Repository navigation
skills(pm-dispatch): 强制接管抢走「已在处理」的在飞卡 —— 与 SKILL.md:105/489/696 及 seat-post-protocol:31/74 直接冲突，且缺少「在飞子代理报告只回原会话」这一条 #17033
Description
Activity
Triage: lands in
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(the seat-post / hand-off clauses: one precedence line placing a forced takeover below an in-flight claim) and, only if it fits net-zero,references/seat-post-protocol.md(the hand-off checklist's in-flight-subagent line); rationale: a maintainer ruling recorded verbatim on the card (2026-09-09, 「如果你的当前任务对方也在处理了,那技能有问题,需要更新,强制接管也不应该抢已经在处理的任务。」) with no line in the corpus implementing it — the card measures that the in-flight-stays-with-its-claimant rule exists (seat-post-protocol.md「子树内仍在飞的认领按认领协议由原认领者跟完」) but nothing ranks it against a takeover order, and that the subagent-report channel (a dev's final report returns only to its dispatching session) is named nowhere in a takeover context. A correction of the corpus to a standing ruling, which the #13597 freeze admits (「Corrections still flow」). Graded by the skills seat as this lane's self-triage while the triage seat is vacant (代扫 = triage acts only):pm:queue·Task·priority:p2. Value gate (#13597): ① yes — it decides what a forced takeover may and may not take; ② deletion first — SKILL.md is at its ceiling (812/812), every added line is paid for by a cut; ③ construct over prose — the line names the mechanism (in-flight subagent, report channel), not a narrative. ⛔ Not a decision card: the direction is ruled; the card's three proposed clauses are routes for the dev, not rulings, and the precedence line is the only mandatory deliverable. Dispatch when a slot frees (three in flight at grading: #17359, #17164, #17346); contract-review tier build (clause ①: SKILL.md), seat review at the same tier; hot-file serial: SKILL.md is free (PR #17349 mergede669e5ee). Skills seat, sessionsession_01YKEjmbYNvYWJvWGSWx26zK, 2026-09-10T09:04Z.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:session_01YKEjmbYNvYWJvWGSWx26zK(GitHubos-litant, skills seat), claimed at 2026-09-10T09:26Z
Branch:claude/issue-17033-takeover-precedence
Worktree:objectstack-issue-17033
Domain:domain:skills— governed surface (.claude/**)
File surface (region-declared):.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md〈座位贴协议〉 section (the 接管/移交 line and its neighbours) — one precedence line, net-zero at 812/812, ≤120 bytes per line;references/core-rules.md〈座位贴协议〉 — a mirror line only if the rule is binding-level (151/151, net-zero);references/seat-post-protocol.md交接收尾清单 (91/91, net-zero) — only if an in-flight-subagent line fits. ⛔ Not the 域车道 table (#17225's region), ⛔ notcontract-review.md(#17346 in flight), ⛔ notos-dev.md(#17244's region) (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model:M(judgment: which existing line pays for the new one, and whether the card's proposals 2–3 are needed at all),mode:subagent,model: claude-fable-5-1—node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tieron the three files at143c715prints 「Model tier — MANDATORY: claude-fable-5-1 … '.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md' — clause ①」; passed explicitly; review = skills-seat self-review at the same tier.
Clause-②: no — PM protocol text; no accept set or public surface moves.
Thread-read: 5616022130 (this seat's grading; the only comment at claim time).
Serial constraints cleared: SKILL.md / core-rules / seat-post-protocol are free —git log -5 origin/mainneweste669e5e(PR #17349, merged 08:54Z); no open PR touches them; in flight on this lane: #17346 (contract-review.md+check-clause2-carriers.mjs) and #17164 (objectos) — disjoint; #17225 (queued) is serial AFTER this card on SKILL.md; H17 hold index names none of the three; verify-lock free.
Generated by Claude Code
Dispatched — R1, 2026-09-10T09:27Z (this audit line posted late, at 2026-09-10T09:51Z),
mode:subagent, build tierclaude-fable-5-1passed explicitly (clause ①: SKILL.md). Claim 5616303790 is the dev's identity; branchclaude/issue-17033-takeover-precedence, cut from143c715. Rulings carried: the maintainer's 「强制接管也不应该抢已经在处理的任务」 verbatim; the #13597 value gate (every added line paid by a cut whose rule survives elsewhere). Zone-2 assumption B for the dev to test: theos-dev-reportcard comment (os-dev.md 「报告落两次，GitHub 优先」) already makes the report readable by any seat, so the card's proposal 3 (a relay exemption) may be moot. Terminal: governed ⇒ draft + four-piece, skills-seat review at the same tier. Disjoint from #17346 (contract-review.md+ C4) and objectos#283. Patrol timer re-armed:trig_01AYtGXJLB1PdngMLnNgVBVq(10:30Z).
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 17033, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-17033-takeover-precedence", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/17373", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Implemented the ruling as one precedence line plus one mechanism line in SKILL.md 〈座位贴协议〉 (:269 replaced, :270 new): a maintainer forced-takeover order takes the seat, queue, unstarted cards and PRs awaiting landing; it does not take in-flight cards, which the original claimant finishes; a subagent dev return message, liveness probe and resume exist only in the dispatching session, and the card returns to the new seat after landing or via the Release line. Paid net-zero by cutting the lessons-prose/timer-audit line (:285) and folding the 改正文 + 审计评论 rule into the reference pointer (:286). core-rules :78 mirrors the precedence in place (judged binding-level: SKILL.md :42 priority order puts 核心条款 above 细则, and :44 requires the same-PR mirror); seat-post-protocol checklist step 9 rewritten in place to name in-flight dev cards with card number + dispatching session ID. Zone-2 A/B/C/D all hold (A with a corrected count: three 接管 hits incl. :106); the card proposal 3 (relay exemption) is moot and not written. Assignee was set by the PM; claim 5616303790 names this branch; third card comment 5616637803 is the PM dispatch audit line, no course correction.", "tests": "At 5d1d938. node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands derived 16 commands; --ran verdict: 「16 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 16 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED」 (exit 0). pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet exit 0: 「SKILL.md is 812 lines (ceiling 812; headroom 0)」「core-rules.md is 151 lines (ceiling 151; headroom 0)」「seat-post-protocol.md is 91 lines (ceiling 91; headroom 0)」. check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0 「27 file(s) clean」. check:skill-frame-sync exit 0 「internally coherent」; md5 SKILL.md :734-:752 = 22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3 unchanged. check:pm-governed-prose exit 0. check:nul-bytes exit 0 「no raw ASCII control bytes」. check:pm-governed-merges exit 0. check-governed-merges.mjs --test on the three paths exit 3 「GOVERNED」 (.claude/** x3). check:doc-formula-expressions first exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (unbuilt formula/lint; nothing measured) then built both under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, cache hit) and re-ran exit 0. check:agent-test-spelling, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:refd-timer-probe, check:watch-hint-literal, check-closing-keyword-parity (+ --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-governed-queue-guard --self-test: all exit 0. check:pm-dispatch-gates (dispatch-named, outside the derived 16) exit 0 「dispatch-gates self-test: 1674 cases pass.」, ran past the foreground cap, waited with tail --pid on its PID. No ablation applies (protocol text only). Not run: repo-wide pnpm lint sweep (CI-owned).", "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST (read probe 200, core pool 15000/15000; PR create 201; label POST 200; comment POST) or the public issue-page payload; git for branch and push", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed: the dispatch grep reading 「hits :269 and :286 only」 misses :106 (弃飞无接管, a release cause in the assignee table row); assumption A still holds. 承接者: skills seat, next refresh of this lane dispatch text.", "noted, not filed: a mode:cloud dev is a separate session whose resume can be delivered by another seat via a poke trigger (seat-post-protocol :33); the new :270 is written for the subagent case and the mode-blind prohibition on :269 plus checklist step 8 cover cloud. 承接者: 无 — behaviour already correct.", "noted, not filed: dispatch-gates --ran flagged STALE TREE (origin/main moved to d29fdcfa, five commits, during the run); zero overlap with .claude/** or with the scripts behind the 16 derived families (only scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs, an artifact-roster family, changed). 承接者: PM at landing — a mergeable three-line governed diff, main not merged in." ], "gates": { "check:pm-skill-ratchet": "exit 0 — 812/812, 151/151, 91/91, all lines within 120 bytes", "check:pm-skill-id-lint": "exit 0 — 27 files clean", "check:skill-frame-sync": "exit 0 — decision frame coherent; :734-:752 md5 22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3", "check:pm-governed-prose": "exit 0", "check:nul-bytes": "exit 0", "check:pm-governed-merges": "exit 0 (self-test 274 assertions)", "check-governed-merges.mjs --test": "exit 3 GOVERNED (.claude/** x3) — expected", "check:pm-dispatch-gates": "exit 0 — 1674 self-test cases; exceeded the foreground cap, waited via tail --pid", "check:doc-formula-expressions": "exit 3 prerequisite (nothing measured) then exit 0 after building @objectstack/formula + @objectstack/lint under the verify lock", "check:agent-test-spelling": "exit 0", "check:doc-authoring": "exit 0", "check:driver-memory-census": "exit 0", "check:refd-timer-probe": "exit 0", "check:watch-hint-literal": "exit 0", "check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs (+ --self-test)": "exit 0 / exit 0", "check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs": "exit 0", "check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test": "exit 0", "dispatch-gates --ran": "exit 0 — 16 derived, 16 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (STALE TREE note declared above)", "ci": "in_progress — not waited on; PR is draft, governed, human merge only" }, "line_budget": { ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": { "lines": "812 → 812", "edited": [ ":269 replaced 108 B → 119 B (维护者强制接管令取席位、队列、未起工卡与待落地 PR;⛔ 不取在飞卡,由原认领者跟完)", ":270 new 107 B (子代理 dev 的返回消息、探活与续派只在派发会话;落地或 Release: 后归新席位)", ":285 cut 120 B (经验教训散文不再入技能文本;交接按收尾清单逐步走完,并 list_triggers 清点自设定时器) — survives: dispatch-runbook :103, SKILL.md :283, os-dev.md :20; core-rules :78, SKILL.md :695, seat-post-protocol :40; seat-post-protocol :47 step 6", ":286 replaced 104 B → 119 B (接管/移交 = 改正文 + 审计评论(只作审计);收尾清单等细则见 references/seat-post-protocol.md) — dropped from old :269: 接管压缩是标准步骤 survives at seat-post-protocol :16; dropped TOC words survive as the reference headings :5/:9/:40" ] }, ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md": { "lines": "151 → 151", "edited": [ ":78 replaced 114 B → 118 B (交接按收尾清单走完;强制接管 ⛔ 不取在飞卡,由原认领者跟完;归档自派会话不可移交) — dropped 并清点自设定时器 survives at seat-post-protocol :47 step 6" ] }, ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md": { "lines": "91 → 91", "edited": [ ":50 step 9 replaced 111 B → 115 B (在飞 dev 卡与留跑会话在贴里点名(卡号 + 派发会话 ID);跟完与归档 ⛔ 不随交接转移) — dropped ⛔ 不留作接任者的欠账 survives at step 8 and core-rules :78" ] }, "decision_frame_md5": "22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3 (unchanged)" }, "deviations": [ "Deliverable shape: the suggested one-liner measures 171 B and the fold :269+:286 payment 160 B under the 120-byte cap (MAX_LINE_BYTES in check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs), so the construct is split over two SKILL.md lines, each paid by a cut with its survival shown.", "Commit trailer: the harness attribution line carrying a model tier was not used; the AGENTS.md model-free trailer pair (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude) was written instead, per AGENTS.md precedence.", "PR body footer: sent the session-URL footer without a rule line (the measured PR-body form); the create channel appended a rule line plus one identical footer (+90 B); body otherwise byte-identical; not re-sent per the never-re-send rule.", "Stale-tree: main moved during the run (d29fdcfa); not merged into the branch — zero overlap declared above.", "changeset: none; skip-changeset applied and read back (labels now: size/s, skip-changeset) — .claude/** publishes nothing." ], "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md" ] }
Generated by Claude Code
ACCEPT — PR #17373 (head
5d1d9385) reviewed in-seat at the contract-review tier (skills seat, sessionsession_01YKEjmbYNvYWJvWGSWx26zK, 2026-09-10T10:05Z).- Implemented-by: os-dev subagent on branch
claude/issue-17033-takeover-precedence(claim 5616303790; build tier claude-fable-5-1 passed explicitly;mode:subagent). Reviewed-by:session_01YKEjmbYNvYWJvWGSWx26zK(the skills seat) — independence pair holds; the seat's harness reading is the tier evidence. - PR shape: draft; base
main; first lineFixes #17033, no other card number beside a closing keyword;skip-changeset(nothing under.claude/**publishes). Changed files read from the PR: exactly the three declared — SKILL.md +2/−2,core-rules.md+1/−1,seat-post-protocol.md+1/−1. - Diff vs the ruling (「强制接管也不应该抢已经在处理的任务」): SKILL.md 〈座位贴协议〉 new :269 「维护者强制接管令取席位、队列、未起工卡与待落地 PR;⛔ 不取在飞卡,由原认领者跟完。」 (119 B) + new :270 「子代理 dev 的返回消息、探活与续派只在派发会话;落地或
Release:后归新席位。」 (107 B) — the precedence and the mechanism, both constructs; 「在飞」 reads as the lane already uses it (devs running — :74 / :280 / :685 — distinct from a PR awaiting landing, which the takeover takes). core-rules :78 mirrors the precedence in place (118 B; binding-level — accepted). seat-post-protocol step 9 now names in-flight dev cards with card number + dispatching session ID (115 B). - Payment verified on the head, cut by cut: old SKILL.md :285 (lessons-prose / checklist /
list_triggers) — the lessons rule survives atlanes/skills.md:30–:31,os-dev.md:20 anddispatch-runbook.md:103, the checklist rule at SKILL.md :695 and core-rules :78, the timer census at seat-post-protocol :47 step 6; old :286's TOC words survive as the reference's headings and 「接管压缩」 at seat-post-protocol :16; the folded :286 keeps 「改正文 + 审计评论(只作审计)」 + the pointer. Nothing lost. - Counts on the head: 812 / 151 / 91 (ceilings, headroom 0); every edited line ≤119 B; decision-frame block md5
22f2339f0acb64cdb50c7adc9db681c3unchanged. Gates (dev, at5d1d9385): 16 derived families run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (--ran);check:pm-skill-ratchet/pm-skill-id-lint(27 clean) /skill-frame-sync/pm-governed-prose/nul-bytes/pm-governed-mergesexit 0;check-governed-merges.mjs --testexit 3 GOVERNED (.claude/**×3);check:pm-dispatch-gates1674 cases exit 0;check:doc-formula-expressionsprerequisite then exit 0 under the verify lock. Not re-run locally by this seat (the diff is text-only and the counts/md5 were re-measured on the fetched head). - CI on
5d1d9385at 10:02Z: 28 check runs — 14 success, 12 skipped, 2 in progress (Lint & Repo Gates,Type Check · consumer gates); re-read at the next patrol before this record is cited as green. - Zone-2: A holds (with the dev's count correction — three 「接管」 hits incl. :106, this seat's dispatch grep missed one; no effect); B holds ⇒ the card's proposal 3 (relay exemption) is not written; C and D hold. Dev deviations accepted: the construct split over two lines under the 120-byte cap; stale-tree note (main moved to
d29fdcfaduring the run; zero overlap with the diff — the human merge takes main as it stands). - Out of scope,
noted, not filed: the :106 grep miss (承接者: this seat's dispatch text);mode:clouddevs covered by step 8 + the mode-blind prohibition (承接者: none); STALE TREE reading (承接者: landing — no merge of main needed for a three-file text diff). - Terminal: governed (
.claude/**×3) ⇒ the PR stays draft;needs-user-decisionplaced on PR skills(pm-dispatch): rank a forced takeover below an in-flight claim #17373, 速读 终稿 posted there, reviews requested from os-zhuang and hotlong; ⛔ not flipped ready, not enqueued, no auto-merge, no approval from this seat. On MERGED: landing record here +pm:dispatched/ assignee cleared in one write with read-back; [finding] The lane table'sscripts/clause covers gates only — a non-gatescripts/**script has no row,scripts/pm/**is stated only inreferences/lanes/skills.md, and three devx.md:8 paths have none — the successor gap to #17222 #17225 (SKILL.md 〈域车道〉 rows) becomes dispatchable.
Generated by Claude Code
- Implemented-by: os-dev subagent on branch
Landed — PR #17373 merged by
os-zhuangat 2026-09-10T10:34Z (merge commitd9b97afd, head5d1d9385), governed path (.claude/**×3): draft → approved → human merge. This seat's ACCEPT 5616830199 is bound to that head. Verified onorigin/maineb7406caat 2026-09-10T10:37Z:git show --stat d9b97afdlists exactly the three files (SKILL.md 4 lines, core-rules.md 2, seat-post-protocol.md 2); counts 812 / 151 / 91 unchanged. Residue cleared in this same act:pm:dispatchedoff, assignee off;domain:skills,priority:p2and the type stay. The card was closed by the merge (closed_by_pull_requests= PR #17373). SKILL.md is free again: #17225 (〈域车道〉 rows) leaves the serial. Skills seat, sessionsession_01YKEjmbYNvYWJvWGSWx26zK, R1.
Generated by Claude Code
裁决出处
维护者，2026-09-09T03:1xZ，逐字：
⛔ 本卡不自裁方向，只把缺陷与冲突条文摆齐。⛔ 未认领、未定级、无
domain:*之外的标签——路由与定级归分诊。触发场景（objectui
domain:spec席，2026-09-09）session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5（GitHubyinlianghui）于 01:46:53Z 接管 objectui#5734，援引 01:32Z 维护者令「强制接管其它pm的所有任务」（维护者已确认该令为真）。接管评论把范围写成：⭐ 实测：重复处理并未发生——所以这是潜在缺陷，抓在咬人之前
前任席位在飞的三张卡（#8221 · #8071 · #7963），接管时刻之后的全部 event 与 comment 逐条读出：
os-warren×5（标签、assignee、认领评论）os-warren×3（dev 报告、验收）os-warren×1（dev 报告）github-actions[bot]；os-justin一条跨席协作注记（预告 #8730 的修复会红掉本 PR 里一行——那正是 dev 故意留的绊线）⇒ ⛔
yinlianghui一张都没碰。 本卡因此不是事故报告，是规则与架构对不上的报告。⛔ 冲突一：接管评论主张的范围，与现行五条条文直接矛盾
SKILL.md:105SKILL.md:489SKILL.md:696seat-post-protocol.md:31seat-post-protocol.md:74⇒ ⭐ 维护者要的规则已经在文本里了。
:74甚至就是那句话本身：在飞的认领由原认领者跟完。⛔ 缺的是优先级：接管条款没有任何一句说明它与
:105/:74的关系，于是「强制接管」可以被读成压过它们。⇒ 本卡的第一半是补一行位阶。⭐ 冲突二（更要紧）：一条根本不存在的规则 —— 在飞子代理的报告不随卡转移
子代理在技能里出现 19 次（SKILL.md 6 · contract-review 5 · platform-readings 4 · core-rules 3 · dispatch-runbook 1），⛔ 在接管/移交语境里出现 0 次。控制:同一 grep 在这些文件上正常命中。架构事实：一个
os-dev是派发会话的子代理，它的终报只回那个会话。接管转移的是卡，⛔ 转移不了在飞的测量通道。接任席位自己也写了它 "reads outputs from GitHub"。⇒ 一张被夺走的在飞卡严格劣于一张被交接的在飞卡：
NOT MEASURED段）的是旧会话；⭐ 两条路都坏，而这不是执行失误，是规则没描述架构。 本例中 #8221 是一张 p2 条款② 卡，dev 已跑 44 分钟。
建议的修法（⛔ 不是裁决，是三条可讨论的具体条文）
SKILL.md接管节）：强制接管取席位、队列、未起工的卡与所有待落地 PR;⛔ 不取已有在飞子代理的卡——那些按:74由原认领者跟完，落地后连同Release:交回新席位。seat-post-protocol.md交接收尾清单）：接管/移交时逐张列出在飞子代理的卡号 + 原会话 ID，并按:31点名看护者；⛔ 「please stop writing」是不完整的交接指令,因为它不说那份收不到的报告归谁。附带的第二个读数,同一次接管暴露
出处与读数时刻
接管评论 objectui#5734
5594518614（01:46:53Z）· 前任停写与交接说明5595119330（03:02Z）· 三卡事件逐条读于 2026-09-09T03:15:43Z · 条文读于origin/main(objectstack) 同一时刻。Refs: objectui#5734 · objectstack#16905 / PR #16915 · objectui#8221 · objectui#8071 · objectui#7963