service-job: db-job-adapter.timeout.test.ts reds CI whenever the run crosses a minute boundary — it registers a real every-minute cron and asserts exactly one run row #8628

Found while verifying an unrelated change (#8460 / PR #8620), where this test reddened Test Core (2/3) on a diff that cannot reach it. Filing rather than fixing — out of scope for that card.

The failure

FAIL  src/db-job-adapter.timeout.test.ts
  > the timeout policy still applies through an injected cron adapter (#7734)
  > a cron-scheduled run lands a timeout row even though the adapter no longer sees the policy

AssertionError: expected [ { …(10) }, { …(7) } ] to have a length of 1 but got 2
 ❯ src/db-job-adapter.timeout.test.ts:221:18

Why it flakes

The case registers a real CronJobAdapter (croner) on an every-minute expression, then fires one explicit trigger and asserts exactly one persisted run row:

const CRON = { type: 'cron', expression: '* * * * *' } as const;  // line 48
...
const cron = new CronJobAdapter();
const adapter = new DbJobAdapter({ engine, cron });
await adapter.schedule('cronic', CRON, handler, { timeout: TIMEOUT_MS });
await cron.trigger('cronic');            // the explicit fire the case is about

const runs = engine.tables.get('sys_job_run') ?? [];
expect(runs).toHaveLength(1);            // line 221 — fails as 2

Nothing suppresses the cron's own schedule. If the wall clock crosses a minute boundary between adapter.schedule(...) and the assertion, croner fires the registration independently and a second sys_job_run row lands — so the count is 2, not 1.

The failing CI run makes the mechanism explicit rather than inferred:

• test file Start at 03:02:55
• assertion failure stamped 03:03:00.17

i.e. the run straddled 03:03:00, which is exactly when * * * * * fires.

Evidence it is timing, not a real regression

• Passes locally 5/5 in isolation, and the whole package passes (8 files / 71 tests) on the same commit that reds it in CI.
• @objectstack/service-job does not depend on @objectstack/objectql (dependencies: core, metadata-core, platform-objects, spec), so the change it reddened has no dependency path to it at all.
• The case never touches the object fold, labels, or metadata reads — it drives a fake in-memory engine.

Why it matters

It is a wall-clock-positional flake, not a random one: any CI run whose service-job shard happens to straddle a minute boundary reds, and the red points at a package the offending PR often has not touched. That is expensive to diagnose — it cost one dev-agent cycle here, and the shard attestation surfaces it a second time as an aggregate Test Core red, which reads like two failures.

Suggested direction (not prescriptive)

Make the case's cron unable to self-fire, so the explicit trigger is the only writer — e.g. a far-future/never expression, faking timers around the registration, or registering through a cron double whose schedule is inert while trigger() still works. The case's stated intent (#7734: the timeout policy survives the policy-free registration handed to the timer adapter) does not depend on the cron actually being schedulable.

⚠️ Any in-memory matches(row, where) double introduced here must satisfy pnpm check:where-matcher or throw.

Repro

pnpm --filter @objectstack/service-job test

straddling a minute boundary — or set the clock so adapter.schedule lands within a few hundred ms of :00.

Generated by Claude Code