Repository navigation
[Decision] 纯重生成提交是否重开达档复核记录?—— 生成物密集面上「基线漂移→同步→head 后移→重审」本轮实测成环两次,两张已 PASS 的 PR 因此没能落地 #19244
Description
Activity
计数更新:本轮 2 次 → 4 次,且后两次是在入队之前测出来的
domain:specseat 2(session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3),2026-09-20T04:23Z。补记,⛔ 不改写卡面。卡面原文写着「本轮 2 次是首次计数,⛔ 不是频率」——现在它是 4 次,基线仍然只有这一轮。# PR 命中点 读数 1 #19226 入队之后 入队 01:55:26Z → 踢出 01:57:27Z, mergeable_state: dirty;冲突源 #192192 #19223 CI Type Check · consumer gatesstep 16Check @objectstack/spec declaration text,必查聚合随之红;漂移源 #192193 #19235 ⭐ arm 之前 component.mdx+ui.txt自合并基以来在主干上被动过;漂移源 #19226 刚落地4 #19223 ⭐ arm 之前 api-surface-declarations/{data,root,system,ui}.txt四条;漂移源同上每次的亮对照都在(同区间主干变动文件数 12 / 19 / 29 / 25),暗对照恒 0。
⭐ 一条本轮换来的做法,写在这里当作卡面选项 C 的实测
卡面选项 C 原本写的是「换落地策略而不是换复核规矩 …… 不消除循环,只减少圈数」。本轮实测到一个更早的检测点,把代价从「被踢一轮」降到「多一次同步」:
在 arm 的同一动作里重测漂移,⛔ 不复用入队前更早的读数。
第 1 次命中时本席正是复用了更早的那个 0(测得时为真,两分钟后 #19219 落地就不真了);第 3、4 次因为改成 arm 时重测,在入队前就拦住了。
半态巡检还给了一把更直接的尺子,本轮已采用并复核过两次:
git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main <head> ⟳ packages/spec/api-surface-declarations/ui.txt not text-merged — it is generated. Regenerate from the merged tree: …⇒ 它直接回答「会不会冲突」,比「主干动过这些路径没有」更贴题。⭐ 这条不改变本卡的四棱,也不改变推荐:C 类做法降低圈数,但每一圈仍然重欠一次达档复核,而那正是本卡请裁的那一条。
⚠️ 本轮的次序选择,一并记下#19223 与 #19235 此刻状态相同(复核已 PASS、被同一个
ui.txt漂移挡住、共用该文件)。若同时同步两张,必有一张的重生成在另一张落地时立刻作废,连带作废它刚做完的那次达档复核。⇒ 本席只同步 #19235,#19223 整张压住等它落地。⇒ 这意味着 #19223 将进入第四轮达档复核。四轮复核的实测消耗:83 / 113 / 136 / 133 / 116 / 100 / 88 次 assistant 请求(本轮全部七次复核),每次 20–40 分钟。⛔ 这不是主张,是把选项 A「维持现状」的代价填上数字。
Generated by Claude Code
第 4 圈的读数:圈在变宽,不是在收敛 —— 并更正本席自己发出去的一条指令
domain:specseat 2(session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3),2026-09-20T06:18Z。补记,⛔ 不改写卡面。圈宽在增加
圈 PR 漂移的 declaration 文件 漂移源 3 #19223 1( ui.txt)1 张已落地 PR 4 #19223 4( data/root/system/ui)2 张已落地 PR(#19226、#19235) ⇒ 同一张 PR,相邻两圈的漂移面 1 → 4。
⚠️ 两个数据点不构成趋势,但它至少证伪了「圈会自己收敛」这个乐观读法:分叉点只会更老,而在重审期间主干继续前进。⭐ 还有一条本席自取的读数,说明这个环有多紧:在本席测完漂移(
origin/main=7056ca50d1)到施工席真正执行合并之间,主干又动了(cb005e06ae)。漂移集合恰好相同所以指令照用,但合并提交的第二父与派发令里的 sha 对不上 —— 施工席把这条如实报了。⛔ 更正本席自己的一条指令 —— 它是不完整的
本席在派发令里写:「重生成后
git status会读MM⇒ 提交前读git diff --cached」。这条不完整,按它做会落错东西。施工席把三个读数全打出来了,它们如警告所言互相矛盾 —— 但方向和本席说的不一样:
git status → 四个文件全 MM git diff --cached --stat → 803 插入 / 535 删除 ← main 那一侧,正是裸 commit 会落的东西 git diff --stat → 531 / 480 git diff HEAD --stat → 323 / 4 ← 真正的净变更⇒ 在
git add -A之前,--cached读到的是 main 那一侧,不是重生成的结果。 本席那条指令漏了前置步骤。正确的次序(施工席实际做的):先
git add -A,此时工作区↔索引为空,git diff --cached才重新读成同一个 323/4;然后把四个 index blob 逐个与工作区文件做哈希比对,四个全 MATCH(e48b030fe5/a3618198c6/9fb0bf0687/045d3b05f6)。⚠️ 记在这张决策卡上,是因为它直接影响选项 B 的可行性:若要设「纯重生成提交」的机器可判口子,判据必须在已提交的树上取,⛔ 不能取任何一个未add时的 diff —— 那一格有三个互相矛盾的读数,而其中一个恰好长得像答案。本圈其余读数
四条必答全 exit 0:
check:api-surface-declarations(17 入口 / 5364 声明)·check:generated16/16 · spec 500 文件 14643 测试 · typecheck(债务台账 54/259/144 未涨)。两侧断言不限路径 + 打印路径 + 对 index blob 复做,暗对照 0;⭐ 量程警告第四次被独立确认:三个*Config:limit与RecordRelatedListProps.columns[number]只住在authorable-*/ui.json与component.mdx,在任何 declaration 文件里都没有。⚠️ 施工席还自报了一次拼错:pnpm check:api-surface与check:migration-registry首次跑 exit 254(它们是包脚本不是根脚本,pnpm 根本没找到脚本)⇒ 那是 MODULE_NOT_FOUND 类,什么都没测,不是红。加--filter @objectstack/spec重跑,两个 exit 0。⛔ 它报了错的那一次而不是只给好看的那次。⇒ 本卡累计:4 圈,#19223 单张已进入第四轮达档复核。
Generated by Claude Code
Ruling: batch #193 item 2 · letter B′ · maintainer 「纯重生成提交不需要开达档复核记录」 2026-09-20T09:44Z
Director seat, summon #25,
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. Presented in detail with the recommendation B′ (B with a machine-decided criterion); the maintainer ruled the direction verbatim: a pure regeneration commit does not open (re-open) an at-tier review record. Thread re-read to its last comment (5748085403) in the act that wrote this: the loop was counted 4 times this round (two before enqueue, two at arm time), and #19223 entered its fourth review.Ruling — B′ (direction B; the attached condition rides execution, ⛔ no second ask)
A review record (PASS) keeps pointing at a new head when the move between the recorded head and the new head is pure regeneration, decided by machine on committed trees, ⛔ never by a seat's own statement:
git diff --name-only <record-head> <new-head>restricted to paths that do not carry themerge=os-regenattribute (git check-attr merge --) is empty — every touched path is a generated artefact or the merge commit's own carry-over frommain; and every non-generated path is byte-identical between the two heads (which the empty set states).- The seat posts one line on the PR,
Regen-provenance: <record id> · <record-head> → <new-head> · <command> → (empty), so a later reader can re-run it. needs:contract-reviewis ⛔ not re-hung on either carrier; the record continues to govern. Any non-generated path in that diff ⇒ the ordinary rule (head moved ⇒ re-review) applies unchanged.- Arm-time re-measurement of drift (the practice in 5747600165) becomes standing: ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero.
⚠️ The reading in 5748085403 binds the criterion: the three contradictorygit diffreadings beforegit add -Aare why the test runs on the committed trees only.Four-facet reading (this seat's own): ① the rule protects 「the record points at what lands」, and a byte-verifiable pure regeneration does not change that — the pointer test is replaced by the content test it stood for; ② four loops and seven reviews of 83–136 requests in one round, two PASSed PRs unlanded; ③ the criterion is machine-read on committed trees, so a seat cannot assert its way through, and
check:generatedindependently judges the artefacts; ④ one command and one protocol sentence, no new script or gate.Prior rulings read:references/contract-review.md:21(the sentence this ruling narrows), thread: 2.Execution, same stroke
This ruling is in force now (维护者裁决 outranks the reference text): the
domain:specseat may apply it on #19223 / #19235 with the provenance line. The text follows: the skills seat editsreferences/contract-review.md:21to carry the exception and the provenance-line format, and measures whether anyscripts/pm/**reader refuses a moved head (fix in the same PR if so) — Tier S, in-seat review. Labels:needs-user-decision→pm:queue, pluspm:retriagewith this comment as the request — the card is bare; its landing is.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**(skills lane perSKILL.md:251); triage grades and routes.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round R1 (skills seat 1)
Session:session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc
Branch:claude/issue-19244-pure-regen-keeps-review-record
Worktree:objectstack-issue-19244
Domain:domain:skills
Seat:domain:skills#1
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md(:20 and :39, the head-binding sentences; net ≤ +2 lines, every line under the 120-byte cap) and thescripts/pm/**readers that bind a review record to a head —scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs(moved-after-clear:3144–:3216, C6reviewOfRecord:4405) andscripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs(latestContractReviewOnHead:804 and the merge-group leg) — with their self-tests;SKILL.mdand.github/workflows/**⛔ not touched (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model:M,mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT—node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --tier .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjsat1c16889a61(2026-09-22T01:43Z) printed verbatim: "Model tier — no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s), derived here, not recalled." Areferences/**-only governed surface builds at the default tier (SKILL.md 派发 clause ①); the Tier S landing record is rendered atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERby an isolated review subagent and adopted by this seat.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5749024878
Ruling-ref: 5749024878
Serial constraints cleared: PR #19379 (draft,claude/pm-superseded-references-tier, thedomain:specseat 4's follow-up of #19146) is OPEN onscripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjsandreferences/landing-operations.md— a different region (the superseded references-tier wording) under ruling 甲 (#18891, region-level concurrency); the dev reads that PR's diff first and the later lander merges once. No open PR touchescontract-review.mdorcheck-clause2-carriers.mjsat 2026-09-22T01:43Z (all 15 open PRs' file lists read). Same-file sibling in this lane's queue: #19068 (无级, theexports-map sentence ofcontract-review.md) stays behind this card and is ⛔ off this card's surface.Dispatch basis: ruling 5749024878 — director seat batch #193 item 2, letter B′, the maintainer's verbatim 「纯重生成提交不需要开达档复核记录」 (2026-09-20T09:44Z) — whose 「Execution, same stroke」 assigns the reference text and the reader measurement to the skills seat (Tier S, in-seat review); triage routed the card to this lane at
priority:p2. Premise re-read onorigin/main1c16889a61:contract-review.md:20still reads 「head 后移或无结论才重挂」 with no pure-regeneration exception and no provenance-line format;check-clause2-carriers.mjsstill returnsmoved-after-clearon any head movement after a clear (:3176); the queue guard's record read still binds to the current head only (:290, :804). Premise live.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 19244, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-19244-pure-regen-keeps-review-record", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19634", "session": "session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "The maintainer's 2026-09-20 ruling B-prime is landed: a head move certified as a PURE REGENERATION keeps the at-tier review record pointing at the new head. The criterion is machine-read on the COMMITTED trees (git diff -z --name-only OLD NEW, then git check-attr --source NEW -z merge --stdin; empty after dropping every merge=os-regen path) and never a seat's statement; the Regen-provenance line is a pointer a reader re-runs, and a reader that cannot reach both commits answers UNJUDGED in --pair and REFUSES at the queue, never clean. One mechanism lives in check-clause2-carriers.mjs and the queue guard reaches it through the lazy import it already takes. Assignee arrived set by the PM (huangyiirene) and was not written by this run. ONE GATE IS RED BY DESIGN AND NEEDS THE SEAT: check:pm-skill-ratchet exit 1, contract-review.md is 62 lines against a ceiling of 60 that had zero headroom before this change.", "tests": "dispatch-gates derivation at the final head: `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` (no paths) derived 44 families for the 3 changed paths; `--ran` reconciles 44 derived / 44 run / 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero: every row recorded an exit code and none is 3). Per family, exit captured before any pipe (`cmd > /tmp/g.out 2>&1; E=$?`). GREEN (43 of 44): `pnpm check:pm-clause2-carriers :: exit 0` verdict line 'check-clause2-carriers self-test: 1132 cases pass' (1115 before, +17 new); `node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test :: exit 0` verdict line 'check-governed-queue-guard self-test: 301 cases pass' at first run, 308 with the new battery; `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:doc-authoring :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:parse-guard :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:entry-guard :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:ratchet-remedy-authority :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pnpm-filter-targets :: exit 0`; plus the 30 remaining derived rows all exit 0 (full list in the run record). RED (1 of 44): `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 1`, verdict line verbatim: 'check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md is 62 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 60. ... Raising a ceiling requires a maintainer ruling quoted in the PR.' NOT MEASURED then MEASURED: `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` first `:: exit 3` (PREREQUISITE NOT MET, nothing measured); after `os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2'` (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 154s, waited 0s) it re-ran `:: exit 0`. Outside the derivation, also run: `pnpm check:pm-governed-prose :: exit 0` (verdict: '2 instruction surface(s) name all 6 registered governed surfaces'), `node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs :: exit 0`. Re-run at the FINAL head 180ce09 after merging origin/main 6ffccc5: the ratchet family, the token ratchet and both self-tests (ratchet still exit 1 on the same one line; the other three exit 0). Script-level owed work (rule 5): `git grep` finds no *.test.ts naming either script, so their `--self-test` batteries ARE their suites; both are declared in package.json / the guard workflow and both were run. LIVE MEASUREMENT of the criterion against real committed trees with the installed git 2.43.0 (not only fixtures): range 0b4022b..744a0a3 moved 28 paths, 10 dropped as merge=os-regen (content/docs/references/**, docs/audits/...counts.md), 18 hand-written kept -> correctly REFUSED; range 744a0a3..this branch moved 5 paths, 0 dropped, 5 kept -> correctly REFUSED. Both directions demonstrated. The line reader parses the real specimen this card recorded: 'Regen-provenance: 5746847791 . 5dd391125e -> e1ae025756 ...' reads [5746847791, 5dd391125e, e1ae025756]. NEGATIVE CONTROLS inside the new batteries stand in for an ablation (no permanent mutation left in the tree): a hand-written path in the range refuses, a chain whose hops name different records refuses, a line naming a record the thread does not carry leaves the record absent, an unreachable tree is UNJUDGED in the carriers reader and EXIT_REFUSED_UNREADABLE at the queue, a run with no git reader refuses, and two lit controls keep today's behaviour where nobody claims the exception. Live pair reading on the new PR: `PM_SWEEP_REPO=objectstack-ai/objectstack node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 19634 :: exit 4` with row C6 only — the Tier S review record does not exist yet, which is the correct resting state for a draft awaiting the seat, not a defect.", "gates_red": [ "pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 1 :: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md is 62 lines; the ratchet ceiling is 60" ], "gates_not_measured": [], "line_budget": "reference: +2 lines (contract-review.md 60 -> 62), both new lines 115 and 118 bytes against the 120-byte cap, one rule per line, no card number. Scripts: net +246 of the 250 allowed — check-clause2-carriers.mjs 10333 -> 10579 (+207, of which 31 are the new self-test battery) and check-governed-queue-guard.mjs 4535 -> 4574 (+39, of which 19 are the new battery). PR size as GitHub reports it: +262 / -14 = 276 changed lines, under the 5000 human-merge threshold.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md", "scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs", "scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs" ], "governed_merges_reading": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19634 :: exit 3 — GOVERNED, Tier S: 1 of 3 paths hits the register (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md under .claude/**); scripts/pm/** is not on the register. 276 changed lines, under the 5000 threshold. The owning seat lands it on a `## Contract review` record for the current head; the PR is draft and stays draft.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "3 REST proxy writes, plus 4 git pushes of the one branch. (1) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls -> HTTP 201, PR #19634 draft; (2) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19634/labels via scripts/pm/label-write.mjs -> HTTP 200, read back {size/m, skip-changeset} MATCHES target; (3) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19244/comments — this report. git push: the empty branch first (the write-routing probe, exit 0), then two work commits and the origin/main merge. PR body written ONCE, on creation, and read back to its tail: stored byte-identical except a stripped trailing newline, one session-URL footer, no sanitizer loss.", "deviations": [ "LINE RATCHET, declared: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md was at 60 of 60 with ZERO headroom before this change, so the dispatch's '+2 on the reference' budget could not be paid. The only legal currency for a line ratchet is deleted content, and none of this file's rules is made redundant by the ruling. Applied os-dev.md's named exception for a zero-slack governed ledger the dispatch prices: the two lines are LANDED, the ceiling line is NOT touched, and the measured count is reported RED. Remedy, one line in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, left to the seat because that file is outside this card's declared file surface: ['.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md', 62], was 60, with the ruling quoted beside it as its neighbouring raises are.", "HARNESS TRAILER, reported not imitated: the harness attribution reminder asks for a Co-Authored-By trailer carrying a model name. AGENTS.md and os-dev.md require the model-free pair, and the pre-push hook check:commit-card-trailers refused the first commit for exactly that line. Amended to the model-free pair — a `Claude-Session:` URL trailer beside a `Co-authored-by: Claude` trailer at the anthropic noreply address, spelled without angle brackets here on purpose — before anything was published; no history was rewritten after publication.", "H3 PARTIALLY FALSIFIED (PM mechanism assumption, Zone 2): the dispatch's H3 asks that a record head which is NOT AN ANCESTOR of the new head be refused. That leg is deliberately NOT implemented as a criterion, and the reason is measurable: `git merge-base --is-ancestor` answers exit 1 on a shallow checkout for want of the objects rather than for want of ancestry (this container's checkout reads `git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository` = true), so an ancestry test would refuse correct chains in exactly the environments the queue and the seats run in. The ruled criterion is a CONTENT test and it already covers what ancestry stood for: if no non-merge=os-regen path differs between the two commits, the hand-written content the record judged is byte-identical to what would land, whatever the topology. Both other halves of H3 ARE implemented: a reader that cannot fetch both heads answers cannot-answer (never clean), and a line naming a record the thread does not carry on that head certifies nothing.", "H2 RESOLVED BY THE SIMPLER SHAPE: the dispatch's H2 offered a three-part candidate (the PR's own delta at each head, plus a carry-over test against origin/main). It is not needed — the ruling's own two-dot test already answers the carry-over case, because every path main brings is itself either generated (dropped by the attribute) or hand-written (and then the move genuinely is not pure). Implementing the three-part shape would have added a merge-base read per hop and a second definition of 'the PR's own delta' that the register does not own.", "H1 MEASURED, one reader needed no change: check-half-states.mjs H51 does bind the head, but only to go SILENT on a moved one — its own text reads 'A review naming an OLDER head is NOT this row' — and it is report-only patrol input that writes no label. It refuses nothing, so the ruling's 'fix in the same PR if so' does not fire. check-governed-merges.mjs is the post-merge audit and also refuses nothing; its Tier S prose still says 'for the CURRENT head', which is now narrower than the rule.", "The ruling's fourth bullet — arm-time re-measurement of drift becoming standing practice — is landing-operations discipline, not carrier discipline. references/landing-operations.md is PR #19379's open region and is outside this card's declared file surface, so it is NOT landed here.", "check:doc-formula-expressions was scheduled by the .md path and first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET). Two packages were built under the shared verify lock to clear it rather than recording a NOT MEASURED." ], "open_questions": [ { "question": "The line ratchet is red because contract-review.md had zero headroom and the ruling directs text into it. Which reading does the seat want recorded?", "options": [ "A — treat this as the declared measurement-first outcome: the seat raises the ceiling 60 -> 62 in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs with the 2026-09-20 ruling quoted beside it, in the same landing, and the PR goes green.", "B — treat the gap as blocking: this report is read as `blocked` on the reference half, the two rule lines are reverted, and the ruling's text half waits for a separate budget decision.", "C — pay the ratchet by deleting two rules from contract-review.md so the file returns to 60." ], "recommendation": "A. The ruling's own execution stroke names this file and this line and directs the exception and the provenance format into it, and the ratchet's own remedy text says a raise takes 'a maintainer ruling quoted in the PR' — which exists and is quoted, verbatim and untranslated, in the PR body. B leaves a landed ruling with no text carrying it, which is the half-state the carrier discipline exists to prevent. C is refused on its face: deleting governed rules to buy lines is not a currency any ruling authorises, and os-dev.md forbids buying lines with re-wrapping too." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: b · scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs states the Tier S landing condition as a `## Contract review` record 'for the PR's CURRENT head' (its GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing text and the --pr rendering, e.g. lines 1027-1028 and 1583-1584). After this ruling that sentence is narrower than the rule it reports: a record carried forward over a certified pure regeneration also satisfies the landing. Contract text: `references/contract-review.md` 载体纪律, the two lines this PR adds. Seam: spec:references/contract-review.md:21-22 -> runtime:scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing | consumer: none (the audit is report-only and refuses nothing, so today the only cost is a reader acting on prose that is now incomplete). carrier: this lane — the same seat that raises the line ratchet will be in scripts/pm/** for this card's follow-up. dedupe words: 达档复核记录绑 head · governed-merges Tier S landing prose · 纯重生成 carry · CURRENT head 措辞 · post-merge audit remedy text", "carrier: PR #19379 (`claude/pm-superseded-references-tier`) · `references/landing-operations.md` is where the ruling's standing arm-time drift re-measurement belongs, and that file is that PR's open region. Noted, not filed." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 19244, "round": "patch round 1", "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-19244-pure-regen-keeps-review-record", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19634", "head": "dcffe20eee", "session": "session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Both rework items are landed and EVERY gate is green this round, including the line ratchet. ITEM 1 took route (2): the exception compresses to ONE reference line and one provably duplicated line retires, so contract-review.md is back at 60 of 60 and `check:pm-skill-ratchet` exits 0 — no ceiling was touched, and scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs is unmodified. ITEM 2 implements the ruling's carry-over arm on committed trees, and the loop the card measured now actually exits: this branch's own merge-forward commit, which round 1 refused, is CARRIED. ONE CONFLICT IS NOT SILENTLY RESOLVED: the instruction to update the PR body conflicts with an unconditional clause in .claude/agents/os-dev.md; the body was NOT patched and the exact replacement text is handed to the seat below. A `documentation` label appeared on the PR from another actor; not set by this run and not corrected.", "item_1_line_ratchet": "RESOLVED by route (2), measured: `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0`, verdict line 'check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md is 60 lines (ceiling 60; headroom 0)'. (a) COMPRESSED to one line, 115 bytes: '- 例外:纯重生成 head 后移原记录继续管;判据机读已提交树 ⛔ 非自述;PR 落 provenance 行。' — the `Regen-provenance:` exact format moved to the checker's own C3 `moved-after-clear` remedy text, which is the row a seat whose head moved actually lands on, and which AGENTS.md makes the authority on such detail. (b) RETIRED one duplicate line, verbatim: '- 0 = 确定性行全清;4 = 任一不成立,只确定性行红才挡落地;3 = 环境答不了 ⛔ 不作干净。' Its surviving homes, named: [1] scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs header, section '## Exit codes — the refusal to read as clean, in one table', which states 0/1/2/3 for the sweep and `--pair`'s own 4 at length; [2] SKILL.md 〈入队与落地〉 line 657, '开 PR 跑 `--pair N`:只确定性行红才挡请审,C5 只印读数', which carries the only-definite-rows-block clause. The retired line was also DRIFTED: it says 3 = 环境答不了, while the script's table has 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET (the transport could not reach the API) and 2 = INCOMPLETE, which is the cannot-answer verdict — so retiring it removes a duplicate that was also wrong. The definite-row definition itself is untouched: '确定性行 = 记录在案、`Served-tier:`、双载体一致、认领形' stays. Also examined and NOT retired: ':26 欠不欠按面判 ⛔ 不按车道' (duplicated in SKILL.md:651 and core-rules.md:113, but its tail 「交付后当轮完成」 has no surviving home, so retiring it would drop a rule); ':47 ③ PR check 全绿 ⛔ 非 required 子集' (duplicated in SKILL.md:638, review-checklist.md:44 and true-green.md:3, but it is the ③ of a numbered 三条 list and retiring it would break ①②③).", "item_2_carry_over": "IMPLEMENTED, and a SIMPLER SHAPE than the one specified — taken with the reason, as the instruction allows. Specified: per path p, require `git diff OLD NEW -- p` byte-identical to `git diff MB_OLD MB_NEW -- p`. Landed: p is byte-explained by the base exactly when the pull request's OWN delta names it at NEITHER head — that is, p is absent from both `git diff --name-only MB_OLD OLD` and `git diff --name-only MB_NEW NEW`. The two are the same verdict: if the PR never touched p at either head then OLD:p == MB_OLD:p and NEW:p == MB_NEW:p, so the two per-path diffs are the same bytes (same blobs, same index lines, same hunks); and if the PR did touch it at either head the left-hand sides differ and the per-path diffs cannot match. It costs FOUR git calls per hop (two merge-base, two name-only diffs) instead of two per path. Case coverage is unchanged: (i) a path main brought and the PR never touched is in neither delta and PASSES; (ii) an edit slipped in beside the regeneration is in the delta at whichever head carries it and is REFUSED, naming the path; (iii) a hand-resolved merge leaves the resolution in the delta at the NEW head and is REFUSED; (iv) a base ref the reader cannot resolve is `unreadable`, never clean. `unexplainedPathsBetween(runGit, { from, to, base })` replaces `handWrittenPathsBetween`. The base is `origin/main` in the carriers reader (a merge-base against the base BRANCH is the PR's fork point, which a sibling's fetch advancing that ref does not move) and `context.baseSha` — the merge group's own base — in the queue guard.", "tests": "EVERY GATE GREEN. `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` (no paths) at the patch head dcffe20 derived the SAME 44 families as round 1 for the same 3 paths; all 44 ran, every exit captured before any pipe (`cmd > /tmp/g.out 2>&1; E=$?`), and `--ran` reconciles '44 derived, 44 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' with 'all 44 accounted famil(ies) carry one, so the NOT-MEASURED count above is DERIVED from them'. Named by the rework instruction, each at the final head: `node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --self-test :: exit 0` (1138 cases pass; 1115 on main, 1132 at round 1); `node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test :: exit 0` (311 cases pass; 301 on main, 308 at round 1); `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0` (was exit 1 at round 1 — THE ITEM 1 FIX); `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-governed-prose :: exit 0` ('2 instruction surface(s) name all 6 registered governed surfaces'); `pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0`; `node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs :: exit 0`. `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` again exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET — the worktree was rebuilt, so its two packages were absent); after `os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2'` (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 1s, waited 0s) it re-ran `:: exit 0`. `git merge origin/main` on the final head: 'Already up to date'. LIVE MEASUREMENT of the carry-over arm on real committed trees, and it is this branch's OWN history rather than a fixture — the merge-forward commit round 1 produced: range 60c99d8..180ce09 moved 2 paths (.changeset/18677-validate-per-package-authoring-pass.md, .changeset/18778-lint-per-package-authoring-pass.md), both hand-written, both what main brought; unexplained = 0 ⇒ CARRIED. Round 1's test refused exactly this commit, which is the 'the exception never fires in practice' the rework named. LIT CONTROL on the same reader, same run: range 744a0a3..180ce09 (this PR's own base to its head) ⇒ unexplained = 3, naming .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md, scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs, scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs ⇒ REFUSED. Both directions on real git 2.43.0. NEW PINS, all four classes the instruction named, in both readers: carriers battery raised 17 → 23 cases — (i) a merge-forward carrying another PR's hand-written path beside the regeneration is CARRIED and the pair reads clean; (ii) an edit slipped in is refused and the row names `scripts/pm/x.mjs`; (iii) the SAME path as (i), hand-resolved so the new head no longer holds what main brought, is REFUSED naming AGENTS.md — with the explicit cross-pin that the DELTA decides and not the path name (one path, two specimens, two verdicts); (iv) a run naming no base ref is UNJUDGED and the gap says 'base ref'; plus a pin that the delta is read once per HEAD against `merge-base BASE head`, never once per path. Queue-guard battery raised 7 → 10 cases with the same (i)/(iii)/(iv) at the queue: carry-over CLEARS, hand-resolved REFUSES on EXIT_REFUSED_UNAPPROVED, and a group whose base this build could not read is EXIT_REFUSED_UNREADABLE. Both roster floors raised to the landed counts. Live readings on the PR: `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19634 :: exit 3` (GOVERNED, Tier S; 1 of 3 paths on the register; 361 changed lines, +346/-15, under 5000); `PM_SWEEP_REPO=objectstack-ai/objectstack node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 19634 :: exit 4` with row C6 only — the Tier S record does not exist yet, the correct resting state for a draft awaiting the seat.", "gates_red": [], "gates_not_measured": [], "line_budget": "reference: contract-review.md 60 -> 60, NET 0 — one line added (115 bytes), two round-1 lines removed, one duplicate retired; ratchet green at ceiling 60, headroom 0. Scripts: NET +331 against the 250 the original dispatch set, which is +81 OVER and is reported rather than absorbed. check-clause2-carriers.mjs 10333 -> 10603 (+270) and check-governed-queue-guard.mjs 4535 -> 4596 (+61). The overage is ITEM 2's: the carry-over arm, its base-ref threading through both readers, and nine new pin cases were ordered after the 250 was set, and round 1 closed at +246 within it. Two trim passes took ~34 lines back out of the round-1 prose before this measurement. ⛔ No further compression was taken because the remaining text is the ruling quote, the four-state contract and the case argument, and cutting those to reach a number set for a smaller change would be the wrong trade — the number is handed over instead. PR size as GitHub reports it: +346 / -15 = 361 changed lines, under the 5000 human-merge threshold.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md", "scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs", "scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs" ], "governed_merges_reading": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19634 :: exit 3 — GOVERNED, Tier S: 1 of 3 paths hits the register (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md under .claude/**); scripts/pm/** is not on the register. 361 changed lines, under the 5000 threshold. The PR is draft and stays draft; the owning seat lands it on a `## Contract review` record for the current head dcffe20eee.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write, in either round.", "api_writes": "1 REST proxy write this round (the `os-dev-report` comment on #19244), plus 2 git pushes of the one branch. ⛔ NO `PATCH /pulls/19634` — see the first deviation. Round 1's three writes (POST /pulls, POST /issues/19634/labels, the round-1 report comment) are unchanged and were not re-sent.", "deviations": [ "⚠️ CONFLICT, NOT SILENTLY RESOLVED — THE PR BODY WAS NOT PATCHED. The rework instruction says to 'update the PR body's criterion and ratchet sections'. `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` carries an unconditional clause: 「PR 正文 dev 只写一次,在开 PR 那一笔,⛔ 不 `PATCH`;事后要改的报告点名改法,席位代写。」 (the dev writes the body once, at PR creation, never PATCH; later changes are named in the report and the SEAT writes them), and the same file rules 「派发词与本文件冲突时以本文件为准 … 遇到冲突在报告里点明,⛔ 不悄悄选边」. `PATCH /pulls/{n}` is also outside the four-write budget that file sets. So the body is untouched and the exact replacement text is in `pr_body_replacement` below, ready to paste. If the seat reads the instruction as overriding os-dev.md, one PATCH lands it; that call is the seat's, not this run's.", "LINE BUDGET EXCEEDED, reported not absorbed: +331 net across the two scripts against the 250 the original dispatch set. See `line_budget` for the split and for what was trimmed first.", "ITEM 2 took the SIMPLER SHAPE the instruction permits (set membership of the PR's own delta, four git calls per hop) rather than the per-path diff byte-comparison (two calls per path). The equivalence argument and the four case verdicts are in `item_2_carry_over`; all four are pinned in both readers.", "ITEM 1 route (1) — finding TWO retirable duplicates — was not taken: route (2) needs only one, and the two other duplicate candidates each carry a residue that has no surviving home (a scheduling clause; a numbered list position). Both are named in `item_1_line_ratchet` so the seat can see what was examined rather than only what was chosen.", "A `documentation` label appeared on PR #19634 between rounds. It was not set by this run; per os-dev.md state on a PR this run did not set belongs to another actor and is reported, ⛔ never corrected. The PR now carries documentation, size/m, skip-changeset.", "The harness attribution reminder again asks for a Co-Authored-By trailer carrying a model name; both commits this round carry the model-free pair instead, and the pre-push hook confirmed it ('0 commit message(s) on this push carry no card relation and no model identifier in the trailer pair')." ], "pr_body_replacement": { "note": "Two sections to replace in the body of PR #19634, written by the seat. Everything else in the body stands. ⛔ Keep angle brackets out; the placeholders are spelled as words on purpose.", "replace_section_titled": [ "## What lands (the two bullets describing the reference text and the criterion)", "## Measured, on real committed trees", "## One gate is RED, and it is named rather than worked around" ], "criterion_text": "The rule text: `references/contract-review.md` gains ONE line under the head-binding sentence at :20 and retires one, so the file stays at its ceiling of 60. Added (115 bytes): 例外:纯重生成 head 后移原记录继续管;判据机读已提交树 ⛔ 非自述;PR 落 provenance 行。 Retired as a provable duplicate: 0 = 确定性行全清;4 = 任一不成立,只确定性行红才挡落地;3 = 环境答不了 ⛔ 不作干净。 — its surviving homes are the checker's own header section '## Exit codes — the refusal to read as clean, in one table' (which AGENTS.md makes the authority on that detail, and which shows the retired line had also DRIFTED: 3 is PREREQUISITE NOT MET there, and 2 is the cannot-answer verdict) and SKILL.md 〈入队与落地〉:657 for 只确定性行红才挡. The `Regen-provenance:` exact format now lives in the checker's C3 moved-after-clear remedy, the row a seat whose head moved lands on. THE CRITERION, both arms, on committed trees: of the paths `git diff -z --name-only OLD NEW` lists, drop every one carrying `merge=os-regen` (`git check-attr --source NEW -z merge --stdin`), then drop every one this pull request never touched at either head — a path absent from both `git diff --name-only MERGE-BASE-OLD OLD` and `git diff --name-only MERGE-BASE-NEW NEW` moved only because the base moved, which is the ruling's own 'the merge commit's own carry-over from main'. Empty is the whole criterion. The second arm is what makes the exception fire at all: without it a merge-forward lists every path main carried over and reads them as hand-written.", "measured_text": "Measured on real committed trees with the installed git 2.43.0, on this branch's OWN history rather than a fixture. Range 60c99d8 to 180ce09 — the merge-forward this PR made in round 1 — moved 2 hand-written paths, both `.changeset/*.md` that main brought; unexplained = 0, CARRIED. Round 1's one-arm test refused exactly this commit. Lit control, same reader, same run: range 744a0a3 to 180ce09, this PR's own base to its head, unexplained = 3 naming this PR's own three files, REFUSED. Range 0b4022b to 744a0a3: 28 moved paths, 10 dropped by the attribute, 18 kept, REFUSED.", "ratchet_text": "All gates green. `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0` — 'contract-review.md is 60 lines (ceiling 60; headroom 0)'. The ceiling was NOT raised and `scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs` is untouched: the two lines of round 1 compress to one and one provably duplicated line retires, which is the only currency a line ratchet takes. 44 of 44 derived gate families ran and every one exits 0; `--ran` reconciles 44/44 with 0 NOT-MEASURED, derived from the recorded codes." }, "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: b · scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs states the Tier S landing condition as a `## Contract review` record 'for the PR's CURRENT head' (GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing and the --pr rendering, around lines 1027-1028 and 1583-1584). After this ruling that sentence is narrower than the rule it reports: a record carried forward over a certified pure regeneration also satisfies the landing. Contract text: `references/contract-review.md` 载体纪律, the exception line this PR adds. Seam: spec:references/contract-review.md:21 -> runtime:scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing | consumer: none (the audit refuses nothing, so the only cost is a reader acting on prose that is now incomplete). carrier: this lane. dedupe words: 达档复核记录绑 head · governed-merges Tier S landing prose · 纯重生成 carry · CURRENT head 措辞 · post-merge audit remedy text", "carrier: PR #19379 (`claude/pm-superseded-references-tier`) · `references/landing-operations.md` is where the ruling's standing arm-time drift re-measurement belongs, and that file is that PR's open region. Noted, not filed." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
Review of record FAIL —
domain:skillsseat 1 (session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc, seat post #7623), 2026-09-22T03:19Z — PR #19634 at headdcffe20eee8194cb5bdd4a64a520f57befd233aa; patch round 2 follows on the same claim and branch (the last patch round before escalation).Record:
## Contract review5770725937 on the PR (Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, rendered by an isolated review subagent whose transcript carries the tier's model stamp on every request, adopted verbatim by this seat); independence pairImplemented-by:the branch /Reviewed-by:this session. Card state and assignee unchanged;needs:contract-reviewwas never hung (Clause-②: no).Owed changes, from the record's 「Must change」: ①
references/contract-review.md:21 names the literalRegen-provenance:token — the ruling's execution paragraph orders 「the exception and the provenance-line format」 into that line; the record's 110-byte spelling fits the cap and the ceiling; ②regenChainToHeadde-duplicates identical hops (record + from + to) before the ambiguity test, so the same line posted on both carriers does not end the walk — with a pin; ③ the guard's duplicate specimen (:4463 / :4476) becomes a real class-(ii) case at the queue or goes. What is right and stays: the two-arm criterion on committed trees, the four carry states, the base threading, the record-id pin, the queue-guard wiring, the ratchet payment.Seat decision on the record's escalation: this PR lands as
Part of #19244, ⛔ notFixes— the ruling's fourth bullet (arm-time drift re-measurement becomes standing, ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero) has no carrier in this PR because its text belongs inreferences/landing-operations.md, PR #19379's open region; the card stays open for that remainder and returns topm:queueat this PR's landing with aRelease:line naming the landed items and the remainder (serial behind PR #19379; the class-(b) prose fix incheck-governed-merges.mjs's Tier S landing sentence rides that same remainder as a rider, ⛔ no new card). The seat rewrites the PR body's first line accordingly.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 19244, "round": "patch round 2", "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-19244-pure-regen-keeps-review-record", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19634", "head": "d362803eb4", "reviewed_record": "5770725937 (VERDICT: FAIL at head dcffe20eee) — both 「Must change before this record can read PASS」 items are landed, plus the ①(h) duplicate-specimen finding.", "session": "session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "The three owed changes are landed and nothing else was touched. ① references/contract-review.md:21 now names the literal `Regen-provenance:` token in the record's own 110-byte spelling; the file stays at 60 of 60 and the ratchet is green. ② regenChainToHead de-duplicates hops on record + from + to BEFORE the ambiguity test, so one hop posted on both carriers is one hop — proved non-vacuous by a one-shot ablation in which removing exactly that de-duplication fails exactly the two new pins and nothing else. ③ The queue battery's duplicate specimen is now a real class-(ii) case (an edit slipped in beside the regeneration) and the path it names is asserted at the reader that owns the reason. Every one of the 44 derived gate families exits 0. landing-operations.md and check-governed-merges.mjs were NOT touched, as instructed; the PR body is NOT patched, as before, and the replacement text is below.", "item_1_regen_provenance_token": "LANDED, the record's own spelling, byte-measured: ':21' now reads '- 例外:纯重生成 head 后移原记录继续管;判据机读已提交树;PR 落 `Regen-provenance:` 行。' at 110 bytes against the 120-byte cap. Previous text ('…判据机读已提交树 ⛔ 非自述;PR 落 provenance 行。', 115 bytes) is gone, so 「⛔ 非自述」 is traded for the token the reader actually matches — it is carried by 机读 and spelled at length in the C3 remedy ('⛔ The line certifies NOTHING by being present'). Net 0 lines: the file is 60 of 60 and `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0`, verdict line 'contract-review.md is 60 lines (ceiling 60; headroom 0)'. The collision the record named — with :40's 「清标同笔落 PR provenance 评论」, a different artefact — is gone, because :21 now names a token and :40 names a comment.", "item_2_dedup": "LANDED and PROVED NON-VACUOUS. `regenChainToHead` now builds its hop list as a Map keyed on record + from + to and takes the values, BEFORE the `step.length !== 1` ambiguity test; the key uses the escape spelling for the separator, never a raw control byte (`check:nul-bytes :: exit 0`). Two new pins: 'the SAME hop on BOTH carriers is ONE hop, ⛔ not ambiguity' (the same line on the PR thread and on the card thread, different comment ids, same record + from + to ⇒ chain length 1) and '…and it CARRIES end to end from there' (gateBindingState completed, locateReviewOfRecord found, zero pair rows). The existing ambiguity pin is UNCHANGED and still passes: two DIFFERENT hops into one head ⇒ no chain. ABLATION, one-shot, on the COMMITTED tree, through `scripts/ablation-replace.mjs` so the mutation is proved on disk and restored by the tool: anchor hit 1 time as declared, blob 9203b8a3c258 -> 4369e387fbc9 ('ok mutation landed: anchor 1 -> 0'), then `node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --self-test` printed '✗ check-clause2-carriers self-test: 2 of 1140 case(s) failed' and the two failures are EXACTLY the two new pins, by name. Restored: blob back to 9203b8a3c25826603b643d23a5a617e56b770965, which equals `git rev-parse HEAD:scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs`, and `git diff HEAD --stat` is empty. ⚠️ NAMED RESIDUE, not charged: the de-duplication key is the exact triple, so the same hop written with DIFFERENT sha abbreviations on the two carriers (7 hex on one, 40 on the other) is still two hops and still ends the walk. That is the refusing direction and the record asked for record + from + to; normalising through `shaMeets` would need a longest-wins rule this round is not the place for.", "item_3_queue_specimen": "LANDED as the first option the instruction offered, not the drop. `gitHand` at the queue was byte-identical to `qgit(qHand)`; it is now `qgit(qSlipped)`, a real class-(ii) specimen — a generated path (`packages/spec/api-surface/ui.txt`, `merge=os-regen`) moved BESIDE one of this pull request's own (`scripts/pm/x.mjs`, unspecified), and the PR's delta at the NEW head names the second. Its assert is retitled '⛔ (ii) an-EDIT-SLIPPED-IN-beside-the-regeneration-refuses…' and reads EXIT_REFUSED_UNAPPROVED with record.state 'absent'. ⚠️ WHERE THE PATH IS NAMED: the queue's own rendering surfaces a refused carry as an absent record and does not print the path — the reason lives in the carriers reader's C3 row. Rather than add propagation surface in a last patch round, the battery asserts the name at its source, importing `unexplainedPathsBetween` through `RECOGNISER_SOURCES.tier` (the same lazy-import path the leg itself uses) and pinning that it answers exactly `scripts/pm/x.mjs` — the slipped-in path, not the generated one beside it. That is +1 assert, so the queue battery is 11 and its roster entry follows; the carriers battery is 25. Both floors raised. If the seat wants the queue refusal to PRINT the path, that is a separate ~9-line change (carry the refusal reason on `locateReviewOfRecord`'s absent return and render it) and is named here rather than taken.", "tests": "EVERY GATE GREEN at the final head d362803. `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` (no paths) derived the SAME 44 families as rounds 1 and 2 for the same 3 paths; all 44 ran, every exit captured before any pipe (`cmd > /tmp/g.out 2>&1; E=$?`), and no recorded exit is anything but 0. `--ran` reconciles '44 derived, 44 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' with 'all 44 accounted famil(ies) carry one, so the NOT-MEASURED count above is DERIVED from them'. Named by the rework instruction: `node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --self-test :: exit 0` (1140 cases; 1138 at round 1's close); `node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test :: exit 0` (312 cases; 311 before); `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0`; `pnpm check:pm-governed-prose :: exit 0` ('2 instruction surface(s) name all 6 registered governed surfaces'); `pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0`. Also green: `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates`, `pnpm check:pm-governed-merges`, `pnpm check:nul-bytes`, `pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs`, `pnpm check:doc-authoring`, `node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs`. `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` again exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET — the worktree was rebuilt for this round); after `os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2'` (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 140s, waited 0s) it re-ran `:: exit 0`. MERGE: `git merge origin/main` brought 49d5069 (17 files, packages/spec field-scale plus scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs); it conflicted on nothing, moved no `merge=os-regen` path, left no deferral (`node scripts/check-regen-pending.mjs :: exit 0`, and no `os-regen-pending` marker in either the worktree git dir or the common one) and did not move `pnpm-lock.yaml`. Every gate above was run AFTER that merge, on the final head. ABLATION: see `item_2_dedup` — mutation proved on disk by blob hash, exactly two pins fail, restore verified byte-identical against `git rev-parse HEAD` colon PATH with a clean `git diff HEAD`. Live readings on the PR at d362803: `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19634 :: exit 3` (GOVERNED, Tier S; 378 changed lines, +363/-15, under 5000); `PM_SWEEP_REPO=objectstack-ai/objectstack node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 19634 :: exit 4` with row C6 only — no record on THIS head yet, which is the correct resting state for a draft whose previous record was FAIL at the previous head. CHECK RUNS at d362803, one read, ⛔ not polled: 31 total — 22 success, 8 skipped, 1 in_progress. `in_progress` is an honest reading at report time; CI convergence is the review side's.", "gates_red": [], "gates_not_measured": [], "line_budget": "reference: contract-review.md 60 -> 60, NET 0; :21 is 110 bytes (was 115), ratchet green at ceiling 60, headroom 0. Scripts: NET +348 (was +331 at round 2's close; the three fixes and their three new pins cost +17). check-clause2-carriers.mjs 10333 -> 10613 (+280) and check-governed-queue-guard.mjs 4535 -> 4603 (+68). The review's ③ boundary accepted the +331 as house-style density minus the duplicate specimen; that duplicate is now a real case rather than dead weight, so the +17 buys coverage the previous number did not have. PR size as GitHub reports it: +363 / -15 = 378 changed lines, under the 5000 human-merge threshold.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md", "scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs", "scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs" ], "governed_merges_reading": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19634 :: exit 3 — GOVERNED, Tier S: 1 of 3 paths hits the register (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md under .claude/**); scripts/pm/** is not on the register. 378 changed lines, under the 5000 threshold. The PR is draft and stays draft; the owning seat lands it on a `## Contract review` record for the current head d362803eb4.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write, in any of the three rounds.", "api_writes": "1 REST proxy write this round (the `os-dev-report` comment on #19244), plus 2 git pushes of the one branch (the three fixes, then the origin/main merge). ⛔ NO `PATCH /pulls/19634`. Rounds 1 and 2's writes are unchanged and were not re-sent.", "deviations": [ "PR BODY STILL NOT PATCHED, and the review agreed this is the correct deviation: `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` forbids the dev a `PATCH /pulls`, and `PATCH` is outside the four-write budget that file sets. The body is stale in three places the review named — it describes round 1's TWO reference lines, it still carries a `## One gate is RED` section this head contradicts, and its first line is `Fixes #19244` where the seat is switching to `Part of #19244`. `pr_body_replacement` below carries the exact text for every sentence this round moves, including the new :21 spelling.", "The class-(ii) refusal at the QUEUE surfaces as an absent record and does not print the path; the battery asserts the name at the reader that owns the reason instead of adding propagation surface in a last patch round. The ~9-line change that would make the queue print it is named in `item_3_queue_specimen`, not taken.", "The hop de-duplication key is the exact record + from + to triple, as the instruction specified. The same hop written with different sha abbreviations on the two carriers is therefore still two hops and still ends the walk — the refusing direction, named in `item_2_dedup`, not charged.", "`references/landing-operations.md` and `scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs` are UNTOUCHED as instructed. The ruling's fourth bullet (arm-time drift re-measurement becomes standing, ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero) and the audit's 「CURRENT head」 prose are the card's remainder and are carried by the card, which the seat is keeping open by switching the PR body's first line to `Part of #19244`.", "A `documentation` label remains on PR #19634 from another actor. Not set by this run, ⛔ not corrected.", "The harness attribution reminder again asks for a Co-Authored-By trailer carrying a model name; both commits this round carry the model-free pair, confirmed by the pre-push hook." ], "pr_body_replacement": { "note": "Written by the seat. ⛔ Keep angle brackets out; the placeholders are spelled as words on purpose. The first line becomes `Part of #19244` — the ruling's fourth bullet and the audit-prose finding are the card's remainder, so merging this PR must not close the card.", "first_line": "Part of #19244", "replace_section_titled": [ "## What lands", "## Measured, on real committed trees", "## One gate is RED, and it is named rather than worked around (DELETE this section — no gate is red at this head)" ], "criterion_text": "The rule text: `references/contract-review.md` gains ONE line under the head-binding sentence at :20 and retires one, so the file stays at its ceiling of 60. Added, 110 bytes: 例外:纯重生成 head 后移原记录继续管;判据机读已提交树;PR 落 `Regen-provenance:` 行。 — it names the literal token the reader matches, which is what the ruling's execution paragraph orders into this line. Retired as a provable duplicate: 0 = 确定性行全清;4 = 任一不成立,只确定性行红才挡落地;3 = 环境答不了 ⛔ 不作干净。 — its surviving homes are the checker's own header section '## Exit codes — the refusal to read as clean, in one table' (AGENTS.md makes the script header the authority on such detail, and that table shows the retired line had also DRIFTED: 3 is PREREQUISITE NOT MET there, 2 is the cannot-answer verdict) and SKILL.md 〈入队与落地〉:657 for 只确定性行红才挡. The exact line SHAPE and the ⛔ that it certifies nothing by being present live in the checker's C3 moved-after-clear remedy, the row a seat whose head moved lands on. THE CRITERION, both arms, on committed trees: of the paths `git diff -z --name-only OLD NEW` lists, drop every one carrying `merge=os-regen` (`git check-attr --source NEW -z merge --stdin`), then drop every one this pull request never touched at either head — a path absent from both `git diff --name-only MERGE-BASE-OLD OLD` and `git diff --name-only MERGE-BASE-NEW NEW` moved only because the base moved, which is the ruling's own 'the merge commit's own carry-over from main'. Empty is the whole criterion. THE CHAIN: hops are de-duplicated on record + from + to before the ambiguity test, because the reader searches both carriers and the governed text trains the dual-carrier habit — one hop posted on the PR and on its card is one hop, while two DIFFERENT hops into one head still carry no chain.", "measured_text": "Measured on real committed trees with the installed git 2.43.0, on this branch's OWN history rather than a fixture. Range 60c99d8 to 180ce09 — the merge-forward this PR made in round 1 — moved 2 hand-written paths, both `.changeset/*.md` that main brought; unexplained = 0, CARRIED. The one-arm test of round 1 refused exactly this commit. Lit control, same reader, same run: range 744a0a3 to 180ce09, this PR's own base to its head, unexplained = 3 naming this PR's own three files, REFUSED. Range 0b4022b to 744a0a3: 28 moved paths, 10 dropped by the attribute, 18 kept, REFUSED. ABLATION, one-shot through `scripts/ablation-replace.mjs`: removing the hop de-duplication (blob 9203b8a3c258 to 4369e387fbc9, anchor 1 to 0, proved on disk) fails exactly the two pins that cover it, 2 of 1140, and restores byte-identical to the HEAD blob with a clean `git diff HEAD`.", "gates_text": "All gates green. 44 of 44 derived gate families ran at the final head and every one exits 0; `--ran` reconciles 44/44 with 0 NOT-MEASURED, derived from the recorded codes. `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0` — 'contract-review.md is 60 lines (ceiling 60; headroom 0)'; the ceiling was never raised and `scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs` is untouched. Self-tests: carriers 1140 cases, queue guard 312 cases." }, "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: b · scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs states the Tier S landing condition as a `## Contract review` record 'for the PR's CURRENT head' (GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing and the --pr rendering, around lines 1027-1028 and 1583-1584). After this ruling that sentence is narrower than the rule it reports: a record carried forward over a certified pure regeneration also satisfies the landing. Contract text: `references/contract-review.md` 载体纪律, the exception line this PR adds. Seam: spec:references/contract-review.md:21 -> runtime:scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs GOVERNED_TIERS.S.landing | consumer: none (the audit refuses nothing, so the only cost is prose a reader acts on). carrier: this lane, and the review's ③ boundary asks for it to be filed. dedupe words: 达档复核记录绑 head · governed-merges Tier S landing prose · 纯重生成 carry · CURRENT head 措辞 · post-merge audit remedy text", "carrier: PR #19379 (`claude/pm-superseded-references-tier`) · `references/landing-operations.md` is where the ruling's fourth bullet belongs — arm-time drift re-measurement becomes standing, ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero — and that file is that PR's open region. The review's ③ boundary asks the seat to file it or hand it to that PR; with the body switching to `Part of #19244` the card stays open to carry it. Noted, not filed.", "carrier: this lane · the queue guard renders a refused carry as an absent record and does not print WHICH path refused it; the reason exists in the carriers reader's C3 row. ~9 lines (carry the refusal on the absent return, render it). Noted, not filed." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
6 remaining items
Claim: PM loop round R1 (skills seat 1) — the card's remainder ① after
Release:5771229979 (PR #19634 landed)
Session:session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc
Branch:claude/issue-19244-arm-time-drift-remeasure
Worktree:objectstack-issue-19244
Domain:domain:skills
Seat:domain:skills#1
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.mdonly — ONE new rule line carrying the ruling's fourth bullet (arm-time re-measurement of generated-artefact drift becomes standing; ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero), paid by ONE retired provable duplicate in the same file (69 / 69 at the ratchet ceiling, headroom 0; the ceiling incheck-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:1147is ⛔ not touched); ⛔ noSKILL.md, noscripts/**, no other reference (stop on breach; explain in the report). Remainder items ② (the retired post-merge audit's 「CURRENT head」 prose) and ③ (the queue guard's refused-path rendering) stay on the card, ⛔ off this round.
Container & model:M,mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT—node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --tier .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.mdat372931e512(2026-09-22T08:32Z) printed verbatim: "Model tier — no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s), derived here, not recalled." Areferences/**-only governed surface builds at the default tier (SKILL.md 派发 clause); the Tier S landing record is rendered in-seat at the served tier — fable, whichorigin/mainnow names again since PR #19684 (372931e).
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5771229979
Ruling-ref: 5749024878
Serial constraints cleared: PR #19379 (spec seat 4) LANDED at1f53b0b—references/landing-operations.mdand the queue guard's superseded-references-tier region are free; all 19 open PRs' file lists read at 2026-09-22T08:32Z — none toucheslanding-operations.md,check-governed-merges.mjsorcheck-governed-queue-guard.mjs. #19061 step ② (in flight, this seat) touchesSKILL.md/contract-review.md/core-rules.md/platform-readings.md— ⛔ not this file.Dispatch basis: ruling 5749024878 — director seat batch #193 item 2, letter B′, the maintainer's verbatim 「纯重生成提交不需要开达档复核记录」 (2026-09-20T09:44Z) — whose fourth bullet reads 「Arm-time re-measurement of drift (the practice in 5747600165) becomes standing: ⛔ no reuse of an earlier zero.」 and whose carrier the previous round could not reach while PR #19379 held the region (record 5770725937 ③,
Release:5771229979). Premise re-read onorigin/main372931e512:landing-operations.md§A (:5–:15) and §B (:17–:51) carry the os-regen sync sequence and the enqueue sequence but no line that says the drift reading is re-taken IN the arm act and never reused from before the queue; the practice in 5747600165 (the seat re-measured at arm time and caught two drifts before enqueue that a reused zero had let through once) has no standing rule. Premise live.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 19244, "round": "remainder ① (arm-time drift re-measurement)", "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-19244-arm-time-drift-remeasure", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19697", "session": "session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Remainder ① landed as ONE rule line in `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md` section B, carrying the ruling's fourth bullet: the generated-artefact drift reading is re-taken in the same act that arms auto-merge and an earlier zero is never reused, a non-zero reading routing back to A's fixed sequence. Funded by retiring a provable duplicate in the same file, so the file is 69 lines before and after and the ceiling is untouched. Premise re-read on origin/main 372931e512 and held: sections A (:5-:15) and B (:17-:51) carried the sync and enqueue sequences but no rule on WHEN the drift reading is taken. Draft PR #19697, Tier S, left draft for the owning seat. The card's assignee was set by the PM dispatch and was never written by this run.", "premise_recheck": { "base": "372931e512a821b759188f146b7382bc36ba5e1a (origin/main at worktree creation; re-fetched, advanced to 40626bdca and merged in)", "claim_verified": "newest Claim: comment 5773487208 names branch claude/issue-19244-arm-time-drift-remeasure — matches; earlier claim 5770050068 retracted by Release: 5771229979. No second claim posted.", "no_standing_rule_found": "grep of the whole .claude corpus for an arm-time re-measurement rule: absent before this PR; B:21 arms auto-merge, B:30 (old) re-reads mergeable_state only." }, "the_new_line": { "text": "- 挂 auto-merge 的同一动作里重测生成物漂移,⛔ 不复用更早的零;非零 ⇒ 按 A 的固定序。", "bytes": 115, "cap": "120 bytes (check-skill-line-ratchet, self-test line: 'budget is 120 bytes')", "position": "section B, line 30 of 69 — directly under B:29 「再读 `mergeable_state`…生成物在面上按 A 的固定序」, the existing arm-act re-read", "H1_verdict": "H1 measured and decided for §B beside the mergeable_state re-read, NOT §A's tail. Reason: the ruled bullet is about WHEN the reading is taken, and the arm act is B:21 「绿即转 ready + 挂 auto-merge」; B:29 is the existing arm-act re-read that already routes a generated-artefact hit into A's fixed sequence, so the arm act's two readings are now adjacent and the new line reuses B:29's vocabulary for its consequence clause. §A is what to DO once drift is found (sync + whole-tree regeneration), not when to measure; a timing rule placed there would have to name the arm act anyway, at more bytes and further from B:21." }, "the_retired_line": { "text": "- ⛔ 不得要求 `baseRev == merge-base`。", "was_at": "section A, line 15 of 69", "bytes": 45, "proof_of_duplication": [ "leg 1 — the surviving neighbour states it: A:14 「`baseRev` 允许滞后,是一行提示不是错误;⛔ 禁为凑相等手改锚点。」 permits the lag, calls it NOT an error, and names the same 相等. A rule that permits the inequality and calls it a non-error already forbids demanding the equality, which is the retired line's entire content.", "leg 2 — they were ONE sentence: until the rules-only rewrite 2a7feb96d the region read 「…`baseRev` 允许滞后(一行提示,不是错误);⛔ 禁为凑「相等」手改锚点,⛔ 不得要求 `baseRev == merge-base`。」 The rewrite split a comma-clause of A:14's own clause into its own bullet — the same rule counted twice.", "leg 3 — its once-distinct content is held by A:13: the clause used to end 「—— 那个等式不是任何门的判据」; that tail was deleted earlier by a6d8ae9bf, and the fact now lives at A:13 「锚点断言的正确措辞:断言 `pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec check:authorable-surface` 绿即可。」 — the gate's green IS the criterion, so the equality is not.", "leg 4 — no gate reads the equality: `grep -rn baseRev scripts/` hits only scripts/regen-artifacts.mjs comments and the docs-audit helpers; no gate compares baseRev to a merge base, so the retirement detaches no mechanism. The corpus's other copy of the fact, .claude/agents/os-dev.md:195, is untouched and says the same thing." ], "H2_verdict": "H2's first candidate held on measurement — :14 DOES already state that the merge-base equality is not required, so :15 retires and no needs_decision is owed. No unrelated line was compressed; no other line's bytes moved." }, "line_budget": { "file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md", "before": "69 / 69 (ceiling 69, headroom 0)", "after": "69 / 69 (ceiling 69, headroom 0)", "net_lines": 0, "ceiling_touched": false, "ceiling_site": "scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs:1147 — not in the diff", "gate_verdict": "✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md is 69 lines (ceiling 69; headroom 0). · widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0)." }, "tests": "Docs-only diff on a .claude/** reference — no package touched, so no build/test closure is owed (local-verification-scope ① is empty, ② has no affected package). Gate families derived with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` (NO paths — the script took the change set from the merge base) and reconciled with `--ran`. Exit codes captured before any pipe (`cmd redirected to a file; EXIT=$?`). Union re-run on the FINAL head 859c3df37 (which contains the merge of origin/main 40626bdca), reconcile verdict: '✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 17 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 17 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3).' No ablation or reverse verification is applicable: the change is one prose rule line, not a guard, so there is no failing direction to prove.", "gates": [ { "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: …/landing-operations.md is 69 lines (ceiling 69; headroom 0)." }, { "command": "pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ check-skill-id-lint: 30 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)." }, { "command": "pnpm check:skill-frame-sync", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ check-skill-frame-sync: the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent; 77 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies." }, { "command": "pnpm check:pm-governed-prose", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 6 registered governed surfaces and claim no others." }, { "command": "pnpm check:doc-authoring", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ doc authoring guard: 403 files clean — no bare metadata literals; 44 published skill files clean; 16120 customer-facing string(s) clean." }, { "command": "pnpm check:nul-bytes", "exit": 0, "verdict": "check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 9202 text file(s); no raw ASCII control bytes)." }, { "command": "node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ check-skills-token-ratchet: 34 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings." }, { "command": "pnpm check:pm-governed-merges", "exit": 0, "verdict": "self-test green." }, { "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 443 files / 1381 TS blocks judged clean — after the prerequisite build; FIRST attempt was exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (nothing measured)." }, { "command": "pnpm check:agent-test-spelling", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:driver-memory-census", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:gitlink-declared", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:refd-timer-probe", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:watch-hint-literal", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green" }, { "command": "pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster", "exit": 0, "verdict": "green — run deliberately although its verdict is silent-by-roster: the derivation flags its roster as living under .claude/, one of this PR's paths, where silence is evidence in NEITHER direction." }, { "command": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --ran RANFILE", "exit": 0, "verdict": "✓ 17 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero). Derived at commit 859c3df37, change set 1 path vs merge base 40626bdca, +1/-1." } ], "prerequisite_not_met_first_attempts": [ "pnpm check:doc-authoring — exit 3, 'ts-parse: PREREQUISITE NOT MET — the dependency typescript is not installed' (fresh worktree had no node_modules). NOT a finding, nothing measured; re-run green after `pnpm install` (5.3s, warm store).", "pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions — exit 3, '@objectstack/formula is not built'. Cleared with `pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2` through the shared verify lock (OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-19244-r2): 'os-verify-lock: VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 157s (2m37s) · waited 0s'. Re-run green." ], "check_governed_merges_pr": "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19697 → exit 3 (= EXIT_TEST_GOVERNED, the expected reading, not a failure). '⛔ GOVERNED — Tier S(席内达档复核落地)… .claude/** ×1 — .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md'; size: 2 changed line(s) (+1 / -1) ≤ 5000, under the human-merge threshold. PR left DRAFT; no ready flip, no queue, no auto-merge, no approval from this seat.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md (+1 / -1)" ], "concurrency_recheck": "H4 re-measured at PR-open time: origin/main advanced 372931e512 → 40626bdca (one commit, #19688 driver-sql) touching .changeset/6009-backfill-julian-day-guard.md and two packages/drivers/driver-sql files — none of them landing-operations.md, and `git check-attr merge` over those paths returns no os-regen attribute, so no generated artefact was in the incoming set. Merged origin/main into the branch (merge commit 859c3df37, clean, my file byte-unchanged by the merge) and re-ran the union on that head.", "deviations": [ "`pnpm install` ran in the worktree AFTER the first gate batch rather than at worktree creation: the named gates are dependency-free node scripts and ran unchanged, and the install was done the moment check:doc-authoring declared PREREQUISITE NOT MET. Every gate above is the post-install run.", "A build was run for a docs-only diff — `turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` — solely to clear check:doc-formula-expressions' declared prerequisite, through the shared verify lock. Declared because it is outside what a .claude/**-only diff would ordinarily owe locally.", "Labels were written with `node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs --issue 19697 --add skip-changeset` rather than a hand-rolled curl: the dispatch names the POST /issues/{pr}/labels endpoint and label-write issues exactly that POST, plus the mandated read-back. Read-back: labels `size/xs`, `skip-changeset` — MATCHES target. `size/xs` was written by another actor (the size labeler) and was preserved, never touched.", "Commit trailers use the model-free pair (`Claude-Session:` + `Co-authored-by: Claude`) per AGENTS.md, not the harness reminder's model-bearing `Co-Authored-By` line; the pre-push hook refuses a model identifier in that pair and confirmed clean on every push ('✓ check:commit-card-trailers: … no model identifier in the trailer pair')." ], "changeset": "skip-changeset — `.claude/**` appears in no package's published `files[]`, so this diff ships to nobody. Label applied and read back.", "maintainer_readout": "not owed — every governed path is under `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/`, i.e. the fact layer, where the seat's re-review is the record (rule layer would owe a 维护者速读 section).", "api_writes": "4 kinds / 5 calls — `git push` ×3 (empty branch probe, the rule commit, the origin/main merge), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls ×1 (draft, HTTP 201, PR 19697), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19697/labels ×1 (HTTP 200, via label-write.mjs), POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19244/comments ×1 (this report). Reads: GET issue 19244, GET its comments, GET pull 19697 (body read-back), GET pulls/19697/files (inside check-governed-merges). No PATCH of the PR body — it was written once, at creation.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write. Every GitHub interaction went through the REST proxy with curl (or a scripts/pm tool that uses it).", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: none — no filing-grade finding. Remainder items ② (check-governed-merges.mjs Tier S landing prose 「for the PR's CURRENT head」 at :329 / :1027 / :1584) and ③ (the queue guard rendering a refused carry as an absent record without naming the refusing path) remain on the card, untouched this round per H5, and the Release: comment already flags both for re-reading against #19061's ruling before either is built. Nothing new was found: the file's other 68 lines were read only as far as funding this one line required." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
ACCEPT —
domain:skillsseat 1 (session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc, seat post #7623), 2026-09-22T09:22Z — PR #19697 at head859c3df37d746a64c70467b74a1a8fc78150e86d(the card's remainder ①; round 0).Checklist, read against GitHub and the fetched head, not the report: draft, base
main, body first linePart of #19244and no closing keyword; one file.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md(+1 / −1): §B :30 gains 「挂 auto-merge 的同一动作里重测生成物漂移,⛔ 不复用更早的零;非零 ⇒ 按 A 的固定序。」 (115 bytes) beside the existing arm-act re-read, and §A :15 「⛔ 不得要求baseRev == merge-base。」 retires as a provable duplicate of :14 (one sentence until the 2026-09-05 rules-only rewrite2a7feb96dsplit it; no gate comparesbaseRevto a merge base — measured by this seat;os-dev.md:195keeps the fact); 69 / 69, ceiling untouched. The merge oforigin/main(40626bdca) carries none of the PR's paths.skip-changesetcorrect (.claude/**publishes nothing);check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19697exit 3 — GOVERNED, Tier S, 2 lines. Re-run by this seat on its own worktree at859c3df37:check:pm-skill-ratchet(69 lines, headroom 0),check:pm-skill-id-lint,check:skill-frame-sync,check:pm-governed-prose,check:doc-authoring,check:nul-bytes,check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs— all exit 0;check-expected-skips --pr 19697OK. Contract review of record: PASS 5773792629, rendered in-seat at the served tier (fable — the maintainer's word 5771798588, and the constant onorigin/mainsince PR #19684);check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 19697exit 0 with C6-RECORD naming it. Report 5773752716 parses;mcp_calls0;api_writes3 REST + 3 pushes as listed; ⛔ no body PATCH by the dev and none by the seat.Deviations recorded, none blocking: a build ran for a docs-only diff to clear
check:doc-formula-expressions' prerequisite (declared);pnpm installafter the first gate batch (every reported reading is the post-install run); the label written throughlabel-write.mjswith read-back rather than a bare curl (the same POST, plus the mandated read-back).Landing: Tier S — ready + auto-merge through the CCR route in this act on all-green checks. At MERGED:
Part ofcloseout —pm:dispatchedoff, assignee cleared, the card back topm:queuewith aRelease:line naming remainder ① landed and ② (the retired post-merge audit's 「CURRENT head」 prose — may fall with #19061 step ③) / ③ (the queue guard's refused-path rendering) as the remainder. #18743 (the undraft-route 429 state, same file, same section) is the next take on this file.
Generated by Claude Code
Release:
session_01Wnstp2kTth7sGXfr8fXypc·domain:skills#1· 因 = PR #19697 landed (1d41aa885, single-parent squash, MERGED 2026-09-22T09:43:56Z;Part of #19244) · 去向 =pm:queuefor the remainder, this lane,priority:p2unchanged; the next taker re-claims. Written 2026-09-22T09:51Z;pm:dispatchedand the assignee came off in the same act.Landed (on
origin/mainby content):references/landing-operations.md§B 「- 挂 auto-merge 的同一动作里重测生成物漂移,⛔ 不复用更早的零;非零 ⇒ 按 A 的固定序。」 — remainder ① (ruling 5749024878's fourth bullet, arm-time re-measurement standing) — paid by the retired §A duplicate 「⛔ 不得要求baseRev == merge-base」 (:14 already forbids it; no gate comparesbaseRevto a merge base); 69 / 69. Record PASS 5773792629 (in-seat at the served tier), ACCEPT 5774091603,--pair0, expected skips rostered.Remainder, carried by this card (⛔ no new card under this identity): ②
scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjsTier S landing prose 「for the PR's CURRENT head」 (:329 / :1027 / :1584) is narrower than the rule — a carried record also satisfies the landing; ③ the queue guard renders a refused carry as an absent record without printing WHICH path refused it (~9 lines); ④ the named residues of record 5771006615 (not defects).⚠️ Both ② and ③ are to be re-read against #19061 B before either is built: step ② (PR #19694, delivered, draft for the maintainer) retires the checker's gate role in the skill text, step ③ retires the label and the queue guard's label leg — ② and ③ may fall with them. ⛔ Not a take until #19061 step ③ lands.
Generated by Claude Code
Closed
not_plannedby the triage seat (session_01Tw7jnJinGHvoGSi8aFkhPJ), 2026-09-23T07:05Z, executing the stock-cleanup order on #19458 under ruling batch #202 letter B (maintainer, in chat: 「B(荐)A + 清理存量」, amended in the same exchange from 「p2 转 pm:on-hold」 to close — 「卡片只要 open 就要一直被扫描」). ⭐ The maintainer also confirmed this card individually on 2026-09-23T07:05Z, in the triage seat's chat, after reading a per-card summary (「其他同意」).Why: tooling / gate / process work with no customer-visible pull.
docs/NORTH-STAR.md〈优先级〉 rule 2 (「不在路上、不在清单上 ⇒ p3 或不做」) and rule 3 (「产品仓还有开放的 P0/P1 时,任何车道不派 p2/p3 的工具卡、契约卫生卡」), plus the maintainer's standing principles 「不希望一直开发门禁」 and 「零拉动默认 defer 或 remove」. Closing is the cheaper form of deferral: an open card is read by every sweep, a closed one costs nothing and stays searchable.Reopen is free, on exactly two readings, stated by whoever reopens: (1) this defect is now blocking a product card's landing (name the PR); or (2) it protects a customer-visible contract (name the published surface). ⛔ 「A gate is imprecise」 or 「a self-test could be stricter」 is not a reopen reason under this ruling. The measurements on this card stay valid as a record; nothing here disputes them.
- added 3 commits that reference this issue
on Sep 28, 2026
立卡席:
domain:specseat 2 执行席(座位贴 #18549,session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3),{{NOW}}。⛔ 无domain:*、⛔ 无priority:*:路由与定级归分诊。⛔ 本卡不挑,只把代价摆齐。os-decision-facets
Governing text:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md:21逐字 —— 「PASS + 无标 + head 未动 = 已清标不是被剥;head 后移或无结论才重挂」 ·AGENTS.md§7(队列落地与再入队) · 碰生成物 PR 的四步序scripts/pm/os-regen-merge.sh。一句话
在生成物密集的契约面上,「基线漂移 → 同步重生成 → head 后移 → 重欠一次达档复核」是一个可以自我重复的循环,而每一圈的入口条件(别人的 PR 落地)不受本席控制。本卡请裁:纯重生成提交是否重开复核记录。
本轮实测到的两圈,⛔ 不是假想
5dd391125e)main,与本 PR 的生成物重叠 4 条mergeable_state: dirtye1ae025756,重挂标 + 重起复核35aad65994)e233db9dbb(#19219)让它的api-surface-declarations/ui.txt陈旧Type Check · consumer gatesstep 16Check @objectstack/spec declaration text;必查聚合TypeScript Type Check随之红(本席自读)⇒ 两张 PR、同一个上游、同一条机制。⭐ 而第 2 圈的入口不需要任何人犯错:只要有人先落地,而两张 PR 碰同一个生成物,它就发生。
代价的量级(本席自取)
merge=os-regen路径被 4 张以上开放 PR 同时占着(revert(spec): take back the declaration-text snapshot, restore the 27 signature hashes #19024 / spec(ui): BulkActionParamSchema is strict and declares dependsOn #19090 / spec: one authority for enableOnInstall, and a read-out of its other two declarations #19130 / spec: pre-parse __proto__ guard on ObjectSchema.fields and AssignmentConfigSchema.assignments (#17852, #18847) #19147 / feat(spec): declare element-levelnavigationon object-kanban / object-calendar and give object-timeline its ComponentPropsMap row (#17987) #19219 / feat(spec)!: manifest.id enforces the reverse-domain rule its registry face already had #18319 / fix(spec,runtime):ActionEngineFacade.findtakes the engine query envelope, not a bare filter #19223 / feat(spec): declare the author-settable row ceiling for the page-shaped view configs #19226)。⇒ 串行接力下,每放行一张都可能让后面那张进入下一圈。四棱
check:generated与门禁独立把关。不区分,就是把一条内容判据实现成一条指针判据。ActionEngineFacade.findtakes the engine query envelope, not a bare filter #19223 是一张 BREAKING narrowing,下游是 objectui。⛔ 但本席也不把「挡了我两张」说成「必须改规矩」——这条轴只说明它不是假想。navigationon object-kanban / object-calendar and give object-timeline its ComponentPropsMap row (#17987) #19219 的ObjectKanbanProps:navigation、ObjectCalendarProps:navigation与整个ObjectTimelineProps块被丢,靠整体重生成才还回来)。⇒ 若要设口子,判据必须是机器读的(例:git diff <记录 head>..<新 head>的路径集 ⊆merge=os-regen∪ 合并提交,且所有手写路径逐字节不变),⛔ 不能是席位的自述。选项
记录 head..新 head的改动路径全部属于merge=os-regen(加一个合并提交),且所有非生成物路径逐字节不变时,原记录继续指向新 head,席位落一条引用原记录与两个 head 的 provenance。代价:多一条要写对的判据;判错的方向是放行一个未被审过的 head。Prior rulings read: os-regen,重生成,重挂 → 0 hits; none; thread: none
推荐:B,且判据必须机器可读。 只看①:规矩想保护的是「记录指向要落地的东西」,而一个逐字节可判的纯重生成不改变那件事;A 把指针当内容判。②③④ 是否翻转:否 —— ③ 不反对 B 本身,它反对的是由席位自述的 B,而 B 的判据已写成机器判定。置信缺口:本轮只有 2 次计数,没有历史基线;若实际上很罕见,④ 会把推荐翻到 A。
⛔ 本席不代裁:这落在「规矩的口子」一格,而且受益者正是提议者(本席),⇒ 利益不中立,应由维护者或总监席裁。
查重
os-regen→ 多条兄弟卡(#19227 等)皆关于门禁本身,⛔ 无一关于复核记录与 head 的绑定。in:body对标识符 token 是死查法(对照GalleryConfigSchema in:body读 0 而去掉in:body读 1),本卡的零取自去掉in:body的查法。查重词
契约复核记录绑 head · 纯重生成提交 ·
os-regen-merge.sh· 基线漂移重审循环 · 生成物占用串行接力Generated by Claude Code