Conversation
|
|
We can't audit private packages for this anyways. |
|
Surely private packages on the public registry can be audited for this? |
|
Even if they are, I would consider that behavior a bug not a feature. If they want to have a string value of |
|
@wraithgar this is still a very valuable feature, can this be reopened? |
|
The npm registry itself doesn't support it. |
|
Also this is in line with our new rfc approach that it's something someone owns and is actively going to implement. |
|
and there's no opportunity to get it onto the registry's roadmap? |
This is a suggestion that grew out of a discussion surrounding #317.
It will afford a way for end-users to publish new versions of packages without having to set a
dist-tagfor the version being published.The name of the parameter is still tbd in the
Bikesheddingsection.References
Related to #319
Related to #317