-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
fix(dev): use get-port-please
to handle socket paths
#973
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This reverts commit d2c200e.
get-port-please
once moreget-port-please
to handle socket paths
Bundle Stats — nuxt-cli size comparisonHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded No assets were added Removed No assets were removed Bigger No assets were bigger Smaller
Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — create-nuxt size comparisonHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded
Removed
Bigger
Smaller
Unchanged
|
Bundle Stats — nuxi size comparisonHey there, this message comes from a GitHub action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle. As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted. Total
Changeset
View detailed bundle breakdownAdded
Removed
Bigger
Smaller
Unchanged
|
commit: |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #973 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
This reverts commit d2c200e.
🔗 Linked issue
#957
📚 Description
in run-up to the release of v4, I didn't have time to debug the issue reported in #956 - it was calling
new URL(socketURL)
, which this also resolves