finding(plugin-charts): an all-boolean scatter coordinate draws nothing and says nothing — deliberately left unguarded by objectui#7171, because whether a boolean plots depends on its neighbours

Ruled: 5809002651 · letter A (the renderer says so when no row can be placed) · 2026-09-24T06:34Z

Measured while implementing objectui#7171 (PR to follow). Recorded rather than fixed there, with the reasoning below — the residual hole is real, and its answer is almost certainly not in the renderer.

The two readings

packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx, scatter arm. Both axes are type="number".

dataset	marks drawn
`[{xm: true, ym: 40}, {xm: false, ym: 25}]` — every x boolean	0 of 2
`[{xm: 10, ym: 40}, {xm: true, ym: 25}, {xm: false, ym: 60}]` — one real number among them	3 of 3

Recharts needs one genuinely numeric value to build the scale, and then coerces the booleans onto it. So whether a boolean coordinate plots is a property of the OTHER rows, not of the value.

Why objectui#7171 does not guard it

That card ships no-plottable-points / unplotted-points on an authoring-side predicate. Rejecting booleans was in the first draft — the all-boolean tile had been measured drawing 0 of 2 marks in the browser sweep and looked like a sibling of null. Pinning it turned the mixed case RED, which is how the second reading above was found.

Rejecting booleans would give the all-boolean tile a correct refusal, and give the mixed tile a footnote reading "2 of 3 rows ... are not drawn" over three points visibly on screen. A false sentence about the picture is worse than the silence, by the same reasoning that decided the copy in objectui#7146 and objectui#7147, so the predicate accepts booleans and the all-boolean case stays exactly as silent as it is today. Not a regression — a narrow hole that predates the card.

Where the answer probably belongs

Upstream, at authoring time: a boolean column bound to a numeric measure is a metadata error, and refusing it where the binding is declared is both earlier and more specific than anything the renderer can say. That makes this a spec/authoring question rather than a chart one, which is why it is filed separately rather than ridden on the renderer PR.

Scope

Narrow. It needs a boolean column bound to a scatter axis and EVERY row boolean. No dataset in the sweep produced it accidentally.

分诊 · `domain:ui` / `priority:p3` / `pm:queue`

Anchor read, not guessed —— 而这张卡的锚点是本轮最难判的一个,理由写在下面。

测得的缺陷面在 packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx 的 scatter 臂(该文件与 scatter 支路在树上,已复核,objectui origin/main a472b07,2026-09-05T00:59:42Z)⇒ domain:ui。

⚠️ ⛔ 但卡面明说答案很可能不在渲染器里:

上游,在授权时:一个绑定到数值度量的布尔列是一个元数据错误,而在声明绑定的地方拒绝它,既更早也更具体,超过渲染器所能说的任何话。这使它成为一个 spec/授权问题而不是图表问题。

⇒ ⭐ 本席仍然给 domain:ui,并说明为什么这不是猜:今天唯一被测量过的面是渲染器;「绑定声明在哪」尚未定位。⇒ 第一项交付是定位那个绑定声明面(可能是 objectui 的 packages/types,也可能是 objectstack 的 spec),定位之后本卡很可能交接。⛔ 这与本轮 objectstack#7571 那种「落点取决于裁决所以刻意留白」不同 —— 那里连问题本身都还没答,这里问题清楚,只是落点还没读出来。

定级 p3

⭐ 范围窄到卡面自己说得很死:需要一个布尔列绑到 scatter 轴,并且每一行都是布尔。扫描里没有任何数据集偶然产生过它。

⇒ 不是 p2:触发条件苛刻,且不是回归 —— 卡面明说「一个先于该卡存在的窄洞」。不是可关掉的:全布尔坐标画 0 个点、什么也不说。

⭐ 这张卡最有价值的部分,是它解释了为什么不能顺手加一条守卫

两次测量:

数据集	画出的标记
`[{xm: true, ym: 40}, {xm: false, ym: 25}]` —— x 全是布尔	0 / 2
`[{xm: 10, …}, {xm: true, …}, {xm: false, …}]` —— 其中有一个真数值	3 / 3

⇒ ⭐ Recharts 需要一个真正的数值来建立刻度,然后把布尔强制到刻度上。所以「一个布尔坐标画不画得出来」是它「邻居们」的属性,不是它自己的值的属性。

⇒ 因此:拒绝布尔会给全布尔那块瓷砖一个正确的拒绝,却会给混合那块瓷砖一句脚注写着「3 行里有 2 行没有画出来」—— 而屏幕上明明有三个点。 卡面按 objectui#7146 / #7147 定文案时的同一条理由作了取舍:关于画面的一句假话,比沉默更糟。

⇒ ⛔ 谁接手都不要在渲染器里加「拒绝布尔」的谓词。 这一条已经被试过一次:它在第一版草稿里,把混合情形钉红了,而那次红色正是第二个读数被发现的方式。

边界测试 —— 取决于落点

渲染器侧加守卫 ⇒ 已被上面的论证否掉。
授权侧(绑定声明处拒绝「布尔列 → 数值度量」)⇒ 收窄一个 accept surface ⇒ 人工地板之上,且若落在 objectstack 的 spec,则是跨仓。

⇒ ⛔ 本席不裁,也不代为交接 —— 先定位绑定声明面,再决定这张卡归谁。

⭐ 立卡方式记一笔:objectui#7171 测量了它、写下了为什么不在那里修、并把残留的洞单独立卡,而不是悄悄放过或强行塞进渲染器。⇒ 这正是本席位希望保持廉价的那种「不越界、但把发现留下」。

⛔ 本席不认领、不派发、不代裁。

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM dispatch — domain:ui execution seat.

Session: session_01YBWFb5YgMU5dw8p2VKj16S
Branch: claude/issue-7195-scatter-boolean-binding-surface
Assignee set by this PM on behalf of the dispatched dev; the dev inherits both and posts no second claim.

Dispatched as a LOCATE-AND-STOP card, because triage says the first deliverable is a location

⇒ 第一项交付是定位那个绑定声明面(可能是 objectui 的 packages/types,也可能是 objectstack 的 spec),定位之后本卡很可能交接。

⇒ The order asks for the binding-declaration surface to be found, and then for the dev to stop and report. It is answerable rather than blocked: the framework repo is checked out locally and read-only for this dev.

⭐ Both outcomes are above this seat, which is why stopping is the deliverable:

objectstack's spec ⇒ cross-repo, and a narrowing.
objectui's packages/types ⇒ still narrowing an accept surface ⇒ manual floor.

⛔ The renderer guard is forbidden, and the reason is measured

⛔ 谁接手都不要在渲染器里加「拒绝布尔」的谓词。 这一条已经被试过一次:它在第一版草稿里,把混合情形钉红了,而那次红色正是第二个读数被发现的方式。

The two readings that settle it:

dataset	markers drawn
`[{xm: true, ym: 40}, {xm: false, ym: 25}]` — x all boolean	0 / 2
`[{xm: 10, …}, {xm: true, …}, {xm: false, …}]` — one real number present	3 / 3

⭐ Recharts needs one real number to establish the scale, then coerces the booleans onto it. So "does a boolean coordinate draw" is a property of its NEIGHBOURS, not of its own value.

⇒ A refuse-booleans predicate would give the all-boolean tile a correct refusal and give the mixed tile a footnote reading "2 of 3 rows were not drawn" — while three points are visibly on screen. The card decided this on the same ground as objectui#7146 / #7147: a false sentence about the picture is worse than silence.

p3, and why it is neither raisable nor closable

⛔ Not p2: the trigger is narrow — a boolean column bound to a scatter axis with every row boolean — and no dataset in the sweep produced it accidentally; it is not a regression but a pre-existing narrow hole. ⛔ Not closable: an all-boolean coordinate draws zero points and says nothing.

⭐ Worth preserving about how this card came to exist

Triage's own note: objectui#7171 measured it, wrote down why the fix does not belong there, and filed the residual hole as its own card rather than passing over it silently or forcing a guard into the renderer. That is the behaviour this seat wants to stay cheap.

Dispatch order follows in the next comment.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-scatter-boolean-binding-surface",
  "pr": null,
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "deliverable": "LOCATE-AND-STOP — measurement only. No renderer guard, no narrowing, no PR, no changeset, as dispatched.",

  "two_readings_reproduced": {
    "reading_A_all_boolean_x": "0 of 2 marks — REPRODUCED exactly",
    "reading_B_one_real_number": "3 of 3 marks — REPRODUCED exactly",
    "and_it_says_nothing": "READING A rendered the plot with NO refusal and NO footnote. Full tile text was exactly \"ym010203040\" — the legend label plus the y-axis ticks 0,10,20,30,40. The x axis emitted no tick values at all: a confident y scale, no x scale, no marks, no sentence.",
    "how_driven": "Drove the real AdvancedChartImpl (not a mock, not an inference) through @testing-library/react in the repo's own established chart harness: recharts ResponsiveContainer mocked to a fixed 480x320 so the happy-dom clientWidth-0 trap cannot masquerade as the defect. Counted path.recharts-symbols, which recharts paints one of per PLACED point. Run root-relative from the repo root: pnpm exec vitest run packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.boolean7195probe.test.tsx",
    "leg_D_classification": "vitest JSON reporter, not the text reporter: numTotalTests 16, passed 16, failed 0, pending 0. Suite status passed. No death strings.",
    "independent_corroboration": "The repo already pins both readings from the other seat's Chromium sweep at packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.degeneratePosition.test.tsx:226. My numbers match it exactly, measured independently."
  },

  "harness_control_fired": true,
  "control_evidence": "CONTROL of 3 fully numeric rows drew 3 of 3 marks on the same harness, asserted rather than eyeballed. Per-family controls fired too: line 1 curve, bar 2 rectangles, area 2. Every zero reported below therefore sits behind a control that drew.",

  "binding_surface_located": {
    "answer": "LOCATED — and it is TWO surfaces in TWO repos, not one. Both bind by bare string.",
    "objectui": {
      "path": "packages/types/src/objectql.ts:2898 (interface ObjectChartSchema) with its accept surface at packages/types/src/zod/objectql.zod.ts:1177",
      "repo": "objectstack-ai/objectui",
      "what_it_declares": "type object-chart, objectName (the OBJECT), chartType whose enum INCLUDES scatter, and the axis bindings: xAxisField z.string().optional(), yAxisFields z.array(z.string()).optional(), plus the ADR-0021 tier dataset / dimensions / values, all arrays of bare strings.",
      "note": "The zod mirror is objectui-LOCAL (BaseSchema.extend), not a spec re-export — contrast ObjectGallerySchema three declarations below it, which does take the spec's schemas by reference."
    },
    "objectstack": {
      "path": "packages/spec/src/ui/chart.zod.ts (ChartAxisSchema.field), packages/spec/src/ui/report.zod.ts:33-35 (ReportChartSchema.xAxis / yAxis), packages/spec/src/ui/chart.zod.ts (ChartAggregateSchema.field), packages/spec/src/ui/dataset.zod.ts (DatasetDimensionSchema, DatasetMeasureSchema)",
      "repo": "objectstack-ai/objectstack",
      "what_it_declares": "ChartAxisSchema.field is z.string().describe('Data field key'). ReportChartSchema.xAxis and yAxis are bare z.string() naming a bound-dataset dimension / measure. ChartAggregateSchema.field names an object field for the ObjectChart aggregate prop."
    },
    "tier_distinction_the_card_did_not_have": "objectui's OTHER chart node — ChartSchema at packages/types/src/data-display.ts:1616, the one the measured renderer defect actually flows through — does NOT bind an object field at all. It carries inline rows (data, an array of plain row records keyed by column name) and xAxisKey names a ROW KEY within them. There is no object and no field metadata in that picture, so it structurally cannot know a type. That is why the location question has a two-part answer."
  },

  "declaration_knows_field_type": {
    "value": false,
    "evidence": [
      "Every chart-axis binding key on every surface above is a bare string naming a column, dimension or measure. None carries or resolves a datatype.",
      "The ONLY datatype anywhere on the path is DatasetDimensionSchema.type at packages/spec/src/ui/dataset.zod.ts:126 — z.enum(['string','number','date','boolean','lookup']).optional(). It is OPTIONAL, so it can simply be absent.",
      "DECISIVE: DatasetMeasureSchema has NO datatype at all. Its `type` key is an ALIAS for `aggregate` — the file calls it 'THE dangerous one' precisely because a Cube-trained author writing type: 'sum' silently lost the aggregation. So on a measure the word `type` is already spent, and no datatype is declarable.",
      "Scatter binds TWO MEASURES — objectui states it in its own code at packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx:348: 'scatter is excluded on purpose: both of its axes are numeric measures'. So on the dataset tier, the datatype needed to refuse a boolean scatter coordinate is STRUCTURALLY ABSENT, not merely unpopulated.",
      "Nothing anywhere cross-references a chart axis to a dataset dimension or measure DECLARATION. The closest existing cross-reference is checkReportOrder at packages/spec/src/ui/report.zod.ts:95, and it only checks NAME membership within the same document (order.by must be one of this report's own rows/columns/values) — never a type. Sweep for a type-aware refinement over chart/report/dashboard zod returned only z.boolean() flags and the count-needs-a-field refinement at chart.zod.ts:885.",
      "objectui DOES read a field type at RUNTIME — packages/plugin-charts/src/ObjectChart.tsx:220 const fieldType = fieldDef.type, resolved from dataSource.getObjectSchema at line 758. But it is runtime not authoring time, it covers only the groupBy CATEGORY field and not the measure axis, it exists for label formatting, and it has no boolean branch at all."
    ],
    "consequence": "Refusing a boolean column bound to a numeric axis AT AUTHORING TIME is therefore NOT a small narrowing. It requires cross-document type resolution that does not exist today — resolve an axis name to its dataset measure or dimension (or to the object's field metadata) and then read a datatype that, for measures, is not even declarable. Saying this plainly as instructed: that is a materially different card — a new capability, not a tightening."
  },

  "floor_side": "objectstack-spec",
  "floor_side_detail": "Primary landing is the objectstack spec, because that is where the datatype is missing and where the dataset tier is declared. There is a secondary objectui component (ObjectChartSchema's xAxisField / yAxisFields), but it cannot be fixed alone: packages/types/src/__tests__/spec-subschema-parity.test.ts pins that schemas belong upstream and that a local fork is the failure mode. Either way it is a narrowing of an accept surface, so it is above the manual floor.",
  "cross_repo": true,

  "other_axes_and_charts_checked": {
    "verdict": "THE HOLE IS WIDER THAN THE CARD. It is not scatter-only and not x-only.",
    "y_axis_all_boolean": "0 of 2 marks, no refusal, no note. Tile text exactly \"ym05101520\". Identical hole on the other axis.",
    "y_axis_mixed": "3 of 3 marks — the neighbour effect is symmetric across both axes.",
    "both_axes_all_boolean": "0 of 2 marks, silent, and tile text collapses to just \"ym\" — no axis scale at all on either side.",
    "line_bar_area_all_boolean_measure": "line 0 drawn, bar 0 drawn, area 0 drawn — every one of them with NO refusal and NO footnote, plot container present. Their numeric controls drew (1 curve, 2 rectangles, 2 areas), so these are readings, not non-readings.",
    "pie_donut_funnel_treemap": "These already SPEAK — the unsized-rows footnote fires on all four, because Number(false) is 0 and fails objectui#7147's magnitude test.",
    "so_what": "The silent family is the CARTESIAN / POSITIONAL one — scatter plus line, bar and area — and it is silent on both axes. The magnitude family is already covered. A routing decision here governs at least four renderer sites and two axes, not one scatter coordinate. The maintainer should know that before ruling.",
    "not_already_filed": "Duplicate-checked: 197 open `finding` cards enumerated over two REST pages (page 3 empty, so the enumeration terminated rather than being truncated). No card covers an all-boolean measure on line/bar/area. objectui#7690 is adjacent but different (the ChartSchema axis-config object dialect being undeclared)."
  },

  "additive_option_found": {
    "found": true,
    "implemented": false,
    "description": "A purely ADDITIVE datatype declaration on the dataset MEASURE would make the fact 'this measure is boolean' expressible without refusing anything that is accepted today, leaving a later card free to act on it. It is additive because adding an optional key to a strictObject widens the accept surface rather than narrowing it.",
    "hazard_found_while_checking_it": "The obvious key name is NOT available. On DatasetMeasureSchema the word `type` is already claimed as an alias for `aggregate`, so an author writing type: 'boolean' would be renamed onto `aggregate` and then fail the AggregationFunction enum. An additive key would have to be spelled differently, e.g. dataType, and would want to reuse the dimension's existing vocabulary so the two tiers do not drift.",
    "why_still_not_done_here": "It is still a change to the objectstack spec — cross-repo, and above this seat. ASKING as instructed; not implemented."
  },

  "routing_recommendation": {
    "recommendation": "HAND OFF to an objectstack spec seat. Do not route it back to the renderer.",
    "because": [
      "Both object-field binding declarations are bare strings, so there is nothing in the renderer's reach to tighten.",
      "The datatype needed is structurally absent on the very tier scatter binds (measures), so the first move is a spec capability question, not a validation question.",
      "Any refusal is a narrowing of an accept surface, which is above the manual floor whichever repo it lands in.",
      "The scope is at least four renderer sites and both axes, so it should be ruled once, upstream, rather than per chart arm."
    ],
    "suggested_shape": "File or transfer as an objectstack spec card whose FIRST question is the capability one — should a chart axis resolve to its dataset measure/dimension declaration at authoring time, and should a measure be able to declare a datatype at all — with objectui#7195 staying open as the measured symptom record it already is. The additive dataType option above is the cheap first step if the maintainer wants one.",
    "explicitly_not_recommended": "No renderer guard, no footnote, no caption, no console warning. Re-measured and re-confirmed this run: a refuse-booleans predicate would give the mixed tile a false sentence while three points are visibly on screen."
  },

  "pm_premises_falsified": [
    "FALSIFIED (framing): the dispatch framed the location as either/or — objectstack's spec OR objectui's packages/types. Measured: BOTH exist and both bind by bare string. objectui's packages/types does hold a genuine object-field binding (ObjectChartSchema.xAxisField / yAxisFields), so the objectui half of the either/or is real rather than absent — but it is not the whole answer, and it cannot be fixed alone because of the spec-subschema-parity pin.",
    "FALSIFIED (scope): the card and the dispatch both scope the hole to a scatter COORDINATE. Measured: the y axis has it identically, and line, bar and area have it too, all silent. Scatter is one of at least four sites.",
    "REFINED, not falsified: the card says the answer 'probably belongs upstream at authoring time'. That direction holds, but it is not a small narrowing — the type is not merely unread, it is undeclarable on a measure. The upstream work is a new capability.",
    "NOT falsified — all still stand: both readings (0/2 and 3/3) reproduced exactly; the no-renderer-guard ruling; priority p3; not-a-regression; not-closable."
  ],

  "mcp_calls": "0 — the whole run used the repo-scoped REST channel plus git and local greps. Zero MCP GitHub calls.",
  "pr_url_or_none": "none — measurement-only, as dispatched. Branch pushed empty as the routing probe; no commits, no changeset, worktree left clean.",

  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "Should the wider cartesian hole (line / bar / area with an all-boolean measure, and the y axis on scatter) be filed as its own card, or should objectui#7195 be widened to cover the family?",
      "options": ["A — widen 7195's title and body to the cartesian family", "B — file one new finding card for line/bar/area and keep 7195 as the scatter/y record", "C — leave it recorded only in this report"],
      "recommendation": "A, because the routing decision is identical for all four sites and splitting it invites two different rulings on one mechanism. I did not file anything: this fell out of the dispatch's own question 4 rather than being an unrelated drive-by, and widening someone's card is not mine to do."
    },
    {
      "question": "Do you want the additive dataType key on DatasetMeasureSchema implemented as the first step?",
      "options": ["A — yes, additive spec change in objectstack now", "B — no, rule on the capability question first", "C — no, and record the alias hazard on the card so the next seat does not walk into `type`"],
      "recommendation": "B with C recorded. It is additive and therefore cheap, but it only pays off if the capability question is answered the way it presumes, and the `type`-is-taken hazard should be written down either way. Asking rather than implementing, per the dispatch."
    },
    {
      "question": "Does objectui#7195 transfer to objectstack, or stay in objectui as the symptom record with a new spec card opened upstream?",
      "options": ["A — transfer", "B — keep here, open an upstream card, cross-link"],
      "recommendation": "B. The measured evidence is all objectui-side and worth keeping where the renderer tests live; the capability question is genuinely a different card."
    }
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

PM review — LOCATE-AND-STOP discharged. Surface located, scope widened by measurement, escalated upstream.

⭐ The decisive answer: the type is not merely unread, it is UNDECLARABLE

DatasetMeasureSchema has NO datatype at all. Its type key is an ALIAS for aggregate — the file calls it "THE dangerous one" precisely because a Cube-trained author writing type: 'sum' silently lost the aggregation.

And scatter binds two measures — objectui says so in its own code: "scatter is excluded on purpose: both of its axes are numeric measures."

⇒ On the tier scatter actually binds, the datatype needed to refuse a boolean coordinate is structurally absent, not merely unpopulated. Nothing anywhere cross-references a chart axis to a dataset measure or dimension declaration; the closest existing refinement (checkReportOrder) checks name membership only, never a type.

⇒ ⭐ "Refuse it at authoring time" is therefore a NEW CAPABILITY, not a tightening. That was the exact question the order asked to be answered plainly, and it reframes the card.

The one runtime type read that does exist (ObjectChart.tsx:220) was correctly discounted: runtime not authoring time, the groupBy category field not the measure axis, present for label formatting, and with no boolean branch at all.

⚠️ Two of my premises falsified, and the second changes the routing

My either/or framing was wrong. I asked whether the surface was in objectstack's spec or objectui's packages/types. Both exist, both bind by bare string — and objectui's ObjectChartSchema.xAxisField / yAxisFields is a genuine object-field binding, so the objectui half is real. But it cannot be fixed alone: spec-subschema-parity.test.ts pins that these schemas belong upstream and that a local fork is the failure mode.
⭐ And the tier distinction neither the card nor I had: objectui's other chart node — ChartSchema, the one the measured defect actually flows through — binds no object field at all. It carries inline rows and xAxisKey names a row key. There is no object and no field metadata in that picture, so it structurally cannot know a type.
⚠️ THE HOLE IS WIDER THAN THE CARD. Measured, each behind a control that drew:

case	marks	speaks?
x all-boolean	0/2	⛔ silent
y all-boolean	0/2	⛔ silent
both axes all-boolean	0/2, tile text collapses to `"ym"`	⛔ silent
line / bar / area, all-boolean measure	0 / 0 / 0	⛔ silent
pie / donut / funnel / treemap	—	✅ already speak (`Number(false)` fails #7147's magnitude test)

⇒ The silent family is the CARTESIAN/POSITIONAL one — scatter, line, bar, area — on both axes. A ruling here governs at least four renderer sites and two axes, not one scatter coordinate.

⭐ "And it says nothing" was measured literally rather than asserted: the all-boolean tile's full text was exactly "ym010203040" — the legend label plus y ticks. A confident y scale, no x scale, no marks, no sentence.

The harness was built against the trap I named: ResponsiveContainer mocked to a fixed 480×320 so happy-dom's clientWidth: 0 cannot masquerade as the defect, with numeric controls drawing on every family. Every zero here sits behind a control that drew.

Rulings

Q1 — widen #7195 to the cartesian family: A. Splitting invites two different rulings on one mechanism, and the routing decision is identical for all four sites. The measurement is recorded here; ⛔ the title and labels are triage's to change, and I am flagging rather than doing it. You were right not to widen someone's card yourself.

Q2 — the additive dataType key: B, with C recorded. ⛔ Do not implement it yet: it is cheap and additive, but it only pays off if the capability question is answered the way it presumes. ⭐ The hazard is recorded upstream regardless — type is already taken on DatasetMeasureSchema, so an author writing type: 'boolean' is renamed onto aggregate and fails the enum. Any additive key must be spelled differently and should reuse the dimension tier's vocabulary so the two do not drift.

Q3 — transfer or keep: B. #7195 stays here as the measured symptom record, where the renderer tests live. I have opened the upstream capability card and cross-linked it.

⇒ Escalated to objectstack as the spec capability question, with the four-site scope, the undeclarable-measure finding and the alias hazard attached. ⛔ The no-renderer-guard ruling stands, re-confirmed this run.

Generated by Claude Code

Cross-link, as promised in the review above: the upstream capability card is objectstack-ai/objectstack#16959 — "A chart axis cannot be type-checked at authoring time — a dataset MEASURE has no datatype to declare, and type is already spent as an aggregate alias."

It carries the undeclarable-measure finding, the type-is-taken hazard, the four-site / two-axis scope, and the explicit note that any refusal is an accept-surface narrowing above the manual floor. ⛔ It proposes no fix — its first question is the capability one.

This card stays open as the measured symptom record, where the renderer evidence and its harness live.

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling: UI closure batch 1 item 7 · letter A (the renderer says so when no row can be placed) · maintainer 「同意」 2026-09-24T06:32Z

Director seat, summon #29 (session_01EcrTi7s5oDYPHS4Pi7h31d). Presented in chat from the business angle; the maintainer answered 「同意」. Thread re-read to its last comment (5590886833) in this act.

Ruled fix shape: the loud fix lives in the renderer, keyed on the whole dataset rather than on the value's type. When a numeric axis of a cartesian tile has rows but no row carries a finite number on it, the tile renders the existing data-chart-error placeholder (the objectui#4683 channel) with a sentence saying that none of the N rows has a numeric value on that axis, naming the bound key. That sentence is true in the all-boolean case (0 of N placed) and never fires in the mixed case (one real number present, 3 of 3 placed). The truth of the sentence does not depend on the neighbouring rows.

⛔ No "reject booleans" predicate. It was measured to put a false footnote over the mixed case (AdvancedChartImpl.degeneratePosition.test.tsx:226, 3 of 3 placed).
⛔ No authoring-time type check. objectstack#16959 closed not_planned on 2026-09-10 (director summon 在开发对象相关组件时，应该一套标准API搞定所有业务 #21), and that ruling names this card as the home of the loud fix.
Scope: the silent cases the 2026-09-08 census measured (5590877640): x all-boolean, y all-boolean, both, and the line / bar / area families where the same predicate holds. The pin at :226 is rewritten to assert the refusal on the all-boolean tile, with the mixed case kept green as its reverse control. ⛔ The pin is not deleted.

Execution: pm:queue · priority:p3 · domain:ui stand. The change is published renderer behaviour, so the lane declares Clause-② per diff.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 5 — domain:ui execution seat 3
Session: session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb
Branch: claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal
Worktree: objectui-issue-7195
Domain: domain:ui
Seat: domain:ui#3
File surface: packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (a numeric axis with rows and no finite number on it renders the objectui#4683 data-chart-error placeholder, naming the bound key), AdvancedChartImpl.degeneratePosition.test.tsx (the :226 pin rewritten to assert the refusal on the all-boolean tile, with the mixed case kept green; ⛔ not deleted), new tests beside it, one .changeset/7195-…md (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: opus (default judgement tier). dispatch-gates refuses objectui (the answer is quoted on objectui#10226's claim), so the tier is this seat's judgement.
Clause-②: yes
Thread-read: 5809002651
Serial constraints cleared: open PRs (file lists read 2026-09-24T20:59Z) and live pm:dispatched claims: none touches AdvancedChartImpl.tsx. This seat's objectui#9792 held the file and landed first.

Ruling-ref: UI closure batch 1 item 7 · letter A, maintainer 「同意」 (5809002651). The refusal is keyed on the whole dataset, not on the value's type. ⛔ No "reject booleans" predicate and ⛔ no authoring-time type check. Why Clause-②: yes: the renderer starts refusing an authored shape it draws today (as an empty frame), so the rendered accept-set narrows. An isolated at-tier contract review runs before ready. A new i18n pack key would breach this surface: stop and report.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "774582568",
  "base_sha": "cd7b728b9",
  "summary": "A cartesian tile whose numeric axis has rows, none of which carries a value the axis can build a scale from, now renders the existing ChartRefusal / data-chart-error placeholder with a NEW code `no-numeric-value` and a literal sentence keyed on the whole dataset: 'none of the N rows has a numeric value for KEY' (singular: 'its only row has no numeric value for KEY'). This covers scatter x / y / both all-boolean, plus bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo when no row gives any bound series a value; the mixed boolean control still draws. Hypothesis 3 was falsified: the predicate follows Recharts' own domain reader (makeNumber: a number, string or Date whose Number() is finite), not a bare Number.isFinite, because numeric strings, '' and Dates draw. It also has a measured stack exception: d3's stack reads booleans as numbers, so all-boolean STACKED series draw and are not refused. Precedence: the outer wrapper checks missing-category-key, then no-plottable-series, then no-numeric-value; scatter's arm checks scatter-multi-series, then no-plottable-points, then no-numeric-value, then the unplotted-points footnote. The :226 pin was rewritten (not deleted): the mixed half is still green as the reverse control, and the all-boolean half asserts the refusal. Assignee was already set (os-project-manager) and was not touched. No i18n key. The file surface was held.",
  "tests": "All at head 774582568. (1) pnpm exec vitest run packages/plugin-charts/ (from the repo root, under the lock): 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 698 passed (698)', VERDICT command-exit 0. (2) Chart-rendering consumers outside the package (plugin-dashboard/src/__tests__/, app-shell DatasetPreview x2 + widget-dom-leak-sweep, plugin-report chartLocaleChrome-9038, examples/schema-catalog gallery render): 'Test Files 126 passed (126) / Tests 2015 passed (2015)', exit 0. (3) Built the pnpm --filter '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure (exit 0), then pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts type-check exit 0. tsc -p tsconfig.test.json --listFiles counts both touched test files (2). (4) Ablation, run after the commit: early 'return true' in anchorsNumericAxis, marker grep -c 1 after the mutation. The two files went 'Tests 43 failed | 93 passed (136)', exactly the 43 refusal assertions (scatter 6 + series 36 + rewritten :226 pin 1), with every drawing and seam test green. Restored via git checkout HEAD --: marker 0, git hash-object == HEAD blob 02440cbc57dc, git diff HEAD empty. There is no build/dist leg because the tests import ./AdvancedChartImpl from src. (5) Before/after probe over 110 tiles (scratch, not committed): every tile that now refuses drew 0 marks before, and every tile that drew marks is unchanged. (6) Gates, exit 0 each, written to files before reading: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations ('0 new citation(s)'), check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims (flagged 7546-chart-series-keys-declared.md for naming AdvancedChartImpl.tsx; I read it and it is still true), check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. (7) Lint narrowed and declared: eslint --format json over the 3 touched files with the package config gave 3 files, 0 errors, 64 warnings (no-explicit-any harness style + existing ones). No type-aware parserOptions in eslint.config.js, so the diff cannot move any untouched file's verdict. Full pnpm lint is left to CI. CI: not awaited (in_progress at report time).",
  "gates": "all local gates above exit 0; CI in_progress, not awaited",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (+161 incl. two stale comments updated)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.degeneratePosition.test.tsx (the :226 pin rewritten)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (new)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (new, plugin-charts patch)"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "Series-family predicate is narrowed to 'some row CARRIES a bound key'. The absent-key shape (objectui#8266) literally satisfies the ruling's predicate, and the first draft refused it. That turned 2 out-of-surface pins red (ObjectChart.countSeriesKeyRender-8266 'draws NOTHING, silently...' and ObjectChart.categoryAxisKeyRender-8269 'status/value'), whose header asks for this to be re-decided on its own. I narrowed the predicate instead of breaching the surface; see open_questions.",
    "Brief hypothesis H3 (Number.isFinite on the raw value) was falsified by measurement and not used, as allowed."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "2 relay writes (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): pr_create POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls (draft, PR 10388, body read back byte-identical 9781 = 9781); comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 2 git pushes (the empty-branch probe and the commit), which are not REST. 0 label writes, 0 PR-body PATCH.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "Should no-numeric-value also cover a bound series key that NO row carries (the objectui#8266 shape: a series named 'value' over rows carrying 'count', which today draws 0 marks silently)? The ruling's predicate holds for it, but two render pins outside this surface assert silence and ask to be re-decided.",
      "options": [
        "A: extend the refusal to it and rewrite both pins (8266 and 8269 render files) in a follow-up with that surface",
        "B: give it its own refusal naming the missing column ('no row has a KEY field'), mirroring missing-category-key, which is the more specific sentence",
        "C: leave it silent"
      ],
      "recommendation": "B, because it is a binding diagnosis ('the column is not there'), not a scale diagnosis, and the missing-category-key precedent shows the specific sentence is the useful one. It is a separate card for the seat to cut; this PR does not pre-empt it."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "Not filed, carrier: this PR's Acceptance notes. Dual-axis tile with one all-boolean axis beside a live one: the dead axis's series draws nothing and nothing says so. Measured, and declined here because a whole-tile refusal would blank the live marks. This is observation-class, not a/b/c.",
    "Not filed, carrier: this PR's Acceptance notes. `stack` on a line series has no effect in the renderer (the line arms spread no stackId), and the predicate treats it as stacked, so an all-boolean stacked line stays silent at 0 marks. It errs toward silence. Observation, not a/b/c."
  ],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "patch round 1 (contract review 5822699522 FAIL on 774582568)",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "18f03f4d6",
  "previous_head": "774582568",
  "summary": "All three required fixes are in one new commit, 18f03f4d6, pushed as a plain push with no force or amend; the PR is still draft. (1) anchorsNumericAxis now mirrors Recharts' makeDomain as well as makeNumber. A two-element array [lo, hi] whose ends each pass the scalar rule anchors the axis; this array branch comes before the stacked-boolean branch, so it holds for stacked series too. A range with a boolean or unparseable end does not anchor. (2) For dotted keys I chose 'unresolved and silent', not re-resolving the key the way Recharts does. hasNoNumericSeriesValue returns null unless EVERY bound series key is an own property (hasOwnProperty) of at least one row. Why: Recharts resolves keys with es-toolkit compat get, and its path grammar (dots, brackets, literal key first) would be a second copy in this file that could drift from the library. When the predicate cannot resolve a key it cannot know whether that series draws, so it must not say it does not. No producer in the repo emits dotted keys (the reviewer's grep). This gate replaces the earlier 'carried' gate and is strictly more silent: one absent key beside an all-boolean series is now silent too (previously refused). The objectui#8266 shape stays silent. Scatter was not touched here: its countPlottablePoints already reads row[key], so a dotted scatter key hits no-plottable-points first on both trees (measured). (3) Prose corrected. The source comment now reads 'Mirrors the two readers Recharts builds the domain with' and covers the array clause, and says precisely that '' on bar / horizontal-bar / combo gives the silent all-zero picture. The changeset's 'What keeps drawing' now lists range values, gives the precise wording for '', and names the unresolved-key silence. Frontmatter and patch level are unchanged. Absent-key option B was not taken up in this PR, as instructed.",
  "tests": "All at head 18f03f4d6. (1) The two touched files: 'Tests 142 passed (142)'. The whole package: pnpm exec vitest run packages/plugin-charts/ gave 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 704 passed (704)', VERDICT command-exit 0. (2) Consumers (plugin-dashboard/src/__tests__/, app-shell DatasetPreview x2 + widget-dom-leak-sweep, plugin-report chartLocaleChrome-9038, examples/schema-catalog gallery): 'Test Files 126 passed (126) / Tests 2015 passed (2015)'. (3) '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure build + pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts type-check: exit 0. (4) New pins under 'what must keep DRAWING': range bar, range area, dotted key a.b beside all-boolean w (bar and line) as the reverse control, and one absent key beside an all-boolean series stays silent. Plus one refusal pin: a range with boolean ends is refused. (5) Two-leg ablation, run after the commit with a trap restore. Leg array ('if (Array.isArray(v)) return false'): 'Tests 2 failed | 100 passed (102)', exactly the two RANGE pins. Leg resolved ('if (!resolved) return null' removed): 'Tests 4 failed | 98 passed (102)', the two DOTTED pins plus the two absent-key silence pins. Markers were 1 after each mutation and 0 after each restore. Restore proven: hash-object 5587c6c0b9ce == HEAD blob, git diff HEAD empty. (6) Probe rerun, base cd7b728b9 vs head 18f03f4d6 in one harness (the base file copied beside the head file; scratch, not committed). It adds range, range-with-numeric-string-ends, range-with-bool-end, range beside an all-boolean series, stacked range, dotted+all-bool, dotted alone, dotted all-bool alone, absent+all-bool, scatter y-range and scatter dotted-x tiles. Result: 'TOTAL tiles=161 drew-on-base=83 drawn-tiles-changed=0 new-no-numeric-value=49 new-refusals-over-base-marks=0'. Every tile that drew on base is unchanged in marks, code and note, and every new refusal sits on a tile that drew 0 marks on base. (7) Gates, exit 0 each, written to files first: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations (0 new), check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims, check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. (8) Narrowed lint over the 3 touched source/test files: 3 files, 0 errors, 64 warnings. Config has no type-aware parserOptions; full pnpm lint is left to CI. CI: not awaited.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (isDomainScalar split out, array clause, resolved gate replacing the carried gate, prose)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (+5 pins, header prose)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (prose only; frontmatter and patch unchanged)"
