docs(pm-dispatch): a card that narrows a published accept set is Clause-② no, stays in its lane and owes one contract-review-tier review before the queue

[objectstack-fleet]

Part of #22167

Clause-②: no

What changes

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md 〈派发〉 gains one bullet directly under the Clause-② lines — after 「条款②只指已发布契约面,拉回已声明契约不触它;卡面复述仍是条款②。」 and before 「删已发布契约文本本就否定的误拒本身是 no;…」:

- 收窄已发布接受集的卡是 `Clause-②: no`,不移车道;入队前欠一次契约复审档复核。

It states the three facts the director's ruling (letter C, comment 6053791774 on the card) settles: a card that narrows a published accept set (refuses tomorrow what passes today) is Clause-②: no, does not move lanes, and owes one contract-review-tier review before the queue. The Clause-② definition lines — 「Clause-②: yes | no 恰这两种拼写,恒英文机器判据;判据:本卡放宽接受集或扩大公开面吗。」 and 「强制条款②:放宽接受集或扩大公开面的卡默认判断档施工;命中即 spec 车道的活。」 — are unchanged byte for byte (re-read on origin/main at 7d7943dd0d, lines 67 and 101).

The ruling's gloss 「明天拒绝今天还能通过的」 is not inside the line: with it the bullet measured 143 bytes against the ratchet's 120-byte per-line budget (check:pm-skill-ratchet went red on exactly that line), and wrapping it would cost a second line the file's ceiling does not have. 「收窄接受集」 reads against the neighbouring 「放宽接受集」 without a gloss; the gloss stays in this PR and on the card.

No issue number enters the operational text (pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint green).

Line ratchet (pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet)

• Ceiling for this file: 183. Count on origin/main: 183 (headroom 0). Count after this PR: 183. The ceiling row is untouched.
• The new line is paid by deleting one line the same file restates — 〈收集〉 「探活是每轮巡检的固定动作;完成通知不可靠,缺席什么都不证明。」 Where its content survives, all in the same 〈收集〉 section: the probe as a fixed patrol action is step 「③ 已派发未回报的 dev 逐个发状态询问;派发后 ~45 分钟无远程产出即到门槛。」 (and 「已有远程分支/PR 不豁免探针。」); "absence proves nothing" is 「⛔ 永不把没收到失败通知读作还在跑」 in the section's second bullet and 「⑤ 判据永远取正向证据:分支、PR、报告、探活回包。」.
• No re-wrap anywhere: the diff is exactly +1 / -1 lines, the new line is 108 bytes, the widest-table-row pin stays at 0.

The card's remainder (not in this PR)

The --tier note in scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs (the string "a card that changes contract accept/reject behaviour or widens the public surface owes a contract-review-tier REVIEW too …") is reworded to the same meaning when #22060 W3 unfreezes that file; the file is frozen (ruling 208 R6, read as whole-file) and this PR does not touch it. #22167 stays open for that remainder. #22135 was already amended to Clause-②: no by triage; nothing more there.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:PM 派发规则文件 execution-duties.md 的〈派发〉节,在条款②那四行之下加一句:收窄已发布接受集的卡(明天开始拒绝今天还能通过的元数据)是 Clause-②: no,不换车道;入队前要过一次契约复审档复核。条款②本身的定义一字未动。为付行数棘轮(该文件 183 行、余量 0),删掉了〈收集〉节一句本文件别处已经说过的话(探活是固定巡检动作、通知缺席不证明什么),它的内容仍在同节的 ③ 与 ⑤ 两条里。

为什么改:两段 PM 规则对"收紧"卡给出两个答案——一段说不欠复审、留本车道,另一段说欠复审且归 spec 车道;哪个席位先读到哪段,决定了客户看到的那次"被拒绝"有没有人按契约档看过。裁决(批次 290 第 5 项,字母 C)拆成两问:条款②只问"扩不扩面"(定车道与施工档);收紧的卡另加一句,欠一次契约复审档复核、不移车道。本 PR 落第一半;dispatch-gates.mjs 里 --tier 注释那一半等该文件解冻后随 #22060 W3 落地。

风险与代价(含回滚):只改一行协议文本,不改任何闸门脚本与机制,不加标签不加链;代价是每张收紧已发布接受集的卡入队前多一次契约档复核。回滚 = revert 本 PR,无数据与行为残留。

席位意见:

你要做的:无需操作——Tier S 面,skills 席席内契约复审档复核 PASS 后翻 ready 入队;若不同意这句话的措辞,在卡上留一句即可。

Verification (tree 869d7896df)

Derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on this tree (17 families: 9 matched by path, 8 whole-tree), every command run in the foreground with its exit code captured before any pipe, and reconciled with --ran:

family	exit	verdict line
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet	0	execution-duties.md is 183 lines (ceiling 183; headroom 0); 157 self-test cases pass
pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint	0	34 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)
pnpm check:skill-frame-sync	0	one declared copy coherent; 90 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies
node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test	0	all 26 cases passed
pnpm check:nul-bytes	0	scanned 10178 text files, no raw ASCII control bytes
node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs (+ --self-test)	0 / 0	green
node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs	0	green
pnpm check:agent-test-spelling	0	green
pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs	0	green
pnpm check:doc-authoring	0	green
pnpm check:driver-memory-census	0	green
pnpm check:gitlink-declared	0	green
pnpm check:pm-governed-merges	0	green
pnpm check:refd-timer-probe	0	green
pnpm check:watch-hint-literal	0	green
pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions	3 then 0	first run exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint not built — nothing measured); after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint under the verify lock, rerun exit 0: ✓ check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 468 files / 1384 TS blocks judged clean by @objectstack/formula.

Not derived, not run: the package builds and type-checks (.claude/** is outside every package), the 53 artifact-roster families (silent on every card), the 11 wide-population families and the type-check lanes — CI owns those. No changeset: .claude/** publishes nothing from any released package, so this PR carries skip-changeset.

The ratchet's red-then-green sequence is recorded on the branch: the first commit carried the 143-byte line (ratchet red on L105), the second shortened it to 108 bytes (ratchet green at 183/183).

Acceptance notes

• Observation, not filed: 〈收集〉 「标记两种拼写等效(HTML 注释形、首行 os-dev-report)」 keeps the HTML-comment spelling readable on the collecting side while the dev-side rules call that spelling bad; a read-side tolerance, no defect class, left as is.
• The PM-suggested closing clause 「席内达档或至档子代理皆可」 was not added: it restates 「契约三面自审资格按车道:spec/skills 席达档席内审;未达档 ⛔ 不自审,起隔离达档子代理。」 and the ruling fixes three facts, not four.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 869d7896dfe89d3d24104fae4848591d07ba5b2b
Local-runs: none

Reviewed in-seat by the skills seat 1 (dispatching seat; this session is served at the contract-review tier, read off get_session), 2026-10-08T07:05Z. Face hit: governed rule text (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md, Tier S; the pm-dispatch root, built at the contract-review tier by the lane's rule). Read-only shape held: the diff (get_files = 1 file, +1/−1), the card #22167 and its thread (triage 6052908903, the seat's analysis 6053148881, the director's ruling 6053791774, the claim 6053963884, the os-dev-report 6054418138), the head's check-runs; nothing built or run locally. Premises re-read on origin/main (:67 and :101 byte-identical, as the ruling requires; merge-tree clean).

① Derived judgments

1. The added bullet, directly under the Clause-② lines in 〈派发〉: 「收窄已发布接受集的卡是 Clause-②: no,不移车道;入队前欠一次契约复审档复核。」 — correct: the three facts ruling C fixes (Clause-② stays no; no lane move; one contract-review-tier review before the queue), in the file's one-line bullet grammar, no issue number (check:pm-skill-id-lint green). The ruling's gloss (明天拒绝今天还能通过的) is not in the line: with it the bullet measured 143 bytes against the ratchet's 120-byte per-line budget; the ruling's own term "narrows a published accept set" is stated. Accepted.
2. The Clause-② definition lines (:67, :101) unchanged, as the ruling requires; scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs untouched (frozen under ruling 208 R6; the --tier note is this card's remainder, Part of, with program(pm): rule-text diet and guard-script split for the skills lane — 3,020 lines of skill text, 126k lines of pm scripts (two files 65k), 58 commits in two weeks; plus a body section-patch door and template files for seat writes #22060 W3).
3. Ratchet payment (pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet: ceiling 183, headroom 0): the deleted 〈收集〉 line 「探活是每轮巡检的固定动作;完成通知不可靠,缺席什么都不证明。」 — its three claims survive in the same section on the head: the probe as the patrol's fixed act in step ③ (已派发未回报的 dev 逐个发状态询问) with 「已有远程分支/PR 不豁免探针」; the unreliability of completion notices in 「⛔ 永不把没收到失败通知读作还在跑」 and 「停摆永不自愈:携带任务中途状态的完成通知本身就是停摆信号」; "absence proves nothing" in step ⑤ 「判据永远取正向证据」. Content, not wrapping; no rule lost. 183 → 183 lines.
4. The first push carried an over-budget line (gate red on L105, 143 bytes); corrected by a second commit, no history rewrite. The ratchet is shown reading the file (red then green). Accepted.
5. 17 gate families derived on the head, each exit captured, --ran reconciliation 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN; one prerequisite re-run recorded with its first exit; a classifier refusal of a sed -i on the recorded exit was answered by re-running the family, which is the right shape. CI reading on the head at this record's clock: 29 check-runs, 15 success, 12 skipped, 2 in progress (Lint & Repo Gates, Type Check · workspace); the flip waits for them.

② Semver level

None. Internal PM protocol text; .claude/** publishes nothing. skip-changeset on the PR is correct and read back (the dev's own relay write went through this time).

③ Boundary flags

• Dev flag: the PM-suggested tail (席内达档或至档子代理皆可) not added — it restates :111; answered: correct omission.
• Dev flag (read-side tolerance of the HTML-comment spelling of the report marker) — stays a note; no defect class.
• The card's remainder: the --tier note, carried by program(pm): rule-text diet and guard-script split for the skills lane — 3,020 lines of skill text, 126k lines of pm scripts (two files 65k), 58 commits in two weeks; plus a body section-patch door and template files for seat writes #22060 W3; this PR is Part of #22167, and the card stays open and goes pm:blocked (Blocked-by: #22060 W3) after this PR lands.
• open_questions: none.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-22167-narrowing-card-review-sentence
Reviewed-by: session_01CXydFDyiQwNbGFkmwrcRQq

VERDICT: PASS

---

Generated by Claude Code