Repository navigation
docs(ROADMAP): P1.12 的 Routes / Tests 两个子块仍把已退场的 PermissionManagementPage 记成已完成(与 #3700 同源、在其文件面之外) #3704
Description
Activity
- addeddocumentationImprovements or additions to documentationImprovements or additions to documentation
on Aug 7, 2026 Findings triage — PROMOTE.
finding→pm:queue, pluspm:blocked/Blocked-by: objectui#3700.Stale-premise check. Both lines still say what the body says they say, and both subjects are still gone:
ROADMAP.md:857(- [x] /system/permissions → PermissionManagementPage) and:871(- [x] 11 new tests (SystemHubPage, AppManagementPage, PermissionManagementPage)), against a console that has six pages undersrc/pages/system/— none of themPermissionManagementPage— and a deliberately absentsystem/permissionsroute, annotated as such atAppContent.tsx:191-201. PR #3699 (component deletion) and PR #3673 (URL redirects) are both merged, which is what made these two lines false; nothing since has touched them.Why promote rather than hold, when the body itself grades it observation-class. The "zero runtime impact" reading is right and still doesn't settle it: the cost of a stale
ROADMAPentry is paid by the next reader, and this repo has now paid it twice on this exact file family (#3655 and #3672 both started from a surface that looked ready-made). A checked box reading/system/permissions → PermissionManagementPagetells the next session to go wire up a page that does not exist, at a URL that is deliberately empty pending a ruling. That is a documentation defect with a concrete victim, not a cosmetic one — and unusually for a promotion, there is no open question about how to fix it: #3700's PR has already established the house form on the same file (entry kept, rewritten to current reality, bare-text reference), and the file has three existing precedents for it (:152,:1046,:82).The wording constraint travels with the promotion and is not optional. The successor surface for
/system/permissionsis undecided — #3655 is open and carriesneeds-user-decision, weighingsys_capabilityagainstsys_permission_set. The rewrite must stay neutral ("pending maintainer decision, see #3655") and must not name either candidate. #3700's P1.12.2 line is the model to copy verbatim. An implementing seat that finds itself picking one is out of scope and should stop.Why
pm:blockedrather than straight queue. #3700 ispm:dispatchedand in flight against the same file and the same### P1.12section (:825-839). Two agents editingROADMAP.mdconcurrently is a merge race that costs more than serialising, and the wording this card must copy does not exist until #3700's PR lands. Sequence it behind, then it is a clean two-line change.Not a duplicate. #3700 is the source card and its dispatch explicitly fenced its file面 to the other two blocks; these two lines were outside it and were reported rather than fixed, which is the discipline working. #3655 is the ruling this card must not pre-empt. #3670 is unrelated.
本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。
Generated by Claude Code
认领(PM 派发)。Session:
session_01GTRjn8xBqp75dk7kFupVRt;分支claude/issue-3704-roadmap-subblocks。文件面:ROADMAP.md:857/:871 两行(Routes/Tests 子块的同源漂移)。前置已落:PR #3705 已在 main(35e84b6),同文件障碍解除,行号经 #3705 的 15/15 中性改动仍准(以内容锚定复核)。处置照 PR #3705 全套:历史台账就地批注惯例、permissions 中性指向 #3655 不预判、纠错锚形态、#3656 措辞、门禁阳性对照打在被改行上。
Generated by Claude Code
验收 ACCEPT → PR #3714(session_01GTRjn8xBqp75dk7kFupVRt)。
已核:2 增 2 删单文件;双行各打阳性对照;#3656 计量(活映射形态 1→0、计数 1→0、纠错锚 2→2 保留)含初稿自纠(组件名在箭头后仍是活映射位 — 与 #3705 初稿同错,诚实记录)。
裁决记录:
- 两处模板偏离接受且正确:子块部分存活 → 标题级退役注本身会成为假话;[x]→[ ] 使同节两行对同一 URL 的判词自洽 — 模板服务于真值,不是反过来。
- 考古升级(泛指 →「(commit cccdf84)」可核对形态,对齐 :1046 惯例)记入方法库。
- docs(ROADMAP): P1.12 的 Routes / Tests 子块另有两条残余漂移(MetadataManagerPage 路由、Total: 20 计数),在 #3704 围栏之外 #3712 入池(P1.12.3 漂移入口 + 未定义计数属维护者语义,标注正确);docs(skills): console-development.md 指路的 7 个 console 页面里 5 个不存在,并整节教用已删除的 MetadataManagerPage #3713 定级入队(agent 消费面双重失真:指南教 5 个不存在页面 + eval 烤入期望输出 — 生成的错误代码会被判对,严重度高于普通文档漂移)。
Generated by Claude Code
- added 3 commits that reference this issue
on Aug 10, 2026
越界发现,记录于 #3700(按现实改写
ROADMAP.md的 P1.12.2 段与 :825-828 Permission Management 段)期间。该单的文件面被派发单明确围到那两段,而同一个### P1.12章节里还有两条同源漂移落在别的子块,按纪律只报不改,单独立单,未认领。观察类:纯文档漂移,用户看不到任何异常。故打
finding、不打pm:queue。基线:
origin/main@b19f54f39(已含 PR #3673 与 PR #3699)。行号为 #3700 的 PR 合并之前的值 —— 那个 PR 只改 :825-839,增删各 15 行,行号不移位,合并后仍是 :857 / :871。事实
**Routes:**子块:**Tests:**子块:两条都以
PermissionManagementPage为主语,而该页面与/system/permissions路由今天都不存在:apps/console/src/pages/system/下无该文件(现存 6 个页面:SystemHubPage/AppManagementPage/ProfilePage/AuditLogPage/ApprovalsInboxPage/AiPendingActionsPage);apps/console/src/AppContent.tsx里system/permissions零条路由声明 —— 且是刻意的,:191-201 的注释写明「absent on purpose」,因为框架把这个面拆成了sys_capability与sys_permission_set两个 Setup 条目,取哪个待 console: 系统导航 / System Hub 的 users / organizations / roles / positions / permissions 五个入口没有对应路由 —— 两个落 "Page not found",三个跳进不存在对象system的记录页 #3655 裁决;复核方式
影响面
零运行时影响。代价与 #3700 同型:ROADMAP 是「这块做完了吗」的首查处,
- [x] /system/permissions → PermissionManagementPage会让下一个读者以为 console 里现成有一个权限管理页可接线 —— 而实情是那条 URL 正空着等裁决。#3655 与 #3672 已各自在「看起来现成」的同一批文件上栽过一次。可能的修法方向(留给分诊,不预判)
与 #3700 落地的写法保持一致即可:该文件对「已退场」项的既有惯例是条目不删、就地改写成当前形态 + 挂一个裸文本引用(:152
_(Removed — replaced by ViewConfigPanel)_、:1046- [x] Tab-drag UX retired in favour of …、:82… was removed as dead surface, #2564)。/system/permissions的继任面尚未定案,#3655 仍开着且带needs-user-decision。改写时不得预判sys_capability/sys_permission_set里的任何一个,只能留中性表述(pending maintainer decision, see #3655)—— #3700 的 PR 在 P1.12.2 那条已按此处理,可直接照抄。关联
system的记录页 #3655 ——/system/permissions继任面待裁决(A/B/C),是本文两条无法直接「改成正确路由」的原因。已就关键词(
PermissionManagementPage、ROADMAP.md、system/permissions、ROADMAP drift)搜过本仓开放 issue,除 #3700 / #3655 / #3670 外无同源单。Generated by Claude Code
Blocked-by: objectui#3700
Generated by Claude Code