Repository navigation
[WIP] Create a new version release - #42
Closed
huangyiirene with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
huangyiirene with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
huangyiirene with Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Copilot stopped work on behalf of
huangyiirene due to an error
January 20, 2026 17:33
os-zhuang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2026
Merge-lap onto current main. One conflict, in the shared ADR-0087 retirement registry (`packages/spec/src/migrations/registry.ts`): main's `import-run-automations-declared-default-corrected` (#6190) and this branch's `api-runtime-create-withdrawn` (#5488) both append a SemanticMigration into step 17's array, sharing the brace above and below. Resolved UNION-KEEP — neither entry may be lost (#6526). Recounted from the merged file: 43 step-17 semantic entries, with both #42 (`api-runtime-create-withdrawn`) and #43 (`import-run-automations-declared-default-corrected`) present. The two generated artifacts were NOT text-merged (the os-regen merge driver refuses to): `spec-changes.json` and `docs/protocol-upgrade-guide.md` were regenerated from the merged tree, and both entries are present in each. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PiRUoQkTSBBmpyXBY3cVn2
This was referenced Sep 5, 2026
This was referenced Sep 5, 2026
zhuangjianguo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2026
…14919) ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove; maintainer ruling 2026-09-05 (director summon #14, decision batch #42). The class was a shell that reported success: four of its five private scanners returned an empty issue list unconditionally, and the fifth matched against an in-memory vulnerability database whose only writer had zero callers -- so every scan() ever performed answered status: 'passed' with a perfect score, for a malicious plugin as readily as a benign one. A security control that cannot fail is worse than none, because callers rely on it. - delete packages/core/examples/phase2-integration.ts (the only constructor) - delete src/security/security-scanner.ts; drop its export block from src/security/index.ts, leaving a tombstone naming the retirement - rewrite PHASE2_IMPLEMENTATION.md section 6 to state plainly that plugin security scanning is NOT a platform capability, and drop the two capability claims elsewhere in the same document that outlived their subject - delete the FOLLOW-UPS.md row, repair the paragraph that existed only to compound it, and correct the neighbouring row whose evidence the deletion falsified - pin the retirement as an export-list assertion on both barrels Repair was refused by name: a real vulnerability scanner is a feature with a design surface, not a defect fix. There is no replacement export. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARYe3yQTQCUFm5qPYNgKaJ
akarma-synetal
pushed a commit
to akarma-synetal/framework
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2026
…is not a platform capability (objectstack-ai#15930) * feat(core)!: retire PluginSecurityScanner across all four surfaces (objectstack-ai#14919) ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove; maintainer ruling 2026-09-05 (director summon objectstack-ai#14, decision batch objectstack-ai#42). The class was a shell that reported success: four of its five private scanners returned an empty issue list unconditionally, and the fifth matched against an in-memory vulnerability database whose only writer had zero callers -- so every scan() ever performed answered status: 'passed' with a perfect score, for a malicious plugin as readily as a benign one. A security control that cannot fail is worse than none, because callers rely on it. - delete packages/core/examples/phase2-integration.ts (the only constructor) - delete src/security/security-scanner.ts; drop its export block from src/security/index.ts, leaving a tombstone naming the retirement - rewrite PHASE2_IMPLEMENTATION.md section 6 to state plainly that plugin security scanning is NOT a platform capability, and drop the two capability claims elsewhere in the same document that outlived their subject - delete the FOLLOW-UPS.md row, repair the paragraph that existed only to compound it, and correct the neighbouring row whose evidence the deletion falsified - pin the retirement as an export-list assertion on both barrels Repair was refused by name: a real vulnerability scanner is a feature with a design surface, not a defect fix. There is no replacement export. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARYe3yQTQCUFm5qPYNgKaJ * feat(spec): register the PluginSecurityScanner retirement in the ADR-0087 ledger (objectstack-ai#14919) check-adr-0087-registration refused the previous disposition, correctly: the changeset carries a real consumer prescription (delete the import and every call), so `not-required (no-migration-prescription)` was a self-contradiction. Every other not-required category is false too -- @objectstack/core publishes, so `unpublished` is out; `already-registered` has no entry to name; `type-surface-only` needs an any/unknown-to-concrete narrowing this is not; and `runtime-interface-only` explicitly inherits the same prescription refusal (objectstack-ai#8299). The only truthful disposition left is `registered`. That is also the repo's settled convention for this exact shape -- a published TS symbol with no spec schema, no stored source and no tombstone, where the ledger is the only channel that reaches an upgrader. contracts.IDataDriver.findStream and actor-user-roles-to-positions are both registered on those grounds. D3 semantic, not a D2 conversion: the class has no spec schema, so there is no authorable key to tombstone and no stored sys_metadata row to rewrite -- a scanner was constructed per call and every result lived in a per-instance Map discarded with the object, so applyConversionsToStoredItem has no seam that would ever see one. This is what the ruling's "no metadata migration" excludes, and it is excluded. - add entries/semantic/18.plugin-security-scanner-retired.ts (one file, per the entries README kit -- no hand edit inside registry.ts's generated markers) - regenerate registry.ts via gen:migration-registry (157 semantic entries) - flip the core changeset's marker to `registered plugin-security-scanner-retired`, keeping the BREAKING banner, the no-replacement statement and the NOT MEASURED paragraph untouched - add the @objectstack/spec patch changeset, mirroring the objectstack-ai#6138 backfill Measured and recorded in that changeset: the regeneration lap the entries README warns about did not materialise. check:generated reports all 15 artifacts up to date, and running gen:spec-changes and gen:upgrade-guide explicitly moved neither file -- a major-18 semantic entry is not yet projected into either. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARYe3yQTQCUFm5qPYNgKaJ * fix(changeset): the `registered` marker takes ids only — move its rationale into the body check-adr-0087-registration parses everything after `registered` as a comma/space-separated id list, so the trailing `why` prose that the `not-required (...)` forms accept was read as 131 nonexistent migration ids. The asymmetry is real and AGENTS.md spells it: `registered SOME-MIGRATION-ID` carries no `why`, the three `not-required` forms do. The rationale is unchanged, only relocated into the changeset body where a reader gets it anyway. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ARYe3yQTQCUFm5qPYNgKaJ --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
akarma-synetal
pushed a commit
to akarma-synetal/framework
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2026
…ts that decided them (objectstack-ai#20757) Part of objectstack-ai#20596 Clause-②: no ## What changed This is the eleventh stage of the `domain:services` lane of the dead-citation sweep. It covers `packages/plugins/plugin-email/src/**` and nothing else. By the seat's census at the claim (`5902547086`), it is the largest package in the lane that no in-flight work holds. Later stages cover the other packages, so this PR says `Part of` and the card stays open. Every comment or docblock site in scope that cited a tracker number answering 404 has been rewritten in ruling C+D's form C (comment 5749154545 on objectstack-ai#19123), by the method of stages 1 to 10 (PR objectstack-ai#20609 as `422db788a`, PR objectstack-ai#20626 as `b80ab579d`, PR objectstack-ai#20634 as `4d04b6be3`, PR objectstack-ai#20658 as `9a4b2bb38`, PR objectstack-ai#20693 as `0e9ad74fb`, PR objectstack-ai#20708 as `9b384f63a`, PR objectstack-ai#20717 as `cbaf04c1f`, PR objectstack-ai#20729 as `d2820876f`, PR objectstack-ai#20737 as `4dfff176b`, PR objectstack-ai#20742 as `697845d19`). That is **16 sites on 16 lines in 8 files, covering 4 numbers**: - 7 census sites (every census site this package has); - 9 sites in test comments, which the census defers. Three of them carry `objectstack-ai#13190`, a dead number that stands only in test files here, so the census never judged it; it was read on its own (404); - no site the gate's grammar cannot see (the package has none that is dead, see Acceptance notes). Each rewritten line now cites the commit in `origin/main` history that decided what the line describes, and says in its own words what was decided: **4 distinct shas**. No number in this package has an ADR or ruling record of its own (a grep of `docs/adr/` and `scripts/adr-anchors/` finds only ADR-0131 naming `objectstack-ai#11741`, as evidence in its D7, not as the record of that decision; nothing else under `docs/` names the four), so every anchor is a commit, per ruling C's order. No number was dropped. Only comments changed. Every touched source file keeps its line count (16 lines out, 16 in, over 8 files), so no line citation into these files moves. Every one of the 16 changed lines carried a dead citation; there is no reflow line. No code token moves (see the guard below). **No citation number is added.** The added lines carry no tracker number at all. Over the whole diff, added minus removed is negative for the four dead numbers and zero for every other number, and no number is new to the diff. No PR number is the citation on an added line: the two `PR objectstack-ai#8675` spellings became that pull request's squash commit. 10 dead sites are left on purpose, all of them `describe` / `it` titles (see the list below). One more file: a `patch` changeset for `@objectstack/plugin-email`, because the rewritten prose ships (see Changeset below). ## Census: `plugin-email`, before and after **Instrument (A1).** The gate's own `node scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs --census --json`, read-only and unchanged. The count below is its `allocated-but-absent` findings under `packages/plugins/plugin-email/`. Each run counts as a reading only because its board frontier equals the newest issue or pull-request number, read by a separate request just before and just after the run. | reading | tree | board | whole-repo `allocated-but-absent` | plugin-email sites | lines | files | numbers | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | before | base `97005aed0`, run 2026-09-30T02:00:45Z to 02:04:02Z | enumerated, 186 pages, frontier objectstack-ai#20748 (newest objectstack-ai#20747 before, objectstack-ai#20748 after: a pull request opened at 02:03:20Z, inside the run) | 1,064 | **7** | 7 | 4 | 3 | | after | head `15a7d69a7`, run 02:11:19Z to 02:14:30Z | enumerated, 186 pages, frontier objectstack-ai#20753 (newest objectstack-ai#20753 before and after) | 1,057 | **0** | 0 | 0 | 0 | The before count matches the seat's census and A1 (7 sites: `objectstack-ai#13189` ×4, `objectstack-ai#11741` ×2, `objectstack-ai#8675` ×1). The before run's board moved during the run; its frontier equals the newest number at the run's end, which is A1's criterion (stage 7's precedent). The whole-repo drop is 7, exactly this diff's census sites. The `resolves` tally is 33,029 in both runs, and `resolves-as-pull-request` (1,984) and `cross-repo-unjudged` (995) did not move either. The after run was taken on `15a7d69a7`; the head `23283d394` adds only the changeset. No run was truncated or discarded: both enumerations read 186 pages at the newest frontier. **Supplementary instrument, the whole scope.** The census does not read test files or strings, and this stage's scope includes test comments. So a second reading runs the gate's own exported `extractCitations` (whole-file and comment-prose projections) and `namesThisRepository` over every `.ts` file under `plugin-email/src` (50 files). It takes its verdicts from the before census's own board reading rather than from a second enumeration: a number is dead when that census reported it `allocated-but-absent`, and alive when that census judged it on this board anywhere (its `--list` extraction, 37,072 rows) and did not report it. The eleven numbers the census never saw, because they stand only in test files or as the second half of a slash pair here, were read one by one on the issues endpoint: `objectstack-ai#13190` answers 404; `objectstack-ai#5169`, `objectstack-ai#5286`, `objectstack-ai#10619`, `objectstack-ai#16506`, `objectstack-ai#20374`, `objectstack-ai#5197` answer 200 as issues, and `objectstack-ai#8348`, `objectstack-ai#5191`, `objectstack-ai#5211`, `objectstack-ai#5232` as pull requests. | reading | citations | dead | src comment | test comment | src string | test string | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | before, `97005aed0` | 360 | **26** | 7 | 9 | 0 | 10 | | after, `15a7d69a7` | 344 | **10** | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | Its src-comment column equals the census's 7, which is the control on the second instrument. The 323 live citations are the same in both readings, and the drop of 16 citations is exactly the rewritten sites. 11 extracted tokens are not tracker references at all and are not judged: the HTML entity `&objectstack-ai#39;` (6 sites in the template engine and its tests) and the fixture subjects `Invoice objectstack-ai#42` to `Invoice objectstack-ai#45` (5 sites). A third, raw reading (every `#` followed by 2 to 6 digits, whatever surrounds it) finds 371 occurrences and 26 dead before, 355 and 10 after. Beyond the gate's grammar it sees 11 tokens, none dead: the nine second numbers of the `#A/#B` lines (all live), the excused `Prime Directive objectstack-ai#12`, and the CSS colour `#2563eb`. ## Per-number table Sites and files count every dead occurrence in scope at the base (comments and strings, tests included). `rewritten / left` counts the sites rewritten and the sites left. Each anchor was read in its message and diff, not only its subject, and `git blame` at the base puts every rewritten line in its anchor commit or in a later commit that descends from it (`merge-base --is-ancestor` exit 0 for all 16 line and anchor pairs). | number | sites / files | rewritten / left | anchor: what it decided | |---|---|---|---| | `objectstack-ai#13189` | 13/4 | 8/5 | `33fbd3566` (PR objectstack-ai#13375): the SMTP port guard tests integrality (`Number.isInteger`), so a fractional port such as `587.5` is refused at construction, and the generated refusal sentence reads `(expected an integer 1-65535)`, the range still rendered from the constants. Its changeset headline names `objectstack-ai#13189`; its diff writes the integrality docblocks the rewritten lines sit in. New to the sweep | | `objectstack-ai#13190` | 5/1 | 3/2 | `56c5b1dbe` (PR objectstack-ai#13316): `smtpOptionsFromMailSettings` passes a present-but-unreadable `smtp_port` through to the guard instead of omitting it (which had silently fallen back to 587); absent and `''` still mean "not set", and no second refusal was added. Its changeset headline names `objectstack-ai#13190`; its diff writes the `objectstack-ai#13190` comment block itself. New to the sweep | | `objectstack-ai#11741` | 6/3 | 3/3 | `b706af987` (PR objectstack-ai#11839): `SendEmailInput` / `SendTemplateInput` gain an optional `organizationId`, which `plugin-email`'s writer stamps verbatim onto `sys_email.organization_id` (pass-through only, no resolution or fabrication), and `sendTemplate` forwards it as a producer of `send()`. Its message names `objectstack-ai#11741` as the card that commit closed; `git blame` puts all three rewritten lines in it. The `plugin-auth` stage's anchor for the same number | | `objectstack-ai#8675` | 2/2 | 2/0 | `c9f595083`: the squash commit of the pull request that was `objectstack-ai#8675` (its subject ends `(objectstack-ai#7987) (objectstack-ai#8675)`): `sys_account`'s OAuth token columns are declared `internal: true`. Its diff records the trap both lines describe: those columns are `required: false`, so inferring "key missing, therefore the strip ran" broke ordinary sign-in (16 red tests), which is why the readback carries the `absenceProvesStrip` discriminator. New to the sweep | Every cited sha matches exactly one commit (`git rev-parse --disambiguate`, count 1 for each of the 4), and every one is an ancestor of the base (`merge-base --is-ancestor`, exit 0 for all 4; control leg: stage 1's landing `422db788a` exit 0; the history is complete, `--is-shallow-repository` false, 15,155 commits). Each of the 4 numbers answers 404 on the issues endpoint, which serves pull requests too. Independently, the package's own shipped `CHANGELOG.md` pairs `b706af9`, `33fbd35` and `56c5b1d` with the same three decisions. ## Wordings to check - **Tag swaps in parentheses.** 「(objectstack-ai#13189)」 became 「(commit 33fbd35)」 at `transports/smtp-port-contract.ts:87` (a section heading), `:134` and `transports/smtp.ts:68`. - **Line openers.** 「objectstack-ai#11741 —」 became 「Commit b706af9 —」 at `email-service.ts:742` and `:1439`; 「objectstack-ai#13190 —」 became 「Commit 56c5b1d —」 at `transports/smtp.test.ts:221`; 「## objectstack-ai#13189 —」 became 「## Commit 33fbd35 —」 at `transports/smtp-port-contract.test.ts:34`. - **`email-service.test.ts:342`**, a section rule: 「── objectstack-ai#11741 —」 became 「── Commit b706af9 —」, and its trailing rule was shortened by 10 characters so the line keeps its width exactly. - **`internal-header-readback.ts:37`.** 「(PR objectstack-ai#8675 hit exactly this on `sys_account`'s optional」 became 「(Commit c9f5950 records exactly this on `sys_account`'s optional」: a commit does not "hit" a trap, it records one, and that commit's own diff is where the 16 red tests are recorded. - **`email-headers-internal.integration.test.ts:251`.** 「The regression PR objectstack-ai#8675 measured on a sibling card」 became 「The regression commit c9f5950 records from a sibling card」, the same reading. - **`transports/smtp-port-contract.test.ts:228`.** 「objectstack-ai#13189 is the card that SPENDS that」 became 「Commit 33fbd35 is the change that SPENDS that」, so the noun matches the anchor. - **`transports/smtp.ts:127`, `transports/smtp.test.ts:272`, `:276`, `:281`, `:283`.** The number became 「commit SHA」 in place (「until commit 33fbd35:」, 「The bucket commit 56c5b1d never had to name」, 「Commit 33fbd35 made the guard test」, 「Commit 56c5b1d's rule is that」, 「commit 33fbd35 changed which numbers」). ## The 10 sites left - **Test strings, 10 sites on 9 lines**, all `describe` / `it` titles, left as stages 1 to 10 left theirs: `email-service.test.ts:349` and `send-template.test.ts:63`, `:88` (`objectstack-ai#11741`); `transports/smtp-port-contract.test.ts:225`, `:309`, `:340` (`objectstack-ai#13189`); `transports/smtp.test.ts:230` (`objectstack-ai#13190`), `:271` (`objectstack-ai#13189`), `:293` (`objectstack-ai#13190` and `objectstack-ai#13189`). - No source string, operator log string, assertion message, quoted maintainer ruling or generated file in this package carries a dead number. - Outside `src`, the package's `CHANGELOG.md` names three of these numbers on 5 lines. It is release-owned and deliberately not edited here (see Acceptance notes). ## Mechanical guard: no code token moves The guard compares the TypeScript parser's leaf nodes (a `forEachChild` walk, so comments are trivia and JSDoc nodes are never visited), base `97005aed0` against head. String and template literals are therefore read in full. It ran over all 8 touched `.ts` files. - Real run: 7,035 base leaf tokens, **0 files with a token change** (exit 0). - Comment control in `email-service.ts` (「no resolution, no default, no fabrication」 to 「… no default and no fabrication」): 0 files changed, as expected (exit 0). - Positive control, a code token added in `transports/smtp.ts` (`isValidSmtpPort(port)` given `as number`): DIFFER, 587 to 588 leaf tokens (exit 1). - Positive control, one digit changed inside a kept test title (`transports/smtp.test.ts:293`, `objectstack-ai#13189` to `objectstack-ai#13188`): DIFFER (exit 1). Every mutation went through `scripts/ablation-replace.mjs` (wrap mode) under a shell trap that restores by absolute path, and each landed (anchor 1 to 0, blob changed). Each restore was proven byte-identical to the HEAD blob (`1e99bd5e2bcb`, `46c13267611b`, `da5314910bc4`), with `git diff HEAD` empty and a clean tree afterwards. ## Changeset This change ships bytes, so a `patch` changeset for `@objectstack/plugin-email` (`.changeset/20596-plugin-email-provenance-anchors.md`) is included. Its body is stage 10's, word for word, with the package name changed. Measured on the built package (A3): `files[]` is `dist`, `README.md` and `CHANGELOG.md`, and the package is not private. After the build, `b706af987` appears twice in each of `dist/index.js` and `dist/index.mjs` (the two inline comments in `email-service.ts`, which the bundle keeps). `c9f595083` appears once in each of `dist/index.d.ts` and `dist/index.d.mts` (the `internal-header-readback.ts` docblock), and so does `33fbd3566` (the docblock on `SmtpTransportOptions.port`). `56c5b1dbe` reaches nothing (test files only). Positive controls, one unchanged line beside each shipped rewrite, land exactly where their neighbours do: 「context, so the input's organization is the one fact it may stamp:」 and 「caller's organization so the sys_email row it persists is stamped.」 once in each JS file; 「token columns: inheriting」 and the unchanged line just above the rewritten one in the `port` docblock once in each declaration file. A never-written negative phrase appears nowhere in `dist`. None of the 4 dead numbers is left in `dist`. ## Gates (head `23283d394`) - **Citation judging, as CI runs it:** `pnpm check:issue-citations` exits 0. `node scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs` exits 0: the diff-scoped run found no citation added against `97005aed0` (4 files read; test files are a deferred surface). - **Doc authoring:** `pnpm check:doc-authoring` exits 0. - **Derived gates:** `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` at `23283d394` derived 61 commands: all 55 derived at dispatch, plus `check:engine-double-contract`, `check:objectql-double-limit`, `check:query-options-erasure`, `check:type-check-coverage`, `check:type-check-debt` and `check:where-matcher`. Each ran with its exit code captured before any pipe, and all 61 exit 0. `--ran`, fed each command with its exit code, reports 61 run, 0 NOT MEASURED (a derived zero), 0 unrun, and exits 0. A full `turbo run build` of `./packages/*` and `./packages/*/*` ran first under the shared verify lock (71 of 71 tasks, exit 0), so no gate hit an unbuilt workspace. - **Roster families the derivation lists outside its commands** (their rosters sit in directories this diff touches): `node scripts/check-changeset-fixed.mjs`, `pnpm check:authz-resolver`, `pnpm check:error-code-casing` and `pnpm check:filter-alias-parity`, each exit 0. - **Tests and typecheck, under the verify lock:** - `pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-email test`: 31 files pass and 510 tests pass. `vitest list --filesOnly` names 31 files, all the tracked test files, the 4 touched ones included. - `pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-email typecheck` exits 0 (`tsc` on `tsconfig.json`, then `check:test-typecheck` on `tsconfig.test.json`: 0 files and 0 errors in its debt ledger). `tsc --listFiles` holds all 8 touched files in both programs, and the test program holds all 50 files under `src/`. - **Lint, as a proven narrowing:** eslint with inline config disabled, over the 8 touched `.ts` files, gives 8 files, 0 errors and 0 warnings. All 8 are in eslint's own population (`isPathIgnored` is false for each; a `dist` file, as the control, is ignored). `eslint.config.mjs` never enables type-aware linting (no `parserOptions.project`, as its own lines 327-328 state), so a comment edit here cannot move the verdict on any untouched file. The repo-wide `pnpm lint` is CI's run. - **Control bytes:** `pnpm check:nul-bytes` exits 0, and a raw scan of the 9 changed files for control bytes finds none. ## Acceptance notes - **The gate-invisible spellings, grepped as the claim asked.** `CITATION_RE` refuses a hyphen after the digits and a `/` before the `#` (objectstack-ai#20636), and `NON_CITATION_HEADS` excuses a number after the word 「option」. In this package: `#N-word` none, `#A/#B` 9 lines, `option #N` none, at the base and at the head, which is the claim's 0 / 9 / 0. Every second number on the 9 slash lines answers 200 (`objectstack-ai#5197` ×2, `objectstack-ai#5191`, `objectstack-ai#5211`, `objectstack-ai#5232` ×2, `objectstack-ai#5177`, `objectstack-ai#4251`, `objectstack-ai#5094`), so nothing there needed rewriting. - **ADR-0131 names `objectstack-ai#11741`.** Its D7 cites `objectstack-ai#11741` as the writer fact that keeps `sys_email` tenant data. That is evidence inside a later record, not the record of what `objectstack-ai#11741` decided, so it is not this stage's anchor, and `docs/adr/**` is a governed Tier H surface outside this card's stages. It joins the ADR-tree residue the seat already carries (ADR-0131's `objectstack-ai#14484`, stage 2). - **`CHANGELOG.md` is left.** `packages/plugins/plugin-email/CHANGELOG.md` names `objectstack-ai#11741`, `objectstack-ai#13189`, `objectstack-ai#13190` and `objectstack-ai#8675` on 5 lines. It is release-owned (AGENTS.md, Documentation Guardrails), a deferred surface of the citation gate, and ⛔ not part of this stage. - **「This card」 phrases are left.** 20 comment lines in 8 files of this package speak of 「this card」, 「the card」 or 「the two cards」. They carry no number and neither instrument sees them. Inside the `objectstack-ai#13189` test block, they still have the kept `(objectstack-ai#13189)` title as their referent; the one rewritten line that said 「the card」 now says 「the change」 (above). The rest are unchanged, as in stages 8 to 10. - **The census instrument did not truncate in this stage.** Both enumerations read 186 pages at the newest frontier. - **Anchors the next stages can reuse**, each checked here: `objectstack-ai#13189` → `33fbd3566`; `objectstack-ai#13190` → `56c5b1dbe`; `objectstack-ai#8675` → `c9f595083`. `objectstack-ai#11741` → `b706af987` reuses the `plugin-auth` stage's anchor. - **Base.** The branch is on `main` at `97005aed0`. `main` has since moved two commits (`9c8f113c6`, `a6866da0c`). Their 14 files touch nothing under `plugin-email`, nor `scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs`, `.changeset/config.json` or the `doc-authoring-prose-id` baseline, and the three console-injection scripts they change are not among this diff's 61 derived families. So no merge was taken; the merge queue rebuilds on the merged generation. --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01XY5uCwTjZj7884yYtyur4H)_ --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.
Original prompt
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.