flow-runas-unscoped (severity error) still searches only top-level nodes — a scheduled flow whose data ops all live in a loop body passes the build and is refused at run time #5633

Found while implementing #5383 (making the flow lint rule family descend into nested regions). Filed unassigned for triage, deliberately out of scope for that PR.

Blocked-by: #5383 — the fix needs the per-region walk that #5383 introduces.

What

#5383 widened the flow anti-pattern family to every graph in a flow. One rule in the same file was deliberately left reading the top-level node list only: flow-runas-unscoped.

packages/lint/src/lint-flow-patterns.ts (after #5383):

const runAs = typeof flow.runAs === 'string' ? flow.runAs : 'user';
const userLessKind = userLessTriggerKind(flow, startCfg);
if (userLessKind && runAs !== 'system') {
  const dataNode = nodes.find((n) => DATA_NODE_TYPES.has(...));   // top-level `nodes` only

userLessTriggerKind and flow.runAs are genuinely flow-level and correct where they are. The dataNode search is not: it is the rule's evidence that the flow performs a data operation at all, and a data node nested in a loop body is exactly as unscoped as one at the top level.

Why it matters more than the other family members

This rule is severity: 'error', and its bar (stated at the top of that module) is "the runtime REFUSES". Since #3760 a user-less run really does refuse the data operation rather than running it unscoped. So the shape this misses is not an advisory footgun — it is a flow that passes the build and then cannot run, which is the precise case the rule was promoted to error to prevent.

It is also the single most common shape for a scheduled flow: query a set, loop it, write per item. The write is almost always inside the loop.

Measured

Same flow, runAs unset (so the spec default 'user'), schedule trigger, one update_record — moved between the two positions and nothing else changed:

update_record at TOP level   -> 1 finding(s) [error]
update_record INSIDE loop body -> 0 finding(s)

Suggested direction

The walk is already there after #5383. The dataNode search becomes a search across collectFlowGraphs(flow) instead of flow.nodes, keeping the finding itself flow-level (one per flow, where = flow 'x' - runAs) since runAs is a flow property — the region only supplies the evidence. Naming the region in the message would help the author find the node (its data node 'touch' (update_record), in loop 'loop_rows' body).

Why it was not folded into #5383

Two reasons, both worth a maintainer's decision rather than a dev's guess:

1. It widens a build-GATING rule. Every flow this newly catches goes from green build to failed build. That is the correct outcome — those flows cannot run — but it is a release-note-worthy change with a real blast radius, unlike the advisory members of the family.
2. flow lint rules never descend into a loop body — the whole family is blind to nested nodes (8 real inert conditions shipped past flow-inert-node-condition) #5383 enumerated the affected rules and this was not among them, so folding it in would have been scope creep on a change that already touched the whole family.

Verified against the repo's own example apps: app-showcase / app-crm / app-todo produce zero findings from this rule today, nested or not, so no in-tree app would break. The blast radius is entirely in customer / template metadata.

Related

• flow lint rules never descend into a loop body — the whole family is blind to nested nodes (8 real inert conditions shipped past flow-inert-node-condition) #5383 — the region-descent this depends on.
• The #1888 user-less fail-open is wider than the lint that guards it — record-change flows fired by a system write run UNSCOPED, unlinted #3760 — promoted this rule to error; the runtime refusal it is grounded in.
• [P0][security] Flow runAs never switches execution identity #1888, ADR-0049, ADR-0073 D5 — the underlying scoping contract.