Skip to content

Inquiry About Potential Release of Training Code #4

Open

Description

@lauvli

Dear PartField Team,

First, thank you for sharing this interesting work and making the inference code publicly available. The results are impressive, and I've enjoyed experimenting with the provided demos.

I wanted to kindly inquire whether your team has plans to release the training code for PartField in the future? Understanding the training pipeline would be incredibly valuable for:

Reproducing/extending the research

Adapting the method to new domains

Helping the community build upon this work

If there are no current plans, could you share any insights about potential challenges (e.g., dependencies, data licensing) that might prevent its release?

Thank you for your time and consideration. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Best regards,
lauvli

Activity

  1. Colin97 commented on May 3, 2025

    @Colin97
    Contributor

    The team does not have a clear plan to release the training code in the short term due to limited bandwidth among full-time employees for code cleanup and access limitations for former interns.

    However, the full model architecture has been released. If you wish to reproduce the training process, the main challenge lies in preparing the data processing pipeline—preprocessing meshes, rendering them, generating part proposals, etc. These components require careful implementation.

  2. lauvli commented on May 13, 2025

    @lauvli
    Author

    The team does not have a clear plan to release the training code in the short term due to limited bandwidth among full-time employees for code cleanup and access limitations for former interns.

    However, the full model architecture has been released. If you wish to reproduce the training process, the main challenge lies in preparing the data processing pipeline—preprocessing meshes, rendering them, generating part proposals, etc. These components require careful implementation.

    I encountered a question while reproducing your work. Has your team considered or compared using PointTransformer, which currently delivers strong performance, as the preceding feature extraction network to replace the PVCNN+Transformer structure? What was the rationale and design considerations behind choosing PVCNN+Transformer as your feature extraction network?

  3. yxchng commented on May 19, 2025

    @yxchng

    @Colin97 is there any code that i can refer to regarding the data processing pipeline?

  4. Colin97 commented on May 30, 2025

    @Colin97
    Contributor

    @lauvli We have not compared against other backbones, but we believe that more recent and stronger backbones capable of encoding a 3D point cloud into a continuous 3D feature field would be beneficial.

  5. Colin97 commented on May 30, 2025

    @Colin97
    Contributor

    @yxchng Unfortunately, the team has no plans to release the data processing scripts at this time. They do require careful implementation to produce correct results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions