[finding] spec ships a three-layer metadata-customization protocol (MetadataOverlaySchema, field-level change tracking) with zero consumers — published reference docs describe an unimplemented customization architecture #12057

packages/spec/src/kernel/metadata-customization.zod.ts declares a complete three-layer
customization protocol — MetadataOverlaySchema (scopes system/platform/user), per-field
FieldChangeSchema (originalValue/currentValue/changedBy), lockedFields/customizableFields
whitelists, and a 3-way-merge upgrade story. It is a public export
(packages/spec/api-surface/kernel.json:213) and it is published as reference documentation
(content/docs/references/kernel/metadata-customization.mdx, auto-generated from the module's
TSDoc), presenting itself as "the overlay system for managing user customizations on top of
package-delivered metadata".

Measured at origin/main 0b048393faa98151600598bcebf2ad905ee7021f:

POSITIVE CONTROL  grep MetadataOverlaySchema|CustomizationOriginSchema|FieldChangeSchema|MetadataCustomizationState|CustomizationConflict
                  -> finds the definitions in packages/spec/src and the api-surface row
ZERO              same grep across packages/** excluding packages/spec:            0 matches
ZERO              same grep across the local ../objectui checkout @ 2ecc9c7cb2:    0 matches

The real, enforced overlay mechanism (ADR-0005: sys_metadata rows keyed by organization_id,
five allowOrgOverride types, OVERLAY_ALLOWED_TYPES in objectql/src/protocol.ts) shares no
code and no vocabulary with this module. Nothing implements the user scope, the field-level
change tracking, lockedFields, or the 3-way merge — and the published reference page describes
them as the platform's customization architecture anyway.

This is the ADR-0049 declared-but-unenforced shape (same family as #11777), on the exact surface
the #12049 customization-model ADR governs: a reader (human or AI) planning post-install
customization from the reference docs lands on a protocol with zero consumers, and the
ServiceNow-style per-field overlay layer it describes is precisely what the #11513 ruling recorded
as deliberately NOT chartered.

Suggested disposition (whoever picks this up, after #12049's ADR settles the model): retire the
module (ADR-0049 remove side — export removal + api-surface regen + the generated reference page
disappears with it), or re-scope it to document only what ADR-0005 actually implements. Not
scoped here; the #12049 ADR records the model-level disposition.

Blocked-by: #12049 (the ADR is the model-level ruling this retirement should cite).

Found while surveying customization mechanisms for #12049; out of that card's scope (⛔ no
packages/spec edits there).

Generated by Claude Code