Skip to content

Whole-text restructuring round of the pm-dispatch protocol face — maintainer-ordered, fires when the skills-lane backlog drains #11086

Description

@os-zhuang

Maintainer ruling, 2026-08-22, live PM chat with the skills seat (session session_01MsbKEG4LtERSLaDrbehM3e), verbatim: 「所有的 skills 任务处理完之后,再来一轮全文重构」.

Context: the maintainer asked whether per-card edits to the protocol get holistic analysis; the seat's honest answer named the real gap — the ratchet caps VOLUME but nothing periodically audits CONCEPTUAL drift across the whole document as per-card edits accumulate. This card is the ordered remedy.

Restart-when: the skills lane has zero open pm:queue cards (other than this one) and zero pm:dispatched in flight

Scope (the round, not the edits — the edits get their own ruling)

  1. Full-text analysis of the protocol face: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md + its references/** + .claude/agents/os-dev.md — read as one document set, in the state the drained backlog leaves them.
  2. Produce a net-reduction restructuring proposal for the maintainer: redundancies (the same rule stated in two places), contradictions or near-contradictions left by accumulated per-card edits, prose that should sink from SKILL.md to references (principle-vs-mechanism layering), retired concepts still carrying words, and any clause whose exceptions have drifted from its statement.
  3. The proposal goes to the maintainer as a decision digest BEFORE any edit — ⛔ the restructuring itself is not pre-authorized by this card; only the analysis round is. Implementation lands as governed draft PR(s) at claude-fable-5 (clause ①), with the ratchet ceiling LOWERED to the post-shrink count in the same change (lowering is always legal).

Constraints carried from standing rulings

  • 「现有的项目经理skills 应该大幅简化,只需要说原则,不需要写细节」 (2026-08-12) is the direction of travel; details live in references, facts in the fact tables, enforcement in gates.
  • 密度优化仅随净减内容的 PR 顺带 (2026-08-17) — this round IS the commissioned net-reduction, so the density work rides it legitimately.
  • Every rule kept must keep its date + verbatim ruling anchors; ⛔ restructuring never rewrites a ruling's words.

Filed by the skills seat under the lane self-triage exception; pm:on-hold until the restart criterion fires (evaluated by the standing daily executable-criteria scan, or by this seat at any round boundary where the queue reads empty).

Activity

  1. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    Claim: skills 席,session 5213b871-5164-5bc3-8874-28b336bbcd40(CCR session_01RMTpSRF5CjMmQBFfPtPCwJ)。启动依据:维护者 2026-08-23 直令「#11086 重构轮可以开始」(队列已空;唯一在飞 #11335 的 PR #11342 已 ACCEPT 待 merge,其 4 行增量已知、纳入分析基线)。本轮仅执行卡内已授权的分析轮:全文读 SKILL.md + references/** + os-dev.md,产出净减重构提案 → 决策摘要呈维护者;⛔ 不动手编辑,无分支(分析无代码)。实施轮待裁定后另立治理 draft PR(clause ①,fable)。


    Generated by Claude Code

  2. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    #11086 分析轮交付 —— pm-dispatch 协议面全文重构提案(决策摘要,先裁后动)

    skills 席,session 5213b871-5164-5bc3-8874-28b336bbcd40。启动依据:维护者 2026-08-23 直令「#11086 重构轮可以开始」。基线:origin/main @ d3956923;语料 = SKILL.md(682 行)+ references 17 文件(约 1330 行)+ os-dev.md(405 行),合计约 2420 行,本席 fable 档全文通读(非抽样)。PR #11342(#11335 可发现性三修,已 ACCEPT 待 merge)的 4 行增量已计入。按卡的授权边界:本评论只是提案,⛔ 未动任何文本;实施须另裁、另开治理 draft PR。


    一、发现清单(五类)

    A. 失实平台事实 —— 同一假事实两份拷贝(必修)

    • SKILL.md「座位 Routine 三原则」① 与 seat-post-protocol「座位 Routine 创建细则」首条,都写「Routines UI 创建并勾 GitHub 连接器」。2026-08-23 实测(维护者截图 + 在跑 Routine 配置读数):UI 无 GitHub 连接器入口,凭据随 Routine 挂的 repo sources 走。两份拷贝同错,正是本轮要抓的漂移类;修正后两处应收敛为一处事实 + 一处指针。

    B. 同一规则多处拷贝(删重是真净减)

    1. 「每轮巡检第一判据:先读半状态巡查锚……」逐字出现在全部 7 个 lanes 文件 —— 全席统一规则被逐席累加成 7 份。上提为 SKILL.md 执行座位职责一句,7 处删除(净 −12 行左右)。
    2. 报告契约 JSON 出现两份(SKILL.md「报告契约」+ os-dev「终报消息」),且已经漂移:os-dev 版 tests 字段多出消融陈述,SKILL.md 版没有。无同步门禁看着它们。
    3. 巡检间隔数字(≤45 / 60–70)写在两处(「收集」与「停止条件与待命」);「守小时 fire 的硬理由是契约复审时延」整句写在两处(SKILL.md 两级盘点 + runbook);「借调已删除」墓碑两处(SKILL.md 多仓协调 4 + runbook 直接接手节);「汇总 issue 已退役」两处(升级与决策节内两段)。各收敛为一处。
    4. hotcrm 收卡判据在 SKILL.md 多仓协调首段与 lanes/hotcrm.md 各写一遍(lanes 是裁定的岗位说明之家,SKILL.md 留一行指针即可)。

    C. 原则/机制分层 —— SKILL.md 应下沉的机制细节(2026-08-12「只需要说原则」方向)

    按行密度排序的四个下沉点:

    1. 状态模型表的四个长行(pm:on-hold / pm:blocked / pm:awaiting-maintainer / pm:retriage):每行已是 10–20 行的整段机制(Restart-touch 双通道、放行双查、Unlock-action 等)。表行收为一句语义 + 指针,机制沉 references(状态表本应可扫读)。
    2. 条款②复审链两个 bullet(入队与落地):约 40 行,是全文最稠处,由 08-16/17/18/21/22 五次裁决累加。闸门原则、双肢定义、档位单源留主文件;保险丝操作程序、subagent 测量事实、载体纪律、放宽路径沉 references(裁决日期 + 原话随迁,⛔ 不改写)。
    3. 座位贴协议节:seat-post-protocol.md 已存在且承载细则,主文件段仍留着换班报告全引文等细节,可再收 6–10 行。
    4. ACCEPT 路径分叉 ③ 的 request-review 机制(author-identity 422 兜底等)属 landing 操作,沉 landing-operations。

    D. 被取代裁决的历史叙事(候选删除;有读者的禁令墓碑保留)

    • 「2026-08-11『不落存储标签』已被 2026-08-13 取代」(标签纪律节)——现行规则已立,死裁决叙事无读者。
    • 「人闸部分 2026-08-14/15 被同席质疑后取代」(波次收工点)——同类。
    • 保留不删:⛔ 不复活汇总 issue、发版板旧读法废除注记(各有明确的防复犯读者)、platform-readings 全部「已死假说」墓碑(设计如此)。

    E. 现实漂移,需要裁定(文本与运行现实已不一致)

    协议文本:契约复审「常设 = 分诊席,小时轮清标是默认路径,skills 席仅过渡期代行」;两级盘点「守小时 fire 的硬理由是契约复审时延」。运行现实(2026-08-23):分诊 Routine 改为每日一次、维护者手工跑(token 成本顾虑),契约复审由维护者直令挂到 skills 席自绑小时钟(trig_01JmZ3RDwvXRgqHCA2QKcwX1)。文本按哪个收敛,需要裁。

    刻意保留、分析过但不动的

    四维框架四份拷贝(check:skill-frame-sync 机械同构,受控冗余,四个读者各在其位);os-dev 消融纪律大块(事故最密面,每条都是实测教训);闭合关键词在 os-dev/checklist/platform-readings 的三个半边(作者侧/复核侧/事实侧各司其职)。


    二、量化目标

    面 现值 提案后 说明
    SKILL.md(每轮必载面) 682 ~575–600 净 −80~110;棘轮上限同笔下调(下调恒合法)
    lanes ×7 ~270 ~258 巡查锚句上提
    新 references — +80~90 状态机细则 + 契约复审链细则(两个新文件,各设新上限)
    os-dev.md 405 ~392 报告 JSON 单源化(视 Q4)
    语料合计 ~2420 约 −30~−50 删重是真净减;下沉是转移 —— 价值主要在必载面瘦身与「一条规则一个家」

    四轴一行:业务(维护者与每个新席位读得快、裁得快 —— 682 行必载面是每轮的固定税);长远(一条规则一个家,per-card 编辑不再制造第 N 份拷贝);防 AI 犯错(两份漂移中的报告 JSON、两份失实的连接器事实,正是复述型错误的温床);创业聚焦(不新增机制,只收敛既有文本)。


    三、请裁(回字母即可;不回视为暂缓,卡留 pm:dispatched 等裁)

    • Q1 下沉结构:A = 新开两个 references 文件(状态机细则、契约复审链细则,各设新棘轮上限)/ B = 并入 dispatch-runbook(243 顶格,需抬其上限)/ C = 只删重不下沉(小改)。推荐 A(新文件按需加载、不动既有顶格文件)。
    • Q2 被取代裁决叙事:A = 删纯历史叙事(防复犯墓碑保留)/ B = 全保留。推荐 A。
    • Q3 契约复审归属文本(上文 E):A = 按现实改(常设 = skills 席小时钟,出处 2026-08-23 直令;分诊席达档时照旧可清)/ B = 维持文本,恢复分诊小时轮 / C = 暂不动,另卡跟踪。推荐 A。
    • Q4 报告 JSON:A = os-dev 版为权威,SKILL.md 改指针 / B = 双份保留 + 新增同步门禁。推荐 A(少养一个门禁)。
    • A 类失实事实修正与 B1 巡查锚句上提为机械修,不需裁定,随实施轮执行(此处报备)。

    四、实施轮形状(裁后执行,你不用管细节)

    治理面全程 draft、人工合并:PR-1 = SKILL.md 重构 + 新 references + 棘轮上/下限(clause ①,fable 施工);PR-2 = lanes 上提 + seat-post/连接器事实修正 + platform-readings sanitizer 三行并一(references-only,opus 施工 + fable 档复核);PR-3 = os-dev.md JSON 指针化(clause ①,fable;视 Q4)。每 PR 带日期 + 原话逐条迁移清单(before/after 引文盘点,⛔ 不改写任何裁决原文),棘轮支付逐行可核。


    Generated by Claude Code

  3. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    Maintainer ruling recorded(2026-08-23,live PM chat,逐字:「接受你的重构提案」)——上一评论(5386318087)的提案整体采纳,四问全部落到推荐项:

    • Q1 = A:新开两个 references 文件(状态机细则、契约复审链细则),各设新棘轮上限;不抬既有顶格文件。
    • Q2 = A:删除被取代裁决的纯历史叙事;有防复犯读者的禁令墓碑保留。
    • Q3 = A:契约复审归属文本按现实收敛——常设 = skills 席自绑小时钟(出处:维护者 2026-08-23「要不还是你挂个定时处理审核吧」),分诊席达档时照旧可清;既有裁决原话(2026-08-21 放宽、2026-08-18 载体不迁移等)逐字保留随迁。
    • Q4 = A:报告契约 JSON 以 os-dev.md 版为权威,SKILL.md 改指针(PM 侧消费规则保留)。
    • A 类失实事实修正(Routines 连接器)与 B1 巡查锚句上提随实施轮执行(提案内已报备)。

    实施轮开始:PR-1(SKILL.md 重构 + 两个新 references 文件 + 棘轮上/下限;clause ①,fable 施工)现在派发,基线 = origin/main @ 231d7664(含 #11342)。PR-2(lanes 锚句删除 ×7 + seat-post 连接器修正 + platform-readings sanitizer 并行)待 PR-1 合入后派发——两 PR 都会动棘轮 CEILINGS 表且 lanes 删句依赖 SKILL.md 上提先落地,串行是构造性防冲突。两 PR 均治理 draft、request review os-zhuang、人工合并;merge 顺序:PR-1 先。

    约束随派发令逐字携带:裁决原话与日期逐条迁移不改写(before/after 引文盘点为 PR 必备件);四维框架块受 check:skill-frame-sync 钉扎,⛔ 不迁移不改写;content/docs/releases/** 不触。


    Generated by Claude Code

  4. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    Dispatch — implementation round, PR-1 of 2 (under the existing claim, session 5213b871-5164-5bc3-8874-28b336bbcd40).

    • Dev: one os-dev, mode:subagent, model: claude-fable-5 (clause ① — SKILL.md 主文件 edit is fable-mandatory; tier per dispatch-gates.mjs --tier mandatory-glob face).
    • Branch: claude/issue-11086-protocol-restructure-pr1 · base origin/main @ 231d7664 (post-docs(pm-dispatch): hang the keys beside the contract-review gate (discoverability only) #11342 baseline verified: 682 lines, anti-pattern sentence present).
    • Scope: the adopted digest's PR-1 — SKILL.md restructure + new references/state-machine.md + references/contract-review.md + ratchet CEILINGS (lower SKILL.md, add new files, headroom 0). Q2/Q3/Q4 = A applied in the same pass. Frame-sync-pinned four-axis block untouched.
    • Excluded (PR-2, dispatched after PR-1 merges — both edit the CEILINGS map and the lanes deletion depends on the hoisted sentence landing first): references/lanes/** ×7 hoist-deletion, references/seat-post-protocol.md connector fix, references/platform-readings.md sanitizer consolidation.
    • Serial constraints: SKILL.md hot-file chain clear (docs(pm-dispatch): hang the keys beside the contract-review gate (discoverability only) #11342 MERGED; no other open claim touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** per lane inventory). PR stays draft, review requested from os-zhuang, human merge only; Part of #11086.

    Provenance requirement carried into the dispatch verbatim: before/after date + 「」-quote inventories must be set-identical across the touched corpus except the explicitly sanctioned removals (two Q2 narratives, one connector-fact line), each listed with its ruling.


    Generated by Claude Code

  5. os-zhuang commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @os-zhuang
    ContributorAuthor
    {
      "issue": 11086,
      "status": "done",
      "branch": "claude/issue-11086-protocol-restructure-pr1",
      "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/11361",
      "premise_still_valid": true,
      "summary": "PR-1 of the adopted digest implemented at base 231d7664 (verified: SKILL.md 682 lines, anti-pattern sentence present). Two new references created — state-machine.md (43, verbatim mechanism of the four long state rows, rows now one-line + pointer) and contract-review.md (44, clause-2 review-chain detail with Q3=A ownership rewrite: standing owner = skills seat self-bound hourly cron, 2026-08-23 quote carried; triage clears when tier-verified). Q2=A (both superseded narratives deleted, tombstones kept), Q4=A (report JSON single-sourced from os-dev.md, PM consumption rules kept, os-dev.md untouched), connector fact corrected in SKILL.md only, patrol-anchor sentence hoisted once into 执行座位职责, five dedups landed (interval numbers / hourly-fire rationale / 借调 / retired digest / hotcrm), ratchet lowered 682-to-666 and 243-to-242 with two new headroom-0 entries. Deviations, honest: (1) SKILL.md lands 666, above the digest 575-600 estimate — the moved bulk sat on single physical lines, so volume shrank far more than line count; no re-wrap used to force it. (2) B3 seat-post compression is a no-op: measured, seat-post-protocol.md defers those details TO the main file, so the assumption is falsified and nothing was deleted there. (3) B8 author-identity-422 text stays in SKILL.md — landing-operations is at its 82 ceiling with no genuine compression found. (4) request-review to os-zhuang failed with the documented author-identity 422 (shared-identity author); PR assigned to os-zhuang as the protocol fallback — PM round report should name it. Provenance proof (dates 91-to-91 with per-date deltas accounted; quotes 193-to-197 wrap-normalized set-identical except the three sanctioned removals and the ruling-mandated additions) is in the PR body. Governed surface: draft, human merge only; skip-changeset applied via additive endpoint and read back (survived beside size/m).",
      "tests": "All at final commit b02c25a3 (= PR head). Union derived via node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs with no hand-fed paths (stderr: change set 5 paths vs merge base 231d7664 of origin/main; answer for objectstack-ai/objectstack) — 13 families matched, all run green under os-verify-lock. Verdict lines: 'check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 666 lines (ceiling 666; headroom 0)' + all other covered files green + self-test 20 cases; 'check-skill-id-lint: 21 file(s) clean'; 'check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files'; 'check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 6378 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes)'; 'check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces'; 'doc authoring guard: 389 files clean'; 'check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) ... judged clean' (after pnpm --workspace-concurrency=2 --filter '@objectstack/lint^...' build, exit 0 — first attempt failed on unbuilt formula dist, second on the --concurrency forwarding trap, both fixed); entry-guard 52+138, parse-guard 46+137, pnpm-filter-targets, cross-package-test-inputs (both spellings), ci-filter-parity — batch exit 0. check-governed-merges --test answers GOVERNED for the 4 .claude paths (exit 3 = verdict, posture kept). No ablation run — docs-only restructuring; the reverse-verification analogue here is the byte-exact date/quote inventory in the PR body, produced by comparing origin/main against the worktree programmatically.",
      "open_questions": [],
      "out_of_scope_findings": []
    }

    Generated by Claude Code


    Generated by Claude Code

  6. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    ACCEPT — PR-1(fable 席验收,session 5213b871-5164-5bc3-8874-28b336bbcd40;PR #11361 @ b02c25a36a)

    逐项核验(对 diff 与两新文件全文本体):

    • 文件面恰为 5 条许可路径;排除清单(lanes/seat-post/platform-readings/os-dev.md)零触碰 ✓。
    • 迁移无损:state-machine.md(43)与 contract-review.md(44)逐字承载四长状态行与条款②链细则,载重原话全部在场(2026-08-22 双载体、2026-08-18 载体不迁移、2026-08-21 放宽、反模式句逐字);Q3=A 归属改写到位(常设 = skills 席小时钟,2026-08-23 原话入档;分诊达档照旧可清)。
    • SKILL.md 侧:四状态行收一行 + 指针;条款②两 bullet 收原则 + 指针;连接器事实修正带实测日期;巡查锚句上提一处;Q2 两处死叙事删除(现行规则与日期保留,「汇总 issue」墓碑单一归家);Q4 JSON 改指针并注明漂移理由,PM 消费规则保留;hotcrm/借调/间隔数字/小时 fire 理由四处去重各归一家 —— runbook 的 Q3 陈旧句一并收敛为现实指针(这一处比派发令预期处理得更完整)。
    • frame-sync 机器判定:4 copies structurally isomorphic across 3 files 绿 —— 钉扎块未动 ✓。
    • 棘轮:682→666、243→242、新文件 43/44 顶格入表,四条带裁决出处注释;headroom 0 verdict 行引自最终 commit(= PR head b02c25a3,读数入账)。
    • 门禁并集:dispatch-gates 无手喂路径推导 13 族全绿,governed-merges --test 对 4 条 .claude 路径答 GOVERNED、posture 保持。
    • 偏差四条全部接受:① 落点 666 高于摘要估算 575–600 —— 被迁内容多为单物理行,体量降幅大于行数降幅,未用 re-wrap 凑数,诚实交付;② B3 座位贴压缩实测为空操作(seat-post 细则反向指回主文件,假设被证伪 —— 好运行);③ B8 422 兜底文本留主文件(landing-operations 顶格无真压缩,遵守 ⛔ 不抬上限);④ request review os-zhuang 撞 author-identity 422,按协议兜底改 assign —— 轮报点名。

    结论:ACCEPT。治理面 draft 等维护者人工合并(merge 顺序:本 PR 先,PR-2 后)。PR-2(lanes ×7 锚句删除 + seat-post 连接器修正 + platform-readings sanitizer 并行)在本 PR 合入后派发。


    Generated by Claude Code

  7. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    PR-1 (#11361) MERGED and content-verified on origin/main @ 9337cd81: SKILL.md 666, state-machine.md 43, contract-review.md 44, hoisted patrol-anchor sentence and connector-fact fix both present. Dispatching PR-2 (final PR of the round, Fixes #11086): one os-dev, mode:subagent, model: opus (references-only ⇒ opus build per clause ① split; fable-tier ACCEPT by this seat compensates). Branch claude/issue-11086-protocol-restructure-pr2, base ≥ 9337cd81. Scope: lanes ×7 hoisted-sentence deletion · seat-post connector-fact fix (mechanism words → repo sources) · platform-readings sanitizer-row consolidation (dates preserved, tombstones out of scope) · ratchet lowerings. Draft, human merge; card closes when PR-2 lands.


    Generated by Claude Code

  8. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor
    {
      "issue": 11086,
      "status": "done",
      "branch": "claude/issue-11086-protocol-restructure-pr2",
      "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/11393",
      "premise_still_valid": true,
      "summary": "PR-2 (final PR of the round) implemented at base 9337cd81, verified before starting: SKILL.md 666, state-machine.md 43, contract-review.md 44, hoisted patrol-anchor sentence present at SKILL.md:327. (a) lanes x7: the anchor sentence deleted from all seven. Verified rather than assumed first - the seven copies hash to ONE distinct value, and versus the SKILL.md copy the only difference is the two-byte list-bullet marker (211 vs 209 bytes, sentence text byte-identical), so verbatim-equivalent and safe to delete; the hoist sits at the head of the section every executing seat reads, so the rule keeps a home; no dangling references left in lanes (grep for the anchor terms returns nothing). (b) seat-post-protocol.md: connector mechanism words replaced by the measured fact in wording matching PR-1's SKILL.md copy; trap warning KEPT with its mechanism restated (in-session fresh-session Routine carries no repo sources, so the fired session gets no GitHub tools, still a silent zero-output trap); smoke-test and model-pinning notes untouched; file stays at 101 lines. (c) platform-readings.md: the three write-side sanitizer rows consolidated into one author rule plus one measured-behaviour row per surface (issue body / comment); the sister-repo five-shape probe boundary and the worst-case truncation posture both preserved; tombstones elsewhere untouched and absent from the diff. (d) ratchet: eight ceilings lowered to landed counts, headroom 0, provenance comments naming the round and the 2026-08-23 ruling; lowering only. Provenance proof in the PR body: line counts 506 to 498 (net minus 8); dates 27 to 28 occurrences with the distinct set UNCHANGED, the single delta being one added 2026-08-23 (the measurement date of the sanctioned connector wording change) and no date lost anywhere; quotes 88 to 87 with EXACTLY one removal and zero additions, that removal being the superseded-reading parenthetical deleted under Q2 = A. Nineteen load-bearing elements of the consolidated rows were probed individually on disk after the splice, each present exactly once. Excluded set (SKILL.md, os-dev.md, state-machine.md, contract-review.md, dispatch-runbook.md, content/docs/releases) has zero touches. DEVIATIONS, honest: (1) The dispatch says the connector mechanism words sit in the FIRST TWO bullets of the Routine-creation section; measured, they sit entirely in bullet 1 - bullet 2 is the smoke-test bullet the same clause tells me to leave untouched, so I edited bullet 1 only. (2) Both PM mechanism assumptions were tested: the byte-identity one HELD; the sizing one is FALSIFIED. The lane bullet is ONE physical line per file, not two (minus 7, not the estimated minus 12), and the three sanitizer rows occupy only FOUR physical lines to begin with - very long ones - so an honest consolidation into the requested three entries nets minus 1, not the estimated minus 4 to minus 8. Same line-count-versus-volume gap PR-1 reported. No re-wrapping to manufacture a number and no content cut to reach one. (3) The author rule and the fence measurement were in near-contradiction (the rule said put it in a fence and spell the character out; the row below says fences do not protect). Resolved in place within scope by keeping the original instruction and attaching the corpus's own already-measured caveat that the spelling, not the fence, is the protection - no new substance. (4) request-review to os-zhuang SUCCEEDED here (HTTP 201, requested_reviewers shows os-zhuang) - it did NOT hit the author-identity 422 that PR-1 reported and fell back from, so no assign fallback was needed; the 422 is evidently not deterministic on this surface. Governed surface: draft, human merge only, never flipped/enqueued/armed. skip-changeset applied via the additive endpoint and read back after the bots settled (survived beside size/s and a bot-added documentation label).",
      "tests": "All at final commit 077bf957 (= PR head, git rev-parse --short HEAD). Union derived with 'node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack' and NO hand-fed paths - stderr provenance: gate list derived from the tree of objectstack-ai/objectstack at commit 077bf957, --repo checked against this checkout's origin remote and it holds; change set derived from git, 10 paths vs merge base 9337cd810 of origin/main (committed 10, working tree 0, untracked 0, three-dot semantics). 12 families matched, all run green under 'bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh -c ...' (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 25s). Exit codes captured per gate with an explicit 'RC name=$?' after each command under 'set -o pipefail', never through a pipe; verdict lines quoted below are the gates' OWN output, not bare shell status. check-skill-line-ratchet self-test: 20 cases pass, then 'lanes/cli.md is 35 lines (ceiling 35; headroom 0)', 'lanes/devx.md is 37 (ceiling 37)', 'lanes/engine.md is 40 (ceiling 40)', 'lanes/hotcrm.md is 44 (ceiling 44)', 'lanes/services.md is 30 (ceiling 30)', 'lanes/skills.md is 35 (ceiling 35)', 'lanes/spec.md is 43 (ceiling 43)', 'platform-readings.md is 133 lines (ceiling 133; headroom 0)', 'seat-post-protocol.md is 101 lines (ceiling 101; headroom 0)', plus every other covered file green incl. SKILL.md 666 and os-dev.md 405 untouched. 'check-skill-id-lint: 21 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g)', self-test 14 cases. 'check-skill-frame-sync: 4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic across 3 files' - the frame-sync-pinned four-axis block is untouched. 'check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 6386 text file(s) -- 6386 tracked, 0 untracked-not-ignored; skipped 5 binary; no raw ASCII control bytes)', self-test 75 assertions; plus an independent control-byte grep over the ten edited files: no hits. 'doc authoring guard: 389 files clean -- no bare metadata literals'; 'check:doc-formula-expressions: 22 record-scoped formula example(s) across 420 files / 1447 TS blocks judged clean' plus the spec-TSDoc leg 9 examples clean - both only after building the lint dependency closure with 'pnpm --workspace-concurrency=2 --filter @objectstack/lint^... build' (flag BEFORE --filter), exit 0. 'check:entry-guard: 138 scripts/ file(s)' (self-test 52 cases), 'check:parse-guard: 137 scripts/ file(s)' (self-test 46 cases), 'check:pnpm-filter-targets: 120/148 --filter occurrence(s) across 25 file(s) resolve against 78 workspace package(s)' (54+40 self-test assertions), check-cross-package-test-inputs 104 self-test cases (both spellings, direct and via pnpm), check-ci-filter-parity - all RC=0. check-governed-merges --self-test 129 assertions; --test over this PR's paths prints 'GOVERNED - a human merge is the review record for this PR' and names 3 of 4 paths under .claude/** (exit 3 is the verdict, not a failure; posture kept). Note for the record: check:nul-bytes is NOT in the path-derived union for these paths (it computes its own population, the 'silent' class the residue section describes) - it was run because the dispatch named it, and it is green. No ablation: documentation restructuring has no runtime behaviour to mutate, so the reverse-verification analogue is the programmatic date/quote/line inventory comparing origin/main against the worktree, whose set-diff is reported above and in the PR body.",
      "open_questions": [],
      "out_of_scope_findings": []
    }

    Generated by Claude Code

  9. claude commented on Aug 23, 2026

    @claude
    Contributor

    ACCEPT — PR-2(fable 席验收,session 5213b871-5164-5bc3-8874-28b336bbcd40;PR #11393 @ 077bf957)

    逐项核验(对 diff 本体):

    • 文件面恰为 10 条许可路径(lanes ×7 + seat-post + platform-readings + 棘轮表);排除清单零触碰 ✓。
    • 锚句上提收尾:7 删 0 加,dev 先以哈希证明七份逐字同一、与 SKILL.md 上提句仅差两字节列表符再删 —— 验证先于删除,方法正确。
    • seat-post 连接器修正:机制词换为「凭据随 repo sources 走,UI 无连接器入口(2026-08-23 实测)」,fresh-session 陷阱警告保留且机制重述正确(不挂 sources ⇒ 无 GitHub 工具),烟测与钉模型条目未动,101 行持平。
    • sanitizer 三行并一:作者规则 / issue body 实测 / 评论实测三条结构清晰,08-18/19/20/21 四个日期全在,姊妹仓五形探针边界与最坏截断姿态保留,markup-declaration 感叹号坑折入 body 行;唯一移除的「」引语是被推翻死读数的标签(Q2=A 授权面,现行规则完整承载真相);近矛盾(围栏措辞 vs 围栏不防护实测)以语料自有测量就地调和,无新实质 —— 处理得当。
    • 棘轮:八条下调全带出处注释;cli 35(-2)顺带清掉一行历史 headroom,回归顶格约定 —— 只降合法。
    • 门禁:12 族并集全绿 @ 077bf957(= PR head,读数入账);frame-sync 4 拷贝同构、id-lint 21 文件净、governed --test 答 GOVERNED、nul-bytes 净 + 独立控制字节 grep 双证。
    • 偏差四条全部接受:① 连接器词实测只在 bullet 1(bullet 2 是烟测条,按令未动)—— 测量胜过派发令措辞;② 尺寸假设被证伪(净 −8 非 −12~-16,长物理行体量差,与 PR-1 同型),未凑数;③ 近矛盾就地调和;④ request review 本次 201 成功(422 非确定性,记录在案)。
    • 来源清单:行 506→498;日期 27→28(集合不变,+1 为连接器修正的实测日期);引语 88→87(恰一删零增,即上述死读数标签)。

    结论:ACCEPT。治理面 draft、review 已请 os-zhuang,等维护者人工合并 —— 合入即 Fixes #11086 关卡,重构轮全案收官。


    Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions