Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency nunit.analyzers to 4.8.1 #1044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 29, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
NUnit.Analyzers 4.8.0 -> 4.8.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

nunit/nunit.analyzers (NUnit.Analyzers)

v4.8.1: NUnit Analyzers 4.8.1 - May 29, 2025

Compare Source

NUnit Analyzers 4.8.1 - May 29, 2025

This release of the NUnit Analyzers fixes a problem with NUnit4002 when applied to comparisons between non-number
types - e.g. strings.

The release contains contributions from the following users (in alphabetical order):

Issues Resolved

Bugs

  • #​870 Compilation error caused by exception in an analyzer after updating to v4.8.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@mikkelbu mikkelbu merged commit 98977b5 into master May 29, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@mikkelbu mikkelbu deleted the renovate/nunit.analyzers-4.x branch May 29, 2025 15:43
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
chore(deps): update dependency nunit.analyzers to 4.8.1 98977b5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant