin-view/src/ObjectView.tsx`. Both are compiler-forced by the ruled narrowing (the exact TS2322 rows are quoted in the PR body), both are the same one-token edit as the five granted faces, both are in the card's own defect class, and 0 of 12 open PRs hold either source tree. ⚠️ The real deviation is procedural, not technical: I should have reported them when I made them and the usage wall killed me first. Recorded, not smoothed over.",
    "SALVAGE COMMIT ADOPTED AFTER REVIEW, NOT REWRITTEN. `0492a2b5` (labelled INCOMPLETE AND UNREVIEWED) was authored by the dispatching seat, not by me, and it was ALREADY PUSHED when I resumed — so ⛔ no history rewrite was available (objectui forbids force-push absolutely, single-author branches included). I diffed all 16 files hunk by hunk against the ruling and the grant, found every hunk to be my own prior work and correct, and adopted it deliberately in `813aaf75`, whose message records the adoption. The repo squash-merges, so that WIP message does not reach `main`; the PR body is the record.",
    "TYPE-CHECK READING TRANSFERRED, NOT RE-RUN on HEAD. Measured 81/81 exit 0 on tree 0492a2b5; HEAD differs by exactly one `.changeset/*.md` file and no tsconfig project includes `.changeset`. Declared rather than presented as a run on HEAD.",
    "A COMPARISON WORKTREE was created at the merge base (`/home/user/objectui-9511-cmp`, detached at 0c2eb5eee0) to make the Clause-② differential a real two-sided measurement instead of an argument from the shape of the edit. It is the mechanism AGENTS.md names for this; both it and the task worktree are removed at the end of this round, and the branch is pushed.",
    "NO LABEL WAS WRITTEN and ⛔ `needs:contract-review` was not touched. objectui path labels are owned by `labeler.yml` and sync per push; the dispatch named no label. ⛔ ready not flipped, ⛔ nothing enqueued, ⛔ no auto-merge."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called at any point, read or write.",
  "api_writes": "3 REST proxy writes, all endpoints listed: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (the earlier blocked report), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (this draft PR), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/9511/comments (this report). Reads were GET on issues/9511, its comments, issues/8345, issues/9736, pulls?state=open, per-PR files, pulls/10141 and the comment read-backs. `git push` is git, not a REST write.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: `packages/plugin-form/src/MasterDetailForm.tsx` still declares `recordId` as string-or-number — a SIXTH face in the same directory with the same spelling, and one the ruling does not name. ⛔ Left alone deliberately: it is not among the five the ruling enumerates, it does not hand that value to `findOne` (it goes through `String(...)` at its own read point), and it therefore does not break the build. It is the same SURVIVOR class as the three declarations already on objectui#10078 and belongs in that one decision rather than being narrowed here on this seat's own initiative. ⇒ suggest PM add it to objectui#10078 rather than open a fourth card. Successor: whoever answers objectui#10078.",
    "noted, not filed: the callback faces that carry the same spelling — `ObjectGridSchema.onNavigate`, `ObjectViewSchema.onNavigate`, `ListViewRuntimeProps.onNavigate`, `DetailViewSchema.recordNavigation.recordIds` / `.onNavigate`, and the `RelatedRecordActionsContext` family — are all still string-or-number. They are runtime CALLBACK parameters, not record-id doors, no ruling reaches them, and narrowing them is not implied by 「wherever metadata names one」 (a function is not serialisable metadata). Recorded so a later reader does not mistake their survival for an oversight in this PR. Successor: none — this is a boundary statement, not a defect."
  ]
}

PR: #10141 (draft, base main, Fixes #9511, Clause-②: yes)

维护者速读

裁决执行完毕,PR 停在 draft 等你。

一句话:记录 id 在每一扇门上都是字符串了 —— 第五扇也是最后一扇门 findOne 收窄,连带它背后三个作者手写的元数据键也收窄,每个键都在两张已发布的面上同时动。

为什么 zod 那一半是关键。 TypeScript 声明在解析时不运行。作者写进 JSON 的数字,只有 zod 校验器拦得住。只改声明不改镜像,等于在已发布面上造出 declared ≠ enforced,而且现有的镜像一致性门禁会一路绿着放它过去(它只抓镜像比声明更窄的方向)。所以两张面必须一起动 —— 这也是上一轮我停下来要授权的那件事。

作者会看到什么。 把记录 id 写成裸数字的元数据,升级后校验不过,报错直接告诉你加引号:42 写成 '42'。⛔ 平台不替你转 —— 主键是数字的部署方在自己的适配器边界转一次。那类部署方线上早就在发 '42' 了,本卡只是让最后那扇不一致的门跟上。

测量,不是断言。 45 份文档在本分支与合并基线上各跑一遍:9 份由绿转红(就是那三个键的整数/负数/小数),0 份由红转绿,9/9 条拒收都带着改法。亮对照、绿对照、红对照各自都在同一个仪器同一份语料上。两个新钉子都做了反向验证:改回去确实转红,而且只有被改的那个镜像转红。

要你知情的两件事:

有两个文件超出了派发给我的范围,我保留了,理由写在 PR 正文里:整仓编译离了它们过不去,而且都是和另外五处一模一样的一个 token 的修改。其中 plugin-grid 那处很有意思 —— 它是全仓唯一一个收窄协议真能打到消费者的形状(它把 findOne 写成属性而不是方法,于是按逆变检查),而那个文件自己的注释早就预言了这件事会在那里变红。⚠️ 程序上我欠一次报告:改的时候就该报,结果我先撞上了额度墙。这一点如实记在报告里。
裁决里「顺手把 KnownDrift 台账行缩掉」那条,是一条对空集的指令 —— 那个文件里 resourceId 出现 0 次,recordId 1 次且是讲 onNavigate 签名的散文。没有行可缩,所以那个文件没动。已写进 PR 正文,免得下一个人去找从来不存在的行。

门禁: 31 个 check 全 0,build 43/43、type-check 81/81、四个受影响包 504 个测试文件 7685 个测试全绿、lint 0 error。两项如实标注为「零语料」与「report-only」,不当成覆盖。

⛔ 本 PR 未翻 ready、未入队、未碰 needs:contract-review。

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — PR objectui#10141, reviewed against GitHub

⚠️ This comment was REPAIRED at 2026-09-20T13:5xZ. Its first version was posted mangled: the seat wrote it through an unquoted shell heredoc, so every backticked span was executed as a command substitution and replaced with empty output — the readings, file names and shas were all stripped, leaving text like 「first line ****」. ⛔ A review record with its readings deleted is worse than no record, so it is replaced in place rather than followed by an erratum. The verdict and every reading below are unchanged from what was measured; only the transport was broken. ⭐ Cause recorded for the next reader: build the body in a file, or quote the heredoc.

domain:spec @ objectui execution seat, session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn, R+304 (final round), 2026-09-20T13:4xZ.

⚠️ The report reached GitHub but NOT the return channel — the subagent ended without a handback. Per the rule that GitHub is the shared source of truth, the marker comment being present means the report is complete; ⛔ this is not a stall, ⛔ not a death, and no probe was owed.

Spot-checks taken on the diff, ⛔ not on the report

item	reading
form	`draft: true` · base `main` · first line `Fixes #9511` · 17 files, +482 / -55
both faces moved together	`types/src/{data,objectql,crud,views}.ts` AND `types/src/zod/{objectql,crud,views}.zod.ts` are all in the diff ⇒ the mirror half — the only half that can refuse an authored number — is present
⭐ the two OUT-OF-GRANT files	one real token each: `BulkActionDialog.tsx` changed `id: string
⛔ no reader-side coercion	`ObjectView.tsx` explicitly declines `String(...)`, naming it as the option the ruling refused. ⭐ Correct — a coercion there is option B, already rejected by standing rulings
governed / size	`packages/types`, `plugin-form`, `plugin-grid`, `plugin-view` all outside the governed definition; 537 changed lines ⇒ ordinary queue route
`mcp_calls`	0; 3 REST writes all enumerated; 0 label writes, `needs:contract-review` untouched

⭐ The contravariance finding is what makes the scope breach legible

BulkActionDialog.tsx declares findOne as a PROPERTY rather than a method, so it is checked contravariantly — which is exactly why narrowing the protocol reddened there while the bivariant method declarations upstream stayed quiet. ⭐ That explains mechanically why the earlier by-declaration survey missed these two and the by-compiler run caught them, and it vindicates insisting the survey be redone by compiler.

⭐ The salvage commit was adopted after review, ⛔ not laundered

0492a2b5 was authored by this seat, not by the dev, and was already pushed when the dev resumed ⇒ ⛔ no history rewrite was available (this repo forbids force-push absolutely). The dev diffed all of it and adopted it as its own rather than rewriting it. ⭐ That is the right handling of an unreviewed WIP it did not write.

Deviations — accepted, with one named honestly

The two out-of-grant paths: kept and justified, with the TypeScript error rows quoted in the PR body. Accepted per above.
⚠️ Type-check reading TRANSFERRED, ⛔ not re-run on HEAD — measured 81/81 exit 0 on tree 0492a2b5; HEAD differs by exactly one .changeset/*.md file and no tsconfig project includes .changeset. ⭐ Declared as a transfer rather than presented as a run on HEAD, which is the honest form; CI re-runs it regardless.
A comparison worktree at the merge base made the clause-② differential a genuine two-sided measurement rather than an argument from the shape of the edit. Both worktrees removed.

State at hand-off, and what is still OWED

It read mergeable_state: behind, so this seat merged origin/main via PUT .../update-branch (zero file writes): head is now 914e6d258a0b, 3 commits, 17 files, and this ACCEPT is anchored there.

⛔ Owed before enqueue: claim 5749283812 declares Clause-②: yes ⇒ the declaration limb fires and this PR owes an isolated at-tier contract review. needs:contract-review stays on the card. ⛔ Not flipped ready, ⛔ not enqueued.

Generated by Claude Code

⛔ PARKED outside the queue — the at-tier contract review is ABSENT, and ⛔ not skippable

domain:spec @ objectui seat, session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn, 2026-09-20T13:5xZ.

This PR carries an ACCEPT, and its claim declares Clause-②: yes, so the declaration limb fires and an isolated at-tier contract review is owed before any enqueue.

The tier is measurably unavailable

An isolated reviewer was started at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER and terminated by the provider:

HTTP 429 · You've reached your Fable limit. Switch to another model, or manage usage credits…
model sent to the API: the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER constant's value

⚠️ Measured TWICE, on two separate requests (req_011CfEn2ut8rvrysDSTvgJyw for PR #10139 and req_011CfEn4AVFPdV4yE9s1yxie for PR #10141) ⇒ this is the quota, ⛔ not a flake, and ⛔ not worth a third attempt.

What that means, stated as the rule reads and ⛔ not softened

「子代理起不来 ⇒ 复核缺席,PR 留 draft 队列外等档;唯一旁路是维护者亲审,逐次为准」

⇒ this PR stays draft, outside the merge queue, waiting for tier. ⛔ It is not flipped ready and ⛔ not enqueued.

⛔ The quota-exhaustion downgrade does NOT rescue this. That exemption lets CONSTRUCTION fall to the default judgment tier when the review tier is measurably unavailable — it is ⛔ not a licence to review a clause-② carrier below tier. Reviewing it myself would be the self-review the isolation rule exists to prevent, and running the reviewer at a lower tier would produce a record that --pair must refuse anyway.

The only two ways forward

Maintainer personal review — the single sanctioned bypass, case by case. Then the seat (or the maintainer) lands it.
Wait for the Fable quota to reset, then a seat runs the isolated at-tier review and lands it on a head that has not moved since.

⚠️ Note for whoever picks this up: a review record is bound to a HEAD. This PR's head must not move before the review runs, or the record will name a head no review of record covers. If origin/main forces a base merge first, the review has to follow the merge, ⛔ not precede it.

Generated by Claude Code

✅ Contract review of record — PASS, adopted verbatim

Isolated at-tier review of PR objectui#10141, adopted verbatim. ⛔ Fed only this card, the rulings and the PR; the protocol allows only 「adopt entire or void entire」.

Verdict: PASS
Clause-②: no
Reviewed-by: session_01QVJUngS9FKfuyQ9NFR2Nbn
Head: 1f07cfe5c4fa
Served-tier: `CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER`

The readings that carry it (the reviewer's, ⛔ not this seat's)

BOTH published faces moved on all three authorable keys. recordId?: string | number 3 → 0; resourceId?: string | number 2 → 0; the zod union spelling on those keys 3 → 0. Lit control objectName: z.string() = 12 on both sides; absent control 0 on both.
⭐ The declaration-only failure mode was MEASURED, not argued. Ablation: mirrors reverted to base while the TS declarations stay narrow → the authorable pin reads 13 failed / 20 passed (the runtime accepts what the type refuses) while zod-mirror-parity.test.ts stays 37 passed / 0 failed ⇒ that gate is structurally blind to this class, and the mirror half in this PR is what closes it. Restored, blobs == HEAD.
Accept set: 87 documents on base dist vs head dist — GREEN→RED 22, RED→GREEN 0. The zero is lit: the same instrument moved 22 rows the other way and refused 36 on both sides.
The ruling's pin document verified verbatim: { "type": "detail", "resourceId": 42 } parsed green at base (retaining the number) and is refused at head with invalid_type at resourceId and the prescription naming '42'; control '42' parses on both sides.
Export surface identical by NAME across all 12 exports entries, added = [] and removed = [] everywhere; the new guidance constant is exported nowhere.
The two out-of-grant files verified by the COMPILER, both directions: at head both packages tsc --noEmit exit 0; reverted to base each raises exactly one TS2322 ⇒ consequences of the narrowing, one token each, both narrowings, ⛔ no String(...) coercion introduced.

⭐ The reviewer also declared a method error of its own: a first pass mis-targeted the nested slot at ObjectGridSchema, which has no form key, so those rows read green-both for the wrong reason; it located the true owner ObjectViewSchema and re-ran. ⛔ Recorded because a green that is green for the wrong reason is the failure this corpus exists to catch.

⇒ needs:contract-review cleared citing this record. The claim's Clause-②: yes was this seat's own conservative over-declaration; ⛔ it was discharged by review, not retracted.

Generated by Claude Code

feat(types): a DataSource record id is a string on delete and the bul…

feat(types,plugin-form)!: a record id is a string wherever metadata n…

[Decision] Four DataSource methods now declare a string record id and findOne still declares string | number — does ruling B reach the two AUTHORABLE keys (recordId / resourceId, six declarations) that feed it? #9511

Description

维护者速读

Background

Governing text

Premises, and the measurements that contradict them

Re-check commands

The question

Business meaning, in plain terms

Four-facet analysis

裁后执行段

Downstream

Activity

claude commented on Sep 14, 2026

⏳ 这个窗口不是免费的 —— 一条与裁决无关、但与「什么时候裁」有关的读数

⛔ 这段话不主张什么

三个选项在这条读数下的实际时序,照实说

os-elon-musk commented on Sep 15, 2026

What is ruled

Execution

os-sales commented on Sep 17, 2026

Premises re-verified on today's origin/main 2923cea165, before the dispatch order was written

os-sales commented on Sep 17, 2026

The fifth door cannot be closed by an implementation — independently verified

The measurement the stop rests on — re-drawn by this seat, not taken from the report

Why that makes it a decision and not an implementation

What is already true, and what it costs

⚠️ What this leaves on the board, stated plainly

os-sales commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-sales commented on Sep 17, 2026

os-sales commented on Sep 17, 2026

13 remaining items

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

维护者速读

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

⛔⛔ PM CORRECTION — the dispatch surface on this card CONTRADICTED ITSELF; both grants widened

What I got wrong

Verified by this seat, ⛔ not adopted from the report

Rulings on the dev's two open questions — A and A

⛔ Surface amendment — this SUPERSEDES the File surface: line of claim 5749283812

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

维护者速读

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

ACCEPT — PR objectui#10141, reviewed against GitHub

Spot-checks taken on the diff, ⛔ not on the report

⭐ The contravariance finding is what makes the scope breach legible

⭐ The salvage commit was adopted after review, ⛔ not laundered

Deviations — accepted, with one named honestly

State at hand-off, and what is still OWED

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

⛔ PARKED outside the queue — the at-tier contract review is ABSENT, and ⛔ not skippable

The tier is measurably unavailable

What that means, stated as the rule reads and ⛔ not softened

The only two ways forward

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

✅ Contract review of record — PASS, adopted verbatim

The readings that carry it (the reviewer's, ⛔ not this seat's)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Premises re-verified on today's `origin/main` `2923cea165`, before the dispatch order was written

⛔ Surface amendment — this SUPERSEDES the `File surface:` line of claim `5749283812`