Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring current with v0.44.x #30

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 15, 2021

Conversation

faddat
Copy link

@faddat faddat commented Dec 15, 2021

No description provided.

mergify bot and others added 3 commits December 6, 2021 12:06
* fix: types/errors Wrap and Wrapf (#10674)

<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

The `Error.Wrap`  and `Error.Wrapf` functions in `types/errors` didn't work with `Is` and `IsOf` because they had non-pointer receivers. This adds a fix and tests that failed and now pass.

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit 9566c99)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md

* fix conflict

Co-authored-by: Aaron Craelius <aaron@regen.network>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
* build(deps): upgrade rosetta to 0.7.0 (#10432)

<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

Closes: #10155

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

Rosetta v0.7.0 introduces a new parameter while initializing Asserter.
This includes more validation by passing validation config path.
Since we are not using this feature, we are passing a empty string.

[Here is the rosetta release changelog](https://github.com/coinbase/rosetta-sdk-go/releases/tag/v0.7.0)

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit b565069)

# Conflicts:
#	go.sum

* fix conflicts++

Co-authored-by: Marin Basic <marin.basic02@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
…gic (backport #10741) (#10745)

* perf: Speedup cachekv iterator on large deletions & IBC v2 upgrade logic (#10741)

(cherry picked from commit 314e1d5)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go

* fix conflicts

Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
@faddat faddat merged commit d93ae13 into notional-labs:v0.44.5-whisky Dec 15, 2021
faddat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2021
catShaark pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant