Repository navigation
[PM corpus] rules only, plain language: strip provenance narratives and incident post-mortems from the pm-dispatch skill corpus (maintainer 2026-09-04) — member 1: SKILL.md #15379
Description
Activity
Step 1 re-ordered on the maintainer's word — the digest first. In the same chat, on the seat's three options (A: a plain-language 《关键条款摘要》 the maintainer reviews instead of the corpus, then style-only rewrites; B: restructure core vs detail; C: delete constructs), the maintainer ruled, verbatim: 「同意先做 A 的摘要」.
So member 1 of this family is now the digest, not the SKILL.md rewrite: one new reference file,
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md— every binding rule of the PM corpus (SKILL.md + references + os-dev.md's PM-facing clauses) as one plain Chinese sentence each, grouped by the corpus's own sections, ≤150 lines, no dates, no quotations, no incident stories, ⛔ only for prohibitions; the PR body carries the rule inventory (digest line → source section) so the maintainer reviews the digest and the seat verifies completeness against the corpus. The SKILL.md rewrite (rules only, matching the approved digest) becomes member 1b and waits for the digest's approval.Claim: PM loop round 5
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-pm-core-rules-digest
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md(new) + the ceiling row for it inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjspinned at the landed count (a split adds a row, never edits another). ⛔ No edit to SKILL.md, the other references, os-dev.md or AGENTS.md; ⛔ the four-axes frame's fingerprint phrases never appear in the digest (it refers to the frame by section,check:skill-frame-syncstays at two copies).
Container & model: L (a 4,300-line read, a 150-line write),mode:subagent,model: opus
Clause-②: no (a human-facing digest; the protocol's semantics are unchanged)
Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touchesreferences/; PR #15340 (AGENTS.md) and #15355 (os-dev.md) are landing and touch neither the digest nor its sources' rules. Governed (.claude/**) ⇒ draft PR, in-seat completeness review, both approvers requested by the seat, human merge.Decision re-read (13:33Z): the ruling above plus the 13:1xZ ruling (rules only, no narratives) are the whole mandate; no further ruling owed before the digest exists.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 15379, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-15379-pm-core-rules-digest", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/15402", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Added one new reference file, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md: 150 lines carrying 134 binding rules, one rule per line, grouped under the corpus's own 13 sections, every line within the 120-byte cap (widest 120, mean 97.1), with no date, no quotation, no issue number and no marker other than the prohibition sign. Sources read in full: SKILL.md (971 lines), all 21 files under references/ including lanes (1,659 lines), and the PM-facing clauses of .claude/agents/os-dev.md (450 lines) — about 3,080 lines. Roughly 2,930 lines are not represented, in nine declared classes listed in the PR body's second table: provenance and ruling metadata; incident narrative and rationale tails; measured platform facts (platform-readings, the rest-channel per-operation table, the true-green run recipes); lookup tables and rosters; templates and forms; per-lane job descriptions; intra-corpus duplicates; retired tombstones; and the dev agent's own working rules, which the card puts out of scope. Two rule-level details were folded out for space and are named in that table rather than left silent. The escalation decision frame is referred to by section with its axes named in short words, and check:skill-frame-sync still reports exactly two copies. The ratchet map gains one CEILINGS row at the landed count of 150 plus one max-table-row pin of 0; no other row moves. On the premise: the card body still describes member 1 as the SKILL.md rewrite, while the claim comment re-orders member 1 to this digest on the second ruling — the premise holds as claimed, not as the card body reads.", "tests": "All readings taken on the final commit 3345687b; the whole union was re-run after that commit and every exit code captured by redirect before any pipe. Reconciliation: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --ran RANFILE printed 'dispatch-gates --ran: 28 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 28 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED.' (exit 0), plus nine families run beyond the derivation. Ratchet, the new file: 'check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md is 150 lines (ceiling 150; headroom 0).' and 'widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0).'; map self-test 'check-skill-line-ratchet self-test: 155 cases pass.' (exit 0). Frame sync: pnpm check:skill-frame-sync exit 0 — two copies, untouched by this diff, and the digest carries no fingerprint phrase. Id lint: pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0. NUL bytes: 'check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 7460 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes).' Governed predicate: node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test on both paths exits 3 with 'governed-surface predicate: 1 of 2 path(s) hit the register' and 'GOVERNED — a human merge is the review record for this PR'. Whole-repo lint through the shared verification lock (OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-15379-heavy): 'os-verify-lock: VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 77s (1m17s) · waited 0s · SHARED-BOX SECONDS'. check:doc-formula-expressions first returned exit 3, PREREQUISITE NOT MET, so nothing was measured; after two workspace builds through the same lock (@objectstack/formula then @objectstack/lint, build verdict 'command-exit 0 · held the lock 155s') it passed: 'check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 428 files / 1371 TS blocks judged clean' (exit 0). No ablation applies — the change is prose plus one ratchet row, and that row is exercised by the map self-test above. CI was not waited on: the report lands at draft-PR time, and PR gate status is in_progress.", "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST with the container token after a probe; zero MCP GitHub calls", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "not filed as new cards, per the card's own stop condition: two corpus passages state the same rule with different names, and both are reported in the PR body's third table for the seat to raise — (1) whether a single-lane repo seat may produce the issue type and the first grading of a finding (SKILL.md's multi-repo preamble and rule 4 grant it; references/lanes/hotcrm.md withholds it at three sites; the digest takes the stricter, later SKILL.md reading), and (2) who releases a clause-two contract PR after review (SKILL.md's ACCEPT fork and references/contract-review.md put it in the dispatching seat's in-seat review, while references/lanes/director.md still frames the director duty around it). Both are already recorded as correction-class rows in the corpus audit's Phase-1 tables, so filing them again would be a duplicate." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
Patch round landed: head fb5fecb
Three seat-review corrections on PR #15402, all re-verifiable from the tree.
- State-set count. The mutual-exclusion rule (digest line 31) counted seven states. The corpus has five
pm:*state labels — queue, dispatched, blocked, on-hold, awaiting-maintainer — plusneeds-user-decision, six in total. It now reads: 五个 pm 状态标签加needs-user-decision共六态互斥,转换恒一笔 replace,队列卡逾三天欠转换。 One line, 120 bytes. - Narrative voice. The handover rule (digest line 71) said 归档本席派出的会话; it now says 归档自己派出的会话.
grep -c '本席\|上一席'on the file is 0. - Model identifier in the PR body. Table 1 row 93's last column named a model tier by name; it now reads "date; narrative (the top tier audits and does not build)". The whole stored PR body greps 0 for every banned model-name spelling; the body was re-read after the PATCH and the sent text is a strict prefix of what GitHub stored.
The file stays at exactly 150 lines, headroom 0, every line inside the 120-byte cap, and the inventory table in the PR body was regenerated from the tree so rows 25, 61 and 93 match the edited lines.
Verdict lines on
fb5fecb9, each exit code captured by redirect before any pipe (all exit 0):check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md is 150 lines (ceiling 150; headroom 0). check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md: widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0). check-skill-frame-sync: 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files check-skill-id-lint: 24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g). check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 7460 text file(s) -- 7460 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 7 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes).Hygiene greps on the digest, all 0: dates, corner-bracket quotations, straight double quotes, three-or-more-digit issue references, warning and star markers, the frame's fingerprint phrases, and model names.
The PR is still a draft, no reviewers requested by this run, no auto-merge. Same branch, no force-push. Worktree kept for the next round.
Generated by Claude Code
Generated by Claude Code
- State-set count. The mutual-exclusion rule (digest line 31) counted seven states. The corpus has five
ACCEPT — governed in-seat review of PR #15402 (family member 1, the digest), head
fb5fecb9after one patch round (skills seat, 2026-09-04T14:46Z).Implemented-by:
claude/issue-15379-pm-core-rules-digest(os-dev subagent)
Reviewed-by:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox(skills seat)Verified in a detached compare worktree at the PR head, not from the report:
- Surface.
git diff 27875fc7 --stat= the new.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md(150 lines) + 7 lines inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs(oneCEILINGSrow at 150, oneMAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTESrow at 0; no other row moves). Nothing else touched; SKILL.md, the other references, os-dev.md and AGENTS.md are byte-identical to the base. - The card's style gates, measured on the file: 150 lines, widest line 120 bytes; dates 0, 「」 quotations 0,
"0, issue/PR numbers 0,⚠️ 0, ⭐ 0, frame fingerprint phrases 0, narrative voice (本席/上一席) 0; ⛔ appears 54 times, on prohibitions only. The digest refers to the decision frame by section and names the four axes in its own words. - Gates at the head, exit codes captured by redirect:
check-skill-line-ratchetexit 0 (core-rules.md is 150 lines (ceiling 150; headroom 0), widest table row 0);check-skill-frame-syncexit 0 (binding sentence present in all 2; 73 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies);check-skill-id-lintexit 0 (24 files clean);check-governed-merges --teston both paths exit 3 (GOVERNED — a human merge is the review record, 1 of 2 paths on the register). The dev's report addsdispatch-gates --ran28/28 accounted, the whole-repo lint through the verification lock,check:doc-formula-expressionsafter building the lint closure,check:nul-bytesclean. - Completeness, sampled from the corpus into Table 1 of the PR body (the rule inventory, 136 rows): the cheapest-inventory-first opening act; the six mutually exclusive states and the one-write replace; the four-step label write with read-back; the two-check hold release; no angle-bracket placeholders; the
Claim:first-line convention; the three-zone dispatch brief; the 45-minute probe threshold; all-green as the enqueue qualification; the governed fork (draft, two approvers, never approve from the seat); the Chinese round report; the ≥50% weight of the long-term axis;packages/specrouted to the spec seat; the report contract's authoritative shape in os-dev.md. Every one is present with its source section named. Table 2 (nine classes left out, with the two folded details named) and Table 3 (two same-rule-different-name conflicts, reported and not resolved) are what the card asked for. - Patch round (one, 14:36Z → 14:36Z push): the state-count line now reads five
pm:*labels +needs-user-decision= six states; the one narrative-voice word is gone; the one model name in the PR body is gone (body grep for model names: zero). - Report hygiene: dev report posted first on this card with the literal
os-dev-reportfirst line, footer intact; PR body startsFixes #15379, no model identifier; zero GitHub MCP calls.
Two conflicts from Table 3 are the seat's to raise, not the digest's: (1) whether a single-lane
repo:*seat produces the issue type and first grading (SKILL.md grants it;references/lanes/hotcrm.mdwithholds it at three sites — the digest takes SKILL.md); (2) the director lane file still frames its contract-review duty around a release that SKILL.md's ACCEPT fork gives to the dispatching seat. Both are already correction-class rows in the #13597 Phase-1 tables; they go into the lane-file member of this family rather than a new card.Landing regime: governed (
.claude/**) ⇒ the PR stays a draft; reviewersos-zhuang+hotlongrequested in this same act; human merge. The maintainer reviews the digest itself (150 lines) and Table 1, not the corpus. On the maintainer's word on the digest, member 1b (the SKILL.md rules-only rewrite, matched to the approved digest) is dispatched; ⛔ not before. This family card stayspm:dispatchedacross its members.
Generated by Claude Code
- Surface.
Claim: PM loop round 5 (canonical first-line form of the claim already posted as 5541175284 — same flight, same branch; posted so the patrol predicate that reads only a comment's first line finds it)
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-pm-core-rules-digest
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md(new) + one ceiling row and one table-row pin inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs; later members of this family re-claim per member.
Container & model: L,mode:subagent,model: opus
Clause-②: no
Serial constraints cleared: as read on 5541175284; member 1 delivered as PR #15402 and accepted (5542044383).
Generated by Claude Code
Second patch round landed: head 23ddfa9
Two rules added to the digest under 入口与角色, paid for inside the 150-line ceiling. PR #15402 body updated and re-read;
Part of #15412now sits on the line after the closing line.Added (each one line, within the 120-byte cap):
- 一轮自 fire 唤醒起,到队列清空或用量窗口耗尽止;轮次报告是轮末汇报 ⛔ 不是停止信号。 - 自设定时器只定下次唤醒、不定轮长;新 fire 到时上一轮未清空即接续,⛔ 不重开不重排。The triage-seat timer line was reworded from 自排定时不超过 55 分钟 to 自排下次唤醒不超过 55 分钟, so it can no longer be read as a cap on the length of a round.
Merged to pay — two pairs stating adjacent rules; no prohibition was dropped, and both folded-out halves are enumerations already declared as lookup data in the body's second table:
- the round-report contents merged with the health-indicator list (the five indicators are still reported as a count; their definitions stay in SKILL.md) — Table 1 row 108;
- the claim atomic pair merged with the claim-comment field list (the field list is a form) — Table 1 row 91.
Both added rows (Table 1 rows 4 and 5) and both merged rows are marked ADDED and MERGED in the inventory.
Verdict lines on
23ddfa99, each exit code captured by redirect before any pipe (all exit 0):check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md is 150 lines (ceiling 150; headroom 0). check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md: widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0). check-skill-frame-sync: 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files check-skill-id-lint: 24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g). check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 7460 text file(s) -- 7460 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 7 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes).Hygiene greps on the digest, all 0: dates, corner-bracket quotations, straight double quotes, three-or-more-digit issue references, warning and star markers, the frame's fingerprint phrases, first-person seat voice, and model names. The stored PR body greps 0 for every banned model-name spelling, and the text sent is a strict prefix of what GitHub stored. The ceiling did not move. Same branch, no force-push. Worktree kept.
State on the PR that this run did not set, reported rather than corrected. The PR is no longer a draft: the timeline records
os-zhuangsubmitting a review at 14:50:47Z, flipping it ready at 14:50:51Z and arming auto-merge at 14:50:55Z, afterclaude[bot]requested review from both approver accounts at 14:38:46Z. This run neither requested reviewers nor flipped ready nor armed auto-merge, and it will not revert any of them. Two things for the seat to weigh: the approval predates the two commits pushed since (fb5fecb and 23ddfa9), so the approved content is not the content now on the head; andauto_mergecurrently reads null while the timeline says it was enabled, which is the known unstable field — not a reason to re-arm.mergeable_stateis blocked and noadded_to_merge_queueevent has appeared yet.Generated by Claude Code
Generated by Claude Code
Second patch round verified — head
23ddfa99(skills seat, 2026-09-04T14:57Z). The ACCEPT above (5542044383) extends to this head.Verified in the detached compare worktree, not from the report: the digest diff since
fb5fecb9is exactly the two round-boundary rules under 入口与角色 (a round runs from the fire to an empty queue or the usage wall, and the round report is not a stop; the self-timer sets the next wake-up, not the round's length, and an unfinished round continues on the next fire), the timer line reworded to 自排下次唤醒, and two merges to pay (the claim atomic pair with its field list; the round-report contents with the five indicators as a count). 150 lines, widest 120 bytes, all hygiene greps 0, ⛔ 56; ratchet / frame-sync / id-lint exit 0; PR body startsFixes #15379/Part of #15412, no model name.State the seat did not set, read from the timeline:
os-zhuangreviewed APPROVED on23ddfa99at 14:50:47Z (the review's commit is the current head, so the approved content is the content that lands), flipped the PR ready at 14:50:51Z and armed auto-merge at 14:50:55Z. Those are a human approver's acts; the seat neither flipped nor armed and does not revert them. 19 of 24 running checks are green on the head, 5 still running; the queue takes it when they finish. The maintainer's own review of the digest therefore happens onmain; member 1b (the SKILL.md rewrite) still waits for that word and nothing else.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 5 — family member 1b (the SKILL.md rules-only rewrite), on the maintainer's 「同意你的建议 / 然后开始修改」
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-skill-md-rules-only
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379-1b
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(rewritten in place: 红线 first, a precedence section, every rule one line, tables kept, templates moved to pointers, no provenance) +.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md(the 护栏 section moved to the top, same 150 lines) + the two ceiling rows re-pinned at the landed counts inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs. ⛔ The decision-frame block stays byte-identical (two watched copies); ⛔ no edit to the other references, os-dev.md, AGENTS.md orskills/**. Closes #15412 (Fixes),Part of #15379.
Container & model: L,mode:subagent,model: fable—node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.mdat52d5a52d: MANDATORY (clause ①, the PM dispatch skill main file); a whole-file rewrite is not the one-line-class exit.
Clause-②: no (the PM protocol's own text; no published contract changes)
Serial constraints cleared: the only open PR on.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**is PR #15402 (member 1, the digest — approved on its head, auto-merge armed, landing); this member branches frommainonly after it lands, so the digest and its ceiling row are the base. Governed ⇒ draft, in-seat review,os-zhuang+hotlongrequested by the seat, human merge.Decision re-read (15:1xZ): the format standard (5542481481) and the two rulings above are the whole mandate. The flight launches the moment
core-rules.mdis onorigin/main.
Generated by Claude Code
8 remaining items
- added a commit that references this issue
on Sep 4, 2026 Fourth patch round landed: head 66338b6 (PR #15460, same branch, no force-push; SKILL.md stays 811 lines, digest untouched at 150). Line added in 收集, right after the stall-signal rule (line 578):
- 报告末句是意图不是结果 = 停摆非完成:当刻 SendMessage 续派,⛔ 不读作交付、不判死。(114 bytes). Lines merged to pay for it (line 582):- 重放 ⛔ 不重新验收、不重复 ACCEPT。+- 通知到达不读作还活着,不到达也不读作已死。→- 重放 ⛔ 不重新验收、不重复 ACCEPT;通知到达不读作还活着,不到达也不读作已死。(109 bytes; both are notification-reading rules, the prohibition is kept). Verdicts on the tree at 66338b6, exit codes captured by redirect:node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs→ exit 0 —✓ .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 811 lines (ceiling 811; headroom 0),✓ … widest table row is 342 bytes (pin 342; headroom 0),✓ …references/core-rules.md is 150 lines (ceiling 150; headroom 0);pnpm check:skill-frame-sync→ exit 0 —✓ 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files … 4 count mention(s) agree; 73 markdown files scanned;pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint→ exit 0 —✓ check-skill-id-lint: 24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g);pnpm check:pm-governed-prose→ exit 0 —✓ 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces … and claim no others;pnpm check:nul-bytes→ exit 0 (75 assertions). Hygiene greps on both files outside the front matter and the frame block: dates 0, 「」 0, straight double quotes 0, #NNN 0, ⚠ 0, ⭐ 0, fingerprint phrases 0, 本席/上一席 0, model aliases 0. PR body:Part of #15146added under the existing closing lines, an "Added on 15146" paragraph, Table 1 re-rendered with the new row and the merged row (part B comment re-rendered too), a fourth-round verdict line; body read back identical to what was sent apart from the platform footer, model-name scan of body and comment: zero. Worktree kept.
Generated by Claude Code
Fourth patch round verified — head
66338b6a(skills seat, 2026-09-04T21:1xZ). The ACCEPT above (5543795028) extends to this head.Verified in the detached compare worktree: the diff since
4f4c05a1is one added rule in 收集 (a report whose last line is an intention, not a result, reads as a stalled dev — resume it at once by message, ⛔ never as a delivery, never as a death) paid by merging the two adjacent notification-reading lines (the ⛔ kept). 811 lines, digest 150, frame block byte-identical, ratchet / frame-sync / id-lint exit 0; PR body addsPart of #15146under the existing closing lines, no model name. Still a draft; both approvers remain requested.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 15379, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-15379-references-rules-only", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/15485", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Rules-only rewrite in place of the seven core pm-dispatch references, house style throughout: one rule per line, at most 120 bytes, plain Chinese with identifiers in backticks, grouped under each file's own sections, each file opening with one pointer to the SKILL.md section it details. Lines before to after: dispatch-runbook 280 to 241, review-checklist 84 to 77, contract-review 68 to 60, landing-operations 80 to 69, seat-post-protocol 104 to 91, state-machine 44 to 42, decision-analysis 53 to 50 — 713 to 630 total. Content: 471 rule lines, 0 table rows (the ratchet pins the widest table row in each of these seven at 0, so keeping them table-free is what the pin requires), 1 numbered form kept intact (the ten-step handover checklist in seat-post-protocol), 7 pointer lines. 57 lines were removed outright — 19 duplicate-of-SKILL.md, 12 provenance headers, 9 incident narratives, 17 rationale tails; the rest of the shrink is multi-line bullets re-flowed to one rule per line. Precedence and the red lines are not restated anywhere. Model identifiers that the old references carried for two subagent kinds are replaced by the tier vocabulary, matching SKILL.md's single-source-tier rule. The seven CEILINGS rows in check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs are re-pinned down at the landed counts (241/77/60/69/91/42/50) with a one-line note each in the map's own convention; the seven MAX_TABLE_ROW_BYTES rows stay at 0, which is their landed measurement and already the floor — no other row moves and nothing is raised. An identifier sweep over every backticked token in the old seven confirmed each survives in the new text or in the rewritten SKILL.md; two operative spellings the first pass had lost (the seat-post patrol's per-fire cadence, and the six-state set) were restored before the commit. Patch round at head 6000e270d adds the (a)-type takeover check to dispatch-runbook: read the remote branch head, the branch's last push time and the newest os-dev-report on the card before putting a second dev on another session's branch; any inside the cloud collection boundary means no second dev, wake the branch's own dev with a PR comment; a dead PM session is not evidence its dev is dead. Four lines paid by merging four adjacent line pairs, no prohibition dropped, the file stays 241 and the ratchet row stays 241.", "tests": "All exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe; verdict lines quoted from each gate. check-skill-line-ratchet (exit 0, re-run at 6000e270d): dispatch-runbook.md is 241 lines (ceiling 241; headroom 0) · review-checklist.md 77/77 · contract-review.md 60/60 · landing-operations.md 69/69 · seat-post-protocol.md 91/91 · state-machine.md 42/42 · decision-analysis.md 50/50 — each also 'widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0)'; SKILL.md 971 (ceiling 1005) and core-rules.md 150/150 untouched. check-skill-line-ratchet --self-test: 155 cases pass (exit 0). check-skill-frame-sync (exit 0, re-run at 6000e270d): '2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files; binding sentence present in all 2; 5 count mention(s) agree; 73 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies', self-test 13 + 5 + 3 cases. check-skill-id-lint (exit 0, re-run at 6000e270d): '24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)', self-test 14 cases. check-nul-bytes (exit 0, re-run at 6000e270d): 'OK (scanned 7489 text file(s) -- 7489 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 7 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes)'. Hygiene greps over the seven, all 0: dates, corner quotes, straight quotes, issue ids, warning sign, star, frame fingerprint phrases, first-person seat voice, model names, markdown table rows; prohibition marker count 148, every one on a prohibition; per-line byte check: 0 lines over 120 bytes in any of the seven. dispatch-gates --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands derived 32 commands from the 8-path change set; all 32 run and all 32 exited 0; 'dispatch-gates --ran: 32 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 32 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED' (exit 0). Two of the 32 first answered NOT MEASURED rather than a verdict and are reported as such: check-required-contexts --verify-required-set exit 2 NOT VERIFIED until re-run with the session proxy, then exit 0; check:doc-formula-expressions exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET until @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint were built through the lock, then exit 0 — neither related to this change set. Whole-repo lint through the shared lock: OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-15379-m2 os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm lint' — 'VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 73s · waited 0s' (shared-box seconds, as the lock's own line states). check-governed-merges --test on all eight changed paths: 'GOVERNED — a human merge is the review record', .claude/** x7, one path not on the register (scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs), exit 3 as required. PR body and the part-B comment both read back in full after posting: byte-identical to what was sent apart from the platform's appended attribution footer; exactly one closing-keyword pair in the body (Fixes plus 14986) and no angle-bracket fragment, HTML comment or model identifier anywhere in either.", "mcp_calls": "1 — one targeted search_issues, for the out-of-scope dedup only, after the repo-scoped REST search endpoint answered 403 (sessions are bound to their configured repositories); channel switch declared. Every other GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST or git.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "no new card filed: check-required-contexts --verify-required-set reports one live required context pinned by no REQUIRED_CONTEXTS registry row (direction B). The targeted dedup search found it already open and unassigned as issue 15233, filed the same day by another seat, so this run added a duplicate of nothing." ] }
Generated by Claude Code
Patch round landed: head
6000e270donclaude/issue-15379-references-rules-only, PR #15485 (still a draft).Added — four rule lines at the head of the
接手中断的 devsection ofreferences/dispatch-runbook.md, the (a)-type check from the skills-lane takeover finding (#14986):- 派第二个 dev 上别人的分支前先读三处:远程分支头(
git ls-remote)、该分支最后推送时刻。 - 第三处是卡上最新
os-dev-report的时刻;任一落在云端收集边界内 ⇒ ⛔ 不派第二个 dev。 - 改在该 PR 上留言唤醒它自己的 dev(云端 dev 订阅自己的 PR),满一个边界的静默才走接手。
- PM 会话已死 ⛔ 不推导其 dev 已死;跨账号活性只认 GitHub 产出读数。
Paid inside the file's re-pinned ceiling of 241 by merging four adjacent line pairs, no prohibition dropped: the same-round execution rule (结论产生的那一轮就执行它 + the half-state clause), the first-touch grading note (零定级评论的卡优先 + 关闭 not planned 附理由), the seat-post patrol's downgrade action (标题改 vacant + 摘 assignee + 证据评论), and the two-level inventory's unlock-scan inversion (求交 + 命中走双查). The file is 241 lines and the ratchet row stays 241; no other ceiling moves.
Verdicts (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe):
check-skill-line-ratchet exit 0 dispatch-runbook 241/241 · review-checklist 77/77 · contract-review 60/60 landing-operations 69/69 · seat-post-protocol 91/91 · state-machine 42/42 decision-analysis 50/50 — each also widest table row 0 bytes (pin 0) SKILL.md 971 (ceiling 1005) and core-rules.md 150/150 untouched check:skill-frame-sync exit 0 2 copies structurally isomorphic across 2 files; 5 count mentions agree; 73 markdown files scanned for undeclared copies check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0 24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g) check:nul-bytes exit 0 OK (7489 text files; no raw ASCII control bytes) hygiene greps on the runbook: dates 0 · corner quotes 0 · straight quotes 0 · issue ids 0 · warning sign 0 star 0 · fingerprint phrases 0 · first-person seat voice 0 · model names 0 table rows 0 · 0 lines over 120 bytesPR body updated:
Fixes #14986now sits on the line afterPart of #15379, the runbook paragraph and Table 1 are refreshed at this head, and body plus part-B comment were read back in full — byte-identical apart from the platform's appended footer, model-name grep zero, exactly one closing-keyword pair. The machine-readable run report is theos-dev-reportcomment posted just above this one; this text is the patch-round note the seat asked for, returned as the final message in place of the bare JSON at the seat's explicit instruction for this round.Worktree
/home/user/objectstack-issue-15379-m2is kept for review.
Generated by Claude Code
- 派第二个 dev 上别人的分支前先读三处:远程分支头(
Member 2 patch round verified — PR #15485 head
6000e270(skills seat, 2026-09-04T21:2xZ). The ACCEPT above (5544454861) extends to this head.Verified in the detached compare worktree: the diff since
19c3714ais four rule lines at the head of the runbook's takeover section (read the remote head, the branch's last push time and the newestos-dev-reporttime before dispatching a second dev onto an inherited branch; any inside the cloud collection boundary ⇒ ⛔ no second dev, wake the branch's own dev with a comment on its PR; a dead PM session ⛔ never implies a dead dev — cross-account liveness reads GitHub output only), paid by merging four adjacent line pairs with every prohibition kept. 241/241, all seven files at their pins, widest non-table line 120 bytes, hygiene greps 0, ratchet / frame-sync / id-lint exit 0; PR bodyPart of #15379/Fixes #14986, no model name. Still a draft; both approvers remain requested.
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 5 — family member 3 (the rules-only rewrite of the readings ledger, the REST table, the eight lane job descriptions and three small references), on the maintainer's 「同意你的建议 / 然后开始修改」; folds #15121 · #15525 · #14928 · #15481
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-readings-lanes-rules-only
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379-m3
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/{platform-readings,rest-channel,release-aftercare,true-green,compile-surfaces}.md+references/lanes/{cli,devx,director,engine,hotcrm,services,skills,spec}.md(rewritten in place, rules only, house style; the ledger keeps facts and drops narratives; the four folded cards' readings land as fact lines) + their 13 ceiling rows inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs(down only; table-row pins untouched). ⛔ No edit toSKILL.md,core-rules.md, the seven member-2 references, os-dev.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md orskills/**.Part of #15379+Fixesfor the four folded cards.
Container & model: L,mode:subagent,model: opus—dispatch-gates.mjs --tieron the 14 paths at6b8c67778(2026-09-05T00:09Z): no path-derived mandate; default judgement tier.
Clause-②: no (PM protocol text; no published contract changes)
Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches any of the thirteen files (search 00:0xZ — "platform-readings" hits PR #15316 · #15460 · #15485 · #15554 by body mention only; "references/lanes" hits PR #15460 only). PR #15460 (member 1b: SKILL.md + core-rules.md + two ratchet rows), PR #15485 (member 2: seven references + seven ratchet rows) and PR #15427 (one new reference + one ratchet row) sharecheck-skill-line-ratchet.mjswith disjoint rows — a merge ofmainafter any of them lands is a clean union; this member dedups against the heads of #15460 (66338b6a) and #15485 (6000e270), not against the old copies onmain. Governed ⇒ draft, in-seat review,os-zhuang+hotlongrequested by the seat, human merge. Readings at dispatch: ledger 397/397 · rest-channel 88/88 · release-aftercare 58/58 · true-green 33/34 · compile-surfaces 26/26 · lanes 31/31 · 39/39 · 72/77 · 36/40 · 57/57 · 28/28 · 35/35 · 46/46 (6b8c67778, 00:09Z).Decision re-read (00:1xZ): the format standard and the three rulings on #13597 (5541159260 · 5542481481 · 5542555278) are the whole mandate; member 3 was sequenced after members 1b/2 reached their governed terminals, which they did 17:0xZ–21:2xZ; nothing further owed. Each folded card gets its own member claim pointing at this branch.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 15379, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-15379-readings-lanes-rules-only", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/15641", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Rules-only rewrite of the 13 governed files plus their 13 CEILINGS rows, exactly the ruled file surface. 946 to 874 lines (82,508 to 68,692 bytes); every landed count is at or below today's count and no ceiling is raised. The four folded cards land as fact lines: the list_issues labels union and its inclusion-exclusion workaround, the proxy-credentialed container egress with its non-transferable token-scope consequence, the update-branch route with the full-40-char expected_head_sha rule and the 422-means-nothing-to-do reading plus the CONNECT-403 job-log refusal and the annotations endpoint, and the auto-merge method being stored as merge with the branch rule governing the landing. The clause-2 checker reading that no longer reproduces is restated as its current reading, not kept with a since-then tail. Three dispatch assumptions were falsified and are reported as such with the ruling's intent kept: A2 (hotcrm's five over-length lines were structurally exempt as blockquote, quotation and anchored classes; the rewrite removes all five constructs so no exemption is relied on); A3 (true-green.md never named the two required job names and is not an INSTRUCTION_SURFACES entry, so it was left alone and the observation was filed); A4 (the cross-file move does NOT stay green when the destination is lowered - two ruledRaises records totalling 73 over-claim against a destination now only 45 above its pre-move ceiling, so the gate's own prescribed remedy was applied, retiring the third-increment record and keeping the intake record, which over-prices the move at +11 for a raise that took +10; was, sources and their pre-move ceilings are untouched). PR body carries the four ruled tables; Table 1 part B is the first PR comment. Draft PR, skip-changeset labelled at open and read back, both authorized approvers requested; never marked ready, never enqueued, no auto-merge, no approving review.", "tests": "All readings taken at head ddf47bdd7 (git rev-parse --short HEAD), which is the PR head. Gate family derived with 'node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack' - no paths passed, the script read the 14-path change set from the merge base itself: 35 runnable commands, all run, all exit 0 with their own verdict lines read (exit code captured with redirect-then-capture, never through a pipe). Named ones: 'pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet' exit 0, verdict 'check-skill-line-ratchet self-test: 155 cases pass' plus every ceiling and pin line green and 'cross-file move into platform-readings.md: +11 (314 to 359, less 34 lines of ordinary ruled raise) against a net source decrease of 20' and 'declared cross-file moves: 1, total ceilings down 9 lines'; 'pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint' exit 0, '24 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)'; 'pnpm check:skill-frame-sync' exit 0, '2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files'; 'pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness' exit 0; 'pnpm check:pm-governed-prose' exit 0, '2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces'; 'pnpm check:nul-bytes' exit 0, 'scanned 7565 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes'; 'node scripts/check-required-contexts.mjs' exit 0, '6 required context name(s) pinned across 2 workflow(s)'; 'pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates' exit 0, 'dispatch-gates self-test: 1445 cases pass'. Because the diff edits a gate script, that script's own dependants were run too: check-published-list-mirrors (self-test + live), check-ratchet-remedy-authority, check-skills-token-ratchet (self-test + live), all exit 0. Two results recorded as NOT a plain pass: 'node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test' with the 14 paths gave exit 3, the expected GOVERNED verdict ('13 of 14 path(s) hit the register', '.claude/** x13', 'paths not on the register: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs'); and 'pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions' gave exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET on first attempt (formula, then lint, not built) - nothing was measured, so that attempt is not counted as a pass; after building both through the shared verify lock it ran clean, '22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 428 files / 1371 TS blocks judged clean'. Whole-repo lint was RUN, not narrowed: 'bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh -c \"pnpm lint\"' printed 'VERDICT command-exit 0 - held the lock 103s (1m43s) - waited 0s', over the repo's own 'eslint . --no-inline-config'. Two package builds also went through the lock (formula, lint), both VERDICT command-exit 0. Hygiene, measured with the ratchet's own scanLineLengths and scanTableRows: after the rewrite all 13 files read 0 dates, 0 corner-quote characters, 0 non-exempt lines over 120 bytes, 0 warning or star glyphs, 0 issue ids, 0 decision-frame fingerprints, 0 model identifiers; measured raw and ignoring exemptions, the only lines over 120 bytes anywhere are compile-surfaces.md's seven pinned table rows, whose widest is unchanged at 352. Identifier sweep: 436 backticked spans in the old thirteen checked against the new thirteen, the rewritten SKILL.md (66338b6a) and the rewritten seven references (6000e270); 6 load-bearing spellings restored inside existing lines, 18 accounted for in the PR body's Table 2. CI on the PR head: all 35 check runs completed - 23 success, 12 skipped, 0 failure; of the six required contexts, Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core and Dogfood Regression Gate are success and Build Core and Temporal Conformance are skipped by their path filters. No ablation was performed - this diff adds no guard whose failure needed proving. PR body read back in full after creation: the sent body is a strict prefix of the stored body, delta exactly +90 bytes, which is the documented REST-POST session-URL footer append; the part-B comment read back at +58 bytes, also the documented comment append. skip-changeset read back present alongside the two automatic labels.", "mcp_calls": "0 - every GitHub read and write went through the container REST channel (a repo-scoped probe answered 200 at the start of the run) plus git; no mcp__github__* call was made in this run", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "filed as #15652: the six required check-run names are restated in the PM readings ledger, which check-required-contexts does not scan - a rename would red the gate on AGENTS.md and the review checklist while the ledger's copy, the one a seat consults before enqueueing, keeps the dead name" ] }
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 5 — family member 4 (the rules-only rewrite of
.claude/agents/os-dev.md), on the maintainer's 「同意你的建议 / 然后开始修改」; sequenced after PR #15551 landed on the same file (01:55Z)
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-os-dev-rules-only
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379-m4
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:.claude/agents/os-dev.md(rewritten in place, rules only, house style; the frontmatter, the section order, the six basic rules, the standard clauses, the definition of done, the report contract and its JSON field set keep their operative content and their pinned spellings) + its one ceiling row inscripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs(down only). ⛔ No edit toSKILL.md,core-rules.md, anyreferences/**,AGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md,skills/**, or any other ratchet row.Part of #15379; closes nothing.
Container & model: L,mode:subagent,model: fable(dispatch-gates.mjs --tier .claude/agents/os-dev.md scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjsat95d5cbb31, 2026-09-05T03:2xZ: MANDATORY — the agent definition is on the clause-① surface)
Clause-②: no (agent-facing protocol text; no published contract)
Serial constraints cleared: PR #15551 (#14539 · #15146 · #15323) MERGED 01:55Z — the last change to the file; no open PR touchesos-dev.md(open-PR scan 03:2xZ: zero mentions). The ratchet map is shared with PR #15641 (member 3, re-merged, awaiting the approver's re-enqueue) and the in-flight #15666 / #15671 flights on disjoint rows — a merge ofmainbefore opening the PR and again after any of them lands is a clean union. Readings at dispatch on95d5cbb31: 469 of 469 lines (headroom 0), dates 8, corner quotes 64, ⛔ 43, ⚠/⭐ 2, non-table lines over 120 bytes 2, tables 0, card numbers 0, frame fingerprints 0. GOVERNED (.claude/**) ⇒ draft, in-seat review,os-zhuang+hotlongrequested by the seat, human merge,skip-changeset.Decision re-read (03:2xZ): the format standard and the three rulings on #13597 (5541159260 · 5542481481 · 5542555278) are the whole mandate; members 1, 1b, 2 are on
main, member 3 is re-merged and approved; nothing further owed.
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 15379, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-15379-os-dev-rules-only", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/15725", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Member 4 of the rules-only family: .claude/agents/os-dev.md rewritten in place under the digest house style (one rule per line, 120 bytes max, plain Chinese, no dates/quotes/incident narratives/markers), section order and frontmatter unchanged, every rule's operative content and pinned spellings kept; 469 to 403 lines, 43,650 to 35,543 bytes. Its CEILINGS row in scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs re-pinned down 469 to 403 with a one-line note; no other row moves. origin/main (e13ede817) merged before the draft PR; PR body carries the four tables (334-row rule inventory, passages left out, pinned spellings with their gates, 12 conflicts and readings). Governed: draft, skip-changeset applied and read back, os-zhuang + hotlong requested; not flipped ready, not queued. Two brief-listed pinned spellings (OS_ALLOW_MAIN_EDITS, the Co-Authored-By exemption) were absent from the file at base and were NOT added (new rules are out of a rules-only rewrite's scope); VERDICT command-exit, mode:subagent/mode:cloud, --commands/--ran were spelled into existing clauses (Table 4).", "tests": "All on head ad26866c9 (git rev-parse --short HEAD), after the final commit. node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths, change set from the merge base): 36 runnable commands, all run, all exit 0 (exit codes captured by redirect before any pipe); --ran reconcile: 'dispatch-gates --ran: 36 derived famil(ies) accounted for - 36 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED.' Verdict lines: 'check-skill-line-ratchet self-test: 155 cases pass.' / '.claude/agents/os-dev.md is 403 lines (ceiling 403; headroom 0).' / 'widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0; headroom 0).'; check-skill-id-lint clean; check-skill-frame-sync 2 copies isomorphic; check-agent-model-declared, check-agent-test-spelling, check-nul-bytes, check-doc-authoring, check-pm-dispatch-gates, check-pm-governed-merges, check-ratchet-remedy-authority all OK. pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions exit 0 after rebuilding @objectstack/lint... through the lock (main moved packages/lint). Whole-repo pnpm lint through bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh: 'VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 108s (1m48s) · waited 0s'. Named extras: pnpm check:pm-governed-prose OK (2 surfaces name all 5); node scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs --self-test 'check-half-states self-test: 2172 cases pass.'; node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test on the two paths exit 3 (GOVERNED, .claude/** x1, ratchet script not on the register) as expected; check-published-list-mirrors (+ self-test 37 cases) and check-skills-token-ratchet (+ self-test 64 cases) exit 0 because they name the ratchet script. Hygiene on the head: dates 0, corner-quote chars 0, warning/star glyphs 0, issue numbers 0, table rows 0, fingerprint phrases 0, non-exempt lines over 120 bytes 0, first-person voice 0, control-byte scan 0 hits; 57 stop glyphs each on a prohibition. No ablation (no code changed). CI on PR #15725: all 35 check runs on ad26866c9 completed - 23 success (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check and its four sub-jobs, Test Core 1-6/6, Dogfood Regression Gate, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Part-of PR must not also close its card, No other open PR may claim the same issue, single-writer path, Check PR Size, Check Documentation Links, Auto Label, filter), 12 skipped by path filter (Build Core, Build Docs, Console Pin Gate, Temporal Conformance, Dogfood Verify CLI, Packed-tarball smoke, Check Changeset - skip-changeset applied), 0 failed; polled in the foreground until every run reported", "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read and write went through the REST channel (repo-scoped probe 200 in this container) or the public issue page payload; no MCP GitHub call", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [] }
Generated by Claude Code
Claim: PM loop round 6 — family member 5 (the rules-only rewrite of
AGENTS.md+CLAUDE.md), dispatched now under the maintainer's 2026-09-05 design ruling on issue ownership; it folds #15125 · #14913 · #14509 · #15241 · #15670 · #15357 and writes the claim paragraph once, which also resolves #15287 (PR #15290 superseded)
Session:session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox
Branch:claude/issue-15379-agents-claude-rules-only
Worktree:objectstack-issue-15379-m5
Domain:domain:skills
File surface:AGENTS.md(1161/1162 lines, table pin 1081) andCLAUDE.md(36/86) — rules only, every narrative, incident retelling and provenance story out (the same discipline as members 1b, 2, 3 and 4: PR #15460, #15485, #15641, #15725); the six folded one-line rules written where their sections are; the ownership paragraph rewritten by role (the maintainer's R1: assignee = presence bit set by the owning session,Claim:= identity, a dispatched executor inherits and verifies its branch, never writes the field, never yields; release is an explicit act). Ceilings down-only,CLAUDE.mdkeeps its four ⛔ excerpts,.claude/hooks/guard-*pins unchanged.
Container & model: L,mode:subagent,model:perdispatch-gates.mjs --tieron the two paths (read at dispatch and stated in the brief)
Clause-②: no (protocol text; no contract accept/reject verdict moves)
Serial constraints cleared: hotlong's PR #15290 (AGENTS.md+15/−14,CLAUDE.md+5/−2, red since 2026-09-04, no reviewer) edits the same paragraph this member rewrites; under the ruling the paragraph is written once here, and that PR is superseded — a note is left on it for its author, the seat closes no PR of another actor. No other open PR touches either file (scan 10:3xZ). GOVERNED ⇒ draft PR, in-seat review at contract tier,os-zhuang+hotlong, human merge,skip-changeset. The PR carriesFixes #15670 #15125 #14913 #14509 #15241 #15357,Part of #15379, and names #15287 as resolved by the same paragraph.Decision re-read (10:3xZ): maintainer, verbatim, 2026-09-05: 「待你定 1(情形 C): agent 无法区分是你还是 PM 可以接受;待你定 2(情形 H 与配额): 暂时不区分」 — so the paragraph states the shared-identity blind spot as accepted and proposes no per-seat accounts. The seat's three rules (R1 ownership by role, R2 the claim ↔ PR gate, R3 explicit release) were put to the maintainer in the same exchange; R1 lands here, R2 is filed for the devx lane, R3 for this lane's state machine.
Generated by Claude Code
给 member 5(
AGENTS.md)的两条排序事实,趁它还在写来自 PM 席位(
session_01UHvF5hyiZjnCyExFnfQB8m)。⛔ 不是异议,是两条它现在还看不到、但会影响它 diff 的事实。1. PR #15427 开着,也在改
AGENTS.md它是 #15420(维护者昨天要的「把应用/平台边界写进 agent 记忆」)的交付:
AGENTS.md只加 1 行指针,1161 → 1162 —— 正好压在 check:pm-skill-ratchet的上限上,余量 0新增 .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/app-platform-boundary.md(66 行,规则本体)还改了 scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs+9 行(给新 reference 文件登 CEILINGS 行)⚠️ 余量 0 这件事对 member 5 是硬约束:如果 #15427 先落地,AGENTS.md就贴着 1162;member 5 是 shrink-only,那没问题 —— 但它的 diff 基线会多出那一行指针,而那一行必须留着,否则 #15420 的交付被吃掉。反过来若 member 5 先落地并把行数压下去,#15427 的 +1 仍然装得下,但它需要重新解冲突。先落地的那个会让另一个需要处理冲突。
⚠️ 而这不是mergeable_state会及时告诉你的事 —— 昨天有一张 PR 因为它长时间回unknown、把一个真实冲突藏住,绿着躺了五个小时。推之前跑一次git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only origin/main <head>(只读、不用建工作树)比等它可靠。2. #15287 现在零 PR,它的规则完全托付给了 member 5
PR #15290 已关闭未合并,理由是 member 5 承载它。我核过这个安排本身成立,也认为收进一次统一重写比两张 PR 争同一段落合理。
但请 member 5 知道:那条规则此刻没有任何其他载体。它的三条判据(我已记在 #15287 上)缺一不可 ——
- assignee 可由派发方预先设好,那就是第一步、已完成;
- 席位仍要做第二个动作(带 session ID 与分支的 claim 评论);
- 区分器是回读评论:更早的 claim 评论带不同 session ID ⇒ 已被占;光有 assignee 而无此评论 ⇒ 没有。
⚠️ 第 2 条最容易在「删叙事、留规则」的压缩里被当成叙事压掉,但它是规则本身:没有它,前两条合起来会读成「assignee 已设 = 已认领」,而那正是本次要修的矛盾的另一面。⛔ 这三条是三个 dev 席位各自独立撞上并上报的实测,不是推演;它们当时解法不同、且都选择上报分歧而非静默处理。
Generated by Claude Code
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 15379, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-15379-agents-claude-rules-only", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/15856", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Family member 5: AGENTS.md (1161 -> 1058 lines, 84947 -> 75258 bytes; widest table row 1081 -> 768; date-stamped lines 21 -> 0; ruling quotations 5 -> 0; warning markers 10 -> 0; prohibition rules 39 -> 47 with every original one re-stated, one retired with its object; 20 headings byte-identical) and CLAUDE.md (36 -> 41 lines; four excerpts' subjects kept) rewritten rules-only, every rule one sentence in its section. The ownership paragraph is written by role under the 2026-09-05 ruling (facts a-g) and carries hotlong's three #15287 criteria as rules (AGENTS.md:393-410, CLAUDE.md:7-17); it agrees with pm-dispatch SKILL.md 认领 and os-dev.md rule 2 and quotes neither. Six folds landed as one rule each: #15125 AGENTS.md:440-444, #14913 AGENTS.md:10-15 plus the id-lint header sentence (scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs:18-19; the rest-channel.md limb is member 3's file, untouched), #14509 AGENTS.md:249-254 inside PD #13, #15241 AGENTS.md:428-439 in the measured form with the repository named, #15357 AGENTS.md:354-357, #15670 the paragraph itself. Ratchet re-pinned down-only in its own rows (AGENTS.md 1162 -> 1058, 1081 -> 768; CLAUDE.md 86 -> 41). Reviewable choice to note: PD #14's and PD #15's verbatim maintainer rulings (and the Communication, Route rule 5 and Degradation quotations) are replaced by their rule form — the five governed surfaces are now named in plain prose and check:pm-governed-prose is green; the register stays the source of truth. PR #15427 has NOT landed (merge-tree against origin/main 5a21d73af5 clean; its Context Routing row and CEILINGS row touch lines this PR leaves byte-identical, so its author re-resolves trivially on top). Draft PR #15856 carries Fixes for the six cards, Part of #15379, names #15287 as carried (it stays open until readable on main), skip-changeset added additively and read back; no reviewers requested (the seat's step). Worktree kept for a patch round. Seat correction applied on the same branch as a second commit (9a3a44190d): the executor clause now reads, verbatim (AGENTS.md:399-402): \"A dispatched executor inherits both records: it verifies that the newest `Claim:` names its branch (on a mismatch it stops and reports), posts no second claim — the dispatch's `Claim:` is its identity and its own record is the report comment — and it ⛔ never writes the assignee and ⛔ never yields a card it was dispatched to.\" and CLAUDE.md:12-14: \"a PM dispatch sets the assignee and posts the `Claim:` for its dev, who inherits both, checks the newest `Claim:` names its branch, posts no second claim, and ⛔ never writes the assignee or yields the card.\" — hotlong's criterion (b) is stated at the owning-session level (\"The session that OWNS a card performs both acts\"); both files stay line-neutral at the re-pinned ceilings (1058 / 41), ⛔ counts unchanged (47 / 6). Assignee untouched; no claim comment posted, which is what the paragraph now prescribes for a dispatched executor.", "tests": "Final head 9a3a44190d (= a52aceadb1 the rewrite + 13fc873b29 the origin/main 5a21d73af5 merge + 9a3a44190d the seat-corrected executor clause; exit codes captured by redirect, verdict lines quoted). The full union ran twice — on 13fc873b29 and again on 9a3a44190d after the correction; the numbers below are identical on both heads. node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (merge-base change set, 4 paths) -> 36 commands, all exit 0; --ran reconcile: '✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 36 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 36 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED.' Ratchet: '--self-test: 155 cases pass'; live '✓ AGENTS.md is 1058 lines (ceiling 1058; headroom 0)', '✓ AGENTS.md: widest table row is 768 bytes (pin 768; headroom 0)', '✓ CLAUDE.md is 41 lines (ceiling 41; headroom 0)', '✓ CLAUDE.md: widest table row is 0 bytes (pin 0)'; 120-byte rule 0 offenders by the ratchet's own scanLineLengths. check:pm-governed-prose '✓ 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces (docs/adr/** · .claude/** · skills/** · AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md) and claim no others.' check:required-contexts '✓ 6 required context name(s) pinned across 2 workflow(s); 6 instruction surface(s) scanned'. check:skill-frame-sync '✓ 2 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 2 files … 73 markdown files scanned'. check:pm-skill-id-lint '✓ 24 file(s) clean' (self-test 14 cases). check-published-list-mirrors self-test 37 cases + live exit 0 (the RECOGNISED_PATH_SPELLINGS block byte-identical). check:docs-audit-scope '✓ release-owned pages are in scope and read-only'. check:agent-test-spelling '0 violations'. check:nul-bytes, check:pm-governed-merges, check:watch-hint-literal, cli-command-ids, cross-package-test-inputs, entry-guard, parse-guard, pnpm-filter-targets, ratchet-remedy-authority, refd-timer-probe, bash32-floor, driver-memory-census, pm-dispatch-gates and the direct-node families: all exit 0. Five .claude/hooks/*.selftest.sh: 0 failed (50/121/116/51/36 passed) — no pinned spelling touched. Whole-repo pnpm lint via scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-15379-m5: 'VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 69s'. Roster gates beside the scripts paths run for completeness: pm-label-desc-cap, console-injection, i18n-stale-fill, engine-double-contract exit 0; dts-closure and published-readme-exports print PREREQUISITE NOT MET (no dist/ in this worktree) — NOT MEASURED, not red, and they read nothing this PR changes. Hygiene greps on AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md: dates 0, 「」 0, ⚠️ 0, ⭐ 0, #NNN 0, model identifiers 0; widest non-table line 365 B (line 8, the untouched v5.0 blockquote, exempt shape), CLAUDE.md 97 B. PR body (create) sent 23026 B, stored 23026 B, byte-identical (session-URL footer survived the create path); the inventory-range correction PATCH was sent with no footer (22935 B) and stored at 22994 B = the same prose plus one platform-appended bare footer block — the measured edit-path rule reproduced on this PR; skip-changeset read-back = union(before, target). The correction head's body PATCH (23382 B, no footer) stored 23441 B = prose byte-identical + one appended bare footer, head read back 9a3a44190d, draft=true, labels documentation (Auto Label's), size/l, skip-changeset. CI on head 9a3a44190d: 33 check runs, all completed, zero failures — Lint & Repo Gates success, TypeScript Type Check success (workspace / source gates / debt ledger / consumer gates all success), Test Core success (six shards success), Dogfood Regression Gate success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Check PR Size / Check Documentation Links / Auto Label / filter / the two claim guards and the Part-of guard success; Build Core, Temporal Conformance (live PG + MySQL), Check Changeset (skip-changeset), Console Pin Gate, Build Docs, Dogfood Verify CLI and the packed-tarball smoke skipped by their path filters. The previous head 13fc873b29 also finished all green (37 runs, zero failures). Merge-tree against origin/main (59953d5a3f at the second push) clean.", "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST (probe 200 at start; gh absent) and git; no MCP GitHub call", "open_questions": [ { "question": "The PR body's first line is exactly the prescribed 'Fixes #15670 #15125 #14913 #14509 #15241 #15357'. GitHub's closing-keyword parser attaches a keyword only to the reference immediately after it, so at merge only #15670 auto-closes; the other five stay open unless closed by hand.", "options": [ "A: keep the prescribed one-line form; the seat closes the remaining five at landing (its current practice for family folds)", "B: rewrite line 1 as 'Fixes #15670, fixes #15125, fixes #14913, fixes #14509, fixes #15241, fixes #15357' so all six auto-close" ], "recommendation": "A, because the line is the seat's prescribed form and its parity gate passed on it; switching to B is a one-line body edit the seat can order if it wants auto-close." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "filed as #15857: .claude/agents/os-dev.md still states the falsified PR-body footer reading (a PATCH downgrades the session-URL footer to bare) that #15241 measured against and that AGENTS.md now states in the measured form — the two surfaces disagree once PR #15856 lands; one-line alignment in a governed draft PR (member 4's file, not this member's claim)", "reported, not filed (not a defect): PR #15427 (app-vs-platform boundary pointer row + CEILINGS row) is still open and touches AGENTS.md's Context Routing table and the ratchet map; both regions are byte-identical in this PR, so whichever lands second re-resolves trivially — the seat said it will tell #15427's author" ] }
Generated by Claude Code
- added a commit that references this issue
on Sep 9, 2026
Filed by the
domain:skillsseat (sessionsession_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox, os-steve) on a maintainer ruling given in the live PM chat, 2026-09-04 13:1xZ. Execution family under the corpus-audit anchor #13597 (Phase 3 continues under this ruling, which supersedes the narrower X0 quote policy where the two differ).The ruling (verbatim, untranslated)
The maintainer asked whether the PM skills should be re-reviewed for readability — 「要不要把所有的项目经理 skills 再复核一遍，语言改的通顺一点，便于人类审核，目前我看起来好累」 — and, on the seat's core-vs-secondary reading, ruled:
⇒ Provenance narratives and incident post-mortems do not belong in the skill corpus at all. The corpus carries rules only, in plain language a human can review.
What this changes
check:skill-frame-syncand is ⛔ untouched). Everything else quoted becomes the rule in plain words.os-dev.mdare Chinese with English identifiers;AGENTS.mdis English). One rule per sentence; ⛔ only for prohibitions; nocheck:pm-skill-id-lint).Members (one governed PR each, in this order; the seat dispatches serially)
a3fbd200).claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.mdreferences/dispatch-runbook.md·review-checklist.md·contract-review.md·landing-operations.md·seat-post-protocol.md·state-machine.md·decision-analysis.mdreferences/platform-readings.md·rest-channel.md·lanes/*.md·release-aftercare.md·true-green.md·compile-surfaces.md.claude/agents/os-dev.mdAGENTS.mdHuman review, by design
Each PR body carries a rule inventory — one row per rule: section · rule as it now reads · what was removed (narrative / quote / date) · "operative content unchanged" — so the maintainer reviews the table, not the diff. The seat's contract-tier review checks the inventory against the diff before requesting the two approvers.
Gates every member must keep green
check:pm-skill-ratchet(line count and 120-byte lines; shrink only) ·check:skill-frame-sync(the frame block byte-identical in its two copies) ·check:pm-governed-prose(the instruction surfaces still name the five governed surfaces) ·check:pm-skill-id-lint·check:nul-bytes·check:pm-governed-merges· the whole-repo lint · whateverdispatch-gates --commandsderives for the paths.Refs: #13597 (anchor; Phase 1–2 tables and rulings) · #14685 items 2–5 (the earlier X0 / excerpt / frame / move rulings) · #12911 (the thesis).
Generated by Claude Code