Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

neofs-adm: Add container estimations inspector #2826

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

carpawell
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@carpawell carpawell self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the feat/estimations-inspector branch 2 times, most recently from 207ead8 to 16c3ca6 Compare April 22, 2024 18:11
@carpawell carpawell marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2024 18:11
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <carpawell@nspcc.ru>
@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit 62ccd2c into master Apr 23, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov deleted the feat/estimations-inspector branch April 23, 2024 13:13
roman-khimov added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2024
And use a bit more of NNS wrapper.

Notice that this changes "alphabet X" to "alphabetX" in dump output, but I
consider this to be an improvement (since that's the contract name).

It also deoptimizes some carefully crafted code to extract a number of names in
one call. Likely it's not a performance issue you care about and it's actually
somewhat broken in that it assumes one result per invocation (but you can get
zero or more than one).

Many more things can be improved, but let's start with this.

Refs. #2826.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
roman-khimov added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2024
And use a bit more of NNS wrapper.

Notice that this changes "alphabet X" to "alphabetX" in dump output, but I
consider this to be an improvement (since that's the contract name).

It also deoptimizes some carefully crafted code to extract a number of names in
one call. Likely it's not a performance issue you care about and it's actually
somewhat broken in that it assumes one result per invocation (but you can get
zero or more than one).

Many more things can be improved, but let's start with this.

Refs. #2826.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
roman-khimov added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
And use a bit more of NNS wrapper.

Notice that this changes "alphabet X" to "alphabetX" in dump output, but I
consider this to be an improvement (since that's the contract name).

It also deoptimizes some carefully crafted code to extract a number of names in
one call. Likely it's not a performance issue you care about and it's actually
somewhat broken in that it assumes one result per invocation (but you can get
zero or more than one).

Many more things can be improved, but let's start with this.

Refs. #2826.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
roman-khimov added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
And use a bit more of NNS wrapper.

Notice that this changes "alphabet X" to "alphabetX" in dump output, but I
consider this to be an improvement (since that's the contract name).

It also deoptimizes some carefully crafted code to extract a number of names in
one call. Likely it's not a performance issue you care about and it's actually
somewhat broken in that it assumes one result per invocation (but you can get
zero or more than one).

Many more things can be improved, but let's start with this.

Refs. #2826.

Signed-off-by: Roman Khimov <roman@nspcc.ru>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants