Repository navigation
pm-dispatch: lanes/ui.md 指向条款②的适用面却不陈述它 —— 维护者据此读成「本车道无需契约复核」 #17933
Description
Activity
- addedpriority:p2Medium: important, M3Medium: important, M3
on Sep 13, 2026 Routed into
domain:skillsand graded —pm:queue·priority:p2·Task(skills seat, sessionsession_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8, GitHubos-project-manager, 2026-09-13T07:19Z).Authority for the routing — maintainer direct routing, verbatim, untranslated (this seat's chat, 2026-09-13T07:0xZ, in the same exchange that produced #17942):
包括:objectstack#17933 lanes/ui.md 指向条款②的适用面却不陈述它
objectstack#17934 落地前检③ 对 base 继承的红没有处置
objectstack#17935 在飞 PR 重叠只查文件面,查不到点名证人Landing:
references/lanes/ui.md:38 andreferences/contract-review.md(60 lines, ceiling 60) ⇒.claude/**governed ⇒domain:skills. Grade: Task (a rule gains a stated applicability table; no declared contract is violated), p2 — the misreading has already happened on the rule's own user (the maintainer's question quoted on the card), and the same applicability question is live twice more: #17915 (the review tier) and the maintainer's 2026-09-13 word on #17178 (5651809638) 「如果需要契约复审你可以派 fable」, which today has no carrier in the tree.Direction (seat reading, veto window in the round report): one per-lane applicability table in
contract-review.md— hang the label or not / who reviews / which parts are exempt — with the 「复核正为补偿低档派发而存在」 derivation ruled applicable-or-not in the same edit, andlanes/ui.md:38 restated as the table pointer plus its own row; paid by density at 60/60 (⛔ no raise; ⛔ re-wrap is not currency). If #17942 rules A, its 「借复核」 clause is the same table's row for every lane and lands in the same PR. Serial:contract-review.mdis free at 07:1xZ (no open PR touches it); this card runs before #17934 on the same file. ⛔ Not folded with #17934 / #17935 — three files, three mechanisms; the filer's split stands.
Generated by Claude Code
Held on substance behind #17942 — stays
pm:queue(skills seat, sessionsession_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8, GitHubos-project-manager, 2026-09-13T07:43Z). If #17942 rules A, its 「借复核」 clause is a row of the same per-lane applicability table this card asks for inreferences/contract-review.md(60/60); one PR carries both, and the maintainer's 2026-09-13 word 「如果需要契约复审你可以派 fable」 (#17178, 5651809638) is written into that table at the same time. Dispatched with the #17942 charter PR; #17934 follows on the same file once its shape is ruled.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 1 — member of the charter-revision family, chain head #17942 (fold gates and the two-layer split are on the chain-head claim)
Session:session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8(GitHubos-project-manager, skills seat), claimed at 2026-09-13T11:26Z
Branch:claude/issue-17942-charter-revision(shared family branch, named after the chain head)
Worktree:objectstack-issue-17942
Domain:domain:skills
This card's part:lanes/ui.md:38 states clause ② applicability instead of pointing at it — in THIS PR (Part of); thecontract-review.mdhalf rides the follow-up references PR (⛔ not folded with #17934 / #17935 as its filer ruled: three files, three mechanisms — this family is a region fold, each member keeps its own commit and grep).
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5652021129 (held behind #17942 — the newest comment at this claim)
Generated by Claude Code
Charter-revision dev (session
session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8, branchclaude/issue-17942-charter-revision, 2026-09-13T12:1xZ): the lanes/ui.md half landed in #18018 (draft), commit 1ecc96e — line 38 now states the applicability (条款②复核本席适用:默认判断档自审加门禁,标照挂;豁免只有独立性件与降档保险丝), 38/38. Deferred: the per-lane table and the 「复核正为补偿低档派发而存在」 ruling in contract-review.md (references PR) — the PR body carriesPart offor this card. Theos-dev-reportfor the whole family is on the chain head (issue 17942); the draft PR is governed (.claude/**+AGENTS.md) — four-piece, no ready / enqueue / auto-merge by the dev.
Generated by Claude Code
ACCEPT (family member) — skills seat, 2026-09-13T12:15Z. PR #18018 head
269933d9, this card's part landed asPart of— rules-layer half here, references-layer half rides the follow-up references PR. Record of the whole family on the chain head #17942: contract review 5653195700 (PASS), 速读 5653195856, ACCEPT 5653199243. Four-piece applied on the PR; lands under ruling C after an authorized approval. Card stayspm:dispatched+ assignee until the landing record.
Generated by Claude Code
Rules-layer half LANDED; card back in the queue for the references PR — skills seat (session
session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8), 2026-09-13T13:41Z. PR #18018 merged at 2026-09-13T13:39Z as9489e2c0(two readings at 2026-09-13T13:40Z: queue ref gone;origin/mainhas(#18018)1, control(#18015)1). This card wasPart ofthat PR; what remains is thecontract-review.mdper-lane applicability half — the charter chain's ONE references PR, dispatched from this seat now that PR #17990 has landed (contract-review.mdfree).pm:dispatched→pm:queueand the assignee stripped in this pass and read back; the next claim names the references branch. Family record on the chain head #17942 — contract review 5653195700, 速读 5653195856, ACCEPT 5653199243.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 1 — member of the charter chain's references PR, chain head #17942 (fold gates, file surface and serial readings on the chain-head claim)
Session:session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8(GitHubos-project-manager, skills seat), claimed at 2026-09-13T13:42Z
Branch:claude/issue-17942-charter-references(shared family branch, named after the chain head)
Worktree:objectstack-issue-17942-refs
Domain:domain:skills
This card's part: thecontract-review.mdper-lane applicability half (lanes/ui.md:38 landed in PR #18018) — completes the card ⇒Fixeson the references PR.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: the rules-layer landing note this seat posted at 13:41Z — the newest comment at this claim
Generated by Claude Code
This card's part is delivered in the charter references PR #18038 (draft, governed 事实层), commit
a390e114: contract-review.md now states the per-lane clause-② applicability once (逐车道:spec 席达档审契约增量;余席默认档自审加门禁、挂标;豁免仅独立性件与保险丝) and closes the 「复核正为补偿低档派发而存在」 derivation (复核 ⛔ 不随派发档位免除); lanes/ui.md :38 landed earlier in PR #18018. File 60 → 60. Theos-dev-reportfor the whole chain is on the chain head #17942.
Generated by Claude Code
ACCEPT (references PR, member) — skills seat, 2026-09-13T14:18Z. PR #18038 head
f0e533fccarries this card's remaining half asFixes— closes on landing. Record of the whole PR on the chain head #17942: contract review 5653826097 (PASS), 速读 5653826263, ACCEPT 5653826642. Four-piece applied on the PR; lands under ruling C after an authorized approval or once #18020's guard tier lands. Card stayspm:dispatched+ assignee until the landing record.
Generated by Claude Code
Landed — skills seat (session
session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8), 2026-09-13T15:02Z. PR #18038 →c185d087onorigin/main; the two readings and the ruling-C trail are on the chain head #17942. This card'sFixesclosed it;pm:dispatchedand the assignee stripped in this pass and read back.
Generated by Claude Code
出处 / provenance: 由 objectui 的
domain:ui执行 PM 席(os-tesla)在 R33 提出。⛔ 不认领、不写代码、不定级 ——domain:*、type 与定级归中央分诊(lanes/ui.md〈形态〉)。现场
维护者在一轮派发中直接问:
⇒ 这不是假设的歧义,是已经发生的误读,而且发生在规则的使用者身上。
规则现状
references/lanes/ui.md:38,逐字:它指向边界,不陈述边界。而被指向的
references/contract-review.md里,答案分散在三段、需要读者自行合成:spec 席审低档实现者的契约增量,非自身产物;余席条款②复核 = 默认判断档自审加门禁。独立性件,spec 席:契约判断真分叉或 dev 挂旗 ⇒ 起上下文隔离的达档复核子代理。保险丝只管 spec 席条款②复核与 skills 席/余席条款②复核与总监席裁决非达档裁决,⛔ 不受本丝合成后的正确答案是:余席(含
domain:ui)要做条款②复核,形态是默认判断档自审加门禁;被豁免的只有独立性件与降档保险丝。⛔ 但没有任何一处把这句话写出来。三段各自正确,合成的负担全在读者身上 —— 而
lanes/ui.md:38那条「⛔ 不凭记忆或继承的注记」还额外禁止读者用记忆补足,于是每次都要重新合成一遍。references/contract-review.md降档保险丝段末:「复核正为补偿低档派发而存在」 —— 这句话给出了复核的目的。若某条车道的派发本身不低档,该目的的前提就不成立,「所以这条车道不需要复核」是一个从源码本身推得出来的读法,不是凭空的。
⇒ 所以这不是「读者没读仔细」,是文档留下了一个可推导但未裁定的结论。维护者的提问正是沿着这条推导走的。
一行可执行判据
references/lanes/ui.md或references/contract-review.md其一,出现一句直接陈述本车道答案的话,使得「本车道挂不挂needs:contract-review」⛔ 不需要跨三段合成即可读出;并就上面那条「补偿低档派发」的推导给出裁定(适用 / 不适用),⛔ 不留作可推导项。建议的形状(⛔ 非裁定)
contract-review.md增一段〈适用面〉,逐车道一行,给出该车道是否挂标、由谁复核、被豁免哪几件。lanes/ui.md:38由指针改为该表的引用加本车道那一行的复述。⇒ 判据是读者读一处即得答案,而不是「文档某处含有答案」。
血缘
同一场里本席另有两处协议缺口,各自立卡而非并入本卡:落地前检③对 base 继承红无处置;在飞 PR 重叠只查文件面、查不到点名证人。三者在不同文件、不同修法。