Skip to content

refactor: replace vim.loop with vim.uv #956

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mrr11k
Copy link
Contributor

@mrr11k mrr11k commented May 27, 2024

This PR uses vim.uv instead of the deprecated vim.loop.

See neovim/neovim#22846 for more info.

@purarue
Copy link

purarue commented May 31, 2024

The lazy instructions use a or, incase the user is on older systems to allow using vim.loop still:

if not (vim.uv or vim.loop).fs_stat(lazypath) then

I know kickstart targets stable, but should probably match that instead of requiring the user to be on v0.10+, would lead to one less error if a user happened to be on an old version

@VlaDexa VlaDexa mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2024
@feoh
Copy link
Collaborator

feoh commented Jul 21, 2024

I think this is obviated by #936 please feel free to re-open if I'm wrong.

@feoh feoh closed this Jul 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants