Document performance comparison with nupic/ nupic.core

[breznak]

hi,
I'd be interested in performance benchmark of the 3 implementations: java, py, c++? Specifically java against the two, as I'm aware of c++-py speeds.

I think a simple hotgym dataset (long version) with reasonable SP/TP settings would be all I'm asking for. I'll try to run the project in netbeans' profile mode.

OT: do you have any experience with interfacing python to java? As I have my other libs in python already..

[cogmission]

Hi,

Can the C++ implementation be counted as a full implementation yet? To my
knowledge there's the linux on vm / py, linux on vm / py-c++ hybrid, (not
sure about windows), mac py, mac py-c++ hybrid?

Also, I haven't done any performance optimization / profiling to speak of
htm.java (yet) so it isn't at full capacity - but - running the integration
tests and unit tests side by side in Eclipse its easy to see that the Java
version at least very much outperforms the Python version. (I'm not sure if
what I'm seeing is the pure Python or the Python-C++ hybrid either).

I would like to see these comparisons as well... Again keep in mind that
I'm sure htm.java can use a performance profiling effort.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:12 PM, breznak notifications@github.com wrote:

hi,
I'd be interested in performance benchmark of the 3 implementations: java,
py, c++? Specifically java against the two, as I'm aware of c++-py speeds.

I think a simple hotgym dataset (long version) with reasonable SP/TP
settings would be all I'm asking for. I'll try to run the project in
netbeans' profile mode.

OT: do you have any experience with interfacing python to java? As I have
my other libs in python already..

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#297.

With kind regards,

David Ray
Java Solutions Architect

Cortical.io http://cortical.io/
Sponsor of: HTM.java https://github.com/numenta/htm.java

d.ray@cortical.io
http://cortical.io

[cogmission]

do you have any experience with interfacing python to java? As I have my
other libs in python already..

Nope, I'm a Python noob... :-)

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, cogmission (David Ray) <
cognitionmission@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Can the C++ implementation be counted as a full implementation yet? To my
knowledge there's the linux on vm / py, linux on vm / py-c++ hybrid, (not
sure about windows), mac py, mac py-c++ hybrid?

Also, I haven't done any performance optimization / profiling to speak of
htm.java (yet) so it isn't at full capacity - but - running the integration
tests and unit tests side by side in Eclipse its easy to see that the Java
version at least very much outperforms the Python version. (I'm not sure if
what I'm seeing is the pure Python or the Python-C++ hybrid either).

I would like to see these comparisons as well... Again keep in mind that
I'm sure htm.java can use a performance profiling effort.

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:12 PM, breznak notifications@github.com wrote:

hi,
I'd be interested in performance benchmark of the 3 implementations:
java, py, c++? Specifically java against the two, as I'm aware of c++-py
speeds.

I think a simple hotgym dataset (long version) with reasonable SP/TP
settings would be all I'm asking for. I'll try to run the project in
netbeans' profile mode.

OT: do you have any experience with interfacing python to java? As I have
my other libs in python already..

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#297.

With kind regards,

David Ray
Java Solutions Architect

Cortical.io http://cortical.io/
Sponsor of: HTM.java https://github.com/numenta/htm.java

d.ray@cortical.io
http://cortical.io

With kind regards,

David Ray
Java Solutions Architect

Cortical.io http://cortical.io/
Sponsor of: HTM.java https://github.com/numenta/htm.java

d.ray@cortical.io
http://cortical.io

[cogmission]

@breznak I assume when you referred to Netbeans that you were going to play around with this?