  ],
  "pr_body_sentences_now_false": [
    "Acceptance notes: 'the predicate now also requires that some row carries a bound key'. It now requires that EVERY bound key is an own property of some row (the unresolved-key gate). Suggested replacement: 'the refusal fires only when every bound series key is a plain own property of some row; a dotted path (Recharts resolves it through get) or a column no row carries keeps the tile silent'.",
    "Mechanism, H3 bullet: 'the predicate (anchorsNumericAxis) mirrors that reader'. It now mirrors makeDomain as well: add 'and a two-element [lo, hi] array whose ends both pass that rule (range bars / areas)'.",
    "Accept-set 'Still draws' is incomplete, not false: add range values (bar, area, stacked) and a dotted dataKey beside a dead series.",
    "Evidence counts ('68/698', ablation '43 failed / 93 passed of 136', '110-tile probe') are labelled 'at head 774582568' and are true as history. The current figures are in tests above (704 tests; 161-tile probe)."
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "None against the patch order. Chosen arm for fix 2: unresolved key means silent, with the reason given in summary."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "1 relay write this round (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 1 git push (18f03f4d6), which is not REST. 0 PR-body PATCH, 0 label writes.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "Observation, not filed, carrier: none named (承接者:无). A line series over range values draws 0 marks on both trees and stays silent: a line does not draw [lo, hi]. The predicate counts the range as anchoring, so it says nothing; this errs toward silence. Noted only."
  ],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "patch round 2 (contract review 5823017165 FAIL on 18f03f4d6) + Lint addendum",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "89c43b447",
  "commits_this_round": [
    "ff3de6d77 round-2 fixes",
    "89c43b447 lint fix"
  ],
  "summary": "Two new commits, pushed as plain pushes with no force or amend; the PR is still draft. (1) makeDomain is now mirrored as written. An array anchors by v[0] and v[1] with no length check, so [1,2,3] draws. isDomainScalar accepts instanceof Number, as recharts' isNumber does, then requires a finite Number(v). (2) Declared domain. New declaresFullDomain(axis) is true when the axis has both a finite numeric min and a finite numeric max; such an axis always has a scale and is never dead. Scatter checks xAxis for the x key and yAxes[0] for the y key, and names only the axes still dead. For series families, a series is live when its axis declares a full domain. The axis is over-approximated toward silence: yAxis 'left' binds yAxes[0]; any other series may bind yAxes[0] or the secondary (yAxes[1], or a lone entry positioned right), because the combo arm routes unbound line / area series to the right axis. min alone, max alone, logarithmic, stepSize, and line / region annotations do not count and are still refused (pinned per family). (3) Seat ruling applied: for a stacked series any array anchors, so the stacked range with a boolean end stays silent. I made this broader than the boolean-end case alone, because a stacked series is not read through makeDomain at all (the reviewer's second boundary flag), and the broader rule errs toward silence. The unstacked boolean-end range stays refused. Both are pinned. (4) Prose: the source comment says 'an ARRAY by its first two elements' and 'Number object', and adds the stacked-array paragraph and the declared-domain doc. 'Errs to silence, never to a refusal over marks' in the dotted-key doc became 'For both shapes the gate errs to silence'. The changeset's 'What keeps drawing' adds Number objects, the first-two-elements range rule, stacked arrays and declared domains, and states which axis settings are still refused. Frontmatter and patch level are unchanged. Lint addendum: the single CI error was the ESLint core check for unused disable directives, 'Unused eslint-disable directive (no problems were reported from no-new-wrappers)', at packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx:347 (head ff3de6d77). My narrowed lint had in fact seen it (1 error), and I missed it. Fixed in 89c43b447 by deleting the directive.",
  "tests": "At head 89c43b447 unless noted. (1) Full package lint, as the addendum asked: pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts lint (the whole eslint .), exit code written to a file: 0, output '✖ 375 problems (0 errors, 375 warnings)'. (2) The two touched test files: 'Tests 193 passed (193)'. (3) At ff3de6d77, whose code differs from 89c43b447 only by that one comment line: whole package 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 755 passed (755)'; the '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure build + type-check exit 0; consumers (plugin-dashboard/src/__tests__/, app-shell DatasetPreview x2 + widget-dom-leak-sweep, plugin-report chartLocaleChrome-9038, schema-catalog gallery) 'Test Files 126 passed (126) / Tests 2015 passed (2015)'. (4) Four-leg ablation at ff3de6d77, run after the commit with a trap restore. Each leg failed exactly its own pins. length (length===2 restored): 3 failed, the LONGER-array pins (bar, area, horizontal-bar). numberobj (instanceof Number dropped): 2 failed, the Number-object pins (bar, line). stackedarray (stacked short-circuit dropped): 1 failed, the stacked boolean-end pin. domain (declaresFullDomain forced false): 9 failed, 3 scatter + 5 families + the right-bound secondary pin. Markers were 1 after each mutation and 0 after each restore; hash-object ca45cfd9e710 == HEAD blob; git diff HEAD empty. (5) Widened probe, base cd7b728b9 vs the round-2 code, in one harness (scratch, not committed). It adds xAxis / yAxes declared domains (full, min-only, max-only, logarithmic, logarithmic-with-full, stepSize, lone-right-full), line and region annotations, dual-axis binding variants, length-3 and length-1 arrays, stacked length-3 / numeric-string / boolean-end ranges, Number objects and NaN Number objects, over scatter and bar / line / area / horizontal-bar / column / combo. Result: 'TOTAL tiles=394 drew-on-base=134 drawn-tiles-changed=0 new-no-numeric-value=196 new-refusals-over-base-marks=0'. (6) Gates at 89c43b447 or ff3de6d77, exit 0 each, written to files first: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations (0 new), check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims, check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. CI: not awaited.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (isDomainScalar Number objects, array without the length check, stacked-array silence, declaresFullDomain wired into scatter and series, prose)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (declared-domain / Number-object / longer-array / stacked boolean-end pins, still-refused axis-settings pins, then the unused directive removed)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (prose only)"
  ],
  "pr_body_sentences_now_false": [
    "Mechanism H3 bullet. Replace 'which takes a number, a string or a Date whose Number() is finite and rejects everything else, booleans included ... So the predicate (anchorsNumericAxis) mirrors that reader' with: 'Recharts builds a numeric domain through makeDomain / makeNumber: a number (primitive or Number object), a string or a Date whose Number() is finite, or an array read by its first two elements when both pass that rule (range bars / areas; [1, 2, 3] draws). Booleans are rejected. The predicate (anchorsNumericAxis) mirrors those readers, and an axis whose spec declares both a numeric min and max always has a scale.'",
    "Stacked bullet. Append: 'Any array in a stacked series also anchors: the stack does not read arrays as ranges, and a stacked [true, 3] painted 2 rectangles (seat ruling, round 2).'",
    "'Still draws, unchanged' list. Replace it with: 'the mixed control; numeric strings; Number objects; Date values; range arrays read by their first two elements ([1, 3], [1, 2, 3]) on bar / area / horizontal-bar / combo, stacked too; any array in a stacked series, including a boolean-end range; an all-boolean series beside a numeric one; an all-boolean stacked series; an axis whose spec declares both min and max (scatter xAxis / yAxes[0]; series yAxes entries), where booleans are placed on the declared scale; a dual-axis tile with one live axis; a bound key that no row carries as a plain own property (a dotted path or an absent column) keeps the tile silent.' Also add after the refused list: 'min or max alone, logarithmic, stepSize and annotations do not build a scale, so those all-boolean tiles are still refused (0 marks on base).'",
    "Acceptance notes: 'the predicate now also requires that some row carries a bound key'. Replace with: 'the refusal fires only when every bound series key is a plain own property of some row; a dotted path or a column no row carries keeps the tile silent'.",
    "Evidence counts. '68 files / 698 tests', 'ablation 43 failed / 93 passed of 136' and '110-tile probe' are labelled 'at head 774582568'; they are true as history but not current. Add a line: 'At head 89c43b447: package 755 tests green; full package lint exit 0 (0 errors); widened 394-tile probe: 134 tiles drew on base, 0 of them changed, 0 new refusals over base marks.'"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "Stacked-array silence covers every stacked array, not only the boolean-end range the seat ruled on, because a stacked series is not read through makeDomain. It errs toward silence; the unstacked refusals are unaffected.",
    "Lint: the first round-2 push (ff3de6d77) went up with a lint error my narrowed run had printed and I did not read; corrected in 89c43b447 and verified with the full package lint (exit 0)."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "1 relay write this round (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 2 git pushes (ff3de6d77, 89c43b447), which are not REST. 0 PR-body PATCH, 0 label writes.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "Observation, not filed, carrier: none named (承接者:无). An all-null series on an axis with a declared full domain draws 0 marks and stays silent: the declared domain marks the axis live whatever the rows carry. This errs toward silence. The same holds for a dual-axis tile whose declared secondary has no series bound to it. Noted only."
  ],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "patch round 3 (contract review 5823473435 FAIL on 89c43b447)",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "604f051c7",
  "summary": "One new commit, 604f051c7, pushed as a plain push with no force or amend; the PR is still draft. Fix 1: stacked series now mirror what the stack paints, per family. I measured it first on base cd7b728b9 over bar / column / horizontal-bar / combo / area / line with 12 stacked value shapes. Stacked BAR family (bar, column, horizontal-bar, a bar inside a combo): only null / undefined keep the series dead; every other value anchors, so it stays silent. On base, 'n/a' / NaN / {} / 'Infinity' / Infinity / 'abc' / true / [true,3] paint 2 rectangles, and false / '' / 0 paint the zero-height all-zero picture. Stacked AREA: base draws an EMPTY path for 'n/a' / NaN / {} / 'Infinity' / Infinity / 'abc' and for null, and a path for booleans and '' / 0. So booleans and arrays anchor and other values keep the scalar rule: stacked-area 'n/a' stays refused (0 marks on base, true sentence). Stacked LINE: the renderer spreads no stackId on a line, so its stack is inert and it keeps the unstacked rule. A 'stacked' all-boolean or all-'n/a' line draws 0 on base and is now refused; this replaces the earlier 'line is read as stacked, errs to silence' caveat. The family is resolved as the renderer resolves it (new stackModeOf): effectiveChartFamily / comboBaseFamily, and inside a combo series[].chartType, then the base family, then the index default (first bar, rest lines). stack: 1 behaves like 's' (truthy). Pins: stacked 'n/a' / NaN / {} / 'Infinity' / Infinity / 'abc' on bar, column, horizontal-bar and combo, plus 'n/a' beside null, under what must keep DRAWING. Refused: stacked-area 'n/a', and 'stacked' line all-boolean and 'n/a'. The stacked all-null pin stays refused on every family. Fix 2, prose: the source's stacked paragraph now states the per-family scalar rule beside the array rule. The changeset's refuse bullet excludes stacked unparseable strings on the bar family and states the area and line rules, and it now says '`logarithmic` alone'. Frontmatter and patch level are unchanged.",
  "tests": "At head 604f051c7. (1) Full package lint: pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts lint (the whole eslint .), exit code written to a file: 0, '✖ 376 problems (0 errors, 376 warnings)'. (2) Whole package: 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 783 passed (783)'; the two touched files alone 221/221. (3) '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure build + type-check: exit 0. (4) Consumer count re-derived. Exact command, from the repo root under the lock: `pnpm exec vitest run examples/schema-catalog/test/catalog-gallery-render.test.tsx packages/app-shell/src/__tests__/widget-dom-leak-sweep.test.tsx packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/previews/DatasetPreview.test.tsx packages/app-shell/src/views/metadata-admin/previews/__tests__/DatasetPreview.dimensionLabels-8187.test.tsx packages/plugin-dashboard/src/__tests__/ packages/plugin-report/src/__tests__/DatasetReportRenderer.chartLocaleChrome-9038.test.tsx --maxWorkers=2`. It was run with the vitest JSON reporter: 126 files, numTotalTests 2015, passed 2015, failed 0, pending 0, todo 0. Per path: plugin-dashboard/src/__tests__/ 121 files / 1181 tests; examples/schema-catalog catalog-gallery-render 1 / 587; app-shell widget-dom-leak-sweep 1 / 230; app-shell DatasetPreview.test 1 / 8; DatasetPreview.dimensionLabels-8187 1 / 5; plugin-report chartLocaleChrome-9038 1 / 4. The same command's text reporter printed 'Tests 2015 passed (2015)' in rounds 0, 1 and 2. I cannot reproduce 1441. The difference from 2015 is 574, which matches no single path above; the reviewer's command or path set is the likely difference, and the per-path figures above should settle it. (5) Two-leg ablation after the commit, with a trap restore. barmode (a stacked bar anchors on booleans only): 'Tests 26 failed | 155 passed (181)', exactly the 24 stacked bar-family scalar pins, the 'n/a'-beside-null pin and the stacked boolean-end-range pin. linefamily (the line branch of stackModeOf removed): 2 failed, exactly the two 'stacked' line refusal pins. Markers were 1 after each mutation and 0 after each restore; hash-object 1ee7967720a7 == HEAD blob; git diff HEAD empty. (6) Widened probe, base cd7b728b9 vs head code, one harness (scratch, not committed). It keeps the round-2 population (declared domains, annotations, logarithmic, stepSize, dual-axis binding, length-3 arrays, Number objects, dotted and absent keys) and adds stacked scalars 'n/a', NaN, {}, 'Infinity', Infinity, 'abc', true, false, '', null, 0, [true,3] and ['a','b']. Each is tested all rows and beside null, with stack 's' and stack 1, plus one-row 'n/a', two series both 'n/a' and two series all-null, on bar / column / horizontal-bar / combo / area / line. It also adds combo series with explicit bar / line / area families, and a bar-derived combo [family, line]. Result: 'TOTAL tiles=694 (stacked-shape tiles=426) drew-on-base=322 drawn-tiles-changed=0 new-no-numeric-value=278 new-refusals-over-base-marks=0'. (7) Gates, exit 0 each, written to files first: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations (0 new), check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims, check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. CI: not awaited.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (StackMode + stackModeOf, per-family stacked rule, stacked prose)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (+26 stacked-scalar drawing pins, +3 stacked refusal pins)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (prose only)"
  ],
  "pr_body_sentences_now_false": [
    "Stacked bullet (with the seat's round-2 addition). Replace with: 'A stacked series is read through d3's stack (Number(value)), not makeDomain, and what it paints depends on the family. A stacked BAR (bar / column / horizontal-bar, or a bar in a combo) paints every value except null / undefined, including booleans, unparseable strings, NaN, objects and arrays, which appear as full-height NaN artefacts, so only an all-null / missing stacked bar is refused. A stacked AREA draws booleans and arrays but an empty path for unparseable values, so those stay refused. A line spreads no stackId, so its stack is inert and it follows the unstacked rule.'",
    "'Now refused (each drew 0 marks before)' list. Replace the series line with: 'bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo, when no row gives any bound series a value the axis can scale: every value boolean, null or an unparseable string (unstacked); for a stacked bar only all-null / missing; for a stacked area also unparseable strings; a \"stacked\" line follows the unstacked rule.'",
    "'Still draws, unchanged' list. Replace 'any array in a stacked series, including a boolean-end range' and 'an all-boolean stacked series' with: 'any value but null in a stacked bar (booleans, unparseable strings, NaN, objects, arrays, including a boolean-end range); booleans and arrays in a stacked area'. Replace 'min or max alone, logarithmic, stepSize and annotations' with 'min or max alone, logarithmic alone, stepSize and annotations'.",
    "Acceptance note 'A stack on a line series has no effect in this renderer ... but the predicate still treats it as stacked ... stays silent at 0 marks'. Replace with: 'A stack on a line series has no effect in this renderer, and the predicate reads the line family the same way, so a \"stacked\" all-boolean or all-unparseable line is refused (0 marks on base).'",
    "Evidence counts. Replace the current figures with: 'At head 604f051c7: package 783 tests green; full package lint exit 0 (0 errors); consumers 126 files / 2015 tests (vitest JSON reporter; per-path breakdown in the report); widened 694-tile probe: 322 tiles drew on base, 0 of them changed, 0 new refusals over base marks.'"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "The consumer count could not be reconciled to the reviewer's 1441. I re-derived it with the exact command above and the JSON reporter (2015 across 126 files) and gave the per-path breakdown instead of adopting the reviewer's figure."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "1 relay write this round (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 1 git push (604f051c7), which is not REST. 0 PR-body PATCH, 0 label writes.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "Observation, not filed, carrier: none named (承接者:无). A stacked area over arrays with a boolean end ([true, 3]) draws 0 marks on base and stays silent, because a stacked area treats every array as anchoring. This errs toward silence; I did not measure a stacked-area array rule finer than that. Noted only."
  ],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "patch round 4 (contract review 5824094683 FAIL on 604f051c7)",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "0e5bb6e8b",
  "summary": "One new commit, 0e5bb6e8b, pushed as a plain push with no force or amend; the PR is still draft. I applied the seat's axis-level rule, which errs to silence: any series with a bar- or area-mode stack (stackModeOf, unchanged from round 3) makes the tile live, whatever its values, so the tile is never refused. I did not need per-axis binding. The refusal needs EVERY series dead, and a stacked series is itself live under the rule, so it keeps its own axis and therefore the whole tile silent. Resolving which axis each sibling binds to cannot change the answer. This also covers the explicit-combo index-default line and a right-bound sibling of a left stack: they stay silent (they draw 0 on base), which the ruling allows. anchorsNumericAxis is back to a pure unstacked reader (makeNumber / makeDomain, booleans never anchor), and StackMode now only feeds stackModeOf. A line's stack stays inert, so a 'stacked' all-boolean or 'n/a' line is still refused (0 marks on base). Consequences of 'whatever its values', all stated in the prose and pinned: a stacked all-null bar / column / horizontal-bar / area / combo and a stacked-area 'n/a' now stay silent. Both draw 0 on base and were refused in round 3; the rule withholds the refusal rather than model the scale. Census cases are unchanged: unstacked, no declared domain, all-boolean / null / unparseable on every family and scatter still refuse. New pins under 'what must keep DRAWING': a stacked all-null bar and a stacked all-null area, each beside an unstacked all-boolean sibling on the same axis. The two-unstacked-all-boolean pin stays refused. Prose: the predicate docblock now states the stacked-axis rule next to 'Only when EVERY series is dead'. The anchorsNumericAxis docblock is rewritten to 'A stacked series is not read here at all — its axis is live'. The changeset's refused list now scopes the series families to 'with no stacked bar or area series', and a new paragraph says that any stacked bar or area chart is never refused, including the ones that draw nothing. So 'each of which drew zero marks before' is true for everything it lists, and the old 'A stacked bar ... is refused only when every value is null' sentence is gone. Frontmatter and patch level are unchanged.",
  "tests": "At head 0e5bb6e8b. (1) Full package lint: pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts lint (the whole eslint .), exit code written to a file: 0, '✖ 376 problems (0 errors, 376 warnings)'. (2) Whole package: 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 785 passed (785)'; the two touched files 223/223. (3) '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure build + type-check: exit 0. (4) Consumers, same command as round 3 with the JSON reporter: 126 files, 2015 tests, 2015 passed, 0 failed. (5) Ablation after the commit, with a trap restore: the stackModeOf clause removed from the live check gave 'Tests 38 failed | 145 passed (183)'. That is exactly the stacked pins: the 5 stacked all-null silence pins, stacked-area 'n/a', 24 stacked bar-family scalars, 'n/a' beside null, the 2 new stacked-null-plus-boolean-sibling pins, the stacked boolean-end range, and the 4 stacked all-boolean pins. No unstacked pin failed. Marker 1 after the mutation and 0 after the restore; hash-object 7c75b75cb1e0 == HEAD blob; git diff HEAD empty. (6) Widened probe, base cd7b728b9 vs head code, one harness (scratch, not committed). It keeps the round-2 / round-3 populations (declared domains, annotations, logarithmic, stepSize, arrays, Number objects, dotted keys, 13 stacked scalars all rows and beside null with stack 's' and 1). It adds 302 MIXED tiles that bind stacked and unstacked series to one axis, on bar / line / area / horizontal-bar / column / combo: a stacked null / 'n/a' / undefined / true series with an unstacked all-bool / bool-end range / 'n/a' / null / numeric sibling, in both orders; stack:1; one row; a third stacked-null series; yAxes min; dual both-right, both-left, stack-left sibling-right and stack-right sibling-left; explicit and derived combos with bar / line / area families and a left-bound or index-default line. It also adds the 28 review tiles (bar / column / horizontal-bar / area times base case, reversed order, 'n/a', undefined, stack:1, bool-end range sibling, yAxes min). Result: 'TOTAL tiles=782 (mixed stacked+unstacked tiles=302, review tiles=28) drew-on-base=432 drawn-tiles-changed=0 new-no-numeric-value=166 new-refusals-over-base-marks=0'. All 28 review tiles drew on base (22 x 1 mark, 3 x 2, 3 x 3) and are unchanged at head. The census tiles (scatter x / y / both all-bool; bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo all-bool, all-null, all-'n/a') still render no-numeric-value. (7) Gates, exit 0 each, written to files first: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations, check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims, check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. CI: not awaited.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (stacked series make the tile live; anchorsNumericAxis unstacked-only; docblocks)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (stacked all-null and stacked-area 'n/a' pins flipped to silent, line still refused; +2 stacked-null-plus-boolean-sibling drawing pins; header prose)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (prose only)"
  ],
  "pr_body_sentences_now_false": [
    "Stacked bullet. Replace with: 'A stacked bar or area gives its axis a scale through d3's stack (Number(value)) whatever its values, and any unstacked series on that axis is placed on it (an all-boolean series beside a stacked all-null one draws). Rather than model that per series, any series with a bar- or area-mode stack keeps the whole tile silent (seat ruling, round 4). A line spreads no stackId, so its stack is inert and it follows the unstacked rule.'",
    "'Now refused (each drew 0 marks before)' list. Replace the series line with: 'bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo with no stacked bar or area series, when no row gives any bound series a value the axis can scale (every value boolean, null or an unparseable string); a \"stacked\" line is judged the same way.' Drop any 'stacked all-null bar / stacked area unparseable is refused' wording.",
    "'Still draws, unchanged' list. Replace the stacked items with: 'every chart with a stacked bar or area series, whatever its values (including an unstacked all-boolean or boolean-end-range sibling on the same axis). Stacked charts that draw nothing (stacked all-null bar, stacked area of unparseable strings) also stay silent, as before.'",
    "Evidence counts. Replace with: 'At head 0e5bb6e8b: package 785 tests green; full package lint exit 0 (0 errors); consumers 126 files / 2015 tests; widened 782-tile probe including 302 mixed stacked+unstacked tiles and the 28 review tiles: 432 tiles drew on base, 0 of them changed, 0 new refusals over base marks.'"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "I did not resolve axis binding for the stacked rule, because it is not needed: a stacked series is itself live, and the refusal requires every series dead, so the per-axis rule and 'any bar/area stack in the tile' give the same answer."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "1 relay write this round (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 1 git push (0e5bb6e8b), which is not REST. 0 PR-body PATCH, 0 label writes.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "Observation, not filed, carrier: none named (承接者:无). Stacked charts that draw nothing (stacked all-null bar / column / horizontal-bar / area / combo, stacked area of unparseable strings) are silent under the round-4 rule; before round 4 they were refused with a true sentence. This errs toward silence by the seat's ruling. Noted only."
  ],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 7195,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "patch round 5 (contract review 5824416651 FAIL on 0e5bb6e8b)",
  "branch": "claude/issue-7195-no-numeric-axis-refusal",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10388",
  "session": "session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "head_sha": "1e13495e2",
  "summary": "One new commit, 1e13495e2, pushed as a plain push with no force or amend; the PR is still draft. I fixed only the scoped point. Fix 1: I chose the BROAD rule. declaresFullDomain is renamed declaresScale and returns true for a finite min AND max, or for ANY finite stepSize (stepSize alone included). It is read in the same two places as before: series declared(s), with the round-2 binding unchanged, and the scatter arm's deadAxes filter (x reads xAxis, y reads yAxes[0]). Why broad: the drawing mechanism is the renderer's own ticksFor. It reads booleans as 0 / 1 and, with one declared bound, returns ticks Recharts resolves the 'auto' end from. Mirroring exactly when ticksFor returns a usable array would be one more model of the scale, while 'any finite stepSize' is trivially true of the spec and errs to silence. Consequence: stepSize alone is no longer refused. It draws 0 marks on base (60 of 60 stepSize-alone tiles in the probe) and now stays silent, so I removed the old 'stepSize: still refused' pin and replaced it with a 'stepSize ALONE keeps the tile silent' pin per family. min alone, max alone, logarithmic alone and annotations stay refused, and are still pinned. New pins under 'what must keep DRAWING': {stepSize:2,min:0} and {stepSize:2,max:10} on bar / column / line / area / horizontal-bar / combo, and on scatter x (xAxis) and y (yAxes[0]). Fix 2, prose: the declaresScale docblock states both shapes, the ticksFor mechanism and the broad-rule choice; the scatter-arm comment and the series docblock heading now say 'declared scale'. The changeset's axis sentence now covers stepSize (a single bound draws; stepSize alone stays silent) and keeps 'A min or max alone, logarithmic alone or an annotation ... still refused'. Frontmatter and patch level are unchanged. Nothing else was changed.",
  "tests": "At head 1e13495e2. (1) Full package lint: pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-charts lint (the whole eslint .), exit code written to a file: 0, '✖ 376 problems (0 errors, 376 warnings)'. (2) Whole package: 'Test Files 68 passed (68) / Tests 801 passed (801)'; the two touched files 239/239. (3) '@object-ui/plugin-charts^...' closure build + type-check: exit 0. (4) Consumers, same command as rounds 3 and 4 with the JSON reporter: 126 files, 2015 tests, 2015 passed, 0 failed. (5) Ablation after the commit, with a trap restore: the stepSize clause removed from declaresScale gave 'Tests 22 failed | 177 passed (199)'. That is exactly the 22 stepSize pins (4 scatter, 12 series-family stepSize+bound, 6 stepSize-alone), and no other pin failed. Marker 1 after the mutation and 0 after the restore; hash-object 364cc5f556a5 == HEAD blob; git diff HEAD empty. One slip: the script's final tail printed the round-4 log file because of a sed substitution I left in it. The round-5 log was read separately and is the one quoted here. (6) Probe, base cd7b728b9 vs head code, one harness (scratch, not committed). Groups: base 255 (a condensed round 0-4 population: scatter and all six families; booleans, null, unparseable, numeric strings, '', ranges, length-3 arrays, Number objects, dotted keys, declared full / min / max / log domains, annotations, stacked scalars with stack 's' and 1, stacked-plus-unstacked siblings). step 300: stepSize 0.5 / 1 / 2 / 200, each with min 0, min -5, max 10, max 1 or no bound, over all-boolean and all-null rows on bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo, plus scatter x, y and both. review 85: my reconstruction of the review's list. That is 13 variants per family (step2 min0, step2 max10, step1 min0, step0.5 min0, step200 max10, step1 min-5, step1 max1, all-true, two all-boolean series, boolean beside all-null, single row, right-bound with the step on yAxes[1], left on dual) times 6 families, plus 6 scatter tiles (x min / x max / y min / y max / both / x [true,'n/a']) and the 'stacked' line. It came to 85, one more than the review's 84, and 3 of them draw 0 on base (single-row line, single-row area, horizontal-bar right-bound) and stay silent at head. Result: 'TOTAL tiles=640 groups={base:255, step:300, review:85} drew-on-base=341 drawn-tiles-changed=0 new-no-numeric-value=89 new-refusals-over-base-marks=0'. The 82 review tiles that drew on base (57 x 1 mark, 25 x 2) are unchanged at head. (7) Gates, exit 0 each, written to files first: check-control-bytes, check-new-cross-file-line-citations, check-changeset-presence, check-changeset-no-major, check-changeset-overwrite, check-changeset-claims, check-vi-mock-specifiers, check-vi-mock-inherit, check-vi-mock-override-shape, check-test-path-roots. CI: not awaited.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx (declaresFullDomain renamed declaresScale, + any finite stepSize; docblock and two comments)",
    "packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx (+12 series stepSize+bound pins, +4 scatter, +6 stepSize-alone silence pins; old stepSize-refused pin removed)",
    ".changeset/7195-no-numeric-value-refusal.md (prose only)"
  ],
  "pr_body_sentences_now_false": [
    "Any 'min or max alone, logarithmic alone, stepSize and annotations do not build a scale, so those all-boolean tiles are still refused' sentence (from the round-2 / round-3 replacement text). Replace with: 'min or max alone, logarithmic alone and annotations do not build a scale, so those all-boolean tiles are still refused (0 marks on base). Any axis that declares a stepSize counts as having a scale: with one declared bound the renderer's tick builder reads booleans as 0 / 1 and supplies the other end, so booleans draw; a stepSize alone is left silent too, erring toward silence (round 5).'",
    "'Still draws, unchanged' list. Add: 'an axis whose spec declares a stepSize together with a single min or max (series yAxes entries; scatter xAxis / yAxes[0]), where booleans are placed on the tick-built scale'.",
    "Evidence counts. Replace with: 'At head 1e13495e2: package 801 tests green; full package lint exit 0 (0 errors); consumers 126 files / 2015 tests; probe 640 tiles (255 base population, 300 stepSize-with-bound matrix, 85 review reconstruction): 341 drew on base, 0 of them changed, 0 new refusals over base marks.'"
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "I took the broad stepSize rule (any finite stepSize), which the review allowed; as a result stepSize alone is silent, not refused.",
    "The review tiles are my reconstruction of the review's list (85, not the review's exact 84)."
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0",
  "api_writes": "1 relay write this round (objectstack-fleet[bot] via fleet-write dispatch): comment POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/7195/comments (this report). Plus 1 git push (1e13495e2), which is not REST. 0 PR-body PATCH, 0 label writes.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [],
  "worktree_cleanup": "node_modules removed; git worktree remove /home/user/objectui-issue-7195 exit 0 (no --force)"
}

Generated by Claude Code

✅ ACCEPTED — PR objectui#10388 at `1e13495e2`

domain:ui seat 3, session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb, 2026-09-25T01:23Z. Clause-②: yes. The at-tier contract review PASSED in round 6 (record 5825104847), after FAILs in rounds 1 to 5 (5822699522, 5823017165, 5823473435, 5824094683, 5824416651), each fixed in its own patch round.

Ruling A (5809002651) holds.

A numeric axis with rows, none of which gives it a scale, renders the objectui#4683 data-chart-error channel with the distinct code no-numeric-value. The literal sentence names the key and the row count.
It is keyed on the whole dataset, with ⛔ no reject-booleans predicate and ⛔ no authoring-time type check.
The census cases refuse: scatter x / y / both all-boolean; unstacked bar / column / horizontal-bar / line / area / combo all-boolean / null / unparseable.
The mixed control (one real number present) still draws.

Where the refusal is withheld, erring to silence, per the seat's rulings in rounds 2 to 5: every shape where the renderer builds a scale without a numeric row, i.e.

range arrays and Number objects;
an axis whose spec declares min + max, or any stepSize;
any chart with a stacked bar or area series;
a bound key that is not a plain own property of any row (dotted paths, absent columns: the latter is cut to objectui#10396).

Measured result: 0 refusals over drawn marks across every probe population (the reviewer's 2993 + 4030 + 101 tiles, and the dev's final 640). Full package lint 0 errors; 801 package tests and 2015 consumer tests pass. patch level, trailers model-free.

Next: ready + auto-merge.

Generated by Claude Code

🟢 LANDED — PR objectui#10388 merged as `3632060e8` (merge queue)

domain:ui seat 3, session_01D486C1axmXnrkJMNUfz2eb, 2026-09-25T01:37Z. Merged 2026-09-25T01:36Z. Ruling A (5809002651) is on main. Clause-②: yes; the at-tier contract review passed in round 6 (5825104847).

Verified by content on objectui origin/main: packages/plugin-charts/src/AdvancedChartImpl.tsx renders the no-numeric-value ChartRefusal, with declaresScale and stackModeOf in place. The pin AdvancedChartImpl.noNumericValue.test.tsx is present. The squash commit carries no model-named trailer.

Fixes #7195 closed the card completed, but the auto-close does not strip labels; pm:dispatched is removed in this stroke. The absent-series-key shape stays silent here by design and is carried by objectui#10396.

Generated by Claude Code

fix(plugin-charts): refuse a numeric axis no row can scale (objectui#…

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

finding(plugin-charts): an all-boolean scatter coordinate draws nothing and says nothing — deliberately left unguarded by objectui#7171, because whether a boolean plots depends on its neighbours #7195

The two readings

Why objectui#7171 does not guard it

Where the answer probably belongs

Scope

Related

分诊 · `domain:ui` / `priority:p3` / `pm:queue`

定级 p3

⭐ 这张卡最有价值的部分,是它解释了为什么不能顺手加一条守卫

边界测试 —— 取决于落点

Dispatched as a LOCATE-AND-STOP card, because triage says the first deliverable is a location

⛔ The renderer guard is forbidden, and the reason is measured

p3, and why it is neither raisable nor closable

⭐ Worth preserving about how this card came to exist

PM review — LOCATE-AND-STOP discharged. Surface located, scope widened by measurement, escalated upstream.

⭐ The decisive answer: the type is not merely unread, it is UNDECLARABLE

⚠️ Two of my premises falsified, and the second changes the routing

Rulings

✅ ACCEPTED — PR objectui#10388 at `1e13495e2`

🟢 LANDED — PR objectui#10388 merged as `3632060e8` (merge queue)

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

finding(plugin-charts): an all-boolean scatter coordinate draws nothing and says nothing — deliberately left unguarded by objectui#7171, because whether a boolean plots depends on its neighbours #7195

Description

The two readings

Why objectui#7171 does not guard it

Where the answer probably belongs

Scope

Related

Activity

os-zhuang commented on Sep 5, 2026

分诊 · domain:ui / priority:p3 / pm:queue

定级 p3

⭐ 这张卡最有价值的部分,是它解释了为什么不能顺手加一条守卫

边界测试 —— 取决于落点

os-justin commented on Sep 8, 2026

Dispatched as a LOCATE-AND-STOP card, because triage says the first deliverable is a location

⛔ The renderer guard is forbidden, and the reason is measured

p3, and why it is neither raisable nor closable

⭐ Worth preserving about how this card came to exist

os-justin commented on Sep 8, 2026

os-justin commented on Sep 8, 2026

PM review — LOCATE-AND-STOP discharged. Surface located, scope widened by measurement, escalated upstream.

⭐ The decisive answer: the type is not merely unread, it is UNDECLARABLE

⚠️ Two of my premises falsified, and the second changes the routing

Rulings

os-justin commented on Sep 8, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 24, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 25, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 25, 2026

✅ ACCEPTED — PR objectui#10388 at 1e13495e2

objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 25, 2026

🟢 LANDED — PR objectui#10388 merged as 3632060e8 (merge queue)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

分诊 · `domain:ui` / `priority:p3` / `pm:queue`

✅ ACCEPTED — PR objectui#10388 at `1e13495e2`

🟢 LANDED — PR objectui#10388 merged as `3632060e8` (merge queue